Kalan S, Chauhan S, Coelho RF, Orvieto MA, Camacho IR, Palmer KJ, Patel VR. History of robotic surgery. J Robot Surg. 2010;4(3):141–7.

Article  Google Scholar 

Kwoh YS, Hou J, Jonckheere EA, Hayati S. A robot with improved absolute positioning accuracy for CT guided stereotactic brain surgery. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1988;35(2):153–60.

Article  Google Scholar 

Alip SL, Kim J, Rha KH, Han WK. Future platforms of robotic surgery. Urol Clin North Am. 2022;49(1):23–38.

Article  Google Scholar 

Paul HA, Bargar WL, Mittlestadt B, Musits N, Taylor RH, Kazanzides P, Zuhars J, Williamson B, Hanson W. Development of a Surgical Robot for Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992;285:57–66.

Article  Google Scholar 

Stauffer TP, Kim BI, Grant C, Adams SB, Anastasio AT. Robotic technology in foot and ankle surgery: a Comprehensive Review. Sens (Basel). 2023; 23(2).

Yuan X, Tan K, Hu J, Zhang B, Zhang H. Does robot-assisted percutaneous hollow screw placement combined with tarsal sinus incision reduction in the treatment of calcaneal fracture perform better at a minimum two year follow-up compared with traditional surgical reduction and fixation? Int Orthop. 2023;47(6):1575–81.

Article  Google Scholar 

Wang J, Han W, Su Y, Wang J, Jiang X. Comparison of Robot-Assisted percutaneous cannulated screws Versus Open reduction and internal fixation in calcaneal fractures. Orthop Surg. 2023;15(3):724–30.

Article  Google Scholar 

Wang C, Fu S, Li X, Wang J, Wu C, Zhang J, Song G, Gu W, Shi Z. Robot-assisted percutaneous screw fixation in the treatment of navicular fracture. Front Surg. 2022;9:1049455.

Article  Google Scholar 

Bautista M, Manrique J, Hozack WJ. Robotics in total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg. 2019;32(7):600–6.

Article  Google Scholar 

Kim HJ, Suh DH, Yang JH, Lee JW, Kim HJ, Ahn HS, Han SW, Choi GW. Total ankle arthroplasty versus ankle arthrodesis for the treatment of end-stage ankle arthritis: a meta-analysis of comparative studies. Int Orthop. 2017;41(1):101–9.

Article  Google Scholar 

Haskell A, Mann RA. Ankle arthroplasty with preoperative coronal plane deformity: short-term results. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004; (424):98–103.

Doets HC, Brand R, Nelissen RG. Total ankle arthroplasty in Inflammatory Joint Disease with Use of two mobile-bearing designs. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88(6):1272–84.

Article  Google Scholar 

Barg A, Elsner A, Anderson AE, Hintermann B. The effect of three-component total ankle replacement malalignment on clinical outcome: pain relief and functional outcome in 317 consecutive patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93(21):1969–78.

Article  Google Scholar 

Buckner BC, Stender CJ, Baron MD, Hornbuckle JHT, Ledoux WR, Sangeorzan BJ. Does coronal plane malalignment of the tibial insert in total ankle arthroplasty alter distal foot bone mechanics? A cadaveric gait study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020;478(7):1683–95.

Article  Google Scholar 

Fukuda T, Haddad SL, Ren Y, Zhang LQ. Impact of talar component rotation on contact pressure after total ankle arthroplasty: a cadaveric study. Foot Ankle Int. 2010;31(5):404–11.

Article  Google Scholar 

Imsdahl SI, Stender CJ, Cook BK, Pangrazzi G, Patthanacharoenphon C, Sangeorzan BJ, Ledoux WR. Anteroposterior Translational Malalignment of Ankle Arthrodesis alters Foot Biomechanics in Cadaveric Gait Simulation. J Orthop Res. 2020;38(2):450–8.

Article  Google Scholar 

McKearney DA, Stender CJ, Cook BK, Moore ES, Gunnell LM, Monier BC, Sangeorzan BJ, Ledoux WR. Altered range of motion and Plantar pressure in anterior and posterior Malaligned Total Ankle Arthroplasty: a cadaveric gait study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019;101(18):e93.

Article  Google Scholar 

Saito GH, Sturnick DR, Ellis SJ, Deland JT, Demetracopoulos CA. Influence of tibial component position on altered kinematics following total ankle arthroplasty during simulated gait. Foot Ankle Int. 2019;40(8):873–9.

Article  Google Scholar 

Bonnin M, Judet T, Colombier JA, Buscayret F, Graveleau N, Piriou P. Midterm results of the Salto Total Ankle Prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004; (424):6–18.

Hintermann B, Valderrabano V, Dereymaeker G, Dick W. The HINTEGRA ankle: rationale and short-term results of 122 consecutive ankles. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004; (424):57–68.

Zhang J, Ndou WS, Ng N, Gaston P, Simpson PM, Macpherson GJ, Patton JT, Clement ND. Robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty is associated with improved accuracy and patient reported outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022;30(8):2677–95.

Article  Google Scholar 

Batailler C, Fernandez A, Swan J, Servien E, Haddad FS, Catani F, Lustig S. MAKO CT-based robotic arm-assisted system is a reliable procedure for total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021;29(11):3585–98.

Article  Google Scholar 

He R, Sun M, Xiong R, Yang J, Guo L, Yang L. Semiactive robotic-arm system versus patient-specific instrumentation in primary total knee arthroplasty: efficacy and accuracy. Asian J Surg. 2023;46(2):742–50.

Article  Google Scholar 

Baek JH, Lee SC, Ryu S, Ahn HS, Nam CH. Coronal correction for post-traumatic Malalignment using Robot-Assisted total knee arthroplasty: a Case Series. Orthop Res Rev. 2022;14:445–51.

Google Scholar 

Figueroa F, Wakelin E, Twiggs J, Fritsch B. Comparison between navigated reported position and postoperative computed tomography to evaluate accuracy in a robotic navigation system in total knee arthroplasty. Knee. 2019;26(4):869–75.

Article  Google Scholar 

Marchand RC, Sodhi N, Khlopas A, Sultan AA, Higuera CA, Stearns KL, Mont MA. Coronal correction for severe deformity using robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg. 2018;31(1):2–5.

Article  Google Scholar 

Emara AK, Samuel LT, Acuna AJ, Kuo A, Khlopas A, Kamath AF. Robotic-arm assisted versus manual total hip arthroplasty: systematic review and meta-analysis of radiographic accuracy. Int J Med Robot. 2021;17(6):e2332.

Article  Google Scholar 

Chen X, Deng S, Sun ML, He R. Robotic arm-assisted arthroplasty: the latest developments. Chin J Traumatol. 2022;25(3):125–31.

Article  Google Scholar 

Bullock EKC, Brown MJ, Clark G, Plant JGA, Blakeney WG. Robotics in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Current Concepts. J Clin Med. 2022; 11(22).

Foissey C, Batailler C, Vahabi A, Fontalis A, Servien E, Lustig S. Better accuracy and implant survival in medial imageless robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty compared to conventional unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: two- to eleven-year follow-up of three hundred fifty-six consecutive knees. Int Orthop. 2023;47(2):533–41.

Article  Google Scholar 

Are L, Mauro DD, Rovere G, Fresta L, Tartarone M, Illuminati A, Smakaj A, Maccauro G, Liuzza F. Robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty performed with Navio system: a systemic review. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2023;27:2624–33.

Google Scholar 

Iniguez M, Negrin R, Duboy J, Reyes NO, Diaz R. Robot-Assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: increasing Surgical Accuracy? A cadaveric study. J Knee Surg. 2021;34(6):628–34.

Article  Google Scholar 

Park KK, Han CD, Yang IH, Lee WS, Han JH, Kwon HM. Robot-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty can reduce radiologic outliers compared to conventional techniques. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(12):e0225941.

Article  Google Scholar 

Motesharei A, Rowe P, Blyth M, Jones B, Maclean A. A comparison of gait one year post operation in an RCT of robotic UKA versus traditional Oxford UKA. Gait Posture. 2018;62:41–5.

Article  Google Scholar 

Adams SB Jr., Spritzer CE, Hofstaetter SG, Jakoi AM, Pietrobon R, Nunley JA 2nd, Easley ME. Computer-assisted tibia preparation for total ankle arthroplasty: a cadaveric study. Int J Med Robot. 2007;3(4):336–40.

Zeitlin J, Henry J, Ellis S. Preoperative Guidance with weight-bearing computed tomography and patient-specific instrumentation in foot and ankle surgery. HSS J. 2021;17(3):326–32.

Article  Google Scholar 

Berlet GC, Penner MJ, Lancianese S, Stemniski PM, Obert RM. Total ankle arthroplasty accuracy and reproducibility using preoperative CT Scan-Derived, patient-specific Guides. Foot Ankle Int. 2014;35(7):665–76.

Article  Google Scholar 

Hsu AR, Davis WH, Cohen BE, Jones CP, Ellington JK, Anderson RB. Radiographic Outcomes of Preoperative CT scan-derived patient-specific total ankle arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Int. 2015;36(10):1163–9.

Article  Google Scholar 

Daigre J, Berlet G, Van Dyke B, Peterson KS, Santrock R. Accuracy and reproducibility using patient-specific instrumentation in total ankle arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Int. 2017;38(4):412–8.

Article  Google Scholar 

Saito GH, Sanders AE, O’Malley MJ, Deland JT, Ellis SJ, Demetracopoulos CA. Accuracy of patient-specific instrumentation in total ankle arthroplasty: a comparative study. Foot Ankle Surg. 2019;25(3):383–9.

Article  Google Scholar 

Faldini C, Mazzotti A, Belvedere C, Durastanti G, Panciera A, Geraci G, Leardini A. A new ligament-compatible patient-specific 3D-printed implant and instrumentation for total ankle arthroplasty: from biomechanical studies to clinical cases. J Orthop Traumatol. 2020;21(1):16.

Article  Google Scholar 

Kalidindi KKV, Sharma JK, Jagadeesh NH, Sath S, Chhabra HS. Robotic spine surgery: a review of the present status. J Med Eng Technol. 2020;44(7):431–7.

Article  Google Scholar 

Al-Naseem A, Sallam A, Gonnah A, Masoud O, Abd-El-Barr MM, Aleem IS. Robot-assisted versus conventional percutaneous sacroiliac screw fixation for posterior pelvic ring injuries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2023;33(1):9–20.

Article  Google Scholar 

Al-Naseem AO, Gonnah AR, Al-Ali H, Al-Naseem AO, Siddique I. Robot-Assisted Versus Conventional Freehand Fluoroscopy-Guided percutaneous screw fixation in femoral Neck Fractures: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. Cureus. 2022;14(4):e24258.

Google Scholar 

Gebremeskel M, Shafiq B, Uneri A, Sheth N, Simmerer C, Zbijewski W, Siewerdsen JH, Cleary K, Li G. Quantification of manipulation forces needed for robot-assisted reduction of the ankle syndesmosis: an initial cadaveric study. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2022;17(12):2263–7.

Article  Google Scholar 

Richter M. Computer aided surgery in foot and ankle: applications and perspectives. Int Orthop. 2013;37(9):1737–45.

Article  Google Scholar 

Richter M, Frink M, Zech S, Vanin N, Geerling J, Droste P. Intraoperative pedography: a validated method for Static Intraoperative Biomechanical Assessment. Foot Ankle Int. 2006;27(10):833–42.

Article  Google Scholar 

Richter M, Zech S. Is intraoperative pedography helpful in clinical use–preliminary results of 100 cases from a consecutive, prospective, randomized, controlled clinical study. Foot Ankle Surg. 2009;15(4):198–204.

Article  Google Scholar 

Panzica M, Westphal R, Citak M, Hawi N, Liodakis E, Goesling T, Krettek C, Stuebig T, Suero EM. Intraoperative computer-assisted prediction of intraarticular contact pressures in the knee during high tibial osteotomy. Int J Med Robot. 2019;15(2):e1972.

Article  Google Scholar 

Li X, Cai H, Yu Z, Li Z, Zhang K, Tian H, Liu Z. Correlation between femorotibial pressure and joint gap in osteoarthritis patients with varus deformity: an intraoperative measurement using sensor device in primary posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty. Ann Transl Med. 2020;8(21):1387.

Article  Google Scholar 

Nan S, Cao Z, Song Y, Kong X, Li H, Chai W. Can mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty achieve natural gap-balancing? An observational study with a novel pressure sensor. J Orthop Surg Res. 2022;17(1):407.

Article  Google Scholar 

Richter M, Zech S, Westphal R, Klimesch Y, Gosling T. Robotic cadaver testing of a new total ankle prosthesis model (german ankle system). Foot Ankle Int. 2007;28(12):1276–86.

Article  Google Scholar