Baker P, Jameson S, Critchley R, Reed M, Gregg P, Deehan D. Center and surgeon volume influence the revision rate following unicondylar knee replacement: an analysis of 23,400 medial cemented unicondylar knee replacements. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 2013;95(8):702–9. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.L.00520.

Article  Google Scholar 

Berger RA, Meneghini RM, Jacobs JJ, Sheinkop MB, Della Valle CJ, Rosenberg AG, et al. Results of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at a minimum of ten years of follow-up. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 2005;87(5):999–1006. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.C.00568.

Article  Google Scholar 

Jennings JM, Kleeman-Forsthuber LT, Bolognesi MP. Medial Unicompartmental Arthroplasty of the Knee. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2019;27(5):166–76. https://doi.org/10.5435/jaaos-d-17-00690.

Article  Google Scholar 

Liu P, Lu FF, Liu GJ, Mu XH, Sun YQ, Zhang QD, et al. Robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a review. Arthroplasty. 2021;3(1):15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42836-021-00071-x.

Article  Google Scholar 

Niinimäki T, Eskelinen A, Mäkelä K, Ohtonen P, Puhto AP, Remes V. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty survivorship is lower than TKA survivorship: a 27-year Finnish registry study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472(5):1496–501. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-013-3347-2.

Article  Google Scholar 

Lyons MC, MacDonald SJ, Somerville LE, Naudie DD, McCalden RW. Unicompartmental versus total knee arthroplasty database analysis: is there a winner? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470(1):84–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-011-2144-z.

Article  Google Scholar 

Jenny JY, Boeri C. Unicompartmental knee prosthesis implantation with a non-image-based navigation system: rationale, technique, case-control comparative study with a conventional instrumented implantation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2003;11(1):40–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-002-0333-8.

Article  Google Scholar 

Keene G, Simpson D, Kalairajah Y. Limb alignment in computer-assisted minimally-invasive unicompartmental knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88(1):44–8. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.88B1.16266.

Article  Google Scholar 

Batailler C, White N, Ranaldi FM, Neyret P, Servien E, Lustig S. Improved implant position and lower revision rate with robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019;27(4):1232–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-018-5081-5.

Article  Google Scholar 

Liddle AD, Pandit H, Judge A, Murray DW. Effect of surgical caseload on revision rate following total and unicompartmental knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016;98(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.N.00487.

Article  Google Scholar 

Negrín R, Duboy J, Iñiguez M, Reyes NO, Barahona M, Ferrer G, et al. Robotic-assisted vs conventional surgery in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a clinical and radiological study. Knee Surg Relat Res. 2021;33(1):5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43019-021-00087-2.

Article  Google Scholar 

Zhang J, Ng N, Scott CEH, Blyth MJG, Haddad FS, Macpherson GJ, et al. Robotic arm-assisted versus manual unicompartmental knee arthroplasty : a systematic review and meta-analysis of the MAKO robotic system. Bone Jt J. 2022;104-b(5):541–8. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.104b5.Bjj-2021-1506.R1.

Article  Google Scholar 

Chen X, Deng S, Sun ML, He R. Robotic arm-assisted arthroplasty: the latest developments. Chin J Traumatol. 2022;25(3):125–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjtee.2021.09.001.

Article  Google Scholar 

Kozinn SC, Scott R. Unicondylar knee arthroplasty. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 1989;71(1):145–50.

Article  Google Scholar 

Hiranaka T, Furuhashi R, Takashiba K, Kodama T, Michishita K, Inui H, et al. Agreement and accuracy of radiographic assessment using a decision aid for medial Oxford partial knee replacement: multicentre study. Knee Surg Relat Res. 2022;34(1):13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43019-022-00140-8.

Article  Google Scholar 

Gowd AK, Plate JF, Lichtig A, Gencer A, Yanmis O, D’Agostino R, et al. Favourable mid-term outcomes following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with wider patient selection: A single-centre experience. J Isakos. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jisako.2023.03.002.

Article  Google Scholar 

Bayoumi T, Kleeblad LJ, Borus TA, Coon TM, Dounchis J, Nguyen JT, et al. Ten-year survivorship and patient satisfaction following robotic-arm-assisted medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a prospective multicenter study. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 2023. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.22.01104.

Article  Google Scholar 

Tolk JJ, Janssen RPA, Haanstra TM, Bierma-Zeinstra SMA, Reijman M. The EKSPECT study: the influence of Expectation modification in Knee arthroplasty on Satisfaction of patients: study protocol for a randomized controlled Trial. Trials. 2018;19(1):437. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2821-2.

Article  Google Scholar 

Kim KT. Unicompartmental knee Arthroplasty. Knee Surg Relat Res. 2018;30(1):1–2. https://doi.org/10.5792/ksrr.18.014.

Article  Google Scholar 

Kayani B, Konan S, Pietrzak JRT, Huq SS, Tahmassebi J, Haddad FS. The learning curve associated with robotic-arm assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study. Bone Jt J. 2018;100(8):1033–42. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.100b8.Bjj-2018-0040.R1.

Article  Google Scholar 

Tay ML, Carter M, Bolam SM, Zeng N, Young SW. Robotic-arm assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty system has a learning curve of 11 cases and increased operating time. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023;31(3):793–802. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-021-06814-2.

Article  Google Scholar 

Emara AK, Zhou G, Klika AK, Koroukian SM, Schiltz NK, Krebs VE, et al. Robotic-arm-assisted knee arthroplasty associated with favorable in-hospital metrics and exponentially rising adoption compared with manual knee arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2021;29(24):e1328–42. https://doi.org/10.5435/jaaos-d-21-00146.

Article  Google Scholar 

Lonner JH, Moretti VM. The evolution of image-free robotic assistance in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Am J Orthop. 2016;45(4):249–54.

Google Scholar 

McKeever DC. The choice of prosthetic materials and evaluation of results. Clin Orthop. 1955;6:17–21.

Google Scholar 

Marmor L. The modular knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1973;94:242–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-197307000-00029.

Article  Google Scholar 

Marmor L. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. ten- to 13-year follow-up study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988;226:14–20.

Article  Google Scholar 

Insall J, Aglietti P. A five to seven-year follow-up of unicondylar arthroplasty. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 1980;62(8):1329–37.

Article  Google Scholar 

Laskin RS. Unicompartmental tibiofemoral resurfacing arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1978;60(2):182–5.

Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Goodfellow J, O’Connor J. The mechanics of the knee and prosthesis design. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1978;60-b(3):358–69. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.60b3.581081.

Article  Google Scholar 

Johal S, Nakano N, Baxter M, Hujazi I, Pandit H, Khanduja V. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: the past, current controversies, and future perspectives. J Knee Surg. 2018;31(10):992–8. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1625961.

Article  Google Scholar 

Murray DW, Goodfellow JW, O’Connor JJ. The Oxford medial unicompartmental arthroplasty: a ten-year survival study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998;80(6):983–9. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.80b6.8177.

Article  Google Scholar 

Argenson JN, Chevrol-Benkeddache Y, Aubaniac JM. Modern unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with cement: a three to ten-year follow-up study. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 2002;84(12):2235–9.

Article  Google Scholar 

Robertsson O, Dunbar M, Pehrsson T, Knutson K, Lidgren L. Patient satisfaction after knee arthroplasty: a report on 27,372 knees operated on between 1981 and 1995 in Sweden. Acta Orthop Scand. 2000;71(3):262–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/000164700317411852.

Article  Google Scholar 

van der List JP, McDonald LS, Pearle AD. Systematic review of medial versus lateral survivorship in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Knee. 2015;22(6):454–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2015.09.011.

Article  Google Scholar 

Bargar WL, Bauer A, Börner M. Primary and revision total hip replacement using the Robodoc system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998;354:82–91. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-199809000-00011.

Article  Google Scholar 

Cobb J, Henckel J, Gomes P, Harris S, Jakopec M, Rodriguez F, et al. Hands-on robotic unicompartmental knee replacement: a prospective, randomised controlled study of the acrobot system. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88(2):188–97. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.88b2.17220.

Article  Google Scholar 

Gioutsos K, Kocher GJ, Schmid RA. Robotics in pulmonology and thoracic surgery: what, why and when? Panminerva Med. 2016;58(4):318–28.

Google Scholar 

Wedmid A, Llukani E, Lee DI. Future perspectives in robotic surgery. BJU Int. 2011;108(6 Pt 2):1028–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10458.x.

Article  Google Scholar 

Hubens G, Coveliers H, Balliu L, Ruppert M, Vaneerdeweg W. A performance study comparing manual and robotically assisted laparoscopic surgery using the da Vinci system. Surg Endosc. 2003;17(10):1595–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-002-9248-1.

Article  Google Scholar 

Sousa PL, Sculco PK, Mayman DJ, Jerabek SA, Ast MP, Chalmers BP. Robots in the operating room during hip and knee arthroplasty. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2020;13(3):309–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-020-09625-z.

Article  Google Scholar 

Netravali NA, Shen F, Park Y, Bargar WL. A perspective on robotic assistance for knee arthroplasty. Adv Orthop. 2013;2013: 970703. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/970703.

Article  Google Scholar 

Konyves A, Willis-Owen CA, Spriggins AJ. The long-term benefit of computer-assisted surgical navigation in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Surg Res. 2010;5:94. https://doi.org/10.1186/1749-799x-5-94.

Article  Google Scholar 

Figueroa F, Parker D, Fritsch B, Oussedik S. New and evolving technologies for knee arthroplasty—computer navigation and robotics: state of the art. J of ISAKOS. 2018;3(1):46–54.

Article  Google Scholar 

Chen AF, Kazarian GS, Jessop GW, Makhdom A. Robotic technology in orthopaedic surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018;100(22):1984–92. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.17.01397.

Article  Google Scholar 

Banks SA. Haptic robotics enable a systems approach to design of a minimally invasive modular knee arthroplasty. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2009;38(2 Suppl):23–7.

Google Scholar 

St Mart JP, Goh EL. The current state of robotics in total knee arthroplasty. EFORT Open Rev. 2021;6(4):270–9.