Radford A, et al. Improving language understanding by generative pre-training. 2018.

Biswas SS. Role of chat gpt in public health. Ann Biomed Eng. 2023;1–2.

Gabrielson AT, Odisho AY, Canes D. Harnessing generative artificial intelligence to improve efficiency among urologists: Welcome ChatGPT. Wolters Kluwer Philadelphia, PA. 2023;827–829.

Sallam M, et al. ChatGPT output regarding compulsory vaccination and COVID-19 vaccine conspiracy: a descriptive study at the outset of a paradigm shift in online search for information. Cureus. 2023;15(2).

Shen Y, et al. ChatGPT and other large language models are double-edged swords. Radiol Soc North Am. 2023;e230163.

Zhu L, Mou W, Chen R. Can the ChatGPT and other large language models with internet-connected database solve the questions and concerns of patient with prostate cancer and help democratize medical knowledge? J Transl Med. 2023;21(1):1–4.

Article  Google Scholar 

Li J, et al. ChatGPT in healthcare: a taxonomy and systematic review. medRxiv. 2023; 2023–03.

Snoswell CL, et al. Artificial intelligence: augmenting telehealth with large language models. J Telemed Telecare, 2023;1357633X231169055.

Dahmen J, et al. Artificial intelligence bot ChatGPT in medical research: the potential game changer as a double-edged sword. Springer. 2023;1–3.

Homolak J. Opportunities and risks of ChatGPT in medicine, science, and academic publishing: a modern Promethean dilemma. Croat Med J. 2023;64(1):1.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Liebrenz M, et al. Generating scholarly content with ChatGPT: ethical challenges for medical publishing. The Lancet Digital Health. 2023;5(3):e105–6.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Smith R. Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals. J R Soc Med. 2006;99(4):178–82.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Mavrogenis AF, Quaile A, Scarlat MM. The good, the bad and the rude peer-review. Springer. 2020;413–415.

Margalida A, Colomer MÀ. Improving the peer-review process and editorial quality: key errors escaping the review and editorial process in top scientific journals. PeerJ. 2016;4: e1670.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Kostick-Quenet KM, Gerke S. AI in the hands of imperfect users. npj Digital Med. 2022;5(1):197.

(2019)., E.g.f.t.A.S.E.s.d.f. and a.D. [WWW. Available from: https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/ethics-guidelines-trustworthy-ai

Biswas S. ChatGPT and the future of medical writing. Radiol Soc North Am. 2023;e223312.

Stokel-Walker C. ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove. Nature. 2023;613(7945):620–1.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ethical guidelines for application of Artificial Intelligence in Biomedical Research and Healthcare 2023, I.C.o.M. Research Editor. Indian Counc Med Res. 2023.

• Naik N, et al. Legal and ethical consideration in artificial intelligence in healthcare: who takes responsibility? Front Surg. 2022;266. This review article addresses issues regarding privacy, protection and algorithmic transparency with the use of Artificial Intelligence.

• de Hond AA, et al. Guidelines and quality criteria for artificial intelligence-based prediction models in healthcare: a scoping review. NPJ Digital Med. 2022;5(1):2. In this scoping review the authors look at AI-based prediction model (AIMP) using a 6-phase approach.

Krarup T, Horst M. European artificial intelligence policy as digital single market making. Big Data & Society. 2023 Jan;10(1):20539517231153811

Helberger N, Diakopoulos N. ChatGPT and the AI Act. Internet Policy Rev. 2023;12(1).

Stokel-Walker C, Van Noorden R. What ChatGPT and generative AI mean for science. Nature. 2023;614(7947):214–6.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

De Angelis L, et al. ChatGPT and the rise of large language models: the new AI-driven infodemic threat in public health. Front Public Health. 2023;11:1567.

Article  Google Scholar 

Zielinski C, et al. Chatbots, ChatGPT, and Scholarly Manuscripts-WAME recommendations on ChatGPT and Chatbots in relation to Scholarly Publications. Afro-Egyptian Journal of Infectious and Endemic Diseases. 2023;13(1):75–9.

Google Scholar 

Sallam M. ChatGPT utility in healthcare education, research, and practice: systematic review on the promising perspectives and valid concerns. in Healthcare. 2023. MDPI.

Marchandot B, et al. ChatGPT: the next frontier in academic writing for cardiologists or a pandora’s box of ethical dilemmas. Eur Heart J Open. 2023;3(2):oead007.

Polonsky MJ, Rotman JD. Should Artificial Intelligent Agents be Your Co-author? Arguments in Favour, Informed by ChatGPT. SAGE Publications Sage UK: London, England. 2023;14413582231167882.

Ahn C. Exploring ChatGPT for information of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Resuscitation. 2023;185.

Hallsworth JE, et al. Scientific novelty beyond the experiment. Microbial Biotechnol. 2023.

Kitamura FC. ChatGPT is shaping the future of medical writing but still requires human judgment. Radiol Soc North Am. 2023;e230171.

Lin Z. Why and how to embrace AI such as ChatGPT in your academic life. 2023.

Fijačko N, et al. Can ChatGPT pass the life support exams without entering the American heart association course? Resuscitation. 2023;185.

• Kung T, et al. Performance of ChatGPT on USMLE: Potential for AI-assisted medical education using large language models. PLOS Digit Health. 2023;2(2): e0000198. The results of this paper suggest that large language models could assist with medical education and clinical decision-making.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar