Ureteropelvic Junction (UPJ) Obstruction. 2011 [cited 2023; Available from: https://www.chop.edu/conditions-diseases/ureteropelvic-junction-upj-obstruction.

•• Esposito C, Cerulo M, Lepore B, Coppola V, D’Auria D, Esposito G, Carulli R, Del Conte F, Escolino M. Robotic-assisted pyeloplasty in children: a systematic review of the literature. J Robot Surg. 2023:1-8. Systematic review discussing controversial topics of pediatric RALP and its evolution throughout time.

Morales-López RA, Pérez-Marchán M, Pérez Brayfield M. Current concepts in pediatric robotic assisted pyeloplasty. Front Pediatr. 2019;7:4.

Park JM, Bloom DA. The pathophysiology of UPJ obstruction. Current concepts Urol Clin North Am. 1998;25(2):161–9.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Silay MS, Spinoit AF, Undre S, Fiala V, Tandogdu Z, Garmanova T, Guttilla A, Sancaktutar AA, Haid B, Waldert M, Goyal A. Global minimally invasive pyeloplasty study in children: Results from the Pediatric Urology Expert Group of the European Association of Urology Young Academic Urologists working party. J Pediatric Urol. 2016;12(4):229-e1.

Chan YY, Durbin-Johnson B, Sturm RM, Kurzrock EA. Outcomes after pediatric open, laparoscopic, and robotic pyeloplasty at academic institutions. J Pediatric Urol. 2017;13(1):49-e1.

Tomaszewski JJ, et al. Pediatric laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery: technical considerations. J Endourol. 2012;26(6):602–13.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Anderson JC, Hynes W. Retrocaval ureter; a case diagnosed pre-operatively and treated successfully by a plastic operation. Br J Urol. 1949;21(3):209–14.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kawal T, Srinivasan AK, Shrivastava D, Chu DI, Van Batavia J, Weiss D, Long C, Shukla AR. Pediatric robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: does age matter?. J Pediatric Urol. 2018;14(6):540-e1.

Kearns JT, Gundeti MS. Pediatric robotic urologic surgery-2014. J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg. 2014;19(3):123–8.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Orvieto MA, Large M, Gundeti MS. Robotic paediatric urology. BJU Int. 2012;110(1):2–13.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Peters CA. Robotically assisted surgery in pediatric urology. Urol Clin North Am. 2004;31(4):743–52.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Muneer A, et al. Current status of robotic surgery in pediatric urology. Pediatr Surg Int. 2008;24(9):973–7.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kafka IZ, et al. Pediatric robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RALP): does weight matter? Pediatr Surg Int. 2019;35(3):391–6.

Article  MathSciNet  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kawal T, Srinivasan AK, Shrivastava D, Chu DI, Van Batavia J, Weiss D, Long C, Shukla AR. Pediatric robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: does age matter. J Pediatric Urol. 2018;14(6):540-e1.

Masieri L, Sforza S, Grosso AA, Cini C, Viola L, Tellini R, Mari A, Di Maida F, Minervini A, Carini M. Does the body weight influence the outcome in children treated with robotic pyeloplasty. J Pediatric Urol. 2020;16(1):109-e1.

Ganpule A, et al. Robotic versus conventional laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children less than 20 kg by weight: single-center experience. World J Urol. 2015;33(11):1867–73.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ballouhey Q, Villemagne T, Cros J, Szwarc C, Braik K, Longis B, Lardy H, Fourcade L. A comparison of robotic surgery in children weighing above and below 15.0 kg: size does not affect surgery success. Surg Endosc. 2015;29:2643-50.

Baek M, Silay MS, Au JK, Huang GO, Elizondo RA, Puttmann KT, Janzen NK, Seth A, Roth DR, Koh CJ. Does the use of 5 mm instruments affect the outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in smaller working spaces? A comparative analysis of infants and older children. J Pediatric Urol. 2018;14(6):537-e1.

Neheman A, et al. Comparison of robotic pyeloplasty and standard laparoscopic pyeloplasty in infants: a bi-institutional study. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2018;28(4):467–70.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Avery DI, Herbst KW, Lendvay TS, Noh PH, Dangle P, Gundeti MS, Steele MC, Corbett ST, Peters CA, Kim C. Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: multi-institutional experience in infants. J Pediatric Urol. 2015;11(3):139-e1.

Kutikov A, Nguyen M, Guzzo T, Canter D, Casale P. Robot assisted pyeloplasty in the infant—lessons learned. J Urol. 2006;176(5):2237-40.

Bansal D, et al. Infant robotic pyeloplasty: comparison with an open cohort. J Pediatr Urol. 2014;10(2):380–5.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

•• Esposito C, Masieri L, Blanc T, Musleh L, Ballouhey Q, Fourcade L, Escolino M. Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RALP) in children with complex pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction (PUJO): results of a multicenter European report. World J Urol. 2021;39:1641-7. Multi-institutional study comparing outcomes of RALP in patients with complex anatomy.

Esposito C, et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RALP) in children with horseshoe kidneys: results of a multicentric study. World J Urol. 2019;37(10):2257–63.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bowen DK, Mittal S, Aghababian A, Eftekharzadeh S, Dinardo L, Weaver J, Long C, Shukla A, Srinivasan AK. Pyeloplasty is a safe and effective surgical approach for low functioning kidneys with ureteropelvic junction obstruction. J Pedia Urol. 2021;17(2):233-e1.

Ransley PG, Dhillon HK, Gordon I, Duffy PG, Dillon MJ, Barratt TM. The postnatal management of hydronephrosis diagnosed by prenatal ultrasound. J Urol. 1990;144(2):584-7.

Bansal R, et al. Long-term results of pyeloplasty in poorly functioning kidneys in the pediatric age group. J Pediatr Urol. 2012;8(1):25–8.

Article  MathSciNet  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Nayyar R, et al. Outcomes of pyeloplasty in very poorly functioning kidneys: examining the myths. Urology. 2016;92:132–5.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sarhan O, Al Otay A, Al Faddagh A, El Helaly A, Al Hagbani M, Al Ghanbar M, Al Kawai F, Nakshabandi Z. Pyeloplasty in children with low differential renal function: functional recoverability. J Pedia Urol. 2021;17(5):658-e1.

Dy GW, et al. National trends in secondary procedures following pediatric pyeloplasty. J Urol. 2016;195(4 Pt 2):1209–14.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Ebert KM, Nicassio L, Alpert SA, Ching CB, Dajusta DG, Fuchs ME, McLeod DJ, Jayanthi VR. Surgical outcomes are equivalent after pure laparoscopic and robotic-assisted pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction. J Pedia Urol. 2020;16(6):845-e1.

Davis TD, Burns AS, Corbett ST, Peters CA. Reoperative robotic pyeloplasty in children. J Pedia Urol. 2016 Dec 1;12(6):394-e1.

•• Mittal S, Aghababian A, Eftekharzadeh S, Dinardo L, Weaver J, Weiss DA, Long C, Srinivasan AK, Shukla AR. Primary vs redo robotic pyeloplasty: A comparison of outcomes. J Pedia Urol. 2021;17(4):528-e1. Largest comparative study between primary and redo-pyeloplasty.

Jacobson DL, et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic reoperative repair for failed pyeloplasty in children: an updated series. J Urol. 2019;201(5):1005–11.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Baek M, et al. Quantifying the additional difficulty of pediatric robot-assisted laparoscopic re-do pyeloplasty: a comparison of primary and re-do procedures. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2018;28(5):610–6.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Chandrasekharam VVS, Babu R. A systematic review and metaanalysis of open, conventional laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic techniques for re-do pyeloplasty for recurrent uretero pelvic junction obstruction in children. J Pediatr Urol. 2022;18(5):642–9.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Esposito C, et al. Laparoscopic and robot-assisted ureterocalicostomy for treatment of primary and recurrent pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction in children: a multicenter comparative study with laparoscopic and robot-assisted Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty. Int Urol Nephrol. 2022;54(10):2503–9.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Mittal S, et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic ureterocalicostomy in the setting of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a multi-institutional cohort. J Urol. 2022;208(1):180–5.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pakkasjarvi N, Taskinen S. Introduction of Pediatric Robot-Assisted Pyeloplasty in A Low-Volume Centre. Clin Pract. 2021;11(1):143–50.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

•• Bodar YJ, Srinivasan AK, Shah AS, Kawal T, Shukla AR. Time-Driven activity-based costing identifies opportunities for process efficiency and cost optimization for robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty. J Pediatr Urol. 2020 Aug 1;16(4):460-e1., 2020. First paper looking at TDABC in RALP.

Mittal S, Srinivasan A. Robotics in pediatric urology: evolution and the future. Urol Clin North Am. 2021;48(1):113–25.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bowen DK, et al. Can proctoring affect the learning curve of robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty? Experience at a high-volume pediatric robotic surgery center. J Robot Surg. 2017;11(1):63–7.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pakkasjärvi N, Krishnan N, Ripatti L, Anand S. Learning Curves in Pediatric Robot-Assisted Pyeloplasty: A Systematic Review. J Clin Med. 2022;11(23):6935.

Pio L, et al. Learning curve for robotic surgery in children: a systematic review of outcomes and fellowship programs. J Robot Surg. 2020;14(4):531–41.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

ESU/ERUS Hands-on Training in Robotic surgery. 20 July 2019. Available from: https://uroweb.org/education/live-events/hands-on-training-courses/robot/esuerus-hands-on-training-in-robotic-surgery/.

Larcher A, et al. The ERUS curriculum for robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: structure definition and pilot clinical validation. Eur Urol. 2019;75(6):1023–31.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Larcher A, et al. Virtual reality validation of the ERUS simulation-based training programmes: results from a high-volume training centre for robot-assisted surgery. Eur Urol. 2019;75(5):885–7.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

European training in basic robot urological skills (E-BRUS). 20 July 2019. Available from: https://www.uroweb.org/education/live-events/hands-on-trainingcourses/robot/european-training-in-basis-robot-urological-skills-e-brus/.