de Wachter S, Abranches-Monteiro L, Gammie A, Hashim H, Nitti V, Rosier P, Sinha S, Tarcan T, Toozs-Hobson P, Wen JG. Urodynamic testing. In: Cardozo L, Rovner E, Wagg A, Wein A, Abrams P, editors. Incontinence. 7th ed. Bristol, UK: ICUD ICS; 2023. p. 487–550.

Google Scholar 

Lerner LB, McVary KT, Barry MJ, Bixler BR, Dahm P, Das AK, et al. Management of lower urinary tract symptoms attributed to benign prostatic hyperplasia: AUA Guideline Part I-Initial work-up and medical management. J Urol. 2021;206(4):806–17.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Harding CK, Lapitan MC, Arlandis S, Bo K, Costantini E, Groen J, Nambiar AK, Omar MI, Phe V. Non-neurogenic female LUTS. European Association of Urology Guidelines. 2023 [cited 2023 Jan 5]. Available from https://uroweb.org/guideline/non-neurogenic-female-luts.

Cornu JN, Gacci M, Hashim H, Herrmann TRW, Malde S, Netsch C, Rieken M, Sakalis V, Tutolo M. Non-neurogenic male LUTS. European Association of Urology Guidelines. 2023 [cited 2023 Jun 12]. Available from https://uroweb.org/guideline/treatment-of-non-neurogenic-male-luts/.

Schäfer W, Abrams P, Liao L, Mattiasson A, Pesce F, Spangberg A, et al. Good urodynamic practices: uroflowmetry, filling cystometry, and pressure-flow studies. Neurourol Urodyn. 2002;21(3):261–74.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

•• Young GJ, Metcalfe C, Lane JA, Lewis AL, Abrams P, Blair PS, et al. Prostate surgery for men with lower urinary tract symptoms: Do we need urodynamics to find the right candidates? Exploratory findings from the UPSTREAM trial. Eur Urol Focus. 2022;8(5):1331–9. Secondary analysis of a large randomized trial comparing the outcome of prostate surgery in men offered routine care versus urodynamics-based evaluation. This analysis showed that regardless of evaluation pathway, uroflow was an important predictor of outcome.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Van Batavia JP, Combs AJ. Non-invasive testing and its role in diagnosis and management of children with voiding dysfunction. Curr Bladder Dysfunct Rep. 2018;13(2):56–65.

Article  Google Scholar 

• Ben Muvhar R, Wagmaister J, Mekayten M. Navigating the diagnostic maze: unraveling the non-invasive evaluation of bladder outlet obstruction in men—A comprehensive systematic review. Curr Bladder Dysfunct Rep. 2023;18(4):318–32. Systematic review of all non-invasive evaluation for assessing bladder outlet obstruction in men including uroflowmetry with comments on flow rate, flow pattern and volume correction.

Article  Google Scholar 

Ito H, Sakamaki K, Young GJ, Blair PS, Hashim H, Lane JA, et al. Predicting prostate surgery outcomes from standard clinical assessments of lower urinary tract symptoms to derive prognostic symptom and flowmetry criteria. Eur Urol Focus. 2023;S2405–4569(23):00154–62.

Google Scholar 

Escobar C, Brucker B. Urodynamics for the “failed” midurethral sling. Curr Bladder Dysfunct Rep. 2020;15(4):245–58.

Article  Google Scholar 

Sinha S, Agarwal MM, Vasudeva P, Khattar N, Madduri VKS, Yande S, et al. The urological Society of India Guidelines for the evaluation and management of nonneurogenic urinary incontinence in adults (executive summary). Indian J Urol. 2019;35(3):185–8.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

•• Tarcan T, Acar O, Agarwal MM, Rubilotta E, De Nunzio C, Rosier P. ICS educational module: The practice of uroflowmetry in adults. Continence. 2024;9:101065. An educational module from the International Continence Society on uroflowmetry with comments on technique, quality check, interpretation, and reporting based on a systematic review and expert consensus.

Article  Google Scholar 

Bauer SB, Nijman RJM, Drzewiecki BA, Sillen U, Hoebeke P, International Children’s Continence Society Standardization Subcommittee. International Children’s Continence Society standardization report on urodynamic studies of the lower urinary tract in children. Neurourol Urodyn. 2015;34(7):640–7.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

ICS Glossary [Internet]. ICS. [cited 2022 Sep 26]. Available from https://www.ics.org/glossary.

Wada N, Watanabe M, Ishikawa M, Takeuchi K, Miyauchi K, Abe N, et al. Uroflowmetry pattern in detrusor underactivity and bladder outlet obstruction in male patients with lower urinary tract symptoms. Low Urin Tract Symptoms. 2021;13(3):361–5.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Netto JMB, Hittelman A, Lambert S, Murphy K, Collette-Gardere T, Franco I. Interpretation of uroflow curves: A global survey measuring inter and intra rater reliability. Neurourol Urodyn. 2020;39(2):826–32.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Martonosi ÁR, Pázmány P, Kiss S, Földi M, Zsákai A, Szabó L. Urine flow acceleration in healthy children: A retrospective cohort study. Neurourol Urodyn. 2023;42(2):463–71.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Karasu AFG, Aydın S, Kalkan S, Ersoz C. Association of intrinsic sphincter deficiency with urine flow acceleration measurement. Low Urin Tract Symptoms. 2021;13(1):154–9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Futyma K, Nowakowski Ł, Bogusiewicz M, Ziętek A, Wieczorek AP, Rechberger T. Use of uroflow parameters in diagnosing an overactive bladder-back to the drawing board. Neurourol Urodyn. 2017;36(1):198–202.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Franco I, Franco J, Lee YS, Choi EK, Han SW. Can a quantitative means be used to predict flow patterns: Agreement between visual inspection vs flow index derived flow patterns. J Pediatr Urol. 2016;12(4):218.e1–8.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ha JS, Lee YS, Han SW, Kim SW. The relationship among flow index, uroflowmetry curve shape, and EMG lag time in children. Neurourol Urodyn. 2020;39(5):1387–93.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Van Batavia JP, Pohl HG, Farhat WA, Chiang G, BaniHani A, Collett-Gardere T, et al. Is it time to reconsider how we document pediatric uroflow studies?: A study from the SPU Voiding Dysfunction task force. J Pediatr Urol. 2023;19(5):546–54. Study from the Society of Pediatric Urology Voiding Dysfunction task force showing the limitations of using flow pattern.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sinha S. Dysfunctional voiding: a review of the terminology, presentation, evaluation and management in children and adults. Indian J Urol. 2011;27(4):437–47.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Sharifi-Rad L, Ladi-Seyedian S-S, Amirzargar H, Kajbafzadeh A-M. Pelvic floor electromyography and urine flow patterns in children with vesicoureteral reflux and lower urinary tract symptoms. Int Braz J Urol. 2018;44(6):1207–14.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Rosier PFWM, Gammie A, Valdevenito JP, Speich J, Smith P, Sinha S, et al. ICS-SUFU standard: Theory, terms, and recommendations for pressure-flow studies performance, analysis, and reporting. Part 2: Analysis of PFS, reporting, and diagnosis. Neurourol Urodyn. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.25187.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

El-Hakim A, Al-Hathal N, Al-Qaoud T, Gagné G, Larocque S, Denis R, et al. Novel uroflow stop test at time of catheter removal is a strong predictor of early urinary continence recovery following robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: A pilot study. Neurourol Urodyn. 2015;34(1):60–4.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Alenizi AM, Bienz M, Rajih E, Alesawi A, Al-Hathal N, Benayoun S, et al. Uroflow stop test and potency recovery: A surrogate for pelvic floor integrity post robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy? Urology. 2015;86(4):766–71.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Boni A, Gervasoni F, Lomauro A, Del Zingaro M, Maiolino G, Galletti C, et al. Urologic latency time during uroflow stop test with electromyography: An incontinence detector in rehabilitation after robotic radical prostatectomy. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2023;59(1):94–102.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Shinohara M, Torimoto K, Matsushita C, Gotoh D, Yoshida H, Saka T, et al. A new nomogram of urinary flow rate and volume based on multiple measurements per healthy adult Japanese men using a portable uroflowmeter (P-Flowdiary®). BMC Urol. 2022;22(1):130.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Szmydki D, Burzynski B, Soltysiak-Gibala Z, Przymuszala P, Trzewik M, Chudek J, et al. Prediction of detrusor underactivity based on non-invasive functional tests and clinical data in patients with symptoms of bladder outlet obstruction. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2020;24(21):10992–8.

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Matsukawa Y, Kameya Y, Takahashi T, Shimazu A, Ishida S, Yamada M, et al. Characteristics of uroflowmetry patterns in men with detrusor underactivity revealed by artificial intelligence. Int J Urol. 2023;30(10):907–12.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Spyropoulos E, Galanakis I, Deligiannis D, Spyropoulou A, Kotsiris D, Panagopoulos A, et al. Flow resistive forces index (QRF): Development and clinical applicability assessment of a novel measure of bladder outlet resistance, aiming to enhance the diagnostic performance of uroflowmetry. Low Urin Tract Symptoms. 2020;12(3):190–7.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Yoshiyama A, Tsujimura A, Hiramatsu I, Morino J, Anno Y, Kurosawa M, et al. Circadian rhythm of voided volume, maximum flow rate, and voiding time evaluated by toilet uroflowmetry in hospitalized women with nocturia. Urology. 2023;179:50–7.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hiramatsu I, Tsujimura A, Miyoshi M, Ogasa T, Miyoshi Y, Ishikawa K, et al. Maximum flow rate is lowest in the early morning in hospitalized men with nocturia evaluated over 24 hours by toilet uroflowmetry. Urology. 2022;166:196–201.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kato S, Watanabe H, Yamasue K. Freeflow: The novel portable uroflowmeter can help to realize practical urinary conditions at home. Low Urin Tract Symptoms. 2022;14(3):208–13.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

•• Lee HJ, Aslim EJ, Balamurali BT, Ng LYS, Kuo TLC, Lin CMY, et al. Development and validation of a deep learning system for sound-based prediction of urinary flow. Eur Urol Focus. 2023;9(1):209–15. Study of audio analysis of the uroflow pattern with use of machine deep learning to develop a smartphone-based test that can identify abnormal and normal flow based on audioflow analysis.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pandolfo SD, Crauso F, Aveta A, Cilio S, Barone B, Napolitano L, et al. A novel low-cost uroflowmetry for patient telemonitoring. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20(4):3287.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Gallo GA, Cabral Dias Filho A, Cruz PR, Moraes CF. Development and construction of an open-platform, open-source low-cost portable uroflowmeter: The OpenFlow device. Neurourol Urodyn. 2024;43(1):153–60.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Rosier PFWM, Valdevenito JP, Smith P, Sinha S, Speich J, Gammie A. ICS-SUFU standard: Theory, terms, and recommendations for pressure-flow studies performance, analysis, and reporting, Part 1: Background theory and practice. Continence. 2023;100710.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cont.2023.100710.

Bladt L, Kashtiara A, Platteau W, De Wachter S, De Win G. First-year experience of managing urology patients with home uroflowmetry: Descriptive retrospective analysis. JMIR Form Res. 2023;7:e51019.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Long Depaquit T, Michel F, Gaillet S, Savoie P-H, Karsenty G. Home uroflowmetry technics and clinical relevance: A narrative review. Prog Urol. 2022;32(17):1531–42.

Article  CAS  PubMed