Guinan JJ (2006) Olivocochlear efferents: anatomy, physiology, function, and the measurement of efferent effects in humans. Ear Hear 27:589–607. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aud.0000240507.83072.e7

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Collet L, Kemp DT, Veuillet E, Duclaux R, Alain M, Moulin A (1990) Effect of contralateral auditory stimuli on active cochlear micro-mechanical properties in human subjects. Hear Res 43:251–261

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Backus BC, Guinan JJ (2007) Measurement of the distribution of medial olivocochlear acoustic reflex strengths across normal-hearing individuals via otoacoustic emissions. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 8:484–496. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10162-007-0100-0

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Chintanpalli A, Jennings SG, Heinz MG, Strickland EA (2012) Modeling the anti-masking effects of the olivocochlear reflex in auditory nerve responses to tones in sustained noise. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 13:219–235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10162-011-0310-3

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Jennings SG (2021) The role of the medial olivocochlear reflex in psychophysical masking and intensity resolution in humans: a review. J Neurophysiol 125:2279–2308. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00672.2020

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Brown GJ, Ferry RT, Meddis R (2010) A computer model of auditory efferent suppression: implications for the recognition of speech in noise. J Acoust Soc Am 127:943–954

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Yashaswini L, Maruthy S (2019) The influence of efferent inhibition on speech perception in noise: a revisit through its level-dependent function. Am J Audiol 28:508–515. https://doi.org/10.1044/2019_AJA-IND50-18-0098

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Shaikh MA, Connell K, Zhang D (2021) Controlled (re)evaluation of the relationship between speech perception in noise and contralateral suppression of otoacoustic emissions. Hear Res 409:108332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2021.108332

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kumar UA, Vanaja CS (2004) Functioning of olivocochlear bundle and speech perception in noise. Ear Hear 25:142–146. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.AUD.0000120363.56591.E6

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Harkrider AW, Smith SB (2005) Acceptable noise level, phoneme recognition in noise, and measures of auditory efferent activity. J Am Acad Audiol 16:530–545. https://doi.org/10.3766/jaaa.16.8.2

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Akbari M, Panahi R, Valadbeigi A, Hamadi Nahrani M (2020) Speech-in-noise perception ability can be related to auditory efferent pathway function: a comparative study in reading impaired and normal reading children. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 86:209–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2018.11.010

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Mukari SZMS, Mamat WHW (2008) Medial olivocochlear functioning and speech perception in noise in older adults. Audiol Neurotol 13:328–334

Article  Google Scholar 

Bidelman GM, Bhagat SP (2015) Right-ear advantage drives the link between olivocochlear efferent ‘antimasking’ and speech-in-noise listening benefits. NeuroReport 26:483–487. https://doi.org/10.1097/WNR.0000000000000376

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Maruthy S, Kumar UA, Gnanateja GN (2017) Functional interplay between the putative measures of rostral and caudal efferent regulation of speech perception in noise. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 18:635–648. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10162-017-0623-y

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

MacPherson A, Akeroyd MA (2014) Variations in the slope of the psychometric functions for speech intelligibility: a systematic survey. Trends Hear 18:233121651453772. https://doi.org/10.1177/2331216514537722

Article  Google Scholar 

Guinan JJ (2011) Physiology of the medial and lateral olivocochlear systems. In: Ryugo DK, Fay RR (eds) Auditory and vestibular efferents. Springer Handbook of Auditory Research, vol 38. Springer, New York, NY, pp 39–81

Mertes IB, Wilbanks EC, Leek MR (2018) Olivocochlear efferent activity is associated with the slope of the psychometric function of speech recognition in noise. Ear Hear 39:583–593. https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000000514

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Otsuka S, Nakagawa S, Furukawa S (2020) Relationship between characteristics of medial olivocochlear reflex and speech-in-noise-reception performance. Acoust Sci Technol 41:404–407. https://doi.org/10.1250/ast.41.404

Article  Google Scholar 

Abdala C, Dhar S, Ahmadi M, Luo P (2014) Aging of the medial olivocochlear reflex and associations with speech perception. J Acoust Soc Am 135:754–765. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4861841

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Füllgrabe C, Moore BCJ, Stone MA (2015) Age-group differences in speech identification despite matched audiometrically normal hearing: contributions from auditory temporal processing and cognition. Front Aging Neurosci 6:1–25. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2014.00347

Article  Google Scholar 

Koerner TK, Zhang Y (2017) Application of linear mixed-effects models in human neuroscience research: a comparison with pearson correlation in two auditory electrophysiology studies. Brain Sci 7:26. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci7030026

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Gueorguieva R, Krystal JH (2004) Move over ANOVA. Arch Gen Psychiatry 61:310. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.61.3.310

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Venkatesan S (2009) Ethical guidelines for bio-behavioral research involving human subjects. http://aiishmysore.in/pdf/ethical_guidelines.pdf. Accessed 7 Sep 2023

American National Standards Institute (1999) American national standard maximum permissible ambient noise levels for audiometric rooms [ANSI S3.1–1999]. New York

Jerger J (1970) Clinical Experience with impedence audiometry. Arch Otolaryngol 92:311–324

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kaipa R, Kumar UA (2017) Functioning of medial olivocochlear bundle in right- and left-handed individuals. Laterality Asymmetries Body Brain Cogn 22:445–454. https://doi.org/10.1080/1357650X.2016.1217229

Article  Google Scholar 

Wilson RH (1981) The effects of aging on the magnitude of the acoustic reflex. J Speech Lang Hear Res 24:406–414. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.2403.406

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Mayadevi C (1974) Development and standardization of a common speech discrimination test for Indians [Unpublished Dissertation]. University of Mysore

Manjula P, Antony J, Kumar K, Geetha C (2015) Development of phonemically balanced word lists for adults in the Kannada language. J Hear Sci 5:22–30. https://doi.org/10.17430/893515

Geetha C, Kumar KSS, Manjula P, Pavan M (2014) Development and standardisation of the sentence identification test in the Kannada language. J Hear Sci 4:18–26

Article  Google Scholar 

Avinash M, Meti R, Kumar U (2009) Development of sentences for Quick Speech-in-Noise (Quick SIN) test in Kannada. J Indian Speech Hear Assoc 24:59–65

Google Scholar 

Stuart A, Butler AK (2012) Contralateral suppression of transient otoacoustic emissions and sentence recognition in noise in young adults. J Am Acad Audiol 23:686–696. https://doi.org/10.3766/jaaa.23.9.3

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gnanateja GN (2017) Speech in noise mixing, signal to noise ratio [Computer Software]

Finney DJ (1952) Probit Analysis: A Statistical Treatment of the Sigmoid Response Curve, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, New York-London

Google Scholar 

Tillman TW, Olsen W (1973) Speech audiometry. In: Jerger J (ed) Modern developments in audiology, 2nd ed. Academic Press, New York, NY, pp 37–74

Schütt H, Harmeling S, Macke J, Wichmann F (2015) Psignifit 4: pain-free Bayesian inference for psychometric functions. J Vis 15:474. https://doi.org/10.1167/15.12.474

Article  Google Scholar 

LaFlair GT, Egbert J, Plonsky L (2015) A practical guide to bootstrapping, descriptive statistics, correlations, t-tests, and ANOVAs. In: Plonsky L (ed) Advancing quantitative methods in second language research. Taylor & Francis, New York, pp 46–77

Field A (2009) Discovering statistics using SPSS, 3rd edn. SAGE Publications Inc., London, UK

R Core Team (2021) R: A language and environment for statistical computing [Computer Software]

Ryan S, Kemp DT (1996) The influence of evoking stimulus level on the neural suppression of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions. Hear Res 94:140–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-5955(96)00021-4

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lewis JD (2019) The effect of otoacoustic emission stimulus level on the strength and detectability of the medial olivocochlear reflex. Ear Hear 40:1391–1403. https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000000719

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw 67:1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01

Kuznetsova A, Brockhoff PB, Christensen RHB (2017) lmerTest package: tests in linear mixed effects models. J Stat Softw 82:1–26. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13

Brown VA (2021) An introduction to linear mixed-effects modeling in R. Adv Methods Pract Psychol Sci 4:1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920960351

Meteyard L, Davies RAI (2020) Best practice guidance for linear mixed-effects models in psychological science. J Mem Lang 112:104092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2020.104092

Article  Google Scholar 

Keppler H, Dhooge I, Corthals P, Maes L, D’haenens W, Bockstael A, Philips B, Swinnen F, Vinck B (2010) The effects of aging on evoked otoacoustic emissions and efferent suppression of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions. Clin Neurophysiol 121:359–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2009.11.003

Shera CA, Guinan JJ (1999) Evoked otoacoustic emissions arise by two fundamentally different mechanisms: a taxonomy for mammalian OAEs. J Acoust Soc Am 105:782–798. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.426948

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Heinrich A, Knight S (2016) The contribution of auditory and cognitive factors to intelligibility of words and sentences in noise. In: van Dijk P, Başkent D, Gaudrain E, de Kleine E, Wagner A, Lanting C (eds) Physiology, psychoacoustics and cognition in normal and impaired hearing. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol 894. Springer, Cham, Switzerland, pp 37–45

Vander Werff KR, Burns KS (2011) Brain stem responses to speech in younger and older adults. Ear Hear 32:168–180. https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181f534b5

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gafoor SA, Uppunda AK (2023) Role of the medial olivocochlear efferent auditory system in speech perception in noise: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Int J Audiol. https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2023.2260951

Kawase T, Liberman MC (1993) Antimasking effects of the olivocochlear reflex. I. Enhancement of compound action potentials to masked tones. J Neurophysiol 70:2519–2532. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1993.70.6.2519

Article  CAS  PubMed