World Health Organization. Dementia. 2022. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/dementia. Accessed 29 Nov 2022.

GBD 2019 Dementia Forecasting Collaborators. Estimation of the global prevalence of dementia in 2019 and forecasted prevalence in 2050: an analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet Public Health. 2022;7(2):e105–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(21)00249-8.

Article  Google Scholar 

World Health Organization. Global action plan on the public health response to dementia 2017–2025. 2017. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/global-action-plan-on-the-public-health-response-to-dementia-2017---2025. Accessed 29 Nov 2022.

Alzheimer’s Association. Stages of Alzheimer’s. https://www.alz.org/alzheimers-dementia/stages#:~:text=Alzheimer’s%20disease%20typically%20progresses%20slowly,progress%20through%20the%20stages%20%E2%80%94%20differently. Accessed 4 Oct 2023.

Matthews FE, Bennett H, Wittenberg R, Jagger C, Dening T, Brayne C. Who lives where and does it matter? Changes in the health profiles of older people living in long term care and the community over two decades in a high-income country. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(9): e0161705.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Federal Ministry of Health. Leuchtturmprojekt Demenz. 2011. https://www.bundesgesundheitsministerium.de/service/publikationen/details/leuchtturmprojekt-demenz.html. Accessed 29 Nov 2022.

Moyle W. The promise of technology in the future of dementia care. Nat Rev Neurol. 2019;15(6):353–9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kok JS, Berg IJ, Scherder EJA. Special care units and traditional care in dementia: relationship with behavior, cognition, functional status and quality of life—a review. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord Extra. 2013;3:360–75.

Article  Google Scholar 

Sharkey SS, Hudak S, Horn SD, James B, Howes J. Frontline caregiver daily practices: a comparison study of traditional nursing homes and the Green House project sites. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2011;59(1):126–31.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Palm R, Bartholomeyczik S, Roes M, Holle B. Structural characteristics of specialised living units for people with dementia: a cross-sectional study in German nursing homes. Int J Ment Health Syst. 2014;8(1):39. https://doi.org/10.1186/1752-4458-8-39.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Kok JS, Nielen MMA, Scherder EJA. Quality of life in small-scaled homelike nursing homes: an 8-month controlled trial. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018;16(1):38. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-018-0853-7.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Palm R, Holle B. Forschungsbericht der Studie DemenzMonitor. Veröffentlichungsreihe des Deutschen Zentrums für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen e.V. (DZNE), Standort Witten; 2016.

Wolf-Ostermann K, Worch A, Fischer T, Wulff I, Gräske J. Health outcomes and quality of life of residents of shared-housing arrangements compared to residents of special care units-results of the Berlin DeWeGE-study. J Clin Nurs. 2012;21(21–22):3047–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04305.x.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Speckemeier C. Preferences for attributes of long-term care in dementia: a scoping review of multi-criteria decision analyses. J Public Health. 2023;31(10):1597–608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-022-01743-x.

Article  Google Scholar 

Statista. Prognostizierte Entwicklung der Anzahl von Demenzkranken im Vergleich zu den über 65-Jährigen in Deutschland bis 2050. 2023. Available at: https://de.statista.com/statistik/daten/studie/245519/umfrage/. Accessed 29 Nov 2022.

Bartholomeyczik S, Halek M. Pflege-Report 2017 "Die Versorgung der Pflegebedürftigen“. Stuttgart: Schattauer; 2017.

Google Scholar 

Dudel C. Vorausberechnung des Pflegepotentials von erwachsenen Kindern für ihre pflegebedürftigen Eltern. Sozialer Fortschritt. 2015;64(1–2):14–24.

Article  Google Scholar 

Kohls M. Pflegebedürftigkeit und Nachfrage nach Pflegeleistungen von Migrantinnen und Migranten im demographischen Wandel. (Forschungsbericht / Bundesamt für Migration und Flüchtlinge (BAMF) Forschungszentrum Migration, Integration und Asyl (FZ), 12). Nürnberg: Bundesamt für Migration und Flüchtlinge (BAMF) Forschungszentrum Migration, Integration und Asyl (FZ) 2012.

BMFSFJ. Nationale Demenzstrategie. 2022. https://www.bmfsfj.de/bmfsfj/themen/aeltere-menschen/demenz/nationale-demenzstrategie. Accessed 29 Nov 2022.

Klie T, Heislbetz C, Schuhmacher B, Keilhauer A, Rischard P, Bruker C. Ambulant betreute Wohngruppen. Bestandserhebung, qualitative Einordnung und Handlungsempfehlungen. Abschlussbericht. AGP Sozialforschung und Hans-Weinberger-Akademie (Hrsg.). Berlin: Studie im Auftrag des Bundesministeriums für Gesundheit; 2017.

Klie T. Pflegereport 2018. Pflege vor Ort – gelingendes Leben mit Pflegebedürftigkeit. 2018. https://www.dak.de/dak/download/dak-pflegereport-2018-pdf-2126422.pdf. Accessed 29 Nov 2022.

Yu X, Bao H, Shi J, Yuan X, Qian L, Feng Z, Geng J. Preferences for healthcare services among hypertension patients in China: a discrete choice experiment. BMJ Open. 2021;11(12): e053270. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053270.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Wilberforce M, Challis D, Davies L, Kelly MP, Roberts C, Loynes N. Person-centredness in the care of older adults: a systematic review of questionnaire-based scales and their measurement properties. BMC Geriatr. 2016;16:63. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-016-0229-y.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Wijnen BF, van der Putten IM, Groothuis S, et al. Discrete-choice experiments versus rating scale exercises to evaluate the importance of attributes. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2015;15(4):721–8. https://doi.org/10.1586/14737167.2015.1033406.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Clark MD, Determann D, Petrou S, Moro D, de Bekker-Grob EW. Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature. Pharmacoeconomics. 2014;32(9):883–902. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40273-014-0170-x.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Soekhai V, Whichello C, Levitan B, et al. Methods for exploring and eliciting patient preferences in the medical product lifecycle: a literature review. Drug Discov Today. 2019;24(7):1324–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2019.05.001.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lancsar E, Louviere J. Conducting discrete choice experiments to inform healthcare decision making: a user’s guide. Pharmacoeconomics. 2008;26(8):661–77. https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-200826080-00004.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Chester H, Clarkson P, Davies L, Sutcliffe C, Roe B, Hughes J, et al. A discrete choice experiment to explore carer preferences. Qual Ageing. 2017;18(1):33–43.

Article  Google Scholar 

Chester H, Clarkson P, Davies L, Sutcliffe C, Davies S, Feast A, et al. People with dementia and carer preferences for home support services in early-stage dementia. Aging Ment Health. 2018;22(2):270–9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Groenewoud S, Van Exel NJ, Bobinac A, Berg M, Huijsman R, Stolk EA. What influences patients’ decisions when choosing a health care provider? measuring preferences of patients with knee arthrosis, chronic depression, or Alzheimer’s disease, using discrete choice experiments. Health Serv Res. 2015;50(6):1941–72.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Jasper R, Chester H, Hughes J, Abendstern M, Loynes N, Sutcliffe C, et al. Practitioners preferences of care coordination for older people: a discrete choice experiment. J Gerontol Soc Work. 2018;61(2):151–70.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kampanellou E, Chester H, Davies L, Davies S, Giebel C, Hughes J, et al. Carer preferences for home support services in later stage dementia. Aging Ment Health. 2019;23(1):60–8.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Nieboer AP, Koolman X, Stolk EA. Preferences for long-term care services: willingness to pay estimates derived from a discrete choice experiment. Soc Sci Med. 2010;70(9):1317–25.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sawamura K, Sano H, Nakanishi M. Japanese public long-term care insured: preferences for future long-term care facilities, including relocation, waiting times, and individualized care. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2015;16(4):350.e9-20.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Teahan Á, Walsh S, Doherty E, O’Shea E. Supporting family carers of people with dementia: a discrete choice experiment of public preferences. Soc Sci Med. 2021;287: 114359.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Walsh S, O’Shea E, Pierse T, Kennelly B, Keogh F, Doherty E. Public preferences for home care services for people with dementia: a discrete choice experiment on personhood. Soc Sci Med. 2020;245: 112675.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Leibniz Science Campus Ruhr. https://lscr.rwi-essen.de/en/, Accessed 20 Sept 2023.

Bridges JFP, Hauber AB, Marshall D, et al. Conjoint analysis applications in health–a checklist: a report of the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Conjoint Analysis Task Force. Value Health. 2011;14(4):403–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2010.11.013.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

World Health Organization. How to conduct a discrete choice experiment for health workforce recruitment and retention in remote and rural areas: a user guide with case studies. 2012. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/586321468156869931/pdf/NonAsciiFileName0.pdf. Accessed 6 Jun 2023.

Helter TM, Boehler CEH. Developing attributes for discrete choice experiments in health: a systematic literature review and case study of alcohol misuse interventions. J Subst Use. 2016;21(6):662–8. https://doi.org/10.3109/14659891.2015.1118563.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Speckemeier C, Niemann A, Weitzel M, Abels C, Höfer K, Walendzik A, Wasem J, Neusser S. Assessment of innovative living and care arrangements for persons with dementia: a systematic review. BMC Geriatr. 2023;23(1):464.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Coast J, Al-Janabi H, Sutton EJ, Horrocks SA, Vosper AJ, Swancutt DR, Flynn TN. Using qualitative methods for attribute development for discrete choice experiments: issues and recommendations. Health Econ. 2012;21(6):730–41. https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.1739.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kessels R, Jones B, Goos P. Bayesian optimal designs for discrete choice experiments with partial profiles. Journal of Choice Modelling. 2011;4(3):52–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1755-5345(13)70042-3.

Article  Google Scholar 

Orme B. Sample size issues for conjoint analysis studies. Sequim: Sawtooth Software Technical Paper; 1998.

Johnson R, Orme B. Getting the most from CBC. Sequim: Sawtooth Software Research Paper Series, Sawtooth Software; 2003.

Hauber AB, González JM, Groothuis-Oudshoorn CGM, et al. Statistical methods for the analysis of discrete choice experiments: a report of the ISPOR Conjoint Analysis Good Research Practices Task Force. Value Health. 2016;19(4):300–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2016.04.004.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

McFadden D. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In: Zarembka P, editor. Frontiers in econometrics. New York: Academic Press; 1973.

Google Scholar 

Hensher DA, Rose JM, Greene WH. Applied choice analysis: a primer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2005.

Book  Google Scholar 

Gamerman D. Sampling from the posterior distribution in generalized linear models. Stat Comput. 1997;7:57–68.