International Agency for research on cancer. Cancer today: Estimated number of new cases in 2020, World, both sexes, all ages (excl. NMSC). https://gco.iarc.fr/today/online-analysis-table?v=2020&mode=cancer&mode_population=continents&population=900&populations=900&key=asr&sex=0&cancer=39&type=0&statistic=5&prevalence=0&population_group=0&ages_group%5B%5D=0&ages_group%5B%5D=17&group_cancer=1&include_nmsc=0&include_nmsc_other=1. Accessed 20 Jan 2023.

Schwartz AG, Cote ML. Epidemiology of lung cancer. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2016;893:21–41.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Migliorino MR, Santo A, Romano G, Cortinovis D, Galetta D, Alabiso O, Cartenì G, Vari S, Fasola G, Pazzola A, Giuffrida D, Zaniboni A, Caprioli A, Longo F, Acciai V, de Marinis F. Economic burden of patients affected by non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): the LIFE study. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2017;143(5):783–91.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gridelli C, Rossi A, Carbone DP, Guarize J, Karachaliou N, Mok T, Petrella F, Spaggiari L, Rosell R. Non-small-cell lung cancer. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2015;21(1):15009.

Article  Google Scholar 

Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2018. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(1):7–30.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Eberhardt WE, De Ruysscher D, Weder W, Le Péchoux C, De Leyn P, Hoffmann H, Westeel V, Stahel R, Felip E, Peters S, Panel Members. 2nd ESMO Consensus Conference in Lung Cancer: locally advanced stage III non-small-cell lung cancer. Ann Oncol. 2015;26(8):1573-1588.

Al Dayel F. EGFR mutation testing in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). J Infect Public Health. 2012;5 Supplement:S31-34.

Article  Google Scholar 

Zhang YL, Yuan JQ, Wang KF, Fu XH, Han XR, Threapleton D, Yang ZY, Mao C, Tang JL. The prevalence of EGFR mutation in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Oncotarget. 2016;48(7):78985–93.

Article  Google Scholar 

Aguiar F, Fernandes G, Queiroga H, Machado JC, Cirnes L, Souto Moura C, Hespanhol V. Overall survival analysis and characterization of an EGFR mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) population. Arch Bronconeumol. 2018;54(1):10–7.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hsu WH, Yang JC, Mok TS, Loong HH. Overview of current systemic management of EGFR-mutant NSCLC. Ann Oncol. 2018;1(Suppl. 1):i3–9.

Article  Google Scholar 

Ding PN, Lord SJ, Gebski V, Links M, Bray V, Gralla RJ, Yang JC, Lee CK. Risk of treatment-related toxicities from EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors: a meta-analysis of clinical trials of gefitinib, erlotinib, and afatinib in advanced EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2017;12(4):633–43.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Normando SR, Cruz FM, Del Giglio A. Cumulative meta-analysis of epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors as first-line therapy in metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. Anticancer Drugs. 2015;26(9):995–1003.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Zhang Y, Sheng J, Yang Y, Fang W, Kang S, He Y, Hong S, Zhan J, Zhao Y, Xue C, Ma Y, Zhou T, Ma S, Gao F, Qin T, Hu Z, Tian Y, Hou X, Huang Y, Zhou N, Zhao H, Zhang L. Optimized selection of three major EGFR-TKIs in advanced EGFR-positive non-small cell lung cancer: a network meta-analysis. Oncotarget. 2016;12(7):20093–108.

Article  Google Scholar 

Sequist LV, Yang JC, Yamamoto N, O’Byrne K, Hirsh V, Mok T, Geater SL, Orlov S, Tsai CM, Boyer M, Su WC, Bennouna J, Kato T, Gorbunova V, Lee KH, Shah R, Massey D, Zazulina V, Shahidi M, Schuler M. hase III study of afatinib or cisplatin plus pemetrexed in patients with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma with EGFR mutations. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(27):3327–34.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wu YL, Zhou C, Hu CP, Feng J, Lu S, Huang Y, Li W, Hou M, Shi JH, Lee KY, Xu CR, Massey D, Kim M, Shi Y, Geater SL. Afatinib versus cisplatin plus gemcitabine for first-line treatment of Asian patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer harbouring EGFR mutations (LUX-Lung 6): an open-label, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(2):213–22.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Yang JC, Wu YL, Schuler M, Sebastian M, Popat S, Yamamoto N, Zhou C, Hu CP, O’Byrne K, Feng J, Lu S, Huang Y, Geater SL, Lee KY, Tsai CM, Gorbunova V, Hirsh V, Bennouna J, Orlov S, Mok T, Boyer M, Su WC, Lee KH, Kato T, Massey D, Shahidi M, Zazulina V, Sequist LV. Afatinib versus cisplatin-based chemotherapy for EGFR mutation-positive lung adenocarcinoma (LUX-Lung 3 and LUX-Lung 6): analysis of overall survival data from two randomised, phase 3 trials. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16(2):141–51.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Griebsch I, Palmer M, Fayers PM, Ellis S. Is progression-free survival associated with a better health-related quality of life in patients with lung cancer? Evidence from two randomised trials with afatinib. BMJ Open. 2014;4(10):1-9.

Pratt-Chapman MBA. Patient-reported outcomes in health economic decision-making: a changing landscape in oncology. Recent Results Cancer Res. 2019;213:67–83.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Trippoli S, Vaiani M, Lucioni C, Messori A. Quality of life and utility in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Quality-of-life Study Group of the Master 2 Project in Pharmacoeconomics. Pharmacoeconomics. 2001;19(8):855–63.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

McDonough CMTA. Measuring preferences for cost-utility analysis: how choice of method may influence decision-making. Pharmacoeconomics. 2007;25(2):93–106.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Brazier J, Usherwood T, Harper R, Thomas K. Deriving a preference-based single index from the UK SF-36 Health Survey. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51(11):1115–28.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

King MT, Costa DS, Aaronson NK, Brazier JE, Cella DF, Fayers PM, Grimison P, Janda M, Kemmler G, Norman R, Pickard AS, Rowen D, Velikova G, Young TA, Viney R. QLU-C10D: a health state classification system for a multi-attribute utility measure based on the EORTC QLQ-C30. Qual Life Res. 2016;25(3):625–36.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Roudijk B, Donders ART, Stalmeier PFM. Setting dead at zero: applying scale properties to the QALY model. Med Decis Making. 2016;38(6):627–34.

Article  Google Scholar 

Rabin R, de Charro F. EQ-5D: a measure of health status from the EuroQol Group. Ann Med. 2001;33(5):337–43.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Feeny D, Furlong W, Boyle M, Torrance GW. Multi-attribute health status classification systems. Health Utilities Index. Pharmacoeconomics. 1995;7(6):490–502.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Rowen D, Brazier J, Ara R, Azzabi ZI. The role of condition-specific preference-based measures in health technology assessment. Pharmacoeconomics. 2017;35(Suppl. 1):33–41.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Drummond M, Sculpher M. Common methodological flaws in economic evaluations. Med Care. 2005;43(Suppl. 7):5–14.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Goodwin EGC. A systematic review of the literature on the development of condition-specific preference-Based Measures of Health. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2016;14(2):161–83.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Langworth L, Yang Y, Young T, Mulhern B, Hernández Alava M, Mukuria C, Rowen D, Tosh J, Tsuchiya A, Evans P, Devianee Keetharuth A, Brazier J. Use of generic and condition-specific measures of health-related quality of life in NICE decision-making: a systematic review, statistical modelling and survey. Health Technol Assess. 2014;9(18):1–224.

Google Scholar 

Versteegh MM, Leunis A, Uyl-de Groot CA, Stolk EA. Condition-specific preference-based measures: benefit or burden? Value Health. 2012;15(3):504–13.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Neumann PJ, Goldie SJ, Weinstein MC. Preference-based measures in economic evaluation in health care. Annu Rev Public Health. 2000;21:587–611.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Brazier JE, Rowen D, Mavranezouli I, Tsuchiya A, Young T, Yang Y, Barkham M, Ibbotson R. Developing and testing methods for deriving preference-based measures of health from condition-specific measures (and other patient-based measures of outcome). Health Technol Assess. 2016;16(32):1–114.

Google Scholar 

Richardson J, Iezzi A, Khan MA, Chen G, Maxwell A. Measuring the sensitivity and construct validity of 6 utility instruments in 7 disease areas. Med Decis Making. 2016;36(2):147–95.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pettitt D, Raza S, Naughton B, Roscoe A, Ramakrishnan A, Ali A, Davies B, Dopson S, Hollander G, Smith J, Brindley D. The limitations of QALY: a literature review. J Stem Cell Res Ther. 2016;6(4):1-7.

Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, van der Windt DA, Knol DL, Dekker J, Bouter LM, de Vet HC. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60(1):34–42.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Miller VA, Hirsh V, Cadranel J, Chen YM, Park K, Kim SW, Zhou C, Su WC, Wang M, Sun Y, Heo DS, Crino L, Tan EH, Chao TY, Shahidi M, Cong XJ, Lorence RM, Yang JC. Afatinib versus placebo for patients with advanced, metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer after failure of erlotinib, gefitinib, or both, and one or two lines of chemotherapy (LUX-Lung 1): a phase 2b/3 randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013;13(5):528–38.

Article