Hanske J, Sanchez A, Schmid M, Meyer CP, Abdollah F, Roghmann F et al (2015) Comparison of 30-day perioperative outcomes in adults undergoing open versus minimally invasive pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction: analysis of 593 patients in a prospective national database. World J Urol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-015-1586-4

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Uberoi J, Disick GIS, Munver R (2009) Minimally invasive surgical management of pelvic-ureteric junction obstruction: Update on the current status of robotic-assisted pyeloplasty. BJU Int. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08682.x

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

O’Reilly PH, Brooman PJC, Mak S, Jones M, Pickup C, Atkinson C et al (2001) The long-term results of anderson-hynes pyeloplasty. BJU Int. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1464-410X.2001.00108.x

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Jacobs BL, Lai JC, Seelam R, Hanley JM, Wolf JS, Hollenbeck BK et al (2017) Variation in the use of open pyeloplasty, minimally invasive pyeloplasty, and endopyelotomy for the treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in adults. J Endourol. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2016.0688

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Moretto S, Gandi C, Bientinesi R, Totaro A, Marino F, Gavi F et al (2023) Robotic versus open pyeloplasty: perioperative and functional outcomes. J Clin Med. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12072538

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Autorino R, Eden C, El-Ghoneimi A, Guazzoni G, Buffi N, Peters CA et al (2014) Robot-assisted and laparoscopic repair of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2013.06.053

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lai WR, Stewart CA, Thomas R (2017) Technology based treatment for uretero pelvic junction obstruction. J Endourol. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2016.0592

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Knudsen BE, Cook AJ, Watterson JD, Beiko DT, Nott L, Razvi H et al (2004) Percutaneous antegrade endopyelotomy: long-term results from one institution. Urology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2003.09.049

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Afane JS, Olweny EO, Bercowsky E, Sundaram CP, Dunn MD, Shalhav AL et al (2000) Flexible ureteroscopes: a single center evaluation of the durability and function of the new endoscopes smaller than 9Fr. J Urol. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(05)67133-9

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Martov AG, Ergakov DV, Golubev MYu, Golubev PM, Baykov NA, Dal Abdullaev (2020) Our experience at retrograde thulium fiber laser endopyelotomy. Eur Urol Open Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2666-1683(20)33045-7

Article  Google Scholar 

Hibi H, Yamada Y, Mizumoto H, Okada M, Mitsui K, Taki T et al (2002) Retrograde ureteroscopic endopyelotomy using the holmium:YAG laser. Int J Urol. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1442-2042.2002.00423.x

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Altman D, Antes G et al (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Elabd SA, Elbahnasy AM, Farahat YA, Soliman MG, Taha MR, Elgarabawy MA et al (2009) Minimally-invasive correction of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: do retrograde endo-incision techniques still have a role in the era of laparoscopic pyeloplasty? Ther Adv Urol. https://doi.org/10.1177/1756287210362070

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Park J, Kim WS, Hong B, Park T, Park HK (2008) Long-term outcome of secondary endopyelotomy after failed primary intervention for ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Int J Urol. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-2042.2008.02035.x

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Conlin MJ, Bagley DH (1998) Ureteroscopic endopyelotomy at a single setting. J Urol 159:727–731

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ponsky LE, Streem SB (2006) Retrograde endopyelotomy: a comparative study of hot-wire balloon and ureteroscopic laser. J Endourol. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2006.20.823

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Vaarala MH, Marttila T, Paananen I, Hellström P (2008) Retrospective analysis of long-term outcomes of 64 patients treated by endopyelotomy in two low-volume hospitals: Good and durable results. J Endourol. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2008.0117

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lam JS, Greene TD, Gupta M (2002) Treatment of proximal ureteral calculi: Holmium:YAG laser ureterolithotripsy versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(05)65065-3

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hoenig DM, Shalhav AL, Elbahnasy AM, McDougall EM, Smith D, Clayman RV (1998) Impact of etiology of secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction on outcome of endopyelotomy. J Endourol. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.1998.12.131

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Minervini A, Davenport K, Keeley FX, Timoney AG (2006) Antegrade versus retrograde endopyelotomy for pelvi-ureteric junction (PUJ) obstruction. Eur Urol 49:536–543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2005.11.025

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Shalhav AL, Giusti G, Elbahnasy AM, Hoenig DM, Maxwell KL, Mcdougall EM et al (1998) Endopyelotomy for High-Insertion Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction, vol 12. Inc, Mary Ann fiebert

Google Scholar 

Rassweiler JJ, Subotic S, Feist-Schwenk M, Sugiono M, Schulze M, Teber D et al (2007) Minimally invasive treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: long-term experience with an algorithm for laser endopyelotomy and laparoscopic retroperitoneal pyeloplasty. J Urol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2006.10.049

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Yanke BV, Lallas CD, Pagnani C, McGinnis DE, Bagley DH (2008) The minimally invasive treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a review of our experience during the last decade. J Urol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2008.06.020

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Vannahme M, Mathur S, Davenport K, Timoney AG, Keeley FX (2014) The management of secondary pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction—a comparison of pyeloplasty and endopyelotomy. BJU Int. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.12454

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lam JS, Cooper KL, Greene TD, Gupta M (2003) Impact of hydronephrosis and renal function on treatment outcome: antegrade versus retrograde endopyelotomy. Urology. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-4295(03)00231-0

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Acher PL, Nair R, Abburaju JS, Dickinson IK, Vohra A, Sriprasad S (2009) Ureteroscopic holmium laser endopyelotomy for ureteropelvic junction stenosis after pyeloplasty. J Endourol. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2008.0550

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kartal I, Çimen S, Karakoyunlu N, Sandıkçı F, Eraslan A, Yalçınkaya F (2021) Factors affecting the effectiveness and success of retrograde holmium laser endopyelotomy as the primary treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in adults. Urol J. https://doi.org/10.1177/0391560320904259

Article  Google Scholar 

Wu Z, Feng C, Ding Q, Jiang H, Zhang Y (2011) Ureteroscopic holmium:YAG laser endopyelotomy is effective in distinctive ureteropelvic junction obstructions. Wideochirurgia I Inne Techniki Maloinwazyjne 6:144–149. https://doi.org/10.5114/wiitm.2011.24692

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Stilling NM, Jung H, Nørby B, Osther SS, Osther PJS (2009) Retrograde ureteroscopic holmium laser endopyelotomy in a selected population of patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Scand J Urol Nephrol. https://doi.org/10.1080/00365590802473164

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Geavlete P, Georgescu D, Mirciulescu V, Niţǎ G (2007) Ureteroscopic laser approach in recurrent ureteropelvic junction stenosis. Eur Urol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2006.08.035

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Grazia Di E, Nicolosi D (2005) Ureteroscopic laser endopyelotomy in secondary UPJ obstruction after pyeloplasty failure. Urol Int. https://doi.org/10.1159/000089169

Article  Google Scholar 

Biyani CS, Urol D, Powell CS (1998) Guidewire fragmentation during holmium:YAG laser endopyelotomy. Tech Urol 4:51–53

CAS