Ilcheva M, Nikolova P, Hadzhiyska V, Mladenov K. Impact of FDG PET/CT on detection of synchronous and metachronous malignancies and clinical management in patients with multiple primary cancers. Neoplasma. 2022;69:948–56. https://doi.org/10.4149/neo2022220203N135.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Vandenberghe S, Moskal P, Karp J. State of the art in total body PET. EJNMMI Phys. 2020;7:7–35. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40658-020-00290-2.

Article  Google Scholar 

Dadgar M, Parzych S, Tayefi Ardebili F. A simulation study to estimate optimum LOR angular acceptance for the image reconstruction with the Total-Body J-PET. In Annual conference on medical image understanding and analysis 2021 (pp. 189-200). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80432-915

Moskal P, Stepien E. Prospects and clinical perspectives of total-body pet imaging using plastic scintillators. PET Clin. 2020;15(4):439–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpet.2020.06.009.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Spencer B, Berg E, Schmall J, Omidvari N, et al. Performance evaluation of the uEXPLORER total-body PET/CT scanner based on NEMA NU 2–2018 with additional tests to characterize PET scanners with a long axial field of view. J Nucl Med. 2021;62:861–70. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.120.250597.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Karp J, Viswanath V, Geagan M, Muehllehner G, Pantel A, et al. Pennpet explorer: design and preliminary performance of a whole-body imager. J Nucl Med. 2020;61:136–43. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.119.229997.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Pantel A, Viswanath V, Daube-Witherspoon M, Dubroff J, et al. Pennpet explorer: human imaging on a whole-body imager. J Nucl Med. 2020;61:144–51. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.119.231845.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Alberts I, Hünermund JN, Prenosil G, Mingels C, Bohn KP, Viscione M, Sari H, Vollnberg B, Shi K, Afshar-Oromieh A, Rominger A. Clinical performance of long axial field of view PET/CT: a head-to-head intra-individual comparison of the biograph vision Quadra with the biograph vision PET/CT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021;48:2395–404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-021-05282-7.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Prenosil GA, Sari H, Fürstner M, Afshar-Oromieh A, Shi K, Rominger A, Hentschel M. Performance characteristics of the biograph vision Quadra PET/CT system with a long axial field of view using the NEMA NU 2–2018 standard. J Nucl Med. 2022;63(3):476–84. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.121.261972.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cherry S, Jones T, Karp J, Qi J, et al. Total-body pet: maximizing sensitivity to create new opportunities for clinical research and patient care. J Nucl Med. 2018;59:3–12. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.116.184028.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Dadgar M, Parzych S, Baran J, et al. Comparative studies of the sensitivities of sparse and full geometries of total-body pet scanners built from crystals and plastic scintillators. EJNMMI Phys. 2023;10:62. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40658-023-00572-5.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Vandenberghe S, Muller F, Withofs N, Dadgar M, et al. Walk-through flat panel total-body PET: a patient-centered design for high throughput imaging at lower cost using DOI-capable high-resolution monolithic detectors. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2023;50:3558–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-023-06341-x.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Vandenberghe S, Karakatsanis NA, Akl MA, Maebe J, Surti S, Dierckx RA, Pryma DA, Nehmeh SA, Bouhali O, Karp JS. The potential of a medium-cost long axial FOV PET system for nuclear medicine departments. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2023;50(3):652–60.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Abi-Akl M, Dadgar M, Toufique Y, et al. Monte Carlo simulation of the system performance of a long axial field-of-view pet based on monolithic lyso detectors. EJNMMI Phys. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40658-023-00559-2.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Dadgar M, Kowalski P. Gate simulation study of the 24-module j-pet scanner: data analysis and image reconstruction. Acta Phys Pol B. 2020;51:309–15. https://doi.org/10.5506/aphyspolb.51.309.

Article  Google Scholar 

Borys D, Baran J, Brzezinski K, et al. Protheramon—a gate simulation framework for proton therapy range monitoring using pet imaging. Phys Med Biol. 2022;67: 224002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ac944c.

Article  Google Scholar 

Dadgar M, Parzych S, Tayefi Ardebili F, et al. Investigation of novel preclinical total body pet designed with J-PET technology: a simulation study. IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci. 2023;7:124–31. https://doi.org/10.1109/TRPMS.2022.3211780.

Article  Google Scholar 

Dadgar M, Parzych S, Tayefi Ardebili F, Moskal P, Vandenberghe S. Introduction of the DOI capable Total-Body J-PET, a simulation study. J Nucl Med. 2022;63(supplement 2):3316.

Google Scholar 

Dadgar M, Maebe J, Abi Akl M, Vervenne B, Vandenberghe S. A simulation study of the system characteristics for a long axial FOV PET design based on monolithic BGO flat panels compared with a pixelated LSO cylindrical design. EJNMMI Phys. 2023;10:75.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Vandenberghe S, Abi Akl M, Withofs N, Muller FM, Maebe J, Dadgar M, et al. Efficient patient throughput and detector usage in low cost efficient monolithic high resolution walk-through flat panel total body PET. In: Total-Body PET 2022, Abstracts. 2022. pp. 28–29

Maebe J, Vandenberghe S. Effect of detector geometry and surface finish on cerenkov based time estimation in monolithic BGO detectors. Phys Med Biol. 2023;68: 025009. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/acabfd.

Article  Google Scholar 

Maebe J, Vandenberghe S. Simulation study on 3D convolutional neural networks for time-of-flight prediction in monolithic pet detectors using digitized waveforms. Phys Med Biol. 2022;67: 125016. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ac73d3.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Muller F, Vanhove C, Vandeghinste B, Vandenberghe S. Performance evaluation of a micro-ct system for laboratory animal imaging with iterative reconstruction capabilities. Med Phys. 2022;49:3121–33. https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.15538.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Stockhoff M, Van Holen R, Vandenberghe S. Optical simulation study on the spatial resolution of a thick monolithic pet detector. Phys Med Biol. 2019;64: 195003. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ab3b83.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cancer data: World cancer research fund international, W. WCRF International https://www.wcrf.org/cancer-trends/worldwide-cancer-data/ (2022).

Sarrut D, Bala M, Bardies M, et al. Advanced monte carlo simulations of emission tomography imaging systems with gate. Phys Med Biol. 2021;14:55–10. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/abf276.

Article  Google Scholar 

Moskal P, Kowalski P, Shopa R, Raczynski L, et al. Simulating nema characteristics of the modular total-body J-PET scanner-an economic total-body pet from plastic scintillators. Phys Med Biol. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ac16bd.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Carra P, Giuseppina Bisogni M, Ciarrocchi E, Morrocchi M, Sportelli G, Rosso V, Belcari N. A neural network-based algorithm for simultaneous event positioning and timestamping in monolithic scintillators. Phys Med Biol. 2022;67: 135001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ac72f2.

Article  Google Scholar 

Segars W, Sturgeon G, Mendonca S, Grimes J, Tsui B. 4D XCAT phantom for multimodality imaging research. Med Phys. 2010;37:4902–15. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.3480985.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Segars W, Veress A, Sturgeon G, Samei E. Incorporation of the living heart model into the 4D XCAT phantom for cardiac imaging research. IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci. 2019;3:54–60. https://doi.org/10.1109/TRPMS.2018.2823060.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Fedrigo R, Segars W, Martineau P, Gowdy C, et al. Development of scalable lymphatic system in the 4D XCAT phantom: application to quantitative evaluation of lymphoma pet segmentations. Med Phys. 2022;49:6871–84. https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.15963.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Segars W, Bond J, Frush J, Hon S, et al. Population of anatomically variable 4D XCAT adult phantoms for imaging research and optimization. Med Phys. 2013;40: 043701. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4794178.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Van Sluis J, Boellaard R, Dierckx R, Stormezand G, et al. Image quality and activity optimization in oncologic 18f-fdg pet using the digital biograph vision PET/CT system. J Nucl Med. 2020;61:764–71. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.119.234351.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gruber J, Decristoforo C, Uprimny P, Schoenberg S, et al. Imaging properties and tumor targeting of 68ga-neobomb1, a gastrin-releasing peptide receptor antagonist, in gist patients. Biomedicines. 2022;10:11–2899. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10112899.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Nievelstein RA, Quarles van Ufford HM, Kwee TC, Bierings MB, Ludwig I, Beek FJ, de Klerk JM, Mali WP, de Bruin PW, Geleijns J. Radiation exposure and mortality risk from CT and PET imaging of patients with malignant lymphoma. Eur Radiol. 2012;22(9):1946–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-012-2447-9.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Cheng X, Yang D, Zhong Y, Shao Y. Real-time marker-less tumor tracking with TOF PET: in silicofeasibility study. Phys Med Biol. 2022;67:11. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ac6d9f.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Adu-Poku O. Image quality assessment using NEMA standards for lu-177 radionuclide. IJMPCERO. 2022;10:125–34. https://doi.org/10.4236/ijmpcero.2022.113011.

Article