Laino L, Majore S, Preziosi N, Grammatico B, De Bernardo C, Scommegna S, et al. Disorders of sex development: a genetic study of patients in a multidisciplinary clinic. Endocr Connect. 2014;3:180–92.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Monlleó IL, Zanotti SV, Araújo BPBD, Cavalcante Júnior EF, Pereira PD, Barros PMD, et al. Prevalence of genital abnormalities in neonates. J de Pediatr. 2012;88:489–95.
Crerand C, Kapa H, Litteral J, Nahata L, Combs B, Indyk J, et al. Parent perceptions of psychosocial care for children with differences of sex development. J Pediatr Urol. 2019;15:522.e1–e8.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Fast AM, Deibert CM, Hruby GW, Glassberg KI. Evaluating the quality of Internet health resources in pediatric urology. J Pediatr Urol. 2013;9:151–6.
Farnan JM, Paro JA, Higa J, Edelson J, Arora VM. The YouTube generation: implications for medical professionalism. Perspect Biol Med. 2008;51:517–24.
Ozsoy‐Unubol T, Alanbay‐Yagci E. YouTube as a source of information on fibromyalgia. Int J Rheum Dis. 2021;24:197–202.
Selvi I, Baydilli N, Akinsal EC. Can YouTube English videos be recommended as an accurate source for learning about testicular self-examination? Urology. 2020;145:181–9.
Cilio S, Collà Ruvolo C, Turco C, Creta M, Capece M, La Rocca R, et al. Analysis of quality information provided by “Dr. YouTubeTM” on phimosis. Int J Impot Res. 2023;35:398–403.
Silberg WM, Lundberg GD, Musacchio RA. Assessing, controlling, and assuring the quality of medical information on the Internet: Caveant lector et viewor—Let the reader and viewer beware. Jama. 1997;277:1244–5.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Bernard A, Langille M, Hughes S, Rose C, Leddin D, Van Zanten SV. A systematic review of patient inflammatory bowel disease information resources on the World Wide Web. Off J Am Coll Gastroenterol| ACG. 2007;102:2070–7.
Charnock D, Shepperd S, Needham G, Gann R. DISCERN: an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1999;53:105–11.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Canvasser NE, Ramo C, Morgan TM, Zheng K, Hollenbeck BK, Ghani KR. The use of social media in endourology: an analysis of the 2013 World Congress of Endourology meeting. J Endourol. 2015;29:615–20.
Duran MB, Kizilkan Y. Quality analysis of testicular cancer videos on YouTube. Andrologia. 2021;53:e14118.
Adorisio O, Silveri M, Torino G. Evaluation of educational value of YouTube videos addressing robotic pyeloplasty in children. J Pediatr Urol. 2021;17:390.e1–e4.
Toksoz A, Duran MB. Analysis of videos about vesicoureteral reflux on YouTube. J Pediatr Urol. 2021;17:858.e1–e6.
Bai G, Pan X, Zhao T, Chen X, Liu G, Fu W. Quality assessment of YouTube Videos as an information source for testicular torsion. Front Public Health. 2022;10:905609.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Salama A, Panoch J, Bandali E, Carroll A, Wiehe S, Downs S, et al. Consulting “Dr. YouTube”: an objective evaluation of hypospadias videos on a popular video-sharing website. J Pediatr Urol. 2020;16:70.e1–e9.
Culha Y, Seyhan Ak E, Merder E, Ariman A, Culha MG. Analysis of the YouTube videos on pelvic floor muscle exercise training in terms of their reliability and quality. Int Urol Nephrol. 2021;53:1–6.
Onder ME, Zengin O. YouTube as a source of information on gout: a quality analysis. Rheumatol Int. 2021;41:1321–8.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Gas S, Zincir OO, Bozkurt AP. Are YouTube videos useful for patients interested in botulinum toxin for bruxism? J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019;77:1776–83.
Comments (0)