Castle, N. G., & Ferguson, J. C. (2010). What is nursing home quality and how is it measured? The Gerontologist, 50(4), 426–442.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Burke, R. E., & Werner, R. M. (2019). Quality measurement and nursing homes: Measuring what matters. BMJ Quality and Safety, 28(7), 520–523.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Round, J., Sampson, E. L., & Jones, L. (2014). A framework for understanding quality of life in individuals without capacity. Quality of Life Research, 23(2), 477–484.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cleland, J., Hutchinson, C., Khadka, J., Milte, R., & Ratcliffe, J. (2021). What defines quality of care for older people in aged care? A comprehensive literature review. Geriatrics & Gerontology International, 21(9), 765–778.

Article  Google Scholar 

Milte, R., & Crotty, M. (2014). Musculoskeletal health, frailty and functional decline. Best Practice & Research Clinical Rheumatology, 28(3), 395–410.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Crawford, M. J., Rutter, D., Manley, C., Weaver, T., Bhui, K., Fulop, N., & Tyrer, P. (2002). Systematic review of involving patients in the planning and development of health care. BMJ, 325(7375), 1263.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Brazier, J., Ratcliffe, J., Salomon, J. A., & Tsuchiya, A. (2017). Measuring and valuing health benefits for economic evaluation (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.

Google Scholar 

World Health Organization. (2015). World report on ageing and health. World Health Organization.

Google Scholar 

Carr, A. J., Gibson, B., & Robinson, P. G. (2001). Measuring quality of life: Is quality of life determined by expectations or experience? British Medical Journal, 322(7296), 1240–1243.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Addington-Hall, J., & Kalra, L. (2001). Who should measure quality of life? British Medical Journal, 322(7299), 1417–1420.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Siette, J., Knaggs, G. T., Zurynski, Y., Ratcliffe, J., Dodds, L., & Westbrook, J. (2021). Systematic review of 29 self-report instruments for assessing quality of life in older adults receiving aged care services. British Medical Journal Open, 11(11), e050892.

Google Scholar 

Stineman, M. G., & Musick, D. W. (2001). Protection of human subjects with disability: Guidelines for research. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 82, S9–S14.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Shepherd, V., Wood, F., Griffith, R., Sheehan, M., & Hood, K. (2019). Protection by exclusion? The (lack of) inclusion of adults who lack capacity to consent to research in clinical trials in the UK. Trials, 20(1), 474.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Taylor, J. S., DeMers, S. M., Vig, E. K., & Borson, S. (2012). The disappearing subject: Exclusion of people with cognitive impairment and dementia from geriatrics research. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 60(3), 413–419.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

World Health Organization and World Bank. (2011). World report on disability. World Health Organization.

Google Scholar 

Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development. (2019). Skills matter: Additional results from the survey of adult skills. OECD Publishing.

Google Scholar 

Matthews, F. E., Arthur, A., Barnes, L. E., Bond, J., Jagger, C., Robinson, L., & Brayne, C. (2013). A two-decade comparison of prevalence of dementia in individuals aged 65 years and older from three geographical areas of England: Results of the Cognitive Function and Ageing Study I and II. Lancet, 382(9902), 1405–1412.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Carter, D. (2015). Dementia & homecare: Driving quality & innovation. United Kingdom Homecare Association.

Google Scholar 

Ratcliffe, J., Laver, K., Couzner, L., & Crotty, M. (2012). Health economics and geriatrics: Challenges and opportunities. In C. S. Atwood (Ed.), geriatrics (pp. 209–234). InTech.

Google Scholar 

Hutchinson, C., Worley, A., Khadka, J., Milte, R., Cleland, J., & Ratcliffe, J. (2022). Do we agree or disagree? A systematic review of the application of preference-based instruments in self and proxy reporting of quality of life in older people. Social Science and Medicine, 305, 115046.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Stancliffe, R. J. (2000). Proxy respondents and quality of life. Evaluation and Program Planning, 23(1), 89–93.

Article  Google Scholar 

Witham, M. D., Anderson, E., Carroll, C., Dark, P. M., Down, K., Hall, A. S., Knee, J., Maier, R. H., Mountain, G. A., Nestor, G., Oliva, L., Prowse, S. R., Tortice, A., Wason, J., Rochester, L., Group, I. W. (2020). Developing a roadmap to improve trial delivery for under-served groups: Results from a UK multi-stakeholder process. Trials, 21(1), 694.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Kitchin, R. (2000). The Researched Opinions on Research: Disabled people and disability research. Disability & Society, 15(1), 25–47.

Article  Google Scholar 

Bigby, C., Frawley, P., & Ramcharan, P. (2014). Conceptualizing inclusive research with people with intellectual disability. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 27(1), 3–12.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Shiggins, C., Ryan, B., O’Halloran, R., Power, E., Bernhardt, J., Lindley, R. I., McGurk, G., Hankey, G. J., & Rose, M. L. (2022). Towards the consistent inclusion of people with aphasia in stroke research irrespective of discipline. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 103(11), 2256–2263.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Alzheimer Europe. (2011). The ethics of dementia research. Alzheimer Europe.

Google Scholar 

Alzheimer’s Australia. (2013). Quality of residential aged care: The consumer perspective. Alzheimer’s Australia.

Google Scholar 

Hotter, B., Ulm, L., Hoffmann, S., Katan, M., Montaner, J., Bustamante, A., & Meisel, A. (2017). Selection bias in clinical stroke trials depending on ability to consent. BMC Neurology, 17(1), 206.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Trigg, R., Jones, R. W., & Skevington, S. M. (2007). Can people with mild to moderate dementia provide reliable answers about their quality of life? Age and Ageing, 36(6), 663–669.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Chinn, D., & Homeyard, C. (2017). Easy read and accessible information for people with intellectual disabilities: Is it worth it? A meta-narrative literature review. Health expectations : An international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 20(6), 1189–1200.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Clunne, S. J., Ryan, B. J., Hill, A. J., Brandenburg, C., & Kneebone, I. (2018). Accessibility and applicability of currently available e-mental health programs for depression for people with poststroke aphasia: Scoping review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 20(12), e291.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Grobler, S., Casey, S., & Farrell, E. (2022). Making information accessible for people with aphasia in healthcare. Advances in Clinical Neuroscience and Rehabilitation, 21(1), 16–18.

Google Scholar 

Tricco, A. C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O’Brien, K. K., Colquhoun, H., Levac, D., Moher, D., Peters, M. D. J., Horsley, T., Weeks, L., Hempel, S., Akl, E. A., Chang, C., McGowan, J., Stewart, L., Hartling, L., Aldcroft, A., Wilson, M. G., Garritty, C., … Straus, S. E. (2018). PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine, 169(7), 467–473.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Munn, Z., Peters, M. D. J., Stern, C., Tufanaru, C., McArthur, A., & Aromataris, E. (2018). Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18(1), 143.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Khadka, J., McAlinden, C., & Pesudovs, K. (2013). Quality assessment of ophthalmic questionnaires: Review and recommendations. Optometry and Vision Science, 90(8), 720–744.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pesudovs, K., Burr, J. M., Harley, C., & Elliott, D. B. (2007). The development, assessment, and selection of questionnaires. Optometry and Vision Science, 84(8), 663–674.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Mokkink, L. B., Terwee, C. B., Knol, D. L., Stratford, P. W., Alonso, J., Patrick, D. L., Bouter, L. M., & de Vet, H. C. W. (2010). The COSMIN checklist for evaluating the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties: A clarification of its content. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 10(1), 22.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Bose, A., McHugh, T., Schollenberger, H., & Buchanan, L. (2009). Measuring quality of life in aphasia: Results from two scales. Aphasiology, 23(7–8), 797–808.

Article  Google Scholar 

Brzoska, P., Erdsiek, F., Aksakal, T., Mader, M., Olcer, S., Idris, M., Altinok, K., Wahidie, D., Padberg, D., & Yilmaz-Aslan, Y. (2022). Pictorial assessment of health-related quality of life. Development and pre-test of the PictoQOL Questionnaire. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(3), 1620.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Buitenweg, D. C., Bongers, I. L., van de Mheen, D., van Oers, H. A. M., & Van Nieuwenhuizen, C. (2018). Worth a thousand words? Visual concept mapping of the quality of life of people with severe mental health problems. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 27(3), 1721.

Article  Google Scholar 

Clark, L., Pett, M. A., Cardell, E. M., Guo, J. W., & Johnson, E. (2017). Developing a health-related quality-of-life measure for people with intellectual disability. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 55(3), 140–153.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Day, A. (2004). The development of the MYMOP pictorial version. Acupuncture in Medicine, 22(2), 68–71.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Engell, B., Hütter, B. O., Willmes, K., & Huber, W. (2003). Quality of life in aphasia: Validation of a pictorial self-rating procedure. Aphasiology, 17(4), 383–396.

Article