Jacobs PA, Browne C, Gregson N, Joyce C, White H. Estimates of the frequency of chromosome abnormalities detectable in unselected newborns using moderate levels of banding. J Med Genet. 1992;29:103–8.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Sugiura-Ogasawara M, Ozaki Y, Sato T, Suzumori N, Suzumori K. Poor prognosis of recurrent aborters with either maternal or paternal reciprocal translocations. Fertil Steril. 2004;81:367–73.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Madan K, Nieuwint AW, van Bever Y. Recombination in a balanced complex translocation of a mother leading to a balanced reciprocal translocation in the child. Review of 60 cases of balanced complex translocations. Hum Genet. 1997;99:806–15.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ogilvie CM, Braude P, Scriven PN. Successful pregnancy outcomes after preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) for carriers of chromosome translocations. Hum Fertil (Camb). 2001;4:168–71.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kato K, Aoyama N, Kawasaki N, Hayashi H, Xiaohui T, Abe T, et al. Reproductive outcomes following preimplantation genetic diagnosis using fluorescence in situ hybridization for 52 translocation carrier couples with a history of recurrent pregnancy loss. J Hum Genet. 2016;61:687–92.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kurahashi H, Kato T, Miyazaki J, Nishizawa H, Nishio E, Furukawa H, et al. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis/screening by comprehensive molecular testing. Reprod Med Biol. 2016;15:13–19.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Tulay P, Gultomruk M, Findikli N, Yagmur E, Bahceci M. Is the interchromosomal effect present in embryos derived from Robertsonian and reciprocal translocation carriers particularly focusing on chromosome 10 rearrangements? Zygote 2015;23:908–15.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bartels CB, Makhijani R, Godiwala P, Bartolucci A, Nulsen JC, Grow DR, et al. In vitro fertilization outcomes after preimplantation genetic testing for chromosomal structural rearrangements comparing fluorescence in-situ hybridization, microarray comparative genomic hybridization, and next-generation sequencing. F S Rep. 2020;1:249–56.

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Nakano T, Ammae M, Satoh M, Mizuno S, Nakaoka Y, Morimoto Y. Analysis of clinical outcomes and meiotic segregation modes following preimplantation genetic testing for structural rearrangements using aCGH/NGS in couples with balanced chromosome rearrangement. Reprod Med Biol. 2022;21:e12476.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Viotti M. Preimplantation genetic testing for chromosomal abnormalities: aneuploidy, mosaicism, and structural rearrangements. Genes. 2020;11:602.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Bono S, Biricik A, Spizzichino L, Nuccitelli A, Minasi MG, Greco E, et al. Validation of a semiconductor next-generation sequencing-based protocol for preimplantation genetic diagnosis of reciprocal translocations. Prenat Diagn. 2015;35:938–44.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Iwasa T, Kuwahara A, Takeshita T, Taniguchi Y, Mikami M, Irahara M. Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy and chromosomal structural rearrangement: a summary of a nationwide study by the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Reprod Med Biol. 2023;22:e12518.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Kato K, Kuroda T, Yamadera-Egawa R, Ezoe K, Aoyama N, Usami A, et al. Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy for recurrent pregnancy loss and recurrent implantation failure in minimal ovarian stimulation cycle for women aged 35-42 years: live birth rate, developmental follow-up of children, and embryo ranking. Reprod Sci. 2023;30:974–83.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Takeuchi K. Pre-implantation genetic testing: past, present, future. Reprod Med Biol. 2021;20:27–40.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sato T, Sugiura-Ogasawara M, Ozawa F, Yamamoto T, Kato T, Kurahashi H, et al. Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy: a comparison of live birth rates in patients with recurrent pregnancy loss due to embryonic aneuploidy or recurrent implantation failure. Hum Reprod. 2019;34:2340–8.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ma X, Xu X, Mao B, Liu H, Li H, Liu K, et al. Chromosomal analysis for embryos from balanced chromosomal rearrangement carriers using next generation sequencing. Mol Reprod Dev. 2021;88:362–70.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Shetty S, Nair J, Johnson J, Shetty N, Kumar AJ, Thondehalmath N, et al. Preimplantation genetic testing for couples with balanced chromosomal rearrangements. J Reprod Infertil. 2022;23:213–23.

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Park SJ, Min JY, Kang JS, Yang BG, Hwang SY, Han SH. Chromosomal abnormalities of 19,000 couples with recurrent spontaneous abortions: a multicenter study. Fertil Steril. 2022;117:1015–25.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ogur C, Kahraman S, Griffin DK, Cinar Yapan C, Tufekci MA, Cetinkaya M, et al. PGT for structural chromosomal rearrangements in 300 couples reveals specific risk factors but an interchromosomal effect is unlikely. Reprod Biomed Online. 2023;46:713–27.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Xie Y, Xu Y, Wang J, Miao B, Zeng Y, Ding C, et al. Preliminary analysis of numerical chromosome abnormalities in reciprocal and Robertsonian translocation preimplantation genetic diagnosis cases with 24-chromosomal analysis with an aCGH/SNP microarray. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018;35:177–86.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Grande M, Borrell A, Garcia-Posada R, Borobio V, Muñoz M, Creus M, et al. The effect of maternal age on chromosomal anomaly rate and spectrum in recurrent miscarriage. Hum Reprod. 2012;27:3109–17.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Yuan P, Zheng L, Ou S, Zhao H, Li R, Luo H, et al. Evaluation of chromosomal abnormalities from preimplantation genetic testing to the reproductive outcomes: a comparison between three different structural rearrangements based on next-generation sequencing. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2021;38:709–18.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Estop AM, Cieply K, Munne S, Surti U, Wakim A, Feingold E. Is there an interchromosomal effect in reciprocal translocation carriers? Sperm FISH studies. Hum Genet. 2000;106:517–24.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Miller DE. The interchromosomal effect: different meanings for different organisms. Genetics. 2020;216:621–31.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Boynukalin FK, Gultomruk M, Turgut NE, Rubio C, Rodrigo L, Yarkiner Z, et al. The impact of patient, embryo, and translocation characteristics on the ploidy status of young couples undergoing preimplantation genetic testing for structural rearrangements (PGT-SR) by next generation sequencing (NGS). J Assist Reprod Genet. 2021;38:387–96.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Fan J, Zhang X, Chen Y, Zhang J, Zhang L, Bi X, et al. Exploration of the interchromosomal effects in preimplantation genetic testing for structural rearrangements based on next-generation sequencing. Mol Genet Genom Med. 2022;10:e2017.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Mayeur A, Ahdad N, Hesters L, Grynberg M, Romana S, Sonigo C, et al. Does the prognosis after PGT for structural rearrangement differ between female and male translocation carriers? Reprod Biomed Online. 2020;40:684–92.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wang J, Li D, Xu Z, Diao Z, Zhou J, Lin F, et al. Analysis of meiotic segregation modes in biopsied blastocysts from preimplantation genetic testing cycles of reciprocal translocations. Mol Cytogenet. 2019;12:11.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar