Calabrò R, Naro A, Russo M, Bramanti P, Carioti L, Balletta T, Buda A, Manuli A, Filoni S, Bramanti A. Shaping neuroplasticity by using powered exoskeletons in patients with stroke: a randomized clinical trial. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2018;15(1):35.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Curt A, van Hedel H, Klaus D, Dietz V. Recovery from a spinal cord injury: significance of compensation, neural plasticity, and repair. J Neurotrauma. 2008;25(6):667–85.

Article  Google Scholar 

Dijkers M, Akers K, Dieffenbach S, Galen S. Systematic reviews of clinical benefits of exoskeleton use for gait and mobility in neurologic disorders: a tertiary study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2021;102(2):300–13.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Labruyère R. Robot-assisted gait training: more randomized controlled trials are needed! Or maybe not? J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2022;19(1):1–5.

Article  Google Scholar 

George Hornby T. Rethinking the tools in the toolbox. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2022;19(1):61.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Vaughan-Graham J, Brooks D, Rose L, Nejat G, Pons J, Patterson K. Exoskeleton use in post-stroke gait rehabilitation: a qualitative study of the perspectives of persons post-stroke and physiotherapists. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2020;17(1):123.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Birch N, Graham J, Priestley T, Heywood C, Sakel M, Gall A, Nunn A, Signal N. Results of the first interim analysis of the RAPPER II trial in patients with spinal cord injury: ambulation and functional exercise programs in the REX powered walking aid. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2017;14(1):1–10.

Article  Google Scholar 

Bhatnagar T, Mortensen W, Mattie J, Wolff J, Parker C, Borisoff J. "A survey of stakeholder perspectives on a proposed combined exoskeleton-wheelchair technology. IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICORR.2017.8009472.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Manns P, Hurd C, Yang J. Perspectives of people with spinal cord injury learning to walk using a powered exoskeleton. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2019;16(1):1–10.

Article  Google Scholar 

Wolff J, Parker C, Borisoff J, Mortenson W, Mattie J. A survey of stakeholder perspectives on exoskeleton technology. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2014;11(1):169.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Ármannsdóttir A, Beckerle P, Moreno J, van Asseldonk E, Manrique-Sancho M, del-Ama A, Veneman J, Briem K. Assessing the involvement of users during development of lower limb wearable robotic exoskeletons: a survey study. Hum Fact. 2020;62(3):351–64.

Article  Google Scholar 

Muijzer-Witteveen H, Sibum N, Van Dijsseldonk R, Keijsers N, Van Asseldonk E. Questionnaire results of user experiences with wearable exoskeletons and their preferences for sensory feedback. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2018;15(1):1–8.

Article  Google Scholar 

Cahill A, Ginley O, Bertrand C, Lennon O. Gym-based exoskeleton walking: a preliminary exploration of non-ambulatory end-user perspectives. Disabil Health J. 2018;11(3):478–85.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Benson I, Hart K, Tussler D, Van Middendorp J. Lower-limb exoskeletons for individuals with chronic spinal cord injury: findings from a feasibility study. Clin Rehabil. 2016;30(1):73–84.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gagnon D, Vermette M, Duclos C, Aubertin-Leheudre M, Ahmed S, Kairy D. Satisfaction and perceptions of long-term manual wheelchair users with a spinal cord injury upon completion of a locomotor training program with an overground robotic exoskeleton. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2019;14(2):138–45.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kozlowski A, Fabian M, Lad D, Delgado A. Feasibility and safety of a powered exoskeleton for assisted walking for persons with multiple sclerosis: a single-group preliminary study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017;98(7):1300–7.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Thomassen G, Jørgensen V, Normann B. “Back at the same level as everyone else”—user perspectives on walking with an exoskeleton, a qualitative study. Spinal Cord Ser Cases. 2019;5(1):103.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Poritz J, Taylor H, Francisco G, Chang S. User satisfaction with lower limb wearable robotic exoskeletons. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2020;15(3):322–7.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Louie D, Mortenson W, Lui M, Durocher M, Teasell R, Yao J, Eng J. Patients’ and therapists’ experience and perception of exoskeleton-based physiotherapy during subacute stroke rehabilitation: a qualitative analysis. Disabil Rehabil. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2021.1989503.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Platz T, Gillner A, Borgwaldt N, Kroll S, Roschka S. "Device-training for individuals with thoracic and lumbar spinal cord injury using a powered exoskeleton for technically assisted mobility: achievements and user satisfaction. Biomed Res Int. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/8459018.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Read E, Woolsey C, McGibbon C, O’Connell C. Physiotherapists’ experiences using the Ekso bionic exoskeleton with patients in a neurological rehabilitation hospital: a qualitative study. Rehabil Res Pract. 2020;2020:2939573.

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Lajeunesse V, Vincent C, Routhier F, Careau E, Michaud F. Exoskeletons’ design and usefulness evidence according to a systematic review of lower limb exoskeletons used for functional mobility by people with spinal cord injury. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2016;11(7):535–47.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Rodríguez-Fernández A, Lobo-Prat J, Font-Llagunes J. Systematic review on wearable lower-limb exoskeletons for gait training in neuromuscular impairments. J NeuroEng Rehabil. 2021;18(1):22.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Koumpouros Y. A systematic review on existing measures for the subjective assessment of rehabilitation and assistive robot devices. J Healthc Eng. 2016;2016:1048964.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Hill D, Holloway C, Ramirez DM, Smitham P, Pappas Y. What are user perspectives of exoskeleton technology? A literature review. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2017;33(2):160–7.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Brown-Triolo D, Roach M, Nelson K, Triolo R. Consumer perspectives on mobility: Implications for neuroprosthesis design. J Rehabil Res. 2002;39:659–70.

Google Scholar 

Cowan R, Fregly B, Boninger M, Chan L, Rodgers M, Reinkensmeyer D. Recent trends in assistive technology for mobility. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2012. https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-9-20.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

McMillen A, Söderberg S. Disabled persons’ experience of dependence on assistive devices. Scand J Occup Ther. 2002;9:176–83.

Article  Google Scholar 

Assarroudi A, Heshmati-Nabavi F, Armat M, Ebadi A, Vaismoradi M. Directed qualitative content analysis: the description and elaboration of its underpinning methods and data analysis process. J Res Nurs. 2018;23(1):42–55.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

O’Brien B, Harris I, Beckman T, Reed D, Cook D. Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations. Acad Med. 2014;89:1245–51.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19:349–57.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sandelowski M. Whatever happened to qualitative description? Res Nurs Health. 2000;23:334–40.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sandelowski M. What’s in a name? Qualitative description revisited. Res Nurs Health. 2010;33:77–84.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Carpenter C, Suto M. Qualitative research for occupational and physical therapist. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing; 2008.

Google Scholar 

Creswell J, Poth C. Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five approaches. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2018.

Google Scholar 

Palacios-Ceña D, Fernández-de-las-Peñas C, Palacios-Ceña M, De-la-Llave-Rincón A, Florencio L. Working on the frontlines of the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study of physical therapists’ experience in Spain. Phys Ther Rehabil J. 2021;101:1–9.

Google Scholar 

Güeita-Rodríguez J, García-Muro F, Rodríguez-Fernández A, Lambeck J, Fernández-de-las-Peñas C, Palacios-Ceña D. What areas of functioning are influenced by aquatic physiotherapy? Experiences of parents of children with cerebral palsy. Dev Neurorehabil. 2017;21(8):506–14.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Korstjens I, Moser A. Series: practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 4: trustworthiness and publishing. Eur J Gen Pract. 2018;24:120–4.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Moser A, Korstjens I. Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 3: sampling, data collection and analysis. Eur J Gen Pract. 2018;24(1):9–18.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Mortenson W, Pysklywec A, Chau L, Prescott M, Townson A. Therapists’ experience of training and implementing an exoskeleton in a rehabilitation centre. Disab Rehabil. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2020.1789765.

Article  Google Scholar 

Groos S, Fuchs M, Kluth K. Determination of the subjective strain experiences during assembly activities using the exoskeleton: Chairless Chair. Adv Intell Syst Comput. 2020;962:72–82.

Article  Google Scholar 

Lajeunesse V, Routhier F, Vincent C, Lettre J, Michaud F. Perspectives of individuals with incomplete spinal cord