Nardi C, Talamonti C, Pallotta S, et al. Head and neck effective dose and quantitative assessment of image quality: a study to compare cone beam CT and multislice spiral CT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2017;46:20170030. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20170030.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Sans Merce M, Damet J, Becker M. Comparative organ dose levels for dentomaxillofacial examinations performed with computed tomography, cone beam CT and panoramic radiographs. Radioprotection. 2018;53:287–91. https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2018036.

Article  Google Scholar 

McCollough C, Cody D, Edyvean S, et al. The measurement, reporting, and management of radiation dose in CT. Report of AAPM Task Group. 2008;23:1–28.

Google Scholar 

Pauwels R, Theodorakou C, Walker A, et al. Dose distribution for dental cone beam CT and its implication for defining a dose index. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2012;41:583–93. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/20920453.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Soares MR, Santos WS, Neves LP, et al. Dose estimate for cone beam CT equipment protocols using Monte Carlo simulation in computational adult anthropomorphic phantoms. Radiat Phys Chem. 2019;155:252–9.

Article  Google Scholar 

Ernst M, Manser P, Dula K, Volken W, Stampanoni MF, Fix MK. TLD measurements and Monte Carlo calculations of head and neck organ and effective doses for cone beam computed tomography using 3D Accuitomo 170. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2017;46:20170047. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20170047.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Morant JJ, Salvadó M, Hernández-Girón I, Casanovas R, Ortega R, Calzado A. Dosimetry of a cone beam CT device for oral and maxillofacial radiology using monte Carlo techniques and ICRP adult reference computational phantoms. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2013;42:92555893. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/92555893.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Morant JJ, Salvadó M, Casanovas R, Hernández-Girón I, Velasco E, Calzado A. Validation of a Monte Carlo simulation for dose assessment in dental cone beam CT examinations. Phys Med. 2012;28:200–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2011.06.047.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

ICRP. Conversion coefficients for radiological protection quantities for external radiation exposures. Ann ICRP. 2010;40:1–257.

Article  Google Scholar 

Ludlow JB, Timothy R, Walker C, et al. Effective dose of dental CBCT-a meta analysis of published data and additional data for nine CBCT units. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2015;44:20140197. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20140197.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

SEDENTEXCT. D2.1 - Definition of a standard index for characterizing the CBCT dose distribution v3.1. 2010. https://www.sedentexct.eu/system/files/D2.1%20v3.1%20FINAL.pdf. Accessed 9 Feb 2022.

Kawrakow I, Rogers DWO, Mainegra-Hing E, Tessier F, Townson RW, Walters BRB. EGSnrc toolkit for Monte Carlo simulation of ionizing radiation transport. Tech Rep. 2000. https://doi.org/10.4224/40001303.

Article  Google Scholar 

NIST.gov. Tables of X-Ray Mass Attenuation Coefficients and Mass Energy-Absorption Coefficients (version 1.4) 2004. http://physics.nist.gov/xaamdi. Accessed 11 Jan 2022

ICRP. Adult Reference Computational Phantoms. ICRP Publication 110. Ann. ICRP 39(2) 2009. https://www.icrp.org/publication.asp?id=icrp%20publication%20110

Sato T, Iwamoto Y, Hashimoto S, et al. Features of particle and heavy ion transport code system (PHITS) version 30.2. J Nucl Sci Technol. 2018;55:684–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223131.2017.1419890.

Article  Google Scholar 

ICRP (2007) The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103. Ann. ICRP. 2007

Hirayama H, Namito Y, Bielajew AF, Wilderman SJ, Nelson WR. The EGS5 Code System by SLAC-R-730 (2005) and KEK Report 2005–8. 2005. http://rcwww.kek.jp/research/egs/egs5_manual/slac730-160113.pdf. Accessed 8 Feb 2022

Downes P, Jarvis R, Radu E, Kawrakow I, Spezi E. Monte Carlo simulation and patient dosimetry for a kilovoltage cone-beam CT unit. Med Phys. 2009;36:4156–67. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.3196182.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Rottke D, Dreger J, Sawada K, Honda K, Schulze D. Comparison of manual and dose reduction modes of a MORITA R100 CBCT. Dentomaxillofacial Radiolo. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20180009.

Article  Google Scholar 

Zhang G, Marshall N, Bogaerts R, Jacobs R, Bosmans H. Monte Carlo modeling for dose assessment in cone beam CT for oral and maxillofacial applications. Med Phys. 2013;40:072103. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4810967.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pauwels R, Beinsberger J, Collaert B, et al. Effective dose range for dental cone beam computed tomography scanners. Eur J Radiol. 2012;81:267–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.11.028.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pauwels R, Theodorakou C, Walker A, et al. Response to Letter to the Editor: Comment on “Effective dose range for dental cone beam computed tomography scanners.” Eur J Radiol. 2012;81:4221–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.05.027.

Article  Google Scholar 

ICRP. ICRP statement on tissue reactions/early and late effects of radiation in normal tissues and organs – threshold doses for tissue reactions in a radiation protection context. Ann ICRP. 2012;41(1–2):1–322.

Google Scholar 

Kralik I, Faj D, Lauc T, Škarica M, Popić J, Brkic H. Dose area product in estimation of effective dose of the patients undergoing dental cone beam computed tomography examinations. J Radiol Prot. 2018;38:1412–27. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6498/aae4e8.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Khan FM, Gibbons JP. Chapter 11 Treatment Planning I: Isodose Distributions. In: Khan’s the physics of radiation therapy. 5th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2014. pp.170–194.