Yao H, et al. Triple-negative breast cancer: is there a treatment on the horizon? Oncotarget. 2017;8(1):1913–24.
Hubalek M, Czech T, Muller H. Biological subtypes of triple-negative breast cancer. Breast Care (Basel). 2017;12(1):8–14.
Lehmann BD, et al. Identification of human triple-negative breast cancer subtypes and preclinical models for selection of targeted therapies. J Clin Invest. 2011;121(7):2750–67.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Hu Z, et al. Multi-cancer analysis of clonality and the timing of systemic spread in paired primary tumors and metastases. Nat Genet. 2020;52(7):701–8.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Yu T, Di G. Role of tumor microenvironment in triple-negative breast cancer and its prognostic significance. Chin J Cancer Res. 2017;29(3):237–52.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Szekely B, et al. Immunological differences between primary and metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2018;29(11):2232–9.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Mittendorf EA, et al. PD-L1 expression in triple-negative breast cancer. Cancer Immunol Res. 2014;2(4):361–70.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Cardoso F, et al. International guidelines for management of metastatic breast cancer: combination vs sequential single-agent chemotherapy. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009;101(17):1174–81.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Seidman AD, et al. Randomized phase III trial of weekly compared with every-3-weeks paclitaxel for metastatic breast cancer, with trastuzumab for metastatic breast cancer, with trastuzumab for all HER-2 overexpressors and random assignment to trastuzumab or not in HER-2 nonoverexpressors: final results of Cancer and Leukemia Group B protocol 9840. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(10):1642–9.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Jones SE, et al. Randomized phase III study of docetaxel compared with paclitaxel in metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(24):5542–51.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Rugo HS, et al. Randomized phase III trial of paclitaxel once per week compared with nanoparticle albumin-bound nab-paclitaxel once per week or ixabepilone with bevacizumab as first-line chemotherapy for locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer: CALGB 40502/NCCTG N063H (Alliance). J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(21):2361–9.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
O’Brien MER, et al. Reduced cardiotoxicity and comparable efficacy in a phase III trial of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin HCl (CAELYX/Doxil) versus conventional doxorubicin for first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2004;15(3):440–9.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Piccart-Gebhart MJ, et al. Taxanes alone or in combination with anthracyclines as first-line therapy of patients with metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(12):1980–6.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Rha SY, et al. Gemcitabine monotherapy as salvage chemotherapy in heavily pretreated metastatic breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2005;90(3):215–21.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Feher O, et al. First-line gemcitabine versus epirubicin in postmenopausal women aged 60 or older with metastatic breast cancer: a multicenter, randomized, phase III study. Ann Oncol. 2005;16(6):899–908.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Cortes J, et al. Eribulin monotherapy versus treatment of physician’s choice in patients with metastatic breast cancer (EMBRACE): a phase 3 open-label randomised study. Lancet. 2011;377(9769):914–23.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Carrick S, et al. 2009 Single agent versus combination chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;2:CD003372.
Pandy JGP, et al. Triple negative breast cancer and platinum-based systemic treatment: a meta-analysis and systematic review. BMC Cancer. 2019;19(1):1065.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Tutt A, et al. Carboplatin in BRCA1/2-mutated and triple-negative breast cancer BRCAness subgroups: the TNT Trial. Nat Med. 2018;24(5):628–37.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Nanda R, et al. Pembrolizumab in patients with advanced triple-negative breast cancer: phase Ib KEYNOTE-012 study. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(21):2460–7.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Emens LA, et al. Long-term clinical outcomes and biomarker analyses of atezolizumab therapy for patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer: a phase 1 study. JAMA Oncol. 2019;5(1):74–82.
Cortes J, et al. Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in advanced triple-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2022;387(3):217–26.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Winer EP, et al. Pembrolizumab versus investigator-choice chemotherapy for metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (KEYNOTE-119): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2021;22(4):499–511.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Schmid P, et al. Atezolizumab and nab-paclitaxel in advanced triple-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(22):2108–21.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Miles D, et al. Primary results from IMpassion131, a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised phase III trial of first-line paclitaxel with or without atezolizumab for unresectable locally advanced/metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2021;32(8):994–1004.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Peshkin BN, Alabek ML, Isaacs C. BRCA1/2 mutations and triple negative breast cancers. Breast Dis. 2010;32(1–2):25–33.
Robson M, et al. Olaparib for metastatic breast cancer in patients with a germline BRCA mutation. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(6):523–33.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Litton JK, et al. Talazoparib in patients with advanced breast cancer and a germline BRCA mutation. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(8):753–63.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Litton JK, et al. Talazoparib versus chemotherapy in patients with germline BRCA1/2-mutated HER2-negative advanced breast cancer: final overall survival results from the EMBRACA trial. Ann Oncol. 2020;31(11):1526–35.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Dieras V, et al. Veliparib with carboplatin and paclitaxel in BRCA-mutated advanced breast cancer (BROCADE3): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2020;21(10):1269–82.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Bardia A, et al. Sacituzumab govitecan-hziy in refractory metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(8):741–51.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Bardia A, et al. Sacituzumab govitecan in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(16):1529–41.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Tarantino P, et al. HER2-low breast cancer: pathological and clinical landscape. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(17):1951–62.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Modi S, et al. Antitumor activity and safety of trastuzumab deruxtecan in patients with HER2-low-expressing advanced breast cancer: results from a phase Ib study. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(17):1887–96.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Diéras V, et al. Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) for advanced breast cancer patients (ABC), regardless HER2 status: a phase II study with biomarkers analysis (DAISY). Clin Cancer Res. 2022;82(suppl 4):PD8–02.
Modi S, et al. Trastuzumab deruxtecan in previously treated HER2-low advanced breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2022;387(1):9–20.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Marabella C. Standard IHC assays show poor accuracy in identifying low HER2 expression in breast cancer, in | San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium. 2021.
Fernandez AI, et al. Examination of low ERBB2 protein expression in breast cancer tissue. JAMA Oncol. 2022;8(4):1–4.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Kim SB, et al. Ipatasertib plus paclitaxel versus placebo plus paclitaxel as first-line therapy for metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (LOTUS): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18(10):1360–72.
Comments (0)