Acklin, M. W., & Oliveira-Berry, J. (1996). Return to the source: Rorschach’s psychodiagnostics. Journal of Personality Assessment, 67(2), 427–433. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa6702_17

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ainsworth, M. D. S., Blehar, M. C., Waters, E., & Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of attachment: A psychological study of the strange situation. Lawrence Erlbaum.

Ales, F., Giromini, L., & Zennaro, A. (2020). Complexity and cognitive engagement in the Rorschach task: An eye-tracking study. Journal of Personality Assessment, 102(4), 538–550. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2019.1575227

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

American Psychological Association. (2013). Specialty guidelines for forensic psychology. American Psychologist, 68(1), 7–19. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029889

Article  Google Scholar 

Andò, A., Pineda, J. A., Giromini, L., Soghoyan, G., QunYang, B., & M., Maryanovsky, D., & Zennaro, A. (2018). Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on attribution of movement to ambiguous stimuli and EEG mu suppression. Brain Research, 1680, 69–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2017.12.007

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Andò, A., Salatino, A., Giromini, L., Ricci, R., Pignolo, C., Cristofanelli, S., Ferro, L., Viglione, D. J., & Zennaro, A. (2015). Embodied simulation and ambiguous stimuli: The role of the mirror neuron system. Brain Research, 1629, 135–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2015.10.025

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Archer, R. P., Buffington-Vollum, J. K., Stredny, R. V., & Handel, R. W. (2006). A survey of psychological test use patterns among forensic psychologists. Journal of Personality Assessment, 87(1), 84–94. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa8701_07

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Areh, I., Verkampt, F., & Allan, A. (2022). Critical review of the use of the Rorschach in European courts. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 29(2), 183–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2021.1894260

Article  Google Scholar 

Asari, T., Konishi, S., Jimura, K., Chikazoe, J., Nakamura, N., & Miyashita, Y. (2008). Right temporopolar activation associated with unique perception. NeuroImage, 41(1), 145–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.01.059

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Asari, T., Konishi, S., Jimura, K., Chikazoe, J., Nakamura, N., & Miyashita, Y. (2010a). Amygdalar enlargement associated with unique perception. Cortex, 46(1), 94–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2008.08.001

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Asari, T., Konishi, S., Jimura, K., Chikazoe, J., Nakamura, N., & Miyashita, Y. (2010b). Amygdalar modulation of frontotemporal connectivity during the inkblot test. Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging, 182(2), 103–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pscychresns.2010.01.002

Article  Google Scholar 

Benjestorf, S. T., Viglione, D. J., Lamb, J. D., & Giromini, L. (2013). Suppression of aggressive Rorschach responses among violent offenders and nonoffenders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 28(15), 2981–3003. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260513488688

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Berry, B. A., & Meyer, G. J. (2019). Contemporary data on the location of response objects in Rorschach’s inkblots. Journal of Personality Assessment, 101(4), 402–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2017.1408016

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bornstein, R. F. (2017). Evidence-based psychological assessment. Journal of Personality Assessment, 99(4), 435–445. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2016.1236343

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bornstein, R. F. (2022). Toward an Integrative Perspective on the Person. Avance Online Publication. https://doi.org/10.1027/1192-5604/a000160

Book  Google Scholar 

Bosco, F. A., Aguinis, H., Singh, K., Field, J. G., & Pierce, C. A. (2015). Correlational effect size benchmarks. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(2), 431–449. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038047

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bundesgerichtsh of [BGH] [Federal Court of Justice]. (1999, July 7). 1 StR 207/99. https://www.hrr-strafrecht.de/hrr/1/99/1-207-99.php3(Ger)

Cafri, G., Kromrey, J. D., & Brannick, M. T. (2010). A meta-meta-analysis: Empirical review of statistical power, type I error rates, effect sizes, and model selection of meta-analyses published in psychology. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 45(2), 239–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171003680187

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Carlson, C. F., Kula, M. L., & St. Laurent, C. M. (1997). Rorschach revised DEPI and CDI with inpatient major depressives and borderline personality disorder with major depression: Validity issues. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 53(1), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-4679(199701)53:1%3c51::aid-jclp7%3e3.0.co;2-y

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cerney, M. S. (1990). The Rorschach and traumatic loss: Can the presence of traumatic loss be detected from the Rorschach? Journal of Personality Assessment, 55(3–4), 781–789. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.1990.9674112

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cicchetti, D. V. (1994). Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychological Assessment, 6(4), 284–290. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.6.4.284

Article  Google Scholar 

Clark, A. (2013). Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(3), 181–204. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X12000477

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Clark, A. (2016). Surfing uncertainty: Prediction, action, and the embodied mind. Oxford University Press.

Book  Google Scholar 

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Erlbaum.

Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cronbach, L. J. (1990). Essentials of psychological testing. Harper & Row.

Google Scholar 

Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc. (1993). 509 U.S. 579.

Davey, C. G., Pujol, J., & Harrison, B. J. (2016). Mapping the self in the brain’s default mode network. NeuroImage, 132, 390–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.02.022

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

De Ruiter, C., & Kaser-Boyd, N. (2015). Forensic psychological assessment in practice: Case Studies. Routledge.

Delavari, M., Shairi, M., & Asghari-Moghadam, M. (2013). Role of culture and gender in Rorschach findings in 9 year old Iranian children. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 84, 1565–1570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.789

European Federation of Psychologists’ Associations. (2005). Meta-code of ethics. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444306514.app1

Exner, J. E., Jr. (Ed.). (1995). Issues and methods in Rorschach research. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Exner, J. E., Jr., & Erdberg, P. (2005). The Rorschach: A Comprehensive System. Vol. 2. Advanced Interpretation (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.

Exner, J. E., Jr. (1996). Critical bits and the Rorschach response process. Journal of Personality Assessment, 67(3), 464–477. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa6703_3

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Exner, J. E., Jr. (2003). The Rorschach: A comprehensive system (4th ed.). Wiley.

F v Bevándorlási és Állampolgársági Hivatal. (2018). Case C-473/16. E.C.R. 36 (Eur. Union).

Finn, S. E. (2012). Implications of recent research in neurobiology for psychological assessment. Journal of Personality Assessment, 94(5), 440–449. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2012.700665

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Freud, S. (1911). Psycho-analytic notes on an autobiographical account of a case of paranoia (dementia paranoides). In Standard edition of the complete works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 12, J. Strachey, Trans., pp. 9–79). Hogarth.

Friston, K. (2009). The free-energy principle: A rough guide to the brain? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13(7), 293–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2009.04.005

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Friston, K., Adams, R. A., Perrinet, L., & Breakspear, M. (2012). Perceptions as hypotheses: Saccades as experiments. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, Article 151. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00151

Funder, D. C., & Ozer, D. J. (2019). Evaluating effect size in psychological research: Sense and nonsense. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(2), 156–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919847202

Article  Google Scholar 

Funder, D. C., & Ozer, D. J. (2020). Corrigendum: Evaluating effect size in psychological research: Sense and nonsense. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 3(4), 509. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920979282

Article  Google Scholar 

Garb, H. N. (1999). Call for a moratorium on the use of the Rorschach Inkblot Test in clinical and forensic settings. Assessment, 6(4), 313–317. https://doi.org/10.1177/107319119900600402

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Garb, H. N., Wood, J. M., Nezworski, M. T., Grove, W. M., & Stejskal, W. J. (2001). Toward a resolution of the Rorschach controversy. Psychological Assessment, 13(4), 433–448. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.13.4.433

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gignac, G. E., & Szodorai, E. T. (2016). Effect size guidelines for individual differences researchers. Personality and Individual Differences, 102, 74–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.06.069

Giromini, L., Porcelli, P., Viglione, D. J., Parolin, L., & Pineda, J. A. (2010). The feeling of movement: EEG evidence for mirroring activity during the observations of static, ambiguous stimuli in the Rorschach cards. Biological Psychology, 85(2), 233–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2010.07.008

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Giromini, L., Viglione, D. J., Pineda, J. A., Porcelli, P., Hubbard, D., Zennaro, A., & Cauda, F. (2019). Human movement responses to the Rorschach and mirroring activity: An fMRI study. Assessment, 26(1), 56–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191117731813

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Giromini, L., Viglione, D. J., Zennaro, A., & Cauda, F. (2017). Neural activity during production of Rorschach responses: An fMRI study. Psychiatric Research: Neuroimaging, 262, 25–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pscychresns.2017.02.001

Article  Google Scholar 

Götz, F. M., Gosling, S. D., & Rentfrow, P. J. (2022). Small effects: The indispensable foundation for a cumulative psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 17(1), 205–215. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620984483

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gurley, J. R., Sheehan, B. L., Piechowski, L. D., & Gray, J. (2014). The admissibility of the R-PAS in court. Psychological Injury and Law, 7(1), 9–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-014-9182-2

Article  Google Scholar 

Heilbrun, K. (1992). The role of psychological testing in forensic assessment. Law and Human Behavior, 16(3), 257–272. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01044769

Article  Google Scholar 

Heilbrun, K., Grisso, T., & Goldstein, A. (2009). Foundations of forensic mental health assessment. Oxford University Press.

Google Scholar 

Hibbard, S. (2003). A critique of Lilienfeld et al.’s (2000) “The scientific status of projective techniques.” Journal of Personality Assessment, 80(3), 260–271. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327752JPA8003_05

Hohwy, J. (2016). The self-evidencing brain. Noûs, 50(2), 259–285. https://doi.org/10.1111/nous.12062

Article  Google Scholar 

Hunsley, J., Lee, C. M., Wood, J. M., & Taylor, W. (2015). Controversial and questionable assessment techniques. In S. O. Lilienfeld, S. J. Lynn, & J. M. Lohr (Eds.), Science and pseudoscience in clinical psychology (pp. 42–82). Guilford Press.

Google Scholar 

Kaplan, R. M., & Saccuzzo, D. P. (2017). Psychological testing: Principles, applications, and issues (9th ed.). Cengage Learni