Ellison WD, Rosenstein LK, Morgan TA, Zimmerman M. Community and clinical epidemiology of borderline personality disorder. Psychiatr Clin. 2018;41(4):561–73.

Google Scholar 

Edition F. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. Am Psychiatr Assoc. 2013;21(21):591–643.

Google Scholar 

Nemiah JC, Sifneos PE. Psychosomatic illness: a problem in communication. Psychother Psychosom. 1970;18(1–6):154–60.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bateman A, Fonagy P. Psychotherapy for borderline personality disorder: mentalization-based treatment. J Pers Disord. 2004;18(1):36–51.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Emerari A, Carcione A, Dimaggio G, Nicolò G, Procacci M. Understanding minds: different functions and different disorders? The contribution of psychotherapy research. Psychother Res. 2007;17(1):106–19.

Article  Google Scholar 

Harari H, Shamay-Tsoory SG, Ravid M, Levkovitz Y. Double dissociation between cognitive and affective empathy in borderline personality disorder. Psychiatry Res. 2010;175(3):277–9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wolf RC, Sambataro F, Vasic N, Schmid M, Thomann PA, Bienentreu SD, et al. Aberrant connectivity of resting-state networks in borderline personality disorder. J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2011;36(6):402.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Qin P, Northoff G. How is our self related to midline regions and the default-mode network? Neuroimage. 2011;57(3):1221–33.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Smith R, Alkozei A, Bao J, Smith C, Lane RD, Killgore WD. Resting state functional connectivity correlates of emotional awareness. Neuroimage. 2017;159:99–106.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Buckner RL, Andrews-Hanna JR, Schacter DL. The brain’s default network: anatomy, function, and relevance to disease. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008;1124(1):1–38.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Damoiseaux JS, Beckmann CF, Arigita EJS, Barkhof F, Scheltens P, Stam CJ, et al. Reduced resting-state brain activity in the “default network” in normal aging. Cereb Cortex. 2008;18(8):1856–64.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lei X, Zhao Z, Chen H. Extraversion is encoded by scale-free dynamics of default mode network. Neuroimage. 2013;74:52–7.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lei X, Wang Y, Yuan H, Mantini D. Neuronal oscillations and functional interactions between resting state networks: effects of alcohol intoxication. Hum Brain Mapp. 2014;35(7):3517–28.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

D’Argembeau A, Stawarczyk D, Majerus S, Collette F, Van der Linden M, Salmon E. Modulation of medial prefrontal and inferior parietal cortices when thinking about past, present, and future selves. Soc Neurosci. 2010;5(2):187–200.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

D’Argembeau A, Feyers D, Majerus S, Collette F, Van der Linden M, Maquet P, et al. Self-reflection across time: cortical midline structures differentiate between present and past selves. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2008;3(3):244–52.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Visintin E, De Panfilis C, Amore M, Balestrieri M, Wolf RC, Sambataro F. Mapping the brain correlates of borderline personality disorder: a functional neuroimaging meta-analysis of resting state studies. J Affect Disord. 2016;204:262–9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kaess M, Brunner R, Chanen A. Borderline personality disorder in adolescence. Pediatrics. 2014;134(4):782–93.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Morgan TA, Chelminski I, Young D, Dalrymple K, Zimmerman M. Differences between older and younger adults with borderline personality disorder on clinical presentation and impairment. J Psychiatr Res. 2013;47(10):1507–13.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Fonagy P, Speranza M, Luyten P, Kaess M, Hessels C, Bohus M, et al. ESCAP expert article: borderline personality disorder in adolescence: an expert research review with implications for clinical practice. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2015;24(11):1307–20.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lieb K, Völlm B, Rücker G, Timmer A, Stoffers JM. Pharmacotherapy for borderline personality disorder: cochrane systematic review of randomised trials. Br J Psychiatry. 2010;196(1):4–12.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ripoll LH, Triebwasser J, Siever LJ. Evidence-based pharmacotherapy for personality disorders. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2011;14(9):1257–88.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Leichsenring F, Leibing E, Kruse J, New AS, Leweke F. Borderline personality disorder. Lancet. 2011;377(9759):74–84.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Fonagy P, Luyten P, Allison E. Epistemic petrification and the restoration of epistemic trust: a new conceptualization of borderline personality disorder and its psychosocial treatment. J Pers Disord. 2015;29(5):575–609.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Stanley B, Perez-Rodriguez MM, Labouliere C, Roose S. A neuroscience-oriented research approach to borderline personality disorder. J Pers Disord. 2018;32(6):784–822.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Perez DL, Vago DR, Pan H, Root J, Tuescher O, Fuchs BH, et al. Frontolimbic neural circuit changes in emotional processing and inhibitory control associated with clinical improvement following transference-focused psychotherapy in borderline personality disorder. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2016;70(1):51–61.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Abbass AA, Nowoweiski SJ, Bernier D, Tarzwell R, Beutel ME. Review of psychodynamic psychotherapy neuroimaging studies. Psychother Psychosom. 2014;83(3):142–7.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lobbestael J, Leurgans M, Arntz A. Inter-rater reliability of the structured clinical interview for DSM-IV axis I disorders (SCID I) and axis II disorders (SCID II). Clin Psychol Psychother. 2011;18(1):75–9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Mohammadi MR, Assadi SM, Sharifi V, Seddigh A. Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV (SCID Persian translation and cultural adaptation). Iran J Psychiatry. 2007;2(1):46–8.

Google Scholar 

First MB. Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV axis I disorders. Biometrics Research Department. 1997.

First MB, Spitzer RL, Gibbon M, Williams JBW. User’s guide for the structured clinical interview for DSM-IV axis I disorders SCID-I: clinician version. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Pub; 1997.

Google Scholar 

First MB, Spitzer RL, Gibbon M, Williams JBW. Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV-TR axis I disorders, research version, patient edition. SCID-I/P New York; 2002.

Sharifi V, Asadi SM, Mohammadi MR, Amini H, Kaviani H, Semnani Y, Shabanikia A, Shahrivar Z, Davari AR, Hakim SM, Sedigh A. Reliability and feasibility of the Persian version of the structured diagnostic interview for DSM-IV (SCID). Adv Cogn Sci. 2004;6(1–2):10–22.

Google Scholar 

Maffei C, Fossati A, Agostoni I, Barraco A, Bagnato M, Deborah D, et al. Interrater reliability and internal consistency of the structured clinical interview for DSM-IV axis II personality disorders (SCID-II), version 20. J Pers Disord. 1997;11(3):279–84.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Group WA. The alcohol, smoking and substance involvement screening test (ASSIST): development, reliability and feasibility. Addiction. 2002;97(9):1183–94.

Article  Google Scholar 

Humeniuk R, Ali R, Babor TF, Farrell M, Formigoni ML, Jittiwutikarn J, et al. Validation of the alcohol, smoking and substance involvement screening test (ASSIST). Addiction. 2008;103(6):1039–47.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pfohl B, Blum N, St. John D, McCormick B, Allen J, Black DW. Reliability and validity of the borderline evaluation of severity over time (best): a self-rated scale to measure severity and change in persons with borderline personality disorder. J Pers Disord. 2009;23(3):281–93. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2009.23.3.281.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Azizi MR, Mohammadsadeghi H, Alavi K, Rasoulian M, Karimzad N, Ardebili ME. Validity and reliability of Persian translation of the borderline evaluation of severity over time (BEST) questionnaire. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2019;33:133.

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Davis MH. Empathic concern and the muscular dystrophy telethon: empathy as a multidimensional construct. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 1983;9(2):223–9.

Article  Google Scholar 

Davis MH. Measuring individual differences in empathy: evidence for a multidimensional approach. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1983;44(1):113.

Article  Google Scholar 

Davis MH. A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Catalog Sel Doc Psychol. 1980;10:85.

Google Scholar 

Ghorbani N, Watson PJ, Lotfi S, Chen Z. Moral affects, empathy, and integrative self-knowledge in Iran. Imagin Cogn Pers. 2014;34(1):39–56.

Article  Google Scholar 

Bagby RM, Parker JD, Taylor GJ. The twenty-item Toronto alexithymia scale—I. Item selection and cross-validation of the factor structure. J Psychosom Res. 1994;38(1):23–32.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bagby M, Taylor GJ, Ryan D. Toronto alexithymia scale: relationship with personality and psychopathology measures. Psychother Psychosom. 1986;45(4):207–15.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Besharat MA. Psychometric characteristics of Persian version of the Toronto alexithymia scale-20 in clinical and non-clinical samples. Iran J Med Sci. 2008;33(1):1–6.

Google Scholar 

Besharat MA. Reliability and factorial validity of a Farsi version of the 20-item Toronto alexithymia scale with a sample of Iranian students. Psychol Rep. 2007;101(1):209–20.

Article  PubMed