1. Wingstrand, M, Hägglund, G, Rodby-Bousquet, E. Ankle-foot orthoses in children with cerebral palsy: a cross sectional population based study of 2200 children. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2014; 15: 327.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline2. Scheffers, G, Hiller, C, Refshauge, K, et al. Prescription of foot and ankle orthoses for children with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease: a review of the evidence. Phys Ther Rev 2012: 79–90.
Google Scholar3. Vogel, LC, Mendoza, MM, Schottler, JC, et al. Ambulation in children and youth with spinal cord injuries. J Spinal Cord Med 2007; 30: S158–S164.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline4. Dickinson, HO, Parkinson, KN, Ravens-Sieberer, U, et al. Self-reported quality of life of 8–12-year-old children with cerebral palsy: a cross-sectional European study. Lancet 2007; 369: 2171–2178.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI5. Skaaret, I, Steen, H, Terjesen, T, et al. Impact of ankle-foot orthoses on gait 1 year after lower limb surgery in children with bilateral cerebral palsy. Prosthet Orthot Int 2019; 43: 12–20.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI6. Buckon, CE, Thomas, SS, Jakobson-Huston, S, et al. Comparison of three ankle–foot orthosis configurations for children with spastic diplegia. Dev Med Child Neurol 2004; 46: 590–598.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI7. Lam, WK, Leong, JCY, Li, YH, et al. Biomechanical and electromyographic evaluation of ankle foot orthosis and dynamic ankle foot orthosis in spastic cerebral palsy. Gait Posture 2005; 22: 189–197.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI8. Phillips, M, Radford, K, Wills, A. Ankle foot orthoses for people with Charcot Marie Tooth disease – views of users and orthotists on important aspects of use. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2011; 6: 491–499.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline9. Wouters, EJM, Hoof, J, Van Zaalen, Y, et al. Use of and satisfaction with ankle foot orthoses. Clin Res Foot Ankle 2015; 3: 167.
Google Scholar10. Dijcks, BPJ, De Witte, LP, Gelderblom, GJ, et al. Non-use of assistive technology in The Netherlands: a non-issue? Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2006; 1: 97–102.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline11. Lai, H-J, Yu, C-H, Kao, H-C, et al. Ankle–foot simulator development for testing ankle–foot orthoses. Med Eng Phys 2010; 32: 623–629.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline12. Ploeger, HE, Brehm, MA, Bus, SA, et al. Comparing the effect of a dorsal-leaf-spring AFO and a spring-hinged AFO on gait characteristics in plantarflexor weakness – a pilot study, the effect of bilateral solid AFO on gait. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2007; 36: 6676.
Google Scholar13. Figueiredo, EM, Ferreira, GB, Maia Moreira, RC, et al. Efficacy of ankle-foot orthoses on gait of children with cerebral palsy: systematic review of literature. Pediatr Phys Ther 2008; 20: 207–223.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline14. Law, D, Cheung, M-C, Yip, J, et al. Scoliosis brace design: influence of visual aesthetics on user acceptance and compliance. Ergonomics 2017; 60: 876–886.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline15. Zuniga, JM, Young, KJ, Peck, JL, et al. Remote fitting procedures for upper limb 3D printed prostheses. Expert Rev Med Devices 2019; 16: 257–266.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline16. Krippendorff, K. Content analysis: an introduction to its methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 2004, p. 413.
Google Scholar17. Patton, MQ. Qualitative evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 1980, 381 p.
Google Scholar18. Elliott, R, Timulak, L. Descriptive and interpretive approaches to qualitative research, vol. 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.
Google Scholar | Crossref19. Attride-Stirling, J. Thematic networks: an analytic tool for qualitative research. Qual Res 2001; 1: 385–405.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals20. Elo, S, Kyngäs, H. The qualitative content analysis process. J Adv Nurs 2008; 62: 107–115.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI21. Patton, MQ. Qualitative research & evaluation methods: integrating theory and practice. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 1990, p. 806
Google Scholar22. Braun, V, Clarke, V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 2006; 3: 77–101.
Google Scholar | Crossref23. Thurmond, VA. The point of triangulation. J Nurs Scholarsh 2001; 33: 253–258.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI24. Van der Wilk, D, Hijmans, JM, Postema, K, et al. A user-centered qualitative study on experiences with ankle-foot orthoses and suggestions for improved design. Prosthet Orthot Int 2018; 42: 121–128.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI25. Faulkner, SL, Trotter, SP. Data saturation. In: Matthes, J, Davis, CS, Potter, RF (eds) The international encyclopedia of communication research methods. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2017, pp. 1–2.
Google Scholar | Crossref26. Fusch, PI, Ness, LR. Are we there yet? Data saturation in qualitative research. Qual Rep 2015; 20: 1408–1416.
Google Scholar27. Guest, G, Bunce, A, Johnson, L. How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods 1995; 18: 59–82.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals28. Saunders, B, Sim, J, Kingstone, T, et al. Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Qual Quant 2018; 52: 1893–1907.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline29. Hawke, F, Burns, J, Radford, JA, et al. Custom-made foot orthoses for the treatment of foot pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008; 3: CD006801.
Google Scholar30. Buckon, CE, Thomas, SS, Jakobson-Huston, S, et al. Comparison of three ankle–foot orthosis configurations for children with spastic hemiplegia. Dev Med Child Neurol 2001; 43: 371–378.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI31. Huppin, L. How to address and prevent complications with AFOs. Podiatry Today 2009; 22: 58–62.
Google Scholar32. Rogozinski, BM, Davids, JR, Davis, RB, et al. The efficacy of the floor-reaction ankle-foot orthosis in children with cerebral palsy. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009; 91: 2440–2447.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI33. Eckles, R. Key insights on orthotics, AFOs and casting for kids. Podiatry Today 2017; 30.
Google Scholar34. Feit, E. Expert insights on prescribing pediatric orthotics. Podiatry Today 2005; 18: 24–29.
Google Scholar35. Tursi, A, Mincolelli, G. Design for people affected by Duchenne muscular dystrophy: proposal of a new type of ankle foot orthosis (AFO) based on 3D indirect survey and 3D printing. Cham: Springer, 2016, pp. 81–86.
Google Scholar36. O’Connor, J, McCaughan, D, McDaid, C, et al. Orthotic management of instability of the knee related to neuromuscular and central nervous system disorders: systematic review, qualitative study, survey and costing analysis. Health Technol Assess 2016; 20: 1–262.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline37. Musa, KE, Roach, ME. Adolescent appearance and self-concept – ProQuest. Adolescence 1973; 8: 385–395.
Google Scholar38. Hussain, S, Sanders, EBN. Fusion of horizons: co-designing with Cambodian children who have prosthetic legs, using generative design tools. CoDesign 2012; 8: 43–79.
Google Scholar | Crossref39. Druin, A. The role of children in the design of new technology. Behav Inf Technol 2002; 21: 1–25.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI40. Lobo, MA, Hall, ML, Greenspan, B, et al. Wearables for pediatric rehabilitation: how to optimally design and use products to meet the needs of users. Phys Ther 2019; 99: 647–657.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline41. Springer, R. Assistive technologies. In: Lueder, R, Rice, VJB (eds) Ergonomics for children: designing products and places for toddlers to teens. 1st ed. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis, 2008, pp. 339–358.
Google Scholar42. Hussain, S. Toes that look like toes: Cambodian children’s perspectives on prosthetic legs. Qual Health Res 2011; 21: 1427–1440.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI43. Andrysek, J, Naumann, S, Cleghorn, WL. Design characteristics of pediatric prosthetic knees. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2004; 12: 369–378.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI44. Lenhart, R, Sumarriva, N. Design of improved ankle-foot orthosis (Chancellor’s Honors Program Projects). Knoxville, TN: The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, 2008.
Google Scholar45. Center for Drug Evaluation and Research . Drug development tools qualification programs – CDER clinical outcome assessments (COA) qualification program: frequently asked questions (FAQs). Rockville, MD: Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, 2019.
Google Scholar46. Heinemann, AW, Bode, RK, O’Reilly, C. Development and measurement properties of the Orthotics and Prosthetics Users’ Survey (OPUS): a comprehensive set of clinical outcome instruments. Prosthet Orthot Int 2003; 27: 191–206.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI47. Schaffalitzky, E, Gallagher, P, Maclachlan, M, et al. Understanding the benefits of prosthetic prescription: exploring the experiences of practitioners and lower limb prosthetic users. Disabil Rehabil 2011; 33: 1314–1323.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI48. Hu, N, Pavlou, PA, Zhang, J. Can online word-of-mouth communication reveal true product quality? Experimental insights, econometric results, and analytical modeling. SSRN Electron J. Epub ahead of print 1 April 2006. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2380731.
Google Scholar49. Koh, NS, Hu, N, Clemons, EK. Do online reviews reflect a product’s true perceived quality? An investigation of online movie reviews across cultures. Electron Commer Res Appl 2010; 9: 374–385.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI