Outcomes evaluation of robotic versus laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a propensity score matching and learning curve analysis

Strobel O, Neoptolemos J, Jäger D, Büchler MW (2019) Optimizing the outcomes of pancreatic cancer surgery. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 16:11–26

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Whipple AO (1945) Pancreaticoduodenectomy for islet carcinoma : a five-year follow-up. Ann Surg 121:847–852

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Gagner M, Pomp A (1994) Laparoscopic pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy. Surg Endosc 8:408–410

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Giulianotti PC, Coratti A, Angelini M, Sbrana F, Cecconi S, Balestracci T, Caravaglios G (2003) Robotics in general surgery: personal experience in a large community hospital. Arch Surg 138:777–784

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Zhang Z, Yin T, Qin T, Pan S, Wang M, Zhang H, Qin R (2022) Comparison of laparoscopic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients with resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: A propensity score-matching analysis of long-term survival. Pancreatology 22:317–324

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Qiu H, Zhang L, Wang D, Miao H, Zhang Y (2022) Comparisons of short-term and long-term results between laparoscopic between open pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic tumors: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Genet 13:1072229

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Mazzola M, Giani A, Crippa J, Morini L, Zironda A, Bertoglio CL, De Martini P, Magistro C, Ferrari G (2021) Totally laparoscopic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy: a propensity score matching analysis of short-term outcomes. Eur J Surg Oncol 47:674–680

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Uijterwijk BA, Wei K, Kasai M, Ielpo B, Hilst JV, Chinnusamy P, Lemmers DHL, Burdio F, Senthilnathan P, Besselink MG, Abu Hilal M, Qin R (2023) Minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: individual patient data meta-analysis of randomized trials. Eur J Surg Oncol 49:1351–1361

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Shyr BU, Shyr BS, Chen SC, Shyr YM, Wang SE (2022) Propensity score-matched comparison of the oncological feasibility and survival outcomes for pancreatic adenocarcinoma with robotic and open pancreatoduodenectomy. Surg Endosc 36:1507–1514

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Mejia A, Shah J, Vivian E, Beard R, Acharya P, Gutierrez JCB (2022) Outcomes in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) undergoing robotic (RPD) or open pancreaticoduodenectomies (OPD): a propensity score-weighted survival analysis. J Robot Surg

Freschi C, Ferrari V, Melfi F, Ferrari M, Mosca F, Cuschieri A (2013) Technical review of the da Vinci surgical telemanipulator. Int J Med Robot 9:396–406

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hotton J, Bogart E, Le Deley MC, Lambaudie E, Narducci F, Marchal F (2023) Ergonomic assessment of the surgeon’s physical workload during robot-assisted versus standard laparoscopy in a french multicenter randomized trial (ROBOGYN-1004 Trial). Ann Surg Oncol 30:916–923

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Beane JD, Borrebach JD, Zureikat AH, Kilbane EM, Thompson VM, Pitt HA (2021) Optimal pancreatic surgery: are we making progress in North America? Ann Surg 274:e355–e363

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Jang JY, Kang CM, Kim H, Choi M, Lee JH, Choi SH (2023) Which one is better? Laparoscopic versus robotic reconstruction in the remnant soft pancreas with a small pancreatic duct following pancreaticoduodenectomy: a multicenter study with propensity score matching analysis. Surg Endosc 37:4028–4039

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Zong K, Luo K, Chen K, Ye J, Liu W, Zhai W (2022) A comparative study of robotics and laparoscopic in minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy: a single-center experience. Front Oncol 12:960241

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Kim H, Choi SH, Jang JY, Choi M, Lee JH, Kang CM (2022) Multicenter comparison of totally laparoscopic and totally robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy: propensity score and learning curve-matching analyses. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 29:311–321

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

van Oosten AF, Ding D, Habib JR, Irfan A, Schmocker RK, Sereni E, Kinny-Köster B, Wright M, Groot VP, Molenaar IQ, Cameron JL, Makary M, Burkhart RA, Burns WR, Wolfgang CL, He J (2021) Perioperative outcomes of robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a propensity-matched analysis to open and laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 25:1795–1804

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wente MN, Bassi C, Dervenis C, Fingerhut A, Gouma DJ, Izbicki JR, Neoptolemos JP, Padbury RT, Sarr MG, Traverso LW, Yeo CJ, Büchler MW (2007) Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreatic surgery: a suggested definition by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery 142:761–768

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bassi C, Marchegiani G, Dervenis C, Sarr M, Abu Hilal M, Adham M, Allen P, Andersson R, Asbun HJ, Besselink MG, Conlon K, Del Chiaro M, Falconi M, Fernandez-Cruz L, Fernandez-Del Castillo C, Fingerhut A, Friess H, Gouma DJ, Hackert T, Izbicki J, Lillemoe KD, Neoptolemos JP, Olah A, Schulick R, Shrikhande SV, Takada T, Takaori K, Traverso W, Vollmer CR, Wolfgang CL, Yeo CJ, Salvia R, Buchler M (2017) The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 Years After. Surgery 161:584–591

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wente MN, Veit JA, Bassi C, Dervenis C, Fingerhut A, Gouma DJ, Izbicki JR, Neoptolemos JP, Padbury RT, Sarr MG, Yeo CJ, Büchler MW (2007) Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH): an International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) definition. Surgery 142:20–25

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Koch M, Garden OJ, Padbury R, Rahbari NN, Adam R, Capussotti L, Fan ST, Yokoyama Y, Crawford M, Makuuchi M, Christophi C, Banting S, Brooke-Smith M, Usatoff V, Nagino M, Maddern G, Hugh TJ, Vauthey JN, Greig P, Rees M, Nimura Y, Figueras J, DeMatteo RP, Büchler MW, Weitz J (2011) Bile leakage after hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: a definition and grading of severity by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery. Surgery 149:680–688

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Maggino L, Malleo G, Bassi C, Allegrini V, McMillan MT, Borin A, Chen B, Drebin JA, Ecker BL, Fraker DL, Lee MK, Paiella S, Roses RE, Salvia R, Vollmer CM Jr (2019) Decoding grade B pancreatic fistula: a clinical and economical analysis and subclassification proposal. Ann Surg 269:1146–1153

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD, de Santibañes E, Pekolj J, Slankamenac K, Bassi C, Graf R, Vonlanthen R, Padbury R, Cameron JL, Makuuchi M (2009) The Clavien–Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 250:187–196

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Nickel F, Kuemmerli C, Müller PC, Schmidt MW, Schmidt LP, Wise P, Klotz R, Tjaden C, Diener M, Probst P, Hackert T, Büchler MW (2024) The PAncreatic Surgery Composite Endpoint PACE - development and validation of a clinically relevant endpoint requiring lower sample sizes. Ann Surg

Dai M, Li P, Xu Q, Chen L, Liu W, Han X, Liu Q, Chen H, Yuan S, Chen W, Liao Q, Zhang T, Guo J (2024) Learning curve of robotic pancreatoduodenectomy by a single surgeon with extensive laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy experience. J Robot Surg 18:298

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Dai M, Liu Q, Xing C, Tian X, Cao F, Tang W, Lv S, Ma Y, Zhang D, Kleeff J, Yang Y, Liu R, He Q, Li F, Li G, Guo J, Liao Q, Zhao Y (2022) Early drain removal is safe in patients with low or intermediate risk of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a multicenter, randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 275:e307–e314

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Müller PC, Kuemmerli C, Cizmic A, Sinz S, Probst P, de Santibanes M, Shrikhande SV, Tschuor C, Loos M, Mehrabi A, Z’Graggen K, Müller-Stich BP, Hackert T, Büchler MW, Nickel F (2022) Learning curves in open, laparoscopic, and robotic pancreatic surgery: a systematic review and proposal of a standardization. Ann Surg Open 3:e111

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Yao XI, Wang X, Speicher PJ, Hwang ES, Cheng P, Harpole DH, Berry MF, Schrag D, Pang HH (2017) Reporting and guidelines in propensity score analysis: a systematic review of cancer and cancer surgical studies. J Natl Cancer Inst 109

Goh BKP, Low TY, Kam JH, Lee SY, Chan CY (2019) Initial experience with laparoscopic and robotic surgery for the treatment of periampullary tumours: single institution experience with the first 30 consecutive cases. ANZ J Surg 89:E137-e141

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Liu R, Zhang T, Zhao ZM, Tan XL, Zhao GD, Zhang X, Xu Y (2017) The surgical outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy versus laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary neoplasms: a comparative study of a single center. Surg Endosc 31:2380–2386

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Zimmerman AM, Roye DG, Charpentier KP (2018) A comparison of outcomes between open, laparoscopic and robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy. HPB (Oxford) 20:364–369

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ouyang L, Zhang J, Feng Q, Zhang Z, Ma H, Zhang G (2022) Robotic versus laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: an up-to-date system review and meta-analysis. Front Oncol 12:834382

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Kamarajah SK, Bundred J, Marc OS, Jiao LR, Manas D, Abu Hilal M, White SA (2020) Robotic versus conventional laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol 46:6–14

Article  PubMed 

Comments (0)

No login
gif