Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Long-term care facility resident assessment instrument 3.0 user’s manual. (2015).

Rahman, A. N., & Applebaum, R. A. (2009). The nursing home minimum data set assessment instrument: Manifest functions and unintended consequences—Past, present, and future. The Gerontologist, 49, 727–735.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

De Almeido, Mello J., Wellens, N. I., Hermans, K., De Stampa, M., Cerase, V., Vereker, N., Jónsson, P. V., Finne-Soveri, H., Meehan, B., & Declercq, A. (2023). The implementation of integrated health information systems: Research studies from 7 countries involving the InterRAI assessment system. International Journal of Integrated Care, 23, 1–24.

Google Scholar 

Department of Health and Social Care. (2023). Care data matters: A roadmap for better data for adult social care. London. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/care-data-matters-a-roadmap-for-better-adult-social-care-data.

Towers, A. M., Gordon, A., Wolters, A. T., Allan, S., Rand, S., Webster, L. A., Crellin, E., Brine, R. J., De Corte, K., Akdur, G., & Irvine, L. (2023). Piloting of a minimum data set for older people living in care homes in England: Protocol for a longitudinal, mixed-methods study. BMJ Open, 13, 1–8.

Article  Google Scholar 

Burton, J. K., Wolters, A. T., Towers, A. M., Jones, L., Meyer, J., Gordon, A. L., Irvine, L., Hanratty, B., Spilsbury, K., Peryer, G., & Rand, S. (2022). Developing a minimum data set for older adult care homes in the UK: Exploring the concept and defining early core principles. The Lancet Healthy Longevity, 3, e186-93.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Akdur, G., Irvine, L., Rand, S., Towers, A. –M., Webster, L., Spilsbury, K., et al. National stakeholder consultation on how to measure care home residents’ quality of life. Health and Social Care Delivery Research. (in submission)

EuroQol Research Foundation. EQ-5D-5L User Guide. (2019).

Dichter, M. N., Ettema, T. P., Schwab, C. G. G., Meyer, G., Bartholomeyczik, S., & Halek, M., et al. (2016). QUALIDEM—User Guide. Witten/Amsterdam.

Ettema, T. P., Dröes, R. M., De Lange, J., Mellenbergh, G. J., & Ribbe, M. W. (2007). QUALIDEM: Development and evaluation of a Dementia specific quality of life instrument. Scalability, reliability and internal structure. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 22, 549–56.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Coast, J., Kinghorn, P., & Mitchell, P. (2015). The development of capability measures in health economics: Opportunities. Challenges and Progress Patient, 8, 119–126.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Proud, L., McLoughlin, C., & Kinghorn, P. (2019). ICECAP-O, the current state of play: A systematic review of studies reporting the psychometric properties and use of the instrument over the decade since its publication. Quality of Life Research, 28, 1429–1439.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Rand, S., Caiels, J., Collins, G., & Forder, J. (2017). Developing a proxy version of the Adult social care outcome toolkit (ASCOT). Health Qual Life Outcomes, 15, 108.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Mokkink, L. B., Terwee, C. B., Patrick, D. L., Alonso, J., Stratford, P. W., Knol, D. L., Bouter, L. M., & de Vet, H. C. W. (2010). The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63, 737–745.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Netten, A., Burge, P., Malley, J., Potoglou, D., Towers, A.-M.M., Brazier, J., Flynn, T., Forder, J., & Wall, B. (2012). Outcomes of social care for adults: Developing a preference-weighted measure. Health Technology Assessment (Rockv), 16, 1–165.

CAS  Google Scholar 

Rand, S., Malley, J., Towers, A. M., Netten, A., & Forder, J. (2017). Validity and test-retest reliability of the self-completion adult social care outcomes toolkit (ASCOT-SCT4) with adults with long-term physical, sensory and mental health conditions in England. Health and Quality Life Outcomes, 15, 163. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-017-0739-0

Article  Google Scholar 

Nguyen, L., Linnosmaa, I., Jokimäki, H., Rand, S., Malley, J., Razik, K., Trukeschitz, B., & Forder, J. (2021). Social care-related outcomes in Finland. Construct validity and structural characteristics of the Finnish ASCOT measure with older home care users. Health and Social Care in the Community, 29, 712–28.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Trukeschitz, B., Hajji, A., Litschauer, J., Malley, J., Schoch, A., Rand, S., Linnosmaa, I., & Forder, J. (2021). Translation, cultural adaptation and construct validity of the German version of the adult social care outcomes toolkit for informal carers (German ASCOT-Carer). Quality of Life Research, 30, 905–920.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Nakamura-Thomas, H., Morikawa, M., Moriyama, Y., Shiroiwa, T., Kyougoku, M., Razik, K., & Malley, J. (2019). Japanese translation and cross-cultural validation of the adult social care outcomes toolkit (ASCOT) in Japanese social service users. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 17, 59.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Towers, A.-M., Smith, N., Allan, S., Vadean, F., Collins, G., Rand, S., Bostock, J., Ramsbottom, H., Forder, J., Lanza, S., & Cassell, J. (2021). Care home residents’ quality of life and its association with CQC ratings and workforce issues: The MiCareHQ mixed-methods study. Health Services and Delivery Research, 9, 1–188.

Article  Google Scholar 

Towers, A.-M., Smith, N., Palmer, S., Welch, E., & Netten, A. (2016). The acceptability and feasibility of using the Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit (ASCOT) to inform practice in care homes. BMC Health Services Research, 16, 523.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Alzheimer’s Society. Fix dementia care: NHS and care homes. London. 2016. https://www.alzheimers.org.uk/sites/default/files/migrate/downloads/fix_dementia_care_nhs_and_care_homes_report.pdf

Caiels, J., Rand, S., Crowther, T., Collins, G., & Forder, J. (2019). Exploring the views of being a proxy from the perspective of unpaid carers and paid carers: Developing a proxy version of the adult social care outcomes toolkit (ASCOT). BMC Health Services Research. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4025-1

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Rand SE, Caiels J. Using proxies to assess quality of life: A review of the issues and challenges [Internet]. Canterbury: Personal Social Services Research Unit, University of Kent; 2015. Available from: https://www.pssru.ac.uk/pub/4980.pdf

Silarova, B., Rand, S., Towers, A. M., & Jones, K. (2023). Feasibility, validity and reliability of the ASCOT-Proxy and ASCOT-Carer among unpaid carers of people living with dementia in England. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 21, 54. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-023-02122-0

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

NHS England. Adult Social Care User Survey (ASCS) 2022–23 guidance and materials for councils [Internet]. 2023. [cited 2023 Jun 5]. Available from: https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/data-collections-and-data-sets/data-collections/social-care-user-surveys/adult-social-care-user-survey-ascs-2022-23

Linacre M. A users guide to winsteps/ministep Rasch model computer programs. Program Manual 4.5.1 [Internet]. [cited 2020 Feb 19]. Available from: http://www.winsteps.com/a/Winsteps-ManualPDF.zip

Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factor simplicity. Psychometrika, 39, 31–36.

Article  Google Scholar 

Bartlett, M. S. (1954). A note on multiplying factors for various chi-squared approximations. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 16, 296–8.

Google Scholar 

Holgado-Tello, F. P., Chacón-Moscoso, S., Barbero-García, I., Vila-Abad, E., Holgado-Tello, F. P., Barbero-García, I., & Vila-Abad, E. (2008). Polychoric versus Pearson correlations in exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis of ordinal variables. Quality & Quantity, 44, 153–66.

Article  Google Scholar 

Kolenikov S. Polychoric, by any other “namelist”. Stata Conference 2016. Chicago: StataCorp, L.P; 2016.

Horn, J. L. (1965). A rationale and technique for estimating the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30, 179–185.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Dinno, A. (2009). Implementing Horn’s parallel analysis for principal component analysis and factor analysis. Symposium (International) on Combustion, 9, 291–298.

Google Scholar 

Dinno, A. paran. Horn’s Test of Principal Components/Factors (Parallel Analysis). Version: 1.5.3 (updated December 16, 2015) [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2023 Mar 1]. Available from: https://www.alexisdinno.com/stata/paran.html

Humphreys, L. G., & Montanelli, R. G. (1975). An investigation of the parallel analysis criterion for determining the number of common factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 10, 193–205.

Article  Google Scholar 

Fabrigar, L. R., MacCallum, R. C., Wegener, D. T., & Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4, 272–299.

Article  Google Scholar 

Glorfeld, L. W. (1995). An improvement on Horn’s parallel analysis methodology for selecting the correct number of factors to retain. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 55, 377–393.

Article  Google Scholar 

Tennant, A., McKenna, S. P., & Hagell, P. (2004). Application of Rasch analysis in the development and application of quality of life instruments. Value in Health., 7, S22–S26.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Boone, W. J. (2016). Rasch analysis for instrument development: Why, when, and how? CBE Life Sciences Education, 15, rm4.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Pallant, J. F., & Tennant, A. (2007). An introduction to the Rasch measurement model: An example using the hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS). British Journal of Clinical Psychology., 46, 1–18.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Masters, G. N. (1982). A rasch model for partial credit scoring. Psychometrika, 47, 149–174.

Article  Google Scholar 

Tennant, A., & Conaghan, P. G. (2007). The Rasch measurement model in rheumatology: What is it and why use it? When should it be applied, and what should one look for in a Rasch paper? Arthritis Care Research (Hoboken), 57, 1358–62. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.23108

Article  Google Scholar 

Bond, T., & Fox, C. (2015). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences. LEA.

Book  Google Scholar 

Lambert, S., McCusker, J., Belzile, E., Yaffe, M., Ihejirika, C., Richardson, J., & Bartlett, S. (2021). Using confirmatory factor analysis and Rasch analysis to examine the dimensionality of the patient assessment of care for chronic illness care (PACIC). Quality of Life Research, 30, 1503–1512.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Souza, M. A. P., Coster, W. J., Mancini, M. C., Dutra, F. C. M. S., Kramer, J., & Sampaio, R. F. (2017). Rasch analysis of the participation scale (P-scale): Usefulness of the P-scale to a rehabilitation services network. BMC Public Health, 17, 934.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Shea, T. L., Tennant, A., & Pallant, J. F. (2009). Rasch model analysis of the depression, anxiety and stress scales (DASS). BMC Psychiatry, 9, 1–10.

Article  Google Scholar 

Linacre, M. (2002). Optimizing rating scale category efectiveness. Journal of Applied Measurement, 3, 85–106.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hair, J. F., Tatham, R. L., Anderson, R. E., & Black, W. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). Prentice-Hall.

Google Scholar 

Rand, S., Towers, A.-M., Malley, J., & Silarova, B. (2023). Exploring the structural characteristics of the adult social care outcomes toolkit (ASCOT) and ASCOT-Carer. NIHR Open Research, 2, 21.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central