Preliminary analysis of predicting the first recurrence in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration using deep learning

Friedman DS, O’Colmain BJ, Muñoz B, Tomany SC, McCarty C, de Jong PT, Nemesure B, Mitchell P, Kempen J. Prevalence of age-related macular degeneration in the United States. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004;122(4):564–72. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.122.4.564.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Quartilho A, Simkiss P, Zekite A, Xing W, Wormald R, Bunce C. Leading causes of certifiable visual loss in England and Wales during the year ending 31 March 2013. Eye (Lond). 2016;30(4):602–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2015.288.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Rosenfeld PJ, Brown DM, Heier JS, Boyer DS, Kaiser PK, Chung CY, Kim RY. Ranibizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(14):1419–31.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Regillo CD, Brown DM, Abraham P, Yue H, Ianchulev T, Schneider S, Shams N. Randomized, double-masked, sham-controlled trial of ranibizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration: PIER Study year 1. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008;145(2):239–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2007.10.004.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Schmidt-Erfurth U, Eldem B, Guymer R, Korobelnik JF, Schlingemann RO, Axer-Siegel R, Wiedemann P, Simader C, Gekkieva M, Weichselberger A. Efficacy and safety of monthly versus quarterly ranibizumab treatment in neovascular age-related macular degeneration: the EXCITE study. Ophthalmology. 2011;118(5):831–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.09.004.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kuroda Y, Yamashiro K, Miyake M, Yoshikawa M, Nakanishi H, Oishi A, Tamura H, Ooto S, Tsujikawa A, Yoshimura N. Factors associated with recurrence of age-related macular degeneration after anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment: a retrospective cohort study. Ophthalmology. 2015;122(11):2303–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.06.053.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cho JH, Ryoo NK, Cho KH, Park SJ, Park KH, Woo SJ. Incidence rate of massive submacular hemorrhage and its risk factors in polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy. Am J Ophthalmol. 2016;169:79–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2016.06.014.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Jaffe GJ, Ying GS, Toth CA, Daniel E, Grunwald JE, Martin DF, Maguire MG. Macular morphology and visual acuity in year five of the comparison of age-related macular degeneration treatments trials. Ophthalmology. 2019;126(2):252–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.08.035.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kaiser PK, Wykoff CC, Singh RP, Khanani AM, Do DV, Patel H, Patel N. Retinal fluid and thickness as measures of disease activity in neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Retina. 2021;41(8):1579–86. https://doi.org/10.1097/iae.0000000000003194.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Simader C, Ritter M, Bolz M, Deák GG, Mayr-Sponer U, Golbaz I, Kundi M, Schmidt-Erfurth UM. Morphologic parameters relevant for visual outcome during anti-angiogenic therapy of neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology. 2014;121(6):1237–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.12.029.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Burlina PM, Joshi N, Pekala M, Pacheco KD, Freund DE, Bressler NM. Automated grading of age-related macular degeneration from color fundus images using deep convolutional neural networks. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2017;135(11):1170–6. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2017.3782.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Treder M, Lauermann JL, Eter N. Automated detection of exudative age-related macular degeneration in spectral domain optical coherence tomography using deep learning. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018;256(2):259–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-017-3850-3.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hwang DK, Hsu CC, Chang KJ, Chao D, Sun CH, Jheng YC, Yarmishyn AA, Wu JC, Tsai CY, Wang ML, et al. Artificial intelligence-based decision-making for age-related macular degeneration. Theranostics. 2019;9(1):232–45. https://doi.org/10.7150/thno.28447.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Gutfleisch M, Ester O, Aydin S, Quassowski M, Spital G, Lommatzsch A, Rothaus K, Dubis AM, Pauleikhoff D. Clinically applicable deep learning-based decision aids for treatment of neovascular AMD. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2022;260(7):2217–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-022-05565-1.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bogunovic H, Waldstein SM, Schlegl T, Langs G, Sadeghipour A, Liu X, Gerendas BS, Osborne A, Schmidt-Erfurth U. Prediction of anti-VEGF treatment requirements in neovascular AMD using a machine learning approach. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2017;58(7):3240–8. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.16-21053.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gallardo M, Munk MR, Kurmann T, De Zanet S, Mosinska A, Karagoz IK, Zinkernagel MS, Wolf S, Sznitman R. Machine learning can predict anti-VEGF treatment demand in a treat-and-extend regimen for patients with neovascular AMD, DME, and RVO associated macular edema. Ophthalmol Retina. 2021;5(7):604–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oret.2021.05.002.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Rohm M, Tresp V, Müller M, Kern C, Manakov I, Weiss M, Sim DA, Priglinger S, Keane PA, Kortuem K. Predicting visual acuity by using machine learning in patients treated for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology. 2018;125(7):1028–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.12.034.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Fu DJ, Faes L, Wagner SK, Moraes G, Chopra R, Patel PJ, Balaskas K, Keenan TDL, Bachmann LM, Keane PA. Predicting incremental and future visual change in neovascular age-related macular degeneration using deep learning. Ophthalmol Retina. 2021;5(11):1074–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oret.2021.01.009.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Abbas A, O’Byrne C, Fu DJ, Moraes G, Balaskas K, Struyven R, Beqiri S, Wagner SK, Korot E, Keane PA. Evaluating an automated machine learning model that predicts visual acuity outcomes in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2022;260(8):2461–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-021-05544-y.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Refaeilzadeh P, Tang L, Liu H. Cross-validation. Encyclopedia Database Syst. 2009;5:532–8.

Article  Google Scholar 

Melinščak M, Radmilović M, Vatavuk Z, Lončarić S. Annotated retinal optical coherence tomography images (AROI) database for joint retinal layer and fluid segmentation. Automatika. 2021;62(3–4):375–85.

Article  Google Scholar 

Ronneberger O, Fischer P, Brox T. U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. In: Navab N, Hornegger J, Wells W, Frangi A, editors. Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2015. MICCAI 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 9351. Cham: Springer; 2015. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_28.

Jadon S. A survey of loss functions for semantic segmentation. In: 2020 IEEE Conference on Computational Intelligence in Bioinformatics and Computational Biology (CIBCB): 2020: IEEE; 2020. p. 1–7. https://arxiv.org/abs/2006.14822.

He K, Zhang X, Ren S, Sun J. Deep residual learning for image recognition. Proc IEEE Conf Comp Vis Pattern Recognit. 2016;2016:770–8.

Google Scholar 

Tercan H, Guajardo A, Heinisch J, Thiele T, Hopmann C, Meisen T. Transfer-learning: Bridging the gap between real and simulation data for machine learning in injection molding. Procedia Cirp. 2018;72:185–90.

Article  Google Scholar 

Mandrekar JN. Receiver operating characteristic curve in diagnostic test assessment. J Thorac Oncol. 2010;5(9):1315–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/JTO.0b013e3181ec173d.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics. 1988;44(3):837–45.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Selvaraju RR, Cogswell M, Das A, Vedantam R, Parikh D, Batra D. Grad-cam: Visual explanations from deep networks via gradient-based localization. Proc IEEE Int Conf Comput Vis. 2017;2017:618–26.

Google Scholar 

Schmidt-Erfurth U, Waldstein SM, Klimscha S, Sadeghipour A, Hu X, Gerendas BS, Osborne A, Bogunovic H. Prediction of individual disease conversion in early AMD using artificial intelligence. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2018;59(8):3199–208. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.18-24106.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ajana S, Cougnard-Grégoire A, Colijn JM, Merle BMJ, Verzijden T, de Jong P, Hofman A, Vingerling JR, Hejblum BP, Korobelnik JF, et al. Predicting progression to advanced age-related macular degeneration from clinical, genetic, and lifestyle factors using machine learning. Ophthalmology. 2021;128(4):587–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.08.031.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pfau M, Sahu S, Rupnow RA, Romond K, Millet D, Holz FG, Schmitz-Valckenberg S, Fleckenstein M, Lim JI, de Sisternes L, et al. Probabilistic forecasting of anti-VEGF treatment frequency in neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2021;10(7):30. https://doi.org/10.1167/tvst.10.7.30.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Chandra RS, Ying GS. Evaluation of multiple machine learning models for predicting number of anti-VEGF injections in the Comparison of AMD Treatment Trials (CATT). Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2023;12(1):18. https://doi.org/10.1167/tvst.12.1.18.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Romo-Bucheli D, Erfurth US, Bogunovic H. End-to-End Deep learning model for predicting treatment requirements in neovascular AMD from longitudinal retinal OCT imaging. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2020;24(12):3456–65. https://doi.org/10.1109/jbhi.2020.3000136.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Freund KB, Zweifel SA, Engelbert M. Do we need a new classification for choroidal neovascularization in age-related macular degeneration? Retina. 2010;30(9):1333–49. https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0b013e3181e7976b.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Nagiel A, Sarraf D, Sadda SR, Spaide RF, Jung JJ, Bhavsar KV, Ameri H, Querques G, Freund KB. Type 3 neovascularization: evolution, association with pigment epithelial detachment, and treatment response as revealed by spectral domain optical coherence tomography. Retina. 2015;35(4):638–47. https://doi.org/10.1097/iae.0000000000000488.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Comments (0)

No login
gif