Almoqbel FM, Yadav NK, Leat SJ, Head LM, Irving EL (2011) Effects of sweep VEP parameters on visual acuity and contrast thresholds in children and adults. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 249(4):613–623

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bach M (1996) The Freiburg visual acuity test–automatic measurement of visual acuity. Optom vis Sci 73(1):49–53

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bach M (2007) The Freiburg visual acuity test-variability unchanged by post-hoc re-analysis. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 245(7):965–971

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bach M, Farmer JD (2020) Evaluation of the “Freiburg Acuity VEP” on commercial equipment. Doc Ophthalmol 140(2):139–145

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bach M, Meigen T (1999) Do’s and don’ts in Fourier analysis of steady-state potentials. Doc Ophthalmol 99(1):69–82

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bach M, Maurer JP, Wolf ME (2008) Visual evoked potential-based acuity assessment in normal vision, artificially degraded vision, and in patients. Br J Ophthalmol 92(3):396–403

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bourne RRA, Flaxman SR, Braithwaite T, Cicinelli MV, Das A, Jonas JB, Keeffe J, Kempen JH, Leasher J, Limburg H, Naidoo K, Pesudovs K, Resnikoff S, Silvester A, Stevens GA, Tahhan N, Wong TY, Taylor HR, Bourne R, Ackland P, Arditi A, Barkana Y, Bozkurt B, Braithwaite T, Bron A, Budenz D, Cai F, Casson R, Chakravarthy U, Choi J, Cicinelli MV, Congdon N, Dana R, Dandona R, Dandona L, Das A, Dekaris I, Del Monte M, Deva J, Dreer L, Ellwein L, Frazier M, Frick K, Friedman D, Furtado J, Gao H, Gazzard G, George R, Gichuhi S, Gonzalez V, Hammond B, Hartnett ME, He M, Hejtmancik J, Hirai F, Huang J, Ingram A, Javitt J, Jonas J, Joslin C, Keeffe J, Kempen J, Khairallah M, Khanna R, Kim J, Lambrou G, Lansingh VC, Lanzetta P, Leasher J, Lim J, Limburg H, Mansouri K, Mathew A, Morse A, Munoz B, Musch D, Naidoo K, Nangia V, Palaiou M, Parodi MB, Pena FY, Pesudovs K, Peto T, Quigley H, Raju M, Ramulu P, Resnikoff S, Robin A, Rossetti L, Saaddine J, Sandar MYA, Serle J, Shen T, Shetty R, Sieving P, Silva JC, Silvester A, Sitorus RS, Stambolian D, Stevens G, Taylor H, Tejedor J, Tielsch J, Tsilimbaris M, van Meurs J, Varma R, Virgili G, Volmink J, Wang YX, Wang N-L, West S, Wiedemann P, Wong T, Wormald R, Zheng Y (2017) Magnitude, temporal trends, and projections of the global prevalence of blindness and distance and near vision impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Glob Health 5(9):e888–e897

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Chen X, Wang Y, Gao S, Jung TP, Gao X (2015) Filter bank canonical correlation analysis for implementing a high-speed SSVEP-based brain-computer interface. J Neural Eng 12(4):046008

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Dragomiretskiy K, Zosso D (2014) Variational mode decomposition. IEEE Trans Signal Process 62(3):531–544

Article  Google Scholar 

Engel BT, Bickford AF (1961) Response specificity. Stimulus-response and individual-response specificity in essential hypertensives. Arch Gen Psychiatry 5:478–489

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Fahad A, Leat SJ, Elizabeth I (2008) The technique, validity and clinical use of the sweep VEP. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 28(5):393–403

Article  Google Scholar 

Farwell LA, Martinerie JM, Bashore TR, Rapp PE, Goddard PH (1993) Optimal digital filters for long-latency components of the event-related brain potential. Psychophysiology 30(3):306–315

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Fricke TR, Tahhan N, Resnikoff S, Papas E, Burnett A, Ho SM, Naduvilath T, Naidoo KS (2018) global prevalence of presbyopia and vision impairment from uncorrected presbyopia: systematic review, meta-analysis, and modelling. Ophthalmology 125(10):1492–1499

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Friman O, Volosyak I, Graser A (2007) Multiple channel detection of steady-state visual evoked potentials for brain-computer interfaces. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 54(4):742–750

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Good WV, Hou C (2006) Sweep visual evoked potential grating acuity thresholds paradoxically improve in low-luminance conditions in children with cortical visual impairment. Invest Ophthalmol vis Sci 47(7):3220–3224

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hamilton R, Bach M, Heinrich SP, Hoffmann MB, Odom JV, McCulloch DL, Thompson DA (2021a) ISCEV extended protocol for VEP methods of estimation of visual acuity. Doc Ophthalmol 142(1):17–24

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hamilton R, Bach M, Heinrich SP, Hoffmann MB, Odom JV, McCulloch DL, Thompson DA (2021b) VEP estimation of visual acuity: a systematic review. Doc Ophthalmol 142(1):25–74

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Huang NE, Shen Z, Long SR, Wu MLC, Shih HH, Zheng QN, Yen NC, Tung CC, Liu HH (1998) The empirical mode decomposition and the Hilbert spectrum for nonlinear and non-stationary time series analysis. Proc R Soc Math Phys Eng Sci 454(1971):903–995

Article  Google Scholar 

Incesu AI, Sobaci G (2011) Malingering or simulation in ophthalmology -visual acuity. Int J Ophthalmol 4(5):558–566

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Knotzele J, Heinrich SP (2019) Can VEP-based acuity estimates in one eye be improved by applying knowledge from the other eye? Doc Ophthalmol 139(2):161–168

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kurtenbach A, Langrova H, Messias A, Zrenner E, Jagle H (2013) A comparison of the performance of three visual evoked potential-based methods to estimate visual acuity. Doc Ophthalmol 126(1):45–56

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lauritzen L, Jorgensen MH, Michaelsen KF (2004) Test-retest reliability of swept visual evoked potential measurements of infant visual acuity and contrast sensitivity. Pediatr Res 55(4):701–708

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Liu B, Huang X, Wang Y, Chen X, Gao X (2020) BETA: a large benchmark database toward SSVEP-BCI application. Front Neurosci 14:627

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Martin Bland J, Altman D (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. The Lancet 327(8476):307–310

Article  Google Scholar 

Meigen T, Bach M (1999) On the statistical significance of electrophysiological steady-state responses. Doc Ophthalmol 98(3):207–232

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Norcia AM, Tyler CW (1985) Infant VEP acuity measurements: analysis of individual differences and measurement error. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 61(5):359–369

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Norcia AM, Appelbaum LG, Ales JM, Cottereau BR, Rossion B (2015) The steady-state visual evoked potential in vision research: a review. J vis 15(6):4

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Odom JV, Bach M, Brigell M, Holder GE, McCulloch DL, Mizota A, Tormene AP, International Society for Clinical Electrophysiology of V (2016) ISCEV standard for clinical visual evoked potentials: (2016 update). Doc Ophthalmol 133(1):1–9

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Rapp PE, Albano AM, Schmah TI, Farwell LA (1993) Filtered noise can mimic low-dimensional chaotic attractors. Phys Rev E Stat Phys Plasmas Fluids Relat Interdiscip Topics 47(4):2289–2297

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Reich LN, Ekabutr M (2002) The effects of optical defocus on the legibility of the Tumbling-E and Landolt-C. Optom vis Sci 79(6):389–393

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Rejer I (2017) Wavelet transform in detection of the subject specific frequencies for SSVEP-based BCI. In: Kobayashi S-Y, Piegat A, Pejaś J, El Fray I, Kacprzyk J (eds) Hard and soft computing for artificial intelligence, multimedia and security. Springer, Cham, pp 146–155

Chapter  Google Scholar 

Ridder WH 3rd (2019) A comparison of contrast sensitivity and sweep visual evoked potential (sVEP) acuity estimates in normal humans. Doc Ophthalmol 139(3):207–219

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Skoczenski AM, Norcia AM (1999) Development of VEP Vernier acuity and grating acuity in human infants. Invest Ophthalmol vis Sci 40(10):2411–2417

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Tyler CW, Apkarian P, Levi DM, Nakayama K (1979) Rapid assessment of visual function: an electronic sweep technique for the pattern visual evoked potential. Invest Ophthalmol vis Sci 18(7):703–713

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wang Y, Chen X, Gao X, Gao S (2017) A benchmark dataset for SSVEP-based brain-computer interfaces. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 25(10):1746–1752

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Yadav NK, Almoqbel F, Head L, Irving EL, Leat SJ (2009) Threshold determination in sweep VEP and the effects of criterion. Doc Ophthalmol 119(2):109–121

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Zhang K, Xu G, Du C, Wu Y, Zheng X, Zhang S, Han C, Liang R, Chen R (2021) Weak feature extraction and strong noise suppression for SSVEP-EEG based on chaotic detection technology. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 29:862–871

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Zhang Y, Xie SQ, Wang H, Zhang Z (2021b) Data analytics in steady-state visual evoked potential-based brain-computer interface: a review. IEEE Sens J 21(2):1124–1138

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Zheng X, Xu G, Wang Y, Han C, Du C, Yan W, Zhang S, Liang R (2019) Objective and quantitative assessment of visual acuity and contrast sensitivity based on steady-state motion visual evoked potentials using concentric-ring paradigm. Doc Ophthalmol 139(2):123–136

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Zheng X, Xu G, Wu Y, Wang Y, Du C, Wu Y, Zhang S, Han C (2020a) Comparison of the performance of six stimulus paradigms in visual acuity assessment based on steady-state visual evoked potentials. Doc Ophthalmol 141(3):237–251