Dingley J, Stephenson J, Allender V, Dawson S, Williams D. Changes in hardness and resilience of i-gelTM cuffs with temperature: a benchtop study. Anaesthesia 2018; 73: 856–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.14300

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hoda MQ, Samad K, Ullah H. ProSeal versus classic laryngeal mask airway (LMA) for positive pressure ventilation in adults undergoing elective surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; 7: CD009026. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd009026.pub2

Article  Google Scholar 

Lai CJ, Yeh YC, Tu YK, Cheng YJ, Liu CM, Fan SZ. Comparison of the efficacy of supraglottic airway devices in low-risk adult patients: a network meta-analysis and systematic review. Sci Rep 2021; 11: 15074. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-94114-7

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Zhang X, Chen M, Li Q. The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway is more effective than the LMA-Classic in pediatric anesthesia: a meta-analysis. J Clin Anesth 2012; 24: 639–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2012.04.012

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Rustagi P, Patkar GA, Ourasang AK, Tendolkar BA. Effect of pneumoperitoneum and lateral position on oropharyngeal seal pressures of Proseal LMA in laparoscopic urological procedures. J Clin Diagn Res 2017; 11: UC05–9. https://doi.org/10.7860/jcdr/2017/22168.9422

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Kang F, Li J, Chai XQ, Yu JG, Zhang HM, Tang CL. Comparison of the i-gel laryngeal mask airway with the LMA-supreme for airway management in patients undergoing elective vertebral surgery. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 2015; 27: 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1097/ana.0000000000000088

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kim MS, Park JH, Lee KY, et al. Influence of head and neck position on the performance of supraglottic airway devices: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2019; 14: e0216673. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216673

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Kayama T. The guidelines for awake craniotomy. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2012; 52: 119–41. https://doi.org/10.2176/nmc.52.119

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Grabert J, Klaschik S, Güresir Á, et al. Supraglottic devices for airway management in awake craniotomy. Medicine (Baltimore) 2019; 98: e17473. https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000017473

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Chaki T, Tachibana S, Kumita S, et al. Head rotation reduces oropharyngeal leak pressure of the i-gel and LMA® SupremeTM in paralyzed, anesthetized patients: a randomized trial. Anesth Analg 2021; 132: 818–26. https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0000000000005150

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Mishra SK, Nawaz M, Satyapraksh MV, et al. Influence of head and neck position on oropharyngeal leak pressure and cuff position with the Proseal laryngeal mask airway and the i-gel: a randomized clinical trial. Anesthesiol Res Pract 2015; 2015: 705869. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/705869

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Maitra S, Khanna P, Baidya DK. Comparison of laryngeal mask airway Supreme and laryngeal mask airway Pro-Seal for controlled ventilation during general anaesthesia in adult patients: systematic review with meta-analysis. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2014; 31: 266–73. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.eja.0000435015.89651.3d

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Maitra S, Baidya DK, Arora MK, Bhattacharjee S, Khanna P. Laryngeal mask airway ProSeal provides higher oropharyngeal leak pressure than i-gel in adult patients under general anesthesia: a meta-analysis. J Clin Anesth 2016; 33: 298–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.04.020

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Shin HW, Yoo HN, Bae GE, et al. Comparison of oropharyngeal leak pressure and clinical performance of LMA ProSealTM and i-gel® in adults: meta-analysis and systematic review. J Int Med Res 2016; 44: 405–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/0300060515607386

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Nakayama E, Kagaya H, Saitoh E, et al. Changes in pyriform sinus morphology in the head rotated position as assessed by 320-row area detector CT. Dysphagia 2013; 28: 199–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-012-9430-0

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Komasawa N, Nishihara I, Tatsumi S, Minami T. Does prewarming the i-gel supraglottic airway device fit the larynx better compared to keeping it at room temperature for non-paralysed, sedated patients: a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open 2015; 5: e006653. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006653

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Sanuki T, Uda R, Sugioka S, et al. The influence of head and neck position on ventilation with the i-gel airway in paralysed, anaesthetised patients. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2011; 28: 597–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/eja.0b013e32834698f4

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Park SH, Han SH, Do SH, Kim JW, Kim JH. The influence of head and neck position on the oropharyngeal leak pressure and cuff position of three supraglottic airway devices. Anesth Analg 2009; 108: 112–7. https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0b013e318192376f

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kim MH, Lee JH, Choi YS, Park S, Shin S. Comparison of the laryngeal mask airway supreme and the i-gel in paralysed elderly patients: a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2018; 35: 598–604. https://doi.org/10.1097/eja.0000000000000700

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kim JT, Jeon SY, Kim CS, Kim SD, Kim HS. Alternative method for predicting optimal insertion depth of the laryngeal tube in children. Br J Anaesth 2007; 99: 704–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aem241

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Jain D, Gandhi K, Sabharwal P, Banerjee G. Mild to moderate degree of neck flexion improves sealing pressures without compromising ventilation with i-gel in anaesthetised adults: a prospective observational study. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2019; 36: 544–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/eja.0000000000000997

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Brimacombe J, Berry A. A proposed fiber-optic scoring system to standardize the assessment of laryngeal mask airway position. Anesth Analg 1993; 76: 457.

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Luthra A, Chauhan R, Jain A, Bhukal I, Mahajan S, Bala I. Comparison of two supraglottic airway devices: i-gel airway and Proseal laryngeal mask airway following digital insertion in nonparalyzed anesthetized patients. Anesth Essays Res 2019; 13: 669-75.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Jain D, Ghai B, Bala I, Gandhi K, Banerjee G. Evaluation of i-gelTM airway in different head and neck positions in anesthetized paralyzed children. Paediatr Anaesth 2015; 25: 1248–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/pan.12748

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Jain D, Ghai B, Gandhi K, Banerjee G, Bala I, Samujh R. Evaluation of i-gelTM size 2 airway in different degrees of neck flexion in anesthetized children—a prospective, self-controlled trial. Paediatr Anaesth 2016; 26: 1136–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/pan.13001

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Shin WJ, Cheong YS, Yang HS, Nishiyama T. The supraglottic airway i-gel in comparison with ProSeal laryngeal mask airway and classic laryngeal mask airway in anaesthetized patients. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2010; 27: 598–601. https://doi.org/10.1097/eja.0b013e3283340a81

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Park SK, Choi GJ, Choi YS, Ahn EJ, Kang H. Comparison of the i-gel and the laryngeal mask airway ProSeal during general anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2015; 10: e0119469. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119469

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Joly N, Poulin LP, Tanoubi I, Drolet P, Donati F, St-Pierre P. Randomized prospective trial comparing two supraglottic airway devices: i-gelTM and LMA-SupremeTM in paralyzed patients. Can J Anesth 2014; 61: 794–800. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-014-0198-6

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Prabha R, Raman R, Khan MP, Kaushal D, Siddiqui AK, Abbas H. Comparison of i-gel for general anesthesia in obese and nonobese patients. Saudi J Anaesth 2018; 12: 535–9. https://doi.org/10.4103/sja.sja_79_18

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Oji M, Koyama Y, Oshika H, et al. Effect of endotracheal tube lubrication on cuff pressure increase during nitrous oxide exposure: a laboratory and prospective randomized controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiol 2019; 19: 169. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-019-0837-0

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Fujimoto M, Kubota J, Yamamoto T. The effect of rocuronium on ventilatory leak and sealing pressure using a supraglottic airway device: a randomized clinical trial. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2020; 64: 1120–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.13608

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Maitra S, Baidya DK, Bhattacharjee S, Khanna P. Evaluation of i-gelTM airway in children: a meta-analysis. Paediatr Anaesth 2014; 24: 1072–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/pan.12483

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kimijima T, Edanaga M, Yamakage M. Superior sealing effect of a three-dimensional printed modified supraglottic airway compared with the i-gel in a three-dimensional printed airway model. J Anesth 2018; 32: 655–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-018-2531-7

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Komasawa N, Nishihara I, Tatsumi S, Minami T. Prewarming of the i-gel facilitates successful insertion and ventilation efficacy with muscle relaxation: a randomized study. J Clin Anesth 2014; 26: 663–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2014.08.009

Article