Ghosh SK. Human cadaveric dissection: a historical account from ancient Greece to the modern era. Anat Cell Biol. 2015;48(3):153–69. https://doi.org/10.5115/acb.2015.48.3.153.

Article  Google Scholar 

Ghosh SK. Cadaveric dissection as an educational tool for anatomical sciences in the 21st century. Anat Sci Educ. 2017;10(3):286–99. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1649.

Article  Google Scholar 

Ahmed K, Rowland S, Patel V, et al. Is the structure of anatomy curriculum adequate for safe medical practice? Surg. 2010;8(6):318–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SURGE.2010.06.005.

Article  Google Scholar 

Turney BW. Anatomy in a modern medical curriculum. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2007;89(2):104–7. https://doi.org/10.1308/003588407X168244.

Article  Google Scholar 

Sugand K, Abrahams P, Khurana A. The anatomy of anatomy: a review for its modernization. Anat Sci Educ. 2010;3(2):83–93. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.139.

Article  Google Scholar 

Elizondo-Omaña RE, López SG. The development of clinical reasoning skills: a major objective of the anatomy course. Anat Sci Educ. 2008;1(6):267–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.57.

Article  Google Scholar 

Lazarus MD, Chinchilli VM, Leong SL, Kauffman GL Jr. Perceptions of anatomy: critical components in the clinical setting. Anat Sci Educ. 2012;5(4):187–99. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1281.

Article  Google Scholar 

Azer SA, Eizenberg N. Do we need dissection in an integrated problem-based learning medical course? Perceptions of first- and second-year students. Surg Radiol Anat. 2007;29(2):173–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-007-0180-x.

Article  Google Scholar 

Davis CR, Bates AS, Ellis H, Roberts AM. Human anatomy: let the students tell us how to teach. Anat Sci Educ. 2014;7(4):262–72. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1424.

Article  Google Scholar 

Evans DJR, Pawlina W, Lachman N. Human skills for human[istic] anatomy: an emphasis on nontraditional discipline-independent skills. Anat Sci Educ. 2018;11(3):221–4. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1799.

Article  Google Scholar 

Talarico EF. A change in paradigm: Giving back identity to donors in the anatomy laboratory. Clin Anat. 2013;26(2):161–72. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.22103.

Article  Google Scholar 

Robbins BD, Tomaka A, Innus C, Patterson J, Styn G. Lessons from the dead: the experiences of undergraduates working with cadavers. OMEGA - J Death Dying. 2009;58(3):177–92. https://doi.org/10.2190/OM.58.3.b.

Article  Google Scholar 

Hildebrandt S. Developing empathy and clinical detachment during the dissection course in gross anatomy. Anat Sci Educ. 2010;3(4):216. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.145.

Article  Google Scholar 

Franchi T. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on current anatomy education and future careers: a student’s perspective. Anat Sci Educ. 2020;13(3):312–5. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1966.

Article  Google Scholar 

Chang HJ, Kim HJ, Rhyu IJ, Lee YM, Uhm CS. Emotional experiences of medical students during cadaver dissection and the role of memorial ceremonies: a qualitative study 13 Education 1303 Specialist Studies in Education. BMC Med Educ. 2018;18(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1358-0.

Sándor I, Birkás E, Gyorffy Z. The effects of dissection-room experiences and related coping strategies among Hungarian medical students. BMC Med Educ. 2015;15(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-015-0355-9.

O’Carroll RE, Whiten S, Jackson D, Sinclair DW. Assessing the emotional impact of cadaver dissection on medical students. Med Educ. 2002;36(6):550–4. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2923.2002.01235.x.

Article  Google Scholar 

Charlton R, Dovey SM, Jones DG, Blunt A. Effects of cadaver dissection on the attitudes of medical students. Med Educ. 1994;28(4):290–5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.1994.tb02714.x.

Article  Google Scholar 

Arráez-Aybar L-A, Castaño-Collado G, Casado-Morales M-I. Dissection as a modulator of emotional attitudes and reactions of future health professionals. Med Educ. 2008;42(6):563–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03079.x.

Article  Google Scholar 

Shin M, Prasad A, Sabo G, et al. Anatomy education in US medical schools: before, during, and beyond COVID-19. BMC Med Educ. 2022;22(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03177-1.

Karrar Alsharif MH, Gasmalla HEE, Almasaad JM, et al. Online anatomy education in the COVID-19 pandemic: challenges and suggested practices as per student and faculty experiences in the Saudi Arabia and United Arab Emirates. Educ Med J. 2022;14(2):61–77. https://doi.org/10.21315/eimj2022.14.2.5.

Article  Google Scholar 

Drake RL. A unique, innovative, and clinically oriented approach to anatomy education. Acad Med. 2007;82(5). https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e31803eab41.

Bareither M Lou, Arbel V, Growe M, Muszczynski E, Rudd A, Marone JR. Clay modeling versus written modules as effective interventions in understanding human anatomy. Anat Sci Educ. 2013;6(3):170–176. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1321.

Ruiz JG, Mintzer MJ, Leipzig RM. The impact of e-learning in medical education. Acad Med. 2006;81(3). https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-200603000-00002.

Huynh R. The role of e-learning in medical education. Acad Med. 2017;92(4). https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000001596.

Gill P, Stewart K, Treasure E, Chadwick B. Methods of data collection in qualitative research: interviews and focus groups. Br Dent J. 2008;204(6):291–5. https://doi.org/10.1038/bdj.2008.192.

Article  Google Scholar 

Gill P, Baillie J. Interviews and focus groups in qualitative research: an update for the digital age. Br Dent J. 2018;225(7):668–72. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2018.815.

Article  Google Scholar 

Hennink MM, Kaiser BN, Weber MB. What influences saturation? Estimating sample sizes in focus group research. Qual Health Res. 2019;29(10):1483–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732318821692.

Article  Google Scholar 

Vasileiou K, Barnett J, Thorpe S, Young T. Characterising and justifying sample size sufficiency in interview-based studies: systematic analysis of qualitative health research over a 15-year period. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018;18(1):148. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0594-7.

Article  Google Scholar 

Hennink M, Kaiser BN. Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: a systematic review of empirical tests. Soc Sci Med. 2022;292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114523.

Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.

Article  Google Scholar 

Natsis K. What useful on anatomy education give us the pandemic? Rev Argentina Anatomía Clínica. 2021;13:52–4. https://doi.org/10.31051/1852.8023.v13.n2.33509.

Article  Google Scholar 

Singal A. Transforming anatomy education: then and now. Anat Sci Int. 2022;97(2):230–1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12565-021-00645-4.

Article  Google Scholar 

Singal A, Bansal A, Chaudhary P. Cadaverless anatomy: darkness in the times of pandemic COVID-19. Morphologie. 2020;104(346):147–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.morpho.2020.05.003.

Article  Google Scholar 

Rose S. Medical student education in the time of COVID-19. JAMA - J Am Med Assoc. 2020;323(21):2131–2. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.5227.

Article  Google Scholar 

Fleagle TR, Borcherding NC, Harris J, Hoffmann DS. Application of flipped classroom pedagogy to the human gross anatomy laboratory: student preferences and learning outcomes. Anat Sci Educ. 2018;11(4):385–96. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1755.

Article  Google Scholar 

Xiao J, Adnan S. Flipped anatomy classroom integrating multimodal digital resources shows positive influence upon students’ experience and learning performance. Anat Sci Educ. 2022;15(6):1086–102. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.2207.

Article  Google Scholar 

Mayfield CH, Ohara PT, O’Sullivan PS. Perceptions of a mobile technology on learning strategies in the anatomy laboratory. Anat Sci Educ. 2013;6(2):81–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1307.

Article  Google Scholar 

Smith CF, Tollemache N, Covill D, Johnston M. Take away body parts! An investigation into the use of 3D-printed anatomical models in undergraduate anatomy education. Anat Sci Educ. 2018;11(1):44–53. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1718.

Article  Google Scholar 

Yammine K, Violato C. A meta-analysis of the educational effectiveness of three-dimensional visualization technologies in teaching anatomy. Anat Sci Educ. 2015;8(6):525–38. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1510.

Article  Google Scholar 

Pujol S, Baldwin M, Nassiri J, Kikinis R, Shaffer K. Using 3D modeling techniques to enhance teaching of difficult anatomical concepts. Acad Radiol. 2016;23(4):507–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2015.12.012.

Article  Google Scholar 

Darras KE, Spouge R, Hatala R, et al. Integrated virtual and cadaveric dissection laboratories enhance first year medical students’ anatomy experience: a pilot study. BMC Med Educ. 2019;19(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1806-5.

Jeyakumar A, Dissanayake B, Dissabandara L. Dissection in the modern medical curriculum: an exploration into student perception and adaptions for the future. Anat Sci Educ. 2020;13(3):366–80. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1905.

Article  Google Scholar 

Thompson AR, Marshall AM. Participation in dissection affects student performance on gross anatomy practical and written examinations: results of a four-year comparative study. Anat Sci Educ. 2020;13(1):30–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1859.

Article  Google Scholar 

Abdellatif H. Time spent in practicing dissection correlated with improvement in anatomical knowledge of students: experimental study in an integrated learning program. Cureus. Published online April 6, 2020. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.7558.

Burgess AW, Luscombe GM, Ramsey-Stewart G. An intensive anatomy by whole-body dissection elective: a longitudinal study. Clin Anat. 2022;35(5):550–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.23861.

Article  Google Scholar 

Iwanaga J, Loukas M, Dumont AS, Tubbs RS. A review of anatomy education during and after the COVID-19 pandemic: revisiting traditional and modern methods to achieve future innovation. Clin Anat. 2021;34(1):108–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.23655.

Article  Google Scholar 

Miyoshi M, Mori T, Tanimura C, et al. Impact of hands-on experience of a cadaver dissection on the professional identity formation of health sciences students. 2019;62. https://doi.org/10.33160/yam.2019.03.018.

Eckert T, Topping D, Abrams M, Daly K. Beyond academic learning: how can human cadaver dissection promote medical students’ professional identity development? FASEB J. 2020;34(S1):1. https://doi.org/10.1096/fasebj.2020.34.s1.03272.

Article  Google Scholar 

Leveritt S, McKnight G, Edwards K, Pratten M, Merrick D. What anatomy is clinically useful and when should we be teaching it? Anat Sci Educ. 2016;9(5):468–75. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1596.

Article  Google Scholar