Fifty years devoted to anaerobes: historical, lessons, and highlights

Wilson SE, Judith A, Hopkins F (1995) Clinical correlates of anaerobic bacteriology in peritonitis. Clin Infect Dis 20(Suppl 2):S251–S256. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinids/20.supplement_2.s251

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

McNamara MJ, Pasquale MD, Evans SR (1993) Acute appendicitis and the use of intraperitoneal cultures. Surg Gynecol Obstet 177(393):7

Google Scholar 

Mosdell DM, Morris DM, Voltura A, Pitcher DE, Twiest MW, Milne RL, Miscall BG, Fry DE (1991) Antibiotic treatment for surgical peritonitis. Ann Surg 214:543–549. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-199111000-00001

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Dougherty SH, Saltzstein EC, Peacock JB, Mercer LC, Cano P (1989) Perforated or gangrenous appendicitis treated with aminoglycosides: how do bacterial cultures influence management? Arch Surg 124:1280–1283. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.1989.01410110034006

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Chow AW, Guze LB (1974) Bacteroidaceae bacteremia: clinical experience with 112 patients. Medicine (Baltimore) 53:93–126

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hopkins JA, Lee JCH (1993) Susceptibility of intra-abdominal isolates at operation. A predictor of postoperative infection. Ann Surg 59:791–6

CAS  Google Scholar 

Koperna T, Schulz F (1996) Prognosis and treatment of peritonitis. Do we need new scoring systems? Arch Surg 131:180–6. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.1996.01430140070019

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Rosenblatt JE, Brook I (1993) Clinical relevance of susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria. Clin Infect Dis 16(suppl 4):S446–S448. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinids/16.supplement4.s446

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Snydman DR, Cuchural GJ Jr, McDermott L, Gill M (1992) Correlation of various in vitro testing methods with clinical outcomes in patients with Bacteroides fragilis group infections treated with cefoxitin: a retrospective analysis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 36:540–544. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.36.3.540

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Salonen JH, Eerola E, Meurman O (1998) Clinical significance and outcome of anaerobic bacteremia. Clin Infect Dis 26:1413–1417. https://doi.org/10.1086/516355

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Finegold SM, George WL. Milligan ME (1986) A disease-a-month classic. Anaerobic infections. Year book medical publishers, INC Chicago, London

Brook I (1988) Recovery of anaerobic bacteria from clinical specimen in 12 years at two military hospitals. J Clin Microbiol 26:1181–1188. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.26.6.1181-1188.1988

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Brook I (1988) Pediatric anaerobic infection. Diagnostics and management, 2nd edn. Mosby Company, St Louis Missouri

Duerden BI, Drasar BS (1991) Anaerobes in human disease. Arnold, London

Google Scholar 

Di Bella S, Antonello RM, Sanson G, Maraolo AE, Giacobbe DR et al (2022) Anaerobic bloodstream infections in Italy (ITANAEROBY): a 5-year retrospective nationwide survey. Anaerobe 75:102583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anaerobe.2022.102583

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Engelkirk PG, Duben-Engelkirk J, Dowell VR (1992) Principles and practice of clinical anaerobic bacteriology. Star publishing Co, Belmont

Google Scholar 

Jousimies-Somer H, Summanen P, Citron DM, Baron JE, Wexler HM, Finegold SM (2002) Wadsworth-KTL anaerobic bacteriology manual, 6th edn. Star Publishing Company, Belmont

Google Scholar 

Sedallian A, Dubreuil L, Riegel P (2019) Généralités sur les bactéries anaérobies. In: Freney J, Riegel P (eds) Bactériologie clinique 3rd editions. ESKA, Paris, pp 1338–57

Google Scholar 

Nagy E, Boyanova L, Justesen US, on behalf of ESCMID Study Group of Anaerobic Infections (2018) How to isolate, identify and determine antimicrobial susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria in routine laboratories. Clin Microbiol Infect 24:1139–1148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2018.02.008

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Montravers P, Lepape A, Dubreuil L, Gauzit R, Pean Y, Benchimol D, Dupont H (2009) Clinical and microbiological profiles of community-acquired and nosocomial intra-abdominal infections: results of the French prospective, observational EBIIA study. J Antimicrob Chemother 63:785–794. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkp005

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Baron EJ, Strong CA, Mc Teague M, Vaisanen ML, Finegold SM (1995) Survival of anaerobic bacteria in original specimens transported by overnight services. Clin Infect Dis 20(Suppl 2):S174–S177. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinids/20.Supplement_2.S174

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Senneville E, Savage C, Nallet I, Yazdanpanah Y, Giraud F, Migaud H, Dubreuil L, Courcol R, Mouton Y (2006) Improved aero-anaerobe recovery from infected prosthetic joint samples taken from 72 patients and collected intraoperatively in Rosenow’s broth. Acta Orthop 77:120–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/17453670610045795

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Rosenow EC (1914) The newer bacteriology of various infections as determined by special methods. J Am Med Ass 63:903–908

Article  Google Scholar 

Justesen US, Skov MN, Knudsen E, Holt HM, Sogaard P, Justesen T (2010) 16S rRNA gene sequencing in routine identification of anaerobic bacteria isolated from blood cultures. J Clin Microbiol 48:946–948. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.02075-09

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Justesen US, Holm A, Knudsen E, Andersen LB, Jensen TG, Kemp M (2011) Species identification of clinical isolates of anaerobic bacteria: comparison of two matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry systems. J Clin Microbiol 49:4314–4318. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.05788-11

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Nagy E, Becker S, Kostrewa M, Barta N, Urban E (2012) The value of MALDI-TOF MS for the identification of clinically relevant anaerobic bacteria in routine laboratories. J Med Microbiol 61:1393–1400. https://doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.043927-0

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Medceky M, Cejkova D, Polansky O, Karasova D, Kubosava T, Ciizek A, Rychlik I (2018) Whole genome sequencing and function prediction of 133 gut anaerobes isolated from chicken caecum in pure cultures. BMC Genomics 31:561. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-018-4959-4

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Dubreuil L (2010) Methods for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria. Méthodes d’étude des anaérobies. In: Courvalin P, Leclercq R, Rice LB (eds) Antibiogramme. Eska, Paris, pp 553–67

Google Scholar 

Finegold SM (1992) Clinical relevance of antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 1002:1021–1024. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01967793

Article  Google Scholar 

Brook I, Wexler HM, Goldstein EJC (2013) Antianaerobic antimicrobials: spectrum and susceptibility testing. Clin Microbiol Rev 26:526–546. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00086-12

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Bourgault AM, Harkness JL, Rosenblatt JE (1978) Clinical usefulness of susceptibility testing of anaerobes. Arch Intern Med 138(1825):7. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.1978.03630370039019

Article  Google Scholar 

Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (2012) Methods for anti-microbial susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria. Approved standard, 8th ed. CLSI document M11-A8. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA.

Hecht DW, Lederer L, Osmolski JR (1995) Susceptibility results for the Bacteroides fragilis group: comparison of the broth microdilution and agar dilution methods. Clin Infect Diseases 20(Suppl 2):S342. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinids/20.supplement_2.s342

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Baron EJ, David AB (1984) Comparison of susceptibilities of anaerobic bacteria determined by agar dilution and by a microbroth. Method Rev infect Dis 6(suppl1):S249–S253. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinids/6.supplement1.s249

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hughes C, Ashhurst-Smith C, Ferguson JK (2018) Gram negative anaerobe susceptibility testing in clinical isolates using Sensititre and Etest methods. Pathology 9:437–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pathol.2017.10.020

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Cherkaoui A, Fischer A, Azam N, Riat A, Schrenzel J (2018) A comparison of sensititre TM Anaerobe MIC plate with ATB ANA® test for the routine susceptibility testing of common anaerobe pathogens. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 37:2279–2284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-018-3369-5

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cordovana M, Ambretti S (2020) Antibiotic susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria by broth microdilution method using the MICRONAUT-S anaerobes MIC plates. Anaerobe 63:102217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anaerobe.2020.102217

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Koru O, Ozyurt M (2008) Determination of antimicrobial susceptibilities of clinically isolated anaerobic bacteria by E-test ATB-ANA and agar dilution. Anaerobe 14:161–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anaerobe.2008.02.004

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

FDA-Antimicrobial Susceptibility Test (AST) Systems—Class ii Special Controls Guidance for Industry and FDA (2018) FDA. Available online: https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/guidance-documents-medical-devices-and-radiation-emitting-products/antimicrobial-susceptibility-test-ast-systems-class-ii-special-controls-guidance-industry-and-fda

Lee K, Yunseop J, Kwon O, Jang In I, Song W, Yoon G (1992) Evaluation of A commercial microdilution (ATB ANA) system for susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria. Korean J Clin Pathol 1992; 12: 341–6. Reported in English In: Ann Lab Med 12: 341–346

Dubreuil L, Houcke I, Singer E (1999) Susceptibility Testing of anaerobic bacteria: evaluation of the redesigned (version 96) bioMerieux ATB ANA device. J Clin Microbiol 37:1824–1828. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.37.6.1824-1828.1999

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central 

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif