Cutting edge of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for solid pancreatic lesions

Vilmann P, Jacobsen GK, Henriksen FW, et al. Endoscopic ultrasonography with guided fine needle aspiration biopsy in pancreatic disease. Gastrointest Endosc. 1992;38:172–3.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kovacevic B, Vilmann P. EUS tissue acquisition: from A to B. Endosc Ultrasound. 2020;9:225–31.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Cheng B, Zhang Y, Chen Q, et al. Analysis of fine-needle biopsy vs fine-needle aspiration in diagnosis of pancreatic and abdominal masses: a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;16:1314–21.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Itonaga M, Yasukawa S, Fukutake N, et al. Comparison of 22-gauge standard and Franseen needles in EUS-guided tissue acquisition for diagnosing solid pancreatic lesions: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2022;96:57-66.e2.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lee HW, Kim KM. Randomized controlled trial comparing a conventional needle and a novel needle for endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided histology of peripancreatic masses. Medicine (Baltimore). 2021;100: e25106.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Noh DH, Choi K, Gu S, et al. Comparison of 22-gauge standard fine needle versus core biopsy needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of suspected pancreatic cancer: a randomized crossover trial. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2018;53:94–9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Vanbiervliet G, Napoleon B, Saint Paul MC, et al. Core needle versus standard needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided biopsy of solid pancreatic masses: a randomized crossover study. Endoscopy. 2014;46:1063–70.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Yousri M, Abusinna E, Tahoun N, et al. A comparative study of the diagnostic utility of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology (EUS-FNA) versus endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) in pancreatic and non-pancreatic lesions. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2022;23:2151–8.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Karsenti D, Palazzo L, Perrot B, et al. 22G Acquire vs. 20G Procore needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided biopsy of pancreatic masses: a randomized study comparing histologic sample quantity and diagnostic accuracy. Endoscopy. 2020;52:747–53.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Crino SF, Le Grazie M, Manfrin E, et al. Randomized trial comparing fork-tip and side-fenestrated needles for EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy of solid pancreatic lesions. Gastrointest Endosc. 2020;92:648-58.e2.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bang JY, Krall K, Jhala N, et al. Comparing needles and methods of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy to optimize specimen quality and diagnostic accuracy for patients with pancreatic masses in a randomized trial. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021;19:825-835.e7.

Article  Google Scholar 

Bang JY, Hebert-Magee S, Navaneethan U, et al. Randomized trial comparing the Franseen and Fork-tip needles for EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy sampling of solid pancreatic mass lesions. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87:1432–8.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ashat M, Klair JS, Rooney SL, et al. Randomized controlled trial comparing the Franseen needle with the Fork-tip needle for EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2021;93:140-50.e2.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ishikawa T, Mohamed R, Heitman SJ, et al. Diagnostic yield of small histological cores obtained with a new EUS-guided fine needle biopsy system. Surg Endosc. 2017;31:5143–9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ishikawa T, Kawashima H, Ohno E, et al. Clinical impact of EUS-guided fine needle biopsy using a novel Franseen needle for histological assessment of pancreatic diseases. Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;2019:8581743.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Kanno A, Tamada K, Fukushima N, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition for the histopathological diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis. J Med Ultrason. 2021;48:555–63.

Article  Google Scholar 

Ishikawa T, Kawashima H, Ohno E, et al. Usefulness of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy for the diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis using a 22-gauge Franseen needle: a prospective multicenter study. Endoscopy. 2020;52:978–85.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kanno A, Masamune A, Fujishima F, et al. Diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis by EUS-guided FNA using a 22-gauge needle: a prospective multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016;84:797-804.e1.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kurita A, Yasukawa S, Zen Y, et al. Comparison of a 22-gauge Franseen-tip needle with a 20-gauge forward-bevel needle for the diagnosis of type 1 autoimmune pancreatitis: a prospective randomized, controlled multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2020;91:373-81.e2.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Morishima T, Kawashima H, Ohno E, et al. Prospective multicenter study on the usefulness of EUS-guided FNA biopsy for the diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016;84:241–8.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gkolfakis P, Crino SF, Tziatzios G, et al. Comparative diagnostic performance of end-cutting fine-needle biopsy needles for EUS tissue sampling of solid pancreatic masses: a network meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2022;95:1067-77.e15.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Takahashi K, Yasuda I, Hayashi N, et al. EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy sampling of solid pancreatic tumors with 3 versus 12 to-and-fro movements: a multicenter prospective randomized controlled study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2023;97:1092–9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kataoka K, Ishikawa T, Ohno E, et al. Randomized trial comparing 15 vs 5 actuations per pass during endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy for specimen acquisition of solid pancreatic lesions. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgh.16258.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Mukai S, Itoi T, Ashida R, et al. Multicenter, prospective, crossover trial comparing the door-knocking method with the conventional method for EUS-FNA of solid pancreatic masses (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2016;83:1210–7.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lee JM, Lee HS, Hyun JJ, et al. Slow-pull using a fanning technique is more useful than the standard suction technique in EUS-guided fine needle aspiration in pancreatic masses. Gut Liver. 2018;12:360–6.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Yang MJ, Park SW, Lee KJ, et al. EUS-guided tissue acquisition using a novel torque technique is comparable with that of the fanning technique for solid pancreatic lesions: a multicenter randomized trial. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2023;30:693–703.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Puri R, Vilmann P, Saftoiu A, et al. Randomized controlled trial of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle sampling with or without suction for better cytological diagnosis. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2009;44:499–504.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Nakai Y, Isayama H, Chang KJ, et al. Slow pull versus suction in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of pancreatic solid masses. Dig Dis Sci. 2014;59:1578–85.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Capurso G, Archibugi L, Petrone MC, et al. Slow-pull compared to suction technique for EUS-guided sampling of pancreatic solid lesions: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Endosc Int Open. 2020;8:E636–43.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Crino SF, Conti Bellocchi MC, Di Mitri R, et al. Wet-suction versus slow-pull technique for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy: a multicenter, randomized, crossover trial. Endoscopy. 2023;55:225–34.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lin MY, Wu CL, Su YY, et al. Tissue quality comparison between heparinized wet suction and dry suction in endoscopic ultrasound-fine needle biopsy of solid pancreatic masses: a randomized crossover study. Gut Liver. 2023;17:318–27.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kitano M, Kudo M, Maekawa K, et al. Dynamic imaging of pancreatic diseases by contrast enhanced coded phase inversion harmonic ultrasonography. Gut. 2004;53:854–9.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Matsubara H, Itoh A, Kawashima H, et al. Dynamic quantitative evaluation of contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasonography in the diagnosis of pancreatic diseases. Pancreas. 2011;40:1073–9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ishikawa T, Hirooka Y, Kawashima H, et al. Multiphase evaluation of contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasonography in the diagnosis of pancreatic solid lesions. Pancreatology. 2018;18:291–7.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Yamashita Y, Kitano M. Endoscopic ultrasonography for pancreatic solid lesions. J Med Ultrason. 2020;47:377–87.

Article  Google Scholar 

Hou X, Jin Z, Xu C, et al. Contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in the diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions: a retrospective study. PLoS ONE. 2015;10: e0121236.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Itonaga M, Kitano M, Kojima F, et al. The usefulness of EUS-FNA with contrast-enhanced harmonic imaging of solid pancreatic lesions: a prospective study. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;35:2273–80.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kamata K, Takenaka M, Omoto S, et al. Impact of avascular areas, as measured by contrast-enhanced harmonic EUS, on the accuracy of FNA for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87:158–63.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Iglesias-Garcia J, Dominguez-Munoz JE, Abdulkader I, et al. Influence of on-site cytopathology evaluation on the diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) of solid pancreatic masses. Am J Gastroenterol. 2011;106:1705–10.

Article  PubMed 

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif