Brantley Scott F, Bradley WE, Timm GW. Management of erectile impotence Use of implantable inflatable prosthesis. Urology. 1973;2:80–2.

Article  Google Scholar 

Salonia A, Bettocchi C, Boeri L, Capogrosso P, Carvalho J, Cilesiz NC, et al. European Association of Urology guidelines on sexual and reproductive health-2021 update: male sexual dysfunction. Eur Urol. 2021;80:333–57.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Burnett AL, Nehra A, Breau RH, Culkin DJ, Faraday MM, Hakim LS, et al. Erectile dysfunction: AUA guideline. J Urol. 2018;200:633–41.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Minervini A, Ralph DJ, Pryor JP. Outcome of penile prosthesis implantation for treating erectile dysfunction: experience with 504 procedures. BJU Int. 2006;97:129–33.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wilson SK, Delk JR, Salem EA, Cleves MA. Long-term survival of inflatable penile prostheses: single surgical group experience with 2,384 first-time implants spanning two decades. J Sex Med. 2007;4:1074–9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lux M, Reyes-Vallejo L, Morgentaler A, Levine LA. Outcomes and satisfaction rates for the redesigned 2-piece penile prosthesis. J Urol. 2007;177:262–6.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hakim LS. Counseling of patients prior to penile implant surgery. Curr Sex Health Rep. 2006;3:145–8.

Article  Google Scholar 

Kramer AC, Schweber A. Patient expectations prior to coloplast titan penile prosthesis implant predicts postoperative satisfaction. J Sex Med. 2010;7:2261–6.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pescatori E, Alei G, Antonini G, Avolio A, Bettocchi C, Bitelli M, et al. INSIST-ED: Italian Society of Andrology registry on penile prosthesis surgery. First data analysis. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2016;88:122–7.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Clavien PA, Barkun J, De Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD, et al. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg. 2009;250:187–96.

Caraceni E, Utizi L. A questionnaire for the evaluation of quality of life after penile prosthesis implant: Quality of Life and Sexuality with Penile Prosthesis (QoLSPP). J Sex Med. 2014;11:1005–12.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Otero JR, Cruz CR, Gómez BG, Geli JS, Polo JM, Castañé ER, et al. Comparison of the patient and partner satisfaction with 700CX and Titan penile prostheses. Asian J Androl. 2017;19:321–5.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Falcone M, Rolle L, Ceruti C, Timpano M, Sedigh O, Preto M, et al. Prospective analysis of the surgical outcomes and patients’ satisfaction rate after the AMS Spectra penile prosthesis implantation. Urology. 2013;82:373–6.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Chierigo F, Capogrosso P, Dehò F, Pozzi E, Schifano N, Belladelli F, et al. Long-term follow-up after penile prosthesis implantation-survival and quality of life outcomes. J Sex Med. 2019;16:1827–33.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Capogrosso P, Pescatori E, Caraceni E, Mondaini N, Utizi L, Cai T, et al. Satisfaction rate at 1-year follow-up in patients treated with penile implants: data from the multicentre prospective registry INSIST-ED. BJU Int. 2019;123:360–6.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pryor MB, Carrion R, Wang R, Henry G. Patient satisfaction and penile morphology changes with postoperative penile rehabilitation 2 years after Coloplast Titan prosthesis. Asian J Androl. 2016;18:754–8.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bettocchi C, Palumbo F, Spilotros M, Lucarelli G, Palazzo S, Battaglia M, et al. Patient and partner satisfaction after AMS inflatable penile prosthesis implant. J Sex Med. 2010;71:304–9.

Article  Google Scholar 

Gentile G, Franceschelli A, Massenio P, Tuccio A, Cocci A, Divenuto L, et al. Patient’s satisfaction after 2-piece inflatable penile prosthesis implantation: an Italian multicentric study. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2016;88:1–3.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Luna E, Rodriguez D, Barrios D, Hernandez H, Bianco F, Gheiler E. Evaluation of quality of life after inflatable penile implantation and analysis of factors influencing postsurgery patient satisfaction. J Sex Med. 2022;19:1472–8.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Narang GL, Figler BD, Coward RM. Preoperative counseling and expectation management for inflatable penile prosthesis implantation. Transl Androl Urol. 2017;6:S869–80.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Kramer A, Goldmark E, Greenfield J. Is a closed‐suction drain advantageous for penile implant surgery? The debate continues. J Sex Med. 2011;8:601–6.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Apoj M, Rodriguez D, Barbosa P, Pan S, Rajender A, Biebel M, et al. Closed suction drain outputs at 12 and 24 h after primary three-piece inflatable penile prosthesis surgery. Int J Impot Res. 2020;32:117–21.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Osmonov D, Ragheb AM, Petry T, Eraky A, Bettocchi C, Lamers KG, et al. Value of prolonged scrotal drainage after penile prosthesis implantation: a multicenter prospective nonrandomized pilot study. Int J Impot Res. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-023-00710-8.

Karpman E, Brant W, Kansas B, Bella A, Christine B, Jones L, et al. 120 Drain use during penile prosthesis surgery, results from the PROPPER study. J Sex Med. 2018;15:S28.

Article  Google Scholar 

Van Huele A, Mennes J, Chung E, Van Renterghem K Majority of erectile dysfunction patients would have preferred earlier implantation of their penile prosthesis: validation of the recently changed EAU guidelines. Int J Impot Res. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-022-00620-1.

Bajic P, Mahon J, Faraday M, Sadeghi-Nejad H, Hakim L, McVary KT. Etiology of erectile dysfunction and duration of symptoms in patients undergoing penile prosthesis: a systematic review. Sex Med Rev. 2020;8:333–7.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ralph DJ, Garaffa G, Muneer A, Freeman A, Rees R, Christopher AN, et al. The immediate insertion of a penile prosthesis for acute ischaemic priapism. Eur Urol. 2009;56:1033–8.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Deveci S, Martin D, Parker M, Mulhall JP. Penile length alterations following penile prosthesis surgery. Eur Urol. 2007;51:1128–31.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wang R, Howard GE, Hoang A, Yuan JH, Lin HC, Dai YT. Prospective and long-term evaluation of erect penile length obtained with inflatable penile prosthesis to that induced by intracavernosal injection. Asian J Androl. 2009;11:411–5.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Henry GD, Kansal NS, Callaway M, Grigsby T, Henderson J, Noble J, et al. Centers of excellence concept and penile prostheses: an outcome analysis. J Urol. 2009;181:1264–8.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lotan Y, Roehrborn CG, McConnell JD, Hendin BN. Factors influencing the outcomes of penile prosthesis surgery at a teaching institution. Urology. 2003;62:918–21.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Onyeji IC, Sui W, Pagano MJ, Weinberg AC, James MB, Theofanides MC, et al. Impact of surgeon case volume on reoperation rates after inflatable penile prosthesis surgery. J Urol. 2017;197:223–9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sørensen LT. Wound healing and infection in surgery. The clinical impact of smoking and smoking cessation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Surg. 2012;147:373–83.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Patel S, Srivastava S, Singh MR, Singh D. Mechanistic insight into diabetic wounds: pathogenesis, molecular targets and treatment strategies to pace wound healing. Biomed Pharmacother. 2019;112:108615.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Osman MM, Huynh LM, El-Khatib FM, Towe M, Su HW, Andrianne R, et al. Immediate preoperative blood glucose and hemoglobin a1c levels are not predictive of postoperative infections in diabetic men undergoing penile prosthesis placement. Int J Impot Res. 2021;33:296–302.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Habous M, Tai R, Tealab A, Soliman T, Nassar M, Mekawi Z, et al. Defining a glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) level that predicts increased risk of penile implant infection. BJU Int. 2018;121:293–300.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Campbell JD, Chan EP, Di Pierdominico A, Karakus S, Trock B, Brock GB, et al. Chronic pain associated with penile prostheses may persist despite revision or explantation. Can Urol Assoc J. 2022;16:42–6.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Akin-Olugbade O, Parker M, Guhring P, Mulhall J. Determinants of patient satisfaction following penile prosthesis surgery. J Sex Med. 2006;3:743–8.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Levine LA, Benson J, Hoover C. Inflatable penile prosthesis placement in men with Peyronie’s disease and drug-resistant erectile dysfunction: a single-center study. J Sex Med. 2010;7:3775–83.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Mulhall JP. Penile length changes after radical prostatectomy. BJU Int. 2005;96:472–4.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Villarreal HG, Jones L. Outcomes of and satisfaction with the inflatable penile prosthesis in the elderly male. Adv Urol. 2012;2012:240963.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Chung E, Solomon M, DeYoung L, Brock GB. Clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction rates among elderly male aged ≥75 years with inflatable penile prosthesis implant for medically refractory erectile dysfunction. World J Urol. 2014;32:173–7.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar