Outcomes of Exeter cemented total hip arthroplasty in a county hospital: survivorship of eight hundred and ninety four hips with a minimum ten-year follow up

Troelsen A, Malchau E, Sillesen N et al (2013) A review of current fixation uses and registry outcomes in total hip arthroplasty: the uncemented paradox. Clin Orthop 471(7):2052–2059. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-013-2941-7

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Berry DJ, Harmsen WS, Cabanela ME et al (2002) Twenty-fiveyear survivorship of two thousand consecutiveprimary Charnley total hip replacements: factors affecting survivorship of acetabular and femoral components. J Bone JtSurg-Am 84(2):171–177. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200202000-00002

Article  Google Scholar 

Callaghan JJ, Bracha P, Liu SS et al (2009) Survivorship of a Charnley total hip arthroplasty: a concise follow-up, at aminimum of thirty-five years, of previous reports. J Bone JtSurg 91(11):2617–2621. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.H.01201

Article  Google Scholar 

Santori N, Falez F, Potestio D, Santori FS (2019) Fourteen-year experience with short cemented stems in total hip replacement. Int Orthop 43(1):55–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/00264-018-4205-3

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Mulroy R, Harris W (1990) The effect of improved cementing techniques on component loosening in total hip replacement. An 11-year radiographic review. J Bone Joint Surg Br 72-B(5): 757–760. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.72B5.2211749

Cassar-Gheiti AJ, McColgan R, Kelly M et al (2020) Current concepts and outcomes in cemented femoral stem design and cementation techniques: the argument for a new classification system. EFORT Open Rev 5(4):241–252. https://doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.5.190034

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Ritter J, Hubert J, Kniep I, Beil FT, Rolvien T, Puschel K (2022) Pulmonary cement embolism is frequently observed but not a contributing factor for death in patients with cemented total hip and knee arthroplasty: a post-mortem study. Int Orthop 46(6):1225–1232. https://doi.org/10.1007/00264-022-05381-6

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Mahon J, McCarthy CJ, Sheridan GA et al (2020) Outcomes of the exeter v40 cemented femoral stem at a minimum of ten years in a non-designer centre. Bone Jt Open 1(12):743–748. https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.112.BJO-2020-0163.R1

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Westerman RW, Whitehouse SL, Hubble MJW et al (2018) The exeter v40 cemented femoral component at a minimum 10 year follow-up: the first 540 cases. Bone Jt J 100-B(8): 1002–1009. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.100B8.BJJ-2017-1535.R1

Ling RSM, Charity J, Lee AJC et al (2009) The long-term results of the original Exeter polished cemented femoral component: a follow-up report. J Arthroplasty 24(4):511–517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2009.02.002

Fowler JL, Gie GA, Lee AJ et al (1970) Experience with the Exeter total hip replacement since 1970. Orthop Clin North Am 19(3):477–489

Google Scholar 

Pai VS (2002) A modified direct lateral approach in total hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Surg 10(1):35–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/230949900201000107

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Hardinge K (1982) The direct lateral approach to the hip. J Bone Joint Surg 64B:17. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.64B1.7068713

Article  Google Scholar 

Williams HDW, Browne G, Gie GA et al (2002) The exeter universal cemented femoral component at 8 to 12 years: a study of the first 325 hips. J Bone Joint Surg Br 84-B(3): 324–334. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.84b3.12261

Carrington NC, Sierra RJ, Gie GA et al (2009) The exeter universal cemented femoral component at 15 to 17 years: an update on the first 325 hips. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91-B(6): 730–737. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.91B6.21627

Petheram TG, Whitehouse SL, Kazi HA et al (2016) The Exeter universal cemented femoral stem at 20 to 25 years: a report of 382 hips. Bone Joint J 98-B(11):1441–1449. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.98B11.37668

Hook S, Moulder E, Yates PJ et al (2006) The exeteruniversal stem: a minimum ten-year review from an independent centre. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88-B(12):1584–1590. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.88B12.18345

Young L, Duckett S, Dunn A (2009) The use of the cemented exeter universal femoral stem in a district general hospital: a minimum ten-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91-B(2):170–175. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.91B2.20473

Mäkelä K, Eskelinen A, Pulkkinen P, Paavolainen P, Remes V (2008) Cemented total hip replacement for primary osteoarthritis in patients aged 55 years or older: results of the 12 most common cemented implants followed for 25 years in the Finnish Arthroplasty Register. J Bone Joint Surg Br 90(12):1562–1569. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.90B12.21151

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Chiu KH, Shen WY, Cheung KW et al (2005) Primary exeter total hip arthroplasty in patients with small femurs. J Arthroplasty 20(3):275–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2004.01.014

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Maggs JL, Smeatham A, Whitehouse SL et al (2016) The Exeter contemporary flanged cemented acetabular component in primary total hip arthroplasty. Bone Joint J 98-B(3):307–312. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.98B3.35901

Boyle AB, Zhu M, Frampton C et al (2022) Comparing uncemented, hybrid and cemented primary total hip arthroplasty in young patients, a New Zealand Joint Registry study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 142(9):2371–2380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-04085-7

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gwynne-Jones DP and Gray AR (2020) Cemented or uncemented acetabular fixation in combination with the exeter universal cemented stem: long-term survival to 18 years. Bone Joint J 102-B(4): 414–422. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.102B4.BJJ-2019-0656.R1

Farhan-Alanie OMH, Hrycaiczuk A, Tinning C et al (2022) Alumina ceramic-on-ceramic hybrid total hip arthroplasty. A median of 15 years follow-up. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 32(6):1127–1136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-021-03087-w

Keeling P, Howell JR, Kassam AAM et al (2020) Long-term survival of the cemented exeter universal stem in patients 50 years and younger: an update on 130 hips. J Arthroplasty 35(4):1042–1047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2019.11.009

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Schmitz MWJL, Bronsema E, de Kam DCJ, et al. (2017) Results of the cemented exeter femoral component in patients under the age of 40: an update at ten to 20 years’ follow-up. Bone Jt J 99-B(2): 192–198. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.99B2.38045

Lewthwaite SC, Squires B, Gie GA et al (2008) The exeter ™ universal hip in patients 50 years or younger at 10–17 years’ follow up. Clin Orthop 466(2):324–331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-007-0049-7

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Chatziagorou G, Lindahl H, Kärrholm J (2019) The design of the cemented stem influences the risk of Vancouver type B fractures, but not of type C: an analysis of 82,837 Lubinus SPII and Exeter Polished stems. Acta Orthop 90(2):135–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2019.1574387

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Pakarinen OA, Neuvonen PS, Lainiala OS et al (2021) Periprosthetic femoral fracture is a leading cause of early revision with taper-slip stems in primary total hip arthroplasty: an analysis of 2765 total hip arthroplasties from a high-volume hospital. J Arthroplasty 36(11):3703-3708.e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2021.06.022

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gausden EB, Abdel MP, Mabry TM et al (2021) Midterm results of primary Exeter cemented stem in a select patient population. J Bone Joint Surg Am 103(19):1826–1833. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.20.01829

Kristensen TB, Dybvik E, Furnes O et al (2018) More reoperations for periprosthetic fracture after cemented hemiarthroplasty with polished taper-slip stems than after anatomical and straight stems in the treatment of hip fractures: a study from the Norwegian Hip Fracture Register 2005 to 2016. Bone Joint J 100-B(12):1565–1571. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.100B12.BJJ-2018-0262.R1

Powell-Bowns MFR, Oag E, Martin D et al (2022) Vancouver B and C periprosthetic fractures around the cemented Exeter stem: sex is associate with fracture pattern. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 142(11):3221–3228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-02104113-6

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Thompson JW, Corbett J, Bye D et al (2021) Analysis of the Exeter V40 femoral stem prosthesis fracture: systematic review and single centre case series. Bone Joint Open 2(6):443–456. https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.26.BJO-2021-0025.R1

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Greenwald AS, Narten NC, Wilde AH (1978) Points in the technique of recementing in the revision of an implant arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 60(1):107–110. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.60B1.627570

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif