Woolf SH, Grol R, Hutchinson A, Eccles M, Grimshaw J. Potential benefits, limitations, and harms of clinical guidelines. BMJ. 1999;318(7182):527–30.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Cieza A, Causey K, Kamenov K, Hanson SW, Chatterji S, Vos T. Global estimates of the need for rehabilitation based on the Global Burden of Disease study 2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. The Lancet (British edition). 2020;396(10267):2006–17.

CAS  Google Scholar 

Dieleman JL, Cao J, Chapin A, Chen C, Li Z, Liu A, et al. US health care spending by payer and health condition, 1996–2016. JAMA. 2020;323(9):863–84.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Australian Institute of Health Welfare. Disease expenditure in Australia 2018–19. Canberra: AIHW; 2021.

Walker BF, Muller R, Grant WD. Low back pain in Australian adults: the economic burden. Asia Pac J Public Health. 2003;15(2):79–87.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Harnan SE, Pickering A, Pandor A, Goodacre SW. Clinical decision rules for adults with minor head injury: a systematic review. J Trauma. 2011;71(1):245–51.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Michaleff ZA, Maher CG, Verhagen AP, Rebbeck T, Lin C-WC. Accuracy of the Canadian C-Spine Rule and NEXUS to screen for clinically important cervical spine injury in patients following blunt trauma: a systematic review. CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal. 2012;184(16):E867.

Beckenkamp PR, Lin C-WC, Macaskill P, Michaleff ZA, Maher CG, Moseley AM. Diagnostic accuracy of the Ottawa Ankle and Midfoot Rules: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2017;51:504–10.

Bachmann LM, Haberzeth S, Steurer J, Ter Riet G. The accuracy of the Ottawa knee rule to rule out knee fractures: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2004;140(2):121–4.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

French SD, Green S, Buchbinder R, Barnes H. Interventions for improving the appropriate use of imaging in people with musculoskeletal conditions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010(1):CD006094.

Gerrelts BD, Petersen EU, Mabry J, Petersen SR. Delayed diagnosis of cervical spine injuries. J Trauma. 1991;31(12):1622–6.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Graham ID, Stiell IG, Laupacis A, McAuley L, Howell M, Clancy M, et al. Awareness and use of the Ottawa Ankle and Knee Rules in 5 countries: can publication alone be enough to change practice? Ann Emerg Med. 2001;37(3):259–66.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Matteucci MJ, Roos JA. Ottawa Knee Rule: a comparison of physician and triage-nurse utilization of a decision rule for knee injury radiography. J Emerg Med. 2003;24(2):147–50.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Nichol G, Stiel IG, Wells GA, Juergensen LS, Laupacis A. An economic analysis of the Ottawa Knee Rule. Annals of Emergency Medicine. 1999;34(4, Part 1):438–47.

Bachmann LM, Kolb E, Koller MT, Steurer J, Riet Gt. Accuracy of Ottawa ankle rules to exclude fractures of the ankle and mid-foot: systematic review. BMJ. 2003;326(7386):417–9.

Ho JK, Chau JP, Cheung NM. Effectiveness of emergency nurses’ use of the Ottawa Ankle Rules to initiate radiographic tests on improving healthcare outcomes for patients with ankle injuries: a systematic review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2016;63:37–47.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Beutel BG, Trehan SK, Shalvoy RM, Mello MJ. The Ottawa Knee Rule: examining use in an academic emergency department. West J Emerg Med. 2012;13(4):366–72.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Kerkhoffs GM, van Den Bekerom M, Elders LAM, van Beek PA, Hullegie WAM, Bloemers GMFM, et al. Diagnosis, treatment and prevention of ankle sprains: an evidence-based clinical guideline. Br J Sports Med. 2012;46(12):854–60.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Robb G, Reid D, Arroll B, Jackson RT, Goodyear-Smith F. General practitioner diagnosis and management of acute knee injuries: summary of an evidence-based guideline. N Z Med J. 2007;120(1249):U2419.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Côté P, Wong J, Sutton D, Shearer H, Mior S, Randhawa K, et al. Management of neck pain and associated disorders: a clinical practice guideline from the Ontario Protocol for Traffic Injury Management (OPTIMa) Collaboration. Eur Spine J. 2016;25(7):2000–22.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Clinical guidelines for the best practice management of acute and chronic whiplash-associated disorders. Adelaide (South Australia): TRACsa; 2008.

National Health and Medical Research Council Evidence-based management of acute musculoskeletal pain. Canberra (AU): The Council; 2003

National Clinical Guideline C. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence: Guidance. Head injury: triage, assessment, investigation and early management of head injury in children, young people and adults. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (UK) Copyright (c) National Clinical Guideline Centre, 2014.; 2014.

Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(4):264–9, w64.

Downs SH, Black N. The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care intervention. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health.52(6):377–84.

Chilvers G, Porter K, Choudhary S. Cervical spine clearance in adults following blunt trauma: a national survey across major trauma centres in England. Clinical Radiology. 2018;73(4).

Huang X, Zhou JC, Pan KH, Zhao HC. Awareness and use of the Canadian computed tomography head rule for mild head injury patients among Chinese emergency physicians. Pakistan J Med Sci. 2013;29(4):951–6.

Google Scholar 

Özan E, Ataç GK. Computed tomography use in minor head injury: attitudes and practices of emergency physicians, neurosurgeons, and radiologists in Turkey. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2018;24(2):121–8.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Tan DW, Lim AME, Ong DY, Peng LL, Chan YH, Ibrahim I, et al. Computed tomography of the head for adult patients with minor head injury: are clinical decision rules a necessary evil? Singapore Med J. 2018;59(4):199–204.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Vedin T, Edelhamre M, Karlsson M, Bergenheim M, Larsson PA. Management of traumatic brain injury in the emergency department: guideline adherence and patient safety. Qual Manag Health Care. 2017;26(4):190–5.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Zakhari R, Sterrett SE. Attitudes toward evidence-based clinical decision support tools to reduce exposure to ionizing radiation: the Canadian CT Head Rule. J Am Assoc Nurse Pract. 2016;28(12):659–67.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Benayoun MD, Allen JW, Lovasik BP, Uriell ML, Spandorfer RM, Holder CA. Utility of computed tomographic imaging of the cervical spine in trauma evaluation of ground-level fall. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016;81(2):339–44.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Burns EC, Yanchar NL. Using cervical spine clearance guidelines in a pediatric population: a survey of physician practices and opinions. Can J Emerg Med. 2011;13(1):1–6.

Article  Google Scholar 

Griffith B, Kelly M, Vallee P, Slezak M, Nagarwala J, Krupp S, et al. Screening cervical spine CT in the emergency department, phase 2: a prospective assessment of use. American J Neuroradiol. 2013;34(4):899–903.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Ngatchou W, Beirnaert J, Lemogoum D, Bouland C, Youatou P, Ramadan AS, et al. Application of the Canadian C-Spine Rule and NEXUS low criteria and results of cervical spine radiography in emergency condition. Pan Afr Med J. 2018;30:157.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Brehaut JC, Stiell IG, Graham ID. Will a new clinical decision rule be widely used? The case of the Canadian C-Spine Rule. Acad Emerg Med. 2006;13(4):413–20.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Clement CM, Stiell IG, Davies B, O’Connor A, Brehaut JC, Sheehan P, et al. Perceived facilitators and barriers to clinical clearance of the cervical spine by emergency department nurses: a major step towards changing practice in the emergency department. Int Emerg Nurs. 2011;19(1):44–52.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Belot M, Hoens AM, Kennedy C, Li LC. Does every patient require imaging after cervical spine trauma? A knowledge translation project to support evidence-informed practice for physiotherapists. Physiother Can. 2017;69(4):280–9.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Paxton M, Heal CF, Drobetz H. Adherence to Canadian C-Spine Rule in a regional hospital: a retrospective study of 406 cases. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2012;56(5):514–8.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Griffith B, Bolton C, Goyal N, Brown ML, Jain R. Screening cervical spine CT in a level I trauma center: overutilization? American journal of roentgenology (1976). 2011;197(2):463–7.

Rostas J, Cason B, Simmons J, Frotan MA, Brevard SB, Gonzalez RP. Implementation of pediatric cervical spine clearance guidelines at a combined trauma center: twelve-month impact. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015;78(6):1095–100.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Slaar A, Fockens MM, van Rijn RR, Maas M, Goslings JC, Bakx R, et al. Adherence to the guidelines of paediatric cervical spine clearance in a level I trauma centre: a single centre experience. Eur J Radiol. 2016;85(1):55–60.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Allerston J, Justham D. Nurse practitioners and the Ottawa Ankle Rules: comparisons with medical staff in requesting X-rays for ankle injured patients. Accid Emerg Nurs. 2000;8(2):110–5.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ashurst JV, Nappe T, Digiambattista S, Kambhampati A, Alam S, Ortiz M, et al. Effect of triage-based use of the Ottawa foot and ankle rules on the number of orders for radiographic imaging. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2014;114(12):890–7.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bessen T, Clark R, Shakib S, Hughes G. A multifaceted strategy for implementation of the Ottawa Ankle Rules in two emergency departments. BMJ. 2009;339: b3056.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Borg M, Pickard AC. Audit on the use of radiography and the management of ankle sprains in A&E. Malta Med J. 2008;20(4):12–4.

Google Scholar 

Brehaut JC, Stiell IG, Visentin L, Graham ID. Clinical decision rules “in the real world”: how a widely disseminated rule is used in everyday practice. Acad Emerg Med. 2005;12(10):948–56.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cameron C, Naylor CD. No impact from active dissemination of the Ottawa Ankle Rules: further evidence of the need for local implementation of practice guidelines. Can Med Assoc J. 1999;160(8):1165–8.

CAS  Google Scholar 

Graham ID, Stiell IG, Laupacis A, O’Connor AM, Wells GA. Emergency physicians’ attitudes toward and use of clinical decision rules for radiography. Acad Emerg Med. 1998;5(2):134–40.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gravel J, Roy M, Carriere B. 44–55-66-PM, a mnemonic that improves retention of the Ottawa ankle and foot rules: a randomized controlled trial. Acad Emerg Med. 2010;17(8):859–64.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar