Al Yafi F, Camenisch B, Al-Sabbagh M. Is digital guided implant surgery accurate and reliable? Dent Clin North Am. 2019;63(3):381–97.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Chen P, Nikoyan L. Guided implant surgery: a technique whose time has come. Dent Clin North Am. 2021;65(1):67–80.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Putra RH, Yoda N, Astuti ER, Sasaki K. The accuracy of implant placement with computer-guided surgery in partially edentulous patients and possible influencing factors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthodont Res. 2022;66(1):29–39.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Flügge T, Derksen W, Te Poel J, Hassan B, Nelson K, Wismeijer D. Registration of cone beam computed tomography data and intraoral surface scans—a prerequisite for guided implant surgery with CAD/CAM drilling guides. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017;28(9):1113–8.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Chandran SK, Jaini JL, Babu AS, Mathew A, Keepanasseril A. Digital versus conventional impressions in dentistry: a systematic review. J Clin Diagn Res. 2019;13(4):1–6.

Google Scholar 

Cicciu M, Fiorillo L, D’Amico C, Gambino D, Amantia EM, Laino L, et al. 3D digital impression systems compared with traditional techniques in dentistry: a recent data systematic review. Materials. 2020;13(8):1982.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Kihara H, Hatakeyama W, Komine F, Takafuji K, Takahashi T, Yokota J, et al. Accuracy and practicality of intraoral scanner in dentistry: a literature review. J Prosthodont Res. 2020;64(2):109–13.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Giachetti L, Sarti C, Cinelli F, Russo DS. Accuracy of digital impressions in fixed prosthodontics: a systematic review of clinical studies. Int J Prosthodont. 2020;33(2):192–201.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Jacobs R, Salmon B, Codari M, Hassan B, Bornstein MM. Cone beam computed tomography in implant dentistry: recommendations for clinical use. BMC Oral Health. 2018;18(1):88.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Fokas G, Vaughn VM, Scarfe WC, Bornstein MM. Accuracy of linear measurements on CBCT images related to presurgical implant treatment planning: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018;29:393–415.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Mai HN, Dam VV, Lee DH. Accuracy of augmented reality-assisted navigation in dental implant surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2023;25: e42040.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Naeini EN, Atashkadeh M, De Bruyn H, D’Haese J. Narrative review regarding the applicability, accuracy, and clinical outcome of flapless implant surgery with or without computer guidance. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2020;22(4):454–67.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Subramani K. Is computer-guided implant placement with a flapless approach more accurate than with a flapped surgical approach? Evid Based Dent. 2022;23(3):110–1.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Seo C, Juodzbalys G. Accuracy of guided surgery via stereolithographic mucosa-supported surgical guide in implant surgery for edentulous patient: a systematic review. J Oral Maxillofac Res. 2018;9(1): e1.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

EftekharAshtiani R, Ghasemi Z, Nami M, Mighani F, Namdari M. Accuracy of static digital surgical guides for dental implants based on the guide system: a systematic review. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021;122(6):600–7.

Article  Google Scholar 

Bover-Ramos F, Vina-Almunia J, Cervera-Ballester J, Penarrocha-Diago M, Garcia-Mira B. Accuracy of implant placement with computer-guided surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing cadaver, clinical, and in vitro studies. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2018;33(1):101–15.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Tahmaseb A, Wu V, Wismeijer D, Coucke W, Evans C. The accuracy of static computer-aided implant surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018;29(Suppl 16):416–35.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Raico Gallardo YN, da Silva-Olivio IRT, Mukai E, Morimoto S, Sesma N, Cordaro L. Accuracy comparison of guided surgery for dental implants according to the tissue of support: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017;28(5):602–12.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372: n71.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Liu X, Liu J, Feng H, Pan S. Accuracy of a milled digital implant surgical guide: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent. 2022;127(3):453–61.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pessoa R, Siqueira R, Li J, Saleh I, Meneghetti P, Bezerra F, et al. The impact of surgical guide fixation and implant location on accuracy of static computer-assisted implant surgery. J Prosthodont. 2022;31(2):155–64.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

D’Haese R, Vrombaut T, Hommez G, De Bruyn H, Vandeweghe S. Accuracy of guided implant surgery using an intraoral scanner and desktop 3D-printed tooth-supported guides. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2022;37(3):479–84.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sun Y, Ding Q, Tang L, Zhang L, Sun Y, Xie Q. Accuracy of a chairside fused deposition modeling 3D-printed single-tooth surgical template for implant placement: an in vitro comparison with a light cured template. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2019;47(8):1216–21.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Li-Rodriguez JK, Diaz-Durany M, Romeo-Rubio M, Paz Salido M, Pradies G. Accuracy of a guided implant system with milled surgical templates. J Oral Sci. 2022;64(2):145–50.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Baez-Marrero N, Rafel JL, Rodriguez-Cardenas YA, Aliaga-Del Castillo A, Dias-Da Silveira HL, Arriola-Guillen LE. Accuracy of computer-assisted surgery in immediate implant placement: an experimental study. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2022;26(3):219–23.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Orban K, Varga E Jr, Windisch P, Braunitzer G, Molnar B. Accuracy of half-guided implant placement with machine-driven or manual insertion: a prospective, randomized clinical study. Clin Oral Investig. 2022;26(1):1035–43.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gargallo-Albiol J, Zilleruelo-Pozo MJ, Lucas-Taule E, Munoz-Penalver J, Paternostro-Betancourt D, Hernandez-Alfaro F. Accuracy of static fully guided implant placement in the posterior area of partially edentulous jaws: a cohort prospective study. Clin Oral Investig. 2022;26(3):2783–91.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Singthong W, Serichetaphongse P, Chengprapakorn W. A randomized clinical trial on the accuracy of guided implant surgery between two implant-planning programs used by inexperienced operators. J Prosthet Dent. 2022.

Feng Y, Su Z, Mo A, Yang X. Comparison of the accuracy of immediate implant placement using static and dynamic computer-assisted implant system in the esthetic zone of the maxilla: a prospective study. Int J Implant Dent. 2022;8(1):65.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Lou F, Rao P, Zhang M, Luo S, Lu S, Xiao J. Accuracy evaluation of partially guided and fully guided templates applied to implant surgery of anterior teeth: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2021;23(1):117–30.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Schneider D, Sax C, Sancho-Puchades M, Hammerle CHF, Jung RE. Accuracy of computer-assisted, template-guided implant placement compared with conventional implant placement by hand—an in vitro study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2021;32(9):1052–60.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Song YW, Kim J, Kim JH, Park JM, Jung UW, Cha JK. Accuracy of dental implant placement by a novel in-house model-free and zero-setup fully guided surgical template made of a light-cured composite resin (VARO Guide((R))): a comparative in vitro study. Materials (Basel). 2021;14(14).

Abduo J, Lau D. Accuracy of static computer-assisted implant placement in long span edentulous area by novice implant clinicians: a cross-sectional in vitro study comparing fully-guided, pilot-guided, and freehand implant placement protocols. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2021;23(3):361–72.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Herschdorfer L, Negreiros WM, Gallucci GO, Hamilton A. Comparison of the accuracy of implants placed with CAD-CAM surgical templates manufactured with various 3D printers: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent. 2021;125(6):905–10.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ngamprasertkit C, Aunmeungthong W, Khongkhunthian P. The implant position accuracy between using only surgical drill guide and surgical drill guide with implant guide in fully digital workflow: a randomized clinical trial. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2022;26(2):229–37.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Spille J, Jin F, Behrens E, Acil Y, Lichtenstein J, Naujokat H, et al. Comparison of implant placement accuracy in two different preoperative digital workflows: navigated vs. pilot-drill-guided surgery. Int J Implant Dent. 2021;7(1):45.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Guentsch A, Sukhtankar L, An H, Luepke PG. Precision and trueness of implant placement with and without static surgical guides: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent. 2021;126(3):398–404.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Han YT, Lin WC, Fan FY, Chen CL, Lin CC, Cheng HC. Comparison of dental surface image registration and fiducial marker registration: an in vivo accuracy study of static computer-assisted implant surgery. J Clin Med. 2021;10(18):4183.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Sittikornpaiboon P, Arunjaroensuk S, Kaboosaya B, Subbalekha K, Mattheos N, Pimkhaokham A. Comparison of the accuracy of implant placement using different drilling systems for static computer-assisted implant surgery: a simulation-based experimental study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2021;23(4):635–43.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Huang L, Zhang X, Mo A. A retrospective study on the transferring accuracy of a fully guided digital template in the anterior zone. Materials (Basel). 2021;14(16):4631.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central