Can ultrasonography be used to determine working length in endodontic treatment? An in vitro study

Nekoofar MH, Ghandi MM, Hayes SJ, Dummer PMH. The fundamental operating principles of electronic root canal length measurement devices. Int Endod J. 2006;39:595–609.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

El Hachem R, Wassef E, Mokbel N, et al. Influence of the Maxillary sinus on the accuracy of the root ZX apex locator: an ex vivo study. Dent J. 2019;7:3.

Article  Google Scholar 

Shacham M, Levin A, Shemesh A, et al. Accuracy and stability of electronic apex locator length measurements in root canals with wide apical foramen: an ex vivo study. BDJ Open. 2020;6:22.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Sivadas G, Sudha P, Shenoy R, et al. Accuracy of apex locator for root canal length determination of deciduous molars compared to conventional radiograph. J Interdiscip Dent. 2013;3:163–6.

Article  Google Scholar 

Rathore K, Tandon S, Sharma M, et al. Comparison of accuracy of apex locator with tactile and conventional radiographic method for working length determination in primary and permanent teeth. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2020;13:235–9.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Marín PN, Alonso ZNV, Castañón MGA, et al. Clinical evaluation of the accuracy of conventional radiography and apex locators in primary teeth. Pediatr Dent. 2011;33:19–22.

Google Scholar 

Mello-Moura ACV, Moura-Netto C, Araki AT, et al. Ex vivo performance of five methods for root canal length determination in primary anterior teeth. Int Endod J. 2010;43:142–7.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Nanda Kishor KM. Comparison of working length determination using apex locator, conventional radiography and radiovisiography: an in vitro study. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2012;13:550–3.

Article  Google Scholar 

Briseño-Marroquín B, Frajlich S, Goldberg F, Willershausen B. Influence of instrument size on the accuracy of different apex locators: an in vitro study. J Endod. 2008;34:698–702.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Venturi M, Breschi L. A comparison between two electronic apex locators: an in vivo investigation. Int Endod J. 2005;38:36–45.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sumer AP, Danaci M, Ozen SE, et al. Ultrasonography and Doppler ultrasonography in the evaluation of intraosseous lesions of the jaws. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2009;38:23–7.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Shahidi S, Shakibafard A, Zamiri B, et al. The feasibility of ultrasonography in defining the size of jaw osseous lesions. J Dent. 2015;16:335–44.

Google Scholar 

Goel S, Nagendrareddy SG, Raju MS, et al. Ultrasonography with color Doppler and power Doppler in the diagnosis of periapical lesions. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2011;21:279–83.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Ferreira TLD, Costa ALF, Tucunduva MJA, et al. Ultrasound evaluation of intra-osseous cavity: a preliminary study in pig mandibles. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2016;6(Suppl 1):14–7.

Article  Google Scholar 

Abdelsalam TA, Amer ME, Mahrous A, Abdelkader M. Evaluation of oral and maxillofacial swellings using ultrasonographic features. Imaging Sci Dent. 2019;49:201–8.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Gundappa M, Ng SY, Whaites EJ. Comparison of ultrasound, digital and conventional radiography in differentiating periapical lesions. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2006;35:326–33.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sandhu SS, Singh S, Arora S, et al. Comparative evaluation of advanced and conventional diagnostic AIDS for endodontic management of periapical lesions, an in vivo study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015;9:ZC01–4.

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Dedeoğlu N, Duman ŞB, Altun O, Arıkan B. In vitro comparison of cone beam computed tomography and ultrasonography imaging methods in the evaluation of artificial mandible intraosseous lesions. J Dent. 2021;22:198–205.

Google Scholar 

Schneider S. Comparison of the canal preparation in straight and curved root canals. Oral Surg Oral Pathol Oral Med Endodontol. 1971;32:271–5.

Article  Google Scholar 

Bernardo RCFD, Alves LS, Bruno AMV, et al. Aust Endod J. 2021;47:217–21.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Abdelsalam N, Hashem N. Impact of apical patency on accuracy of electronic apex locators. In Vitro Study J Endod. 2020;46:509–14.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Akisue E, Gratieri SD, Barletta FB, et al. Not all electronic foramen locators are accurate in teeth with enlarged apical foramina: an in vitro comparison of 5 brands. J Endod. 2014;40:109–12.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ustun Y, Aslan T, Sekerci AE, Sagsen B. Evaluation of the reliability of cone-beam computed tomography scanning and electronic apex locator measurements in working length determination of teeth with large periapical lesions. J Endod. 2016;42:1334–7.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Şen ÖG, Ulusoy Öİ, Paltun YN, Ulusoy Ç. Effect of orthodontic brackets on the accuracy of apex locators: a pilot study. Biomed Res Int. 2021;1:1–4.

Article  Google Scholar 

Serna-Peña G, Gomes-Azevedo S, Flores-Treviño J. In vivo evaluation of 3 electronic apex locators: root ZX mini, apex ID, and propex pixi. J Endod. 2020;46:158–61.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Martins JN, Marques D, Mata A, Carames J. Clinical efficacy of electronic apex locators: systematic review. J Endod. 2014;40:759–77.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Tsesis I, Blazer T, Ben-Izhack G, et al. The precision of electronic apex locators in working length determination: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. J Endod. 2015;41:1818–23.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Piasecki L, Carneiro E, Fariniuk LF, et al. Accuracy of root ZX II in locating foramen in teeth with apical periodontitis: an in vivo study. J Endod. 2011;37(1213):1216.

Google Scholar 

Kuttler Y. Microscopic investigation of root apexes. J Am Dent Assoc. 1955;50:544–52.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Vertucci FJ. Root canal morphology and its relationship to endodontic procedures. Endod Topics. 2005;10:3–29.

Article  Google Scholar 

Dummer PM, McGinn JH, Rees DG. The position and topography of the apical canal constriction and apical foramen. Int Endod J. 1984;17:192–8.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Versiani MA, Ahmed HM, Sousa-Neto MD, et al. Unusual deviation of the main foramen from the root apex. Braz Dent J. 2016;27:589–91.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Stabholz A, Rotstein I, Torabinejad M. Effect of preflaring on tactile detection of the apical constriction. J Endod. 1995;21:92–4.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Vasconcelos BC, Bueno MM, Luna-Cruz SM, et al. Accuracy of five electronic foramen locators with different operating systems: an ex vivo study. J Appl Oral Sci. 2013;21:132–7.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Stober EK, Duran-Sindreu F, Mercade M, et al. An evaluation of root ZX and iPex apex locators: an in vivo study. J Endod. 2011;37:608–10.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pascon EA, Marrelli M, Congi O, et al. An ex vivo comparison of working length determination by 3 electronic apex locators. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009;108:147–51.

Article  Google Scholar 

Das S, Adhikari HD. Reliability of Ultrasonography in differentially diagnosing periapical lesions of endodontic origin in comparison with Intra-oral periapical radiography and Cone-beam computed tomography: an in vivo study. J Conserv Dent. 2021;24(5):445–50.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif