Singla N, Singla AK. Post-prostatectomy incontinence: etiology, evaluation, and management. Turk J Urol. 2014;40(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.5152/tud.2014.222014.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Penson DF, McLerran D, Feng Z, et al. 5-year urinary and sexual outcomes after radical prostatectomy: results from the prostate cancer outcomes study. J Urol. 2005;173(5):1701–5. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000154637.38262.3a.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Fontaine E, Izadifar V, Barthélémy Y, Desgrippes A, Beurton D. Urinary continence following radical prostatectomy assessed by a self-administered questionnaire. Eur Urol. 2000;37(2):223–7. https://doi.org/10.1159/000020122.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Potosky AL, Davis WW, Hoffman RM, et al. Five-year outcomes after prostatectomy or radiotherapy for prostate cancer: the prostate cancer outcomes study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004;96(18):1358–67. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djh259.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ravi P, Karakiewicz PI, Roghmann F, Gandaglia G, Choueiri TK, Menon M, McKay RR, Nguyen PL, Sammon JD, Sukumar S, Varda B, Chang SL, Kibel AS, Sun M, Trinh Q-D. Mental health outcomes in elderly men with prostate cancer. Urol Oncol. 2014;32(8):1333–2134.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Zhang AY, Ganocy S, Fu AZ, et al. Mood outcomes of a behavioral treatment for urinary incontinence in prostate cancer survivors. Support Care Cancer. 2019;27(12):4461–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-019-04745-w.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Urkmez A, Ranasinghe W, Davis JW. Surgical techniques to improve continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Transl Androl Urol. 2020;9(6):3036–48. https://doi.org/10.21037/tau.2020.03.36.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Filocamo MT, Li Marzi V, Del Popolo G, et al. Effectiveness of early pelvic floor rehabilitation treatment for post-prostatectomy incontinence. Eur Urol. 2005;48(5):734–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2005.06.004.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sandhu JS, Breyer B, Comiter C, et al. Incontinence after Prostate Treatment: AUA/SUFU Guideline. J Urol. 2019;202(2):369–78. https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000000314.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Tutolo M, Cornu JN, Bauer RM, et al. Efficacy and safety of artificial urinary sphincter (AUS): results of a large multi-institutional cohort of patients with mid-term follow-up. Neurourol Urodyn. 2019;38(2):710–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.23901.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Van der Aa F, Drake MJ, Kasyan GR, Petrolekas A, Cornu JN; Young Academic Urologists Functional Urology Group. The artificial urinary sphincter after a quarter of a century: a critical systematic review of its use in male non-neurogenic incontinence. Eur Urol. 2013;63(4):681–689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2012.11.034.

Litwiller SE, Kim KB, Fone PD, White RW, Stone AR. Post-prostatectomy incontinence and the artificial urinary sphincter: a long-term study of patient satisfaction and criteria for success. J Urol. 1996;156(6):1975–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(01)65408-9.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bauer RM, Grabbert MT, Klehr B, et al. 36-month data for the AdVance XP® male sling: results of a prospective multicentre study. BJU Int. 2017;119(4):626–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.13704.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bauer RM, Mayer ME, May F, et al. Complications of the AdVance transobturator male sling in the treatment of male stress urinary incontinence. Urology. 2010;75(6):1494–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2009.12.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Malik RD, Cohn JA, Fedunok PA, Chung DE, Bales GT. Assessing variability of the 24-hour pad weight test in men with post-prostatectomy incontinence. Int Brazilian J Urol Off J Brazilian Soc Urol. 2016;42(2):327. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2014.0506.

Article  Google Scholar 

Tsui JF, Shah MB, Weinberger JM, et al. Pad count is a poor measure of the severity of urinary incontinence. J Urol. 2013;190(5):1787–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JURO.2013.05.055.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Org S, Pham CT, Patel MI, Mungovan SF. Pad weight, pad number and incontinence-related patient-reported outcome measures after radical prostatectomy. Société Int d’Urologie J. 2022;3(3):124–30. https://doi.org/10.48083/10.48083/TIWQ1657.

Article  Google Scholar 

Jr. RKK, Yi YA, Ortiz NM, et al. Standing cough test stratification of moderate male stress urinary incontinence. Int Brazilian J Urol Off J Brazilian Soc Urol. 2021;47(2):415. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2020.0551.

• Zemp L, Tong S, Hoy N, Rourke KF. Preoperative pad usage is independently associated with failure of non-adjustable male trans-obturator slings in otherwise well-selected patients. Can Urol Assoc J. 2019;13(4):120–4. https://doi.org/10.5489/CUAJ.5468. While subjective, number of pads per day (PPD) is a very useful tool in predicting who may fail slings. The use of more than 3 ppd is correlated with increased risk of failing a transobturator sling.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Mumm J, Abrarova B, Schütz J, et al. Age at surgery is not a prognostic factor for the AdVance‐XP male sling efficacy: a post‐hoc analysis of a prospective 7‐year multicentric study Neurourology and Urodynamics. 2021;40:1616–1624. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.24727. Age does not impact success rates associated with transobturator slings.

Fuller TW, Ballon-Landa E, Gallo K, et al. Outcomes and risk factors of revision and replacement artificial urinary sphincter implantation in radiated and nonradiated cases. J Urol. 2020;204(1):110–4. https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000000749.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Huang MM, Huffman P, Dani H, Knijnik PG, da Silva AF, Burnett AL, Mostwin JL, Wright EJ, Cohen AJ. Association between previous pelvic radiation and all-cause and cause-specific failure of replacement artificial urinary sphincters. J Urol. 2022;207(6):1268–75. https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000002433.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bø K, Hilde G. Does it work in the long term? – a systematic review on pelvic floor muscle training for female stress urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn. 2013;32:215–23.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wu ML, Wang CS, Xiao Q, Peng CH, Zeng TY. The therapeutic effect of pelvic floor muscle exercise on urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy: a meta-analysis. Asian J Androl. 2019;21(2):170–6. https://doi.org/10.4103/aja.aja_89_18.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cheng H, Wang Y, Qi F, Si S, Li X, Chen M. Preoperative pelvic floor muscle exercise does not reduce the rate of postprostatectomy incontinence: evidence from a meta-analysis and a systematic review. Transl Androl Urol. 2020;9(5):2146–56. https://doi.org/10.21037/tau-20-684.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Scott KM, Gosai E, Bradley MH, Walton S, Hynan LS, Lemack G, Roehrborn C. Individualized pelvic physical therapy for the treatment of post-prostatectomy stress urinary incontinence and pelvic pain. Int Urol Nephrol. 2020;52(4):655–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-019-02343-7. Epub 2019 Dec 5 PMID: 31807975.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Nager CW, Brubaker L, Litman HJ, et al. A randomized trial of urodynamic testing before stress-incontinence surgery. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(21):1987–97. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMOA1113595.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Lepor H, Kaci L. The impact of open radical retropubic prostatectomy on continence and lower urinary tract symptoms: a prospective assessment using validated self-administered outcome instruments. J Urol. 2004;171(3):1216–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.JU.0000113964.68020.A7.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Toia B, Leung LY, Saigal R, et al. Is pre-operative urodynamic bladder function the true predictor of outcome of male sling for post prostatectomy incontinence? World J Urol. 2021;39(4):1227–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00345-020-03288-8. Urodynamics has a role in helping guide patient selection. Detrusor overactivity and low cystometric capacity (< 337 cc) are associated with lower success rates for transobturator slings.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

•• Ajay D, Kahokehr AA, Lentz AC, Peterson AC. Valsalva leak point pressure (VLPP) greater than 70 cm H2O is an indicator for sling success: a success prediction model for the male transobturator sling. Int Urol Nephrol. 2022;54(7):1499–503. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11255-022-03222-4. This paper highlights that a valsava leak point pressure greater than 70 can help predict success with male transobturator slings.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Morey AF, Singla N, Carmel M, Klein A, Tausch TJ, Siegel J, Tachibana I, Scott J. Standing cough test for evaluation of post-prostatectomy incontinence: a pilot study. Can J Urol. 2017;24(1):8664–9 PMID: 28263134.

PubMed  Google Scholar