Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and minimal detectable change (MDC) of Spinal Cord Ability Ruler (SCAR)

Bryce TN, Huang V, Escalon MX. Spinal cord injury. In: Cifu DX, Eapen BC, Johns JS, Kowalske K, (eds). Braddom’s physical medicine and rehabilitation. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2021. p. 1049–1100.

Catz A, Itzkovich M, Tesio L, Biering-Sorensen F, Weeks C, Laramee MT, et al. A multicenter international study on the Spinal Cord Independence Measure, version III: Rasch psychometric validation. Spinal Cord. 2007;45:275–91.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Reed R, Mehra M, Kirshblum S, Maier D, Lammertse D, Blight A, et al. Spinal cord ability ruler: an interval scale to measure volitional performance after spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2017;55:730–8.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bach Jønsson A, Møller Thygesen M, Krogh S, Kasch H. Feasibility of predicting improvements in motor function following SCI using the SCAR outcome measure: a retrospective study. Spinal Cord. 2019;57:966–71.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pattanakuhar S, Kammuang-lue P, Kovindha A, Komaratat N, Mahachai R, Chotiyarnwong C. Is admission to an SCI specialized rehabilitation facility associated with better functional outcomes? Analysis of data from the Thai Spinal Cord Injury Registry. Spinal Cord. 2019;57:684–91.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Van Middendorp JJ, Pouw MH, Hayes KC, Williams R, Chhabra HS, Putz C, et al. Diagnostic criteria of traumatic central cord syndrome. Part 2: a questionnaire survey among spine specialists. Spinal Cord. 2010;48:657–63.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kirshblum S, Snider B, Rupp R, Read MS. Updates of the International Standards for Neurologic Classification of Spinal Cord Injury: 2015 and 2019. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2020;31:319–30.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Dhand NK, Khatkar MS. Sample size calculator for estimating a single mean. 2020. http://statulator.com/SampleSize/ss1M.html.

Biering-Sørensen F, DeVivo MJ, Charlifue S, Chen Y, New PW, Noonan V, et al. International Spinal Cord Injury Core Data Set (version 2.0)-including standardization of reporting. Spinal Cord. 2017;55:759–64.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Copay AG, Subach BR, Glassman SD, Polly DW Jr., Schuler TC. Understanding the minimum clinically important difference: a review of concepts and methods. Spine J. 2007;7:541–6.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Engel L, Beaton DE, Touma Z. Minimal clinically important difference: a review of outcome measure score interpretation. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2018;44:177–88.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Norman GR, Sloan JA, Wyrwich KW. Interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life: the remarkable universality of half a standard deviation. Med Care. 2003;41:582–92.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ousmen A, Touraine C, Deliu N, Cottone F, Bonnetain F, Efficace F, et al. Distribution- and anchor-based methods to determine the minimally important difference on patient-reported outcome questionnaires in oncology: a structured review. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018;16:228.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Hägg O, Fritzell P, Nordwall A. The clinical importance of changes in outcome scores after treatment for chronic low back pain. Eur Spine J. 2003;12:12–20.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Beninato M, Fernandes A, Plummer LS. Minimal clinically important difference of the functional gait assessment in older adults. Phys Ther. 2014;94:1594–603.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Scivoletto G, Tamburella F, Laurenza L, Molinari M. The spinal cord independence measure: how much change is clinically significant for spinal cord injury subjects. Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35:1808–13.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Corallo V, Torre M, Ferrara G, Guerra F, Nicosia G, Romanelli E, et al. What do spinal cord injury patients think of their improvement? A study of the minimal clinically important difference of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure III. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2017;53:508–15.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wyrwich KW, Nienaber NA, Tierney WM, Wolinsky FD. Linking clinical relevance and statistical significance in evaluating intra-individual changes in health-related quality of life. Med Care. 1999;37:469–78.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Storm FA, Petrarca M, Beretta E, Strazzer S, Piccinini L, Maghini C, et al. Minimum clinically important difference of gross motor function and gait endurance in children with motor impairment: a comparison of distribution-based approaches. Biomed Res Int. 2020; https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/2794036.

Kay ED, Deutsch A, Fau - Wuermser LA, Wuermser LA. Predicting walking at discharge from inpatient rehabilitation after a traumatic spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;88:745–50.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Burns SP, Golding DG, Rolle WA Jr., Graziani V, Ditunno JF, et al. Recovery of ambulation in motor-incomplete tetraplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997;78:1169–72.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Piovesana A, Senior G. How small is big: sample size and skewness. Assessment. 2018;25:793–800.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif