Hamilton WG, Cashen DV, Ho H et al (2007) Extensively porous-coated stems for femoral revision: a choice for all seasons. J Arthroplasty 22:106–110

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

McAuley JP, Engh CA Jr (2004) Femoral fixation in the face of considerable bone loss: cylindrical and extensively coated femoral components. Clin Orthop Relat Res 429:215–221

Article  Google Scholar 

DeRogatis MJ, Wintermeyer E, Sperring TR et al (2019) Modular fluted titanium stems in revision hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 101:745–754

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Weeden SH, Paprosky WG (2002) Minimal 11-year follow-up of extensively porous-coated stems in femoral revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 17:134–137

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lachiewicz PF, Soileau ES (2015) What is the survivorship of fully coated femoral components in revision hip arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res 473:549–554

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sporer SM, Paprosky WG (2003) Revision total hip arthroplasty: the limits of fully coated stems. Clin Orthop Relat Res 417:203–209

Article  Google Scholar 

Konan S, Garbuz DS, Masri BA et al (2014) Non-modular tapered fluted titanium stems in hip revision surgery: gaining attention. Bone Joint J 96-B:56–59

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Munro JT, Garbuz DS, Masri BA et al (2012) Role and results of tapered fluted modular titanium stems in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 94:58–60

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Zhang Y, Zhang Y, Sun JN et al (2020) Comparison of cylindrical and tapered stem designs for femoral revision hip arthroplasty. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 21:411

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Russell RD, Pierce W, Huo MH (2016) Tapered vs cylindrical stem fixation in a model of femoral bone deficiency in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 31:1352–1355

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Richards CJ, Duncan CP, Masri BA et al (2010) Femoral revision hip arthroplasty: a comparison of two stem designs. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:491–496

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Garbuz DS, Toms A, Masri BA et al (2006) Improved outcome in femoral revision arthroplasty with tapered fluted modular titanium stems. Clin Orthop Relat Res 453:199–202

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cohn MR, Tetreault MW, Li J et al (2020) Is there a benefit to modularity for femoral revisions when using a splined, tapered titanium stem? J Arthroplasty 35:S278–s283

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Yacovelli S, Ottaway J, Banerjee S et al (2021) Modern revision femoral stem designs have no difference in rates of subsidence. J Arthroplasty 36:268–273

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Koutalos AA, Varitimidis S, Malizos KN et al (2022) Clinical, functional and radiographic outcomes after revision total hip arthroplasty with tapered fluted modular or non-modular stems: a systematic review. Hip Int 32:475–487

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM et al (2021) The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Int J Surg 88:105906

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bojcic R, Todoric M, Puljak L (2022) Adopting AMSTAR 2 critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews: speed of the tool uptake and barriers for its adoption. BMC Med Res Methodol 22:104

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Saracco M, Ciriello V, D'Angelo F et al (2023) Do prior intra-articular injections impact on the risk of periprosthetic joint infection in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty? A meta-analysis of the current evidences with a focus on the timing of injection before surgery. EFORT Open Rev 8:459–467

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Feng S, Zhang Y, Bao YH et al (2020) Comparison of modular and nonmodular tapered fluted titanium stems in femoral revision hip arthroplasty: a minimum 6-year follow-up study. Sci Rep 10:13692

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Huang Y, Shao H, Zhou Y et al (2019) Femoral bone remodeling in revision total hip arthroplasty with use of modular compared with monoblock tapered fluted titanium stems: The role of stem length and stiffness. J Bone Joint Surg Am 101:531–538

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Clair AJ, Cizmic Z, Vigdorchik JM et al (2019) Nonmodular stems are a viable alternative to modular stems in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 34:S292–s296

Article  Google Scholar 

Clair AJ, Gabor JA, Patel KS et al (2020) Subsidence following revision total hip arthroplasty using modular and monolithic components. J Arthroplasty 35:S299–s303

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Huang Y, Zhou Y, Shao H et al (2017) What is the difference between modular and nonmodular tapered fluted titanium stems in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 32:3108–3113

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Moreta J, Uriarte I, Ormaza A et al (2019) Outcomes of Vancouver B2 and B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures after total hip arthroplasty in elderly patients. Hip Int 29:184–190

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Zeng M, Xie J, Li M et al (2015) Cementless femoral revision in patients with a previous cemented prosthesis. Int Orthop 39:1513–1518

Article  Google Scholar 

Chatziagorou G, Lindahl H, Kärrholm J (2019) Surgical treatment of Vancouver type B periprosthetic femoral fractures: patient characteristics and outcomes of 1381 fractures treated in Sweden between 2001 and 2011. Bone Joint J 101-b:1447–1458

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Böhm P, Bischel O (2001) Femoral revision with the Wagner SL revision stem : evaluation of one hundred and twenty-nine revisions followed for a mean of 4.8 years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83:1023–1031

Article  Google Scholar 

Regis D, Sandri A, Bonetti I et al (2011) Femoral revision with the Wagner tapered stem: a ten- to 15-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93:1320–1326

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Böhm P, Bischel O (2004) The use of tapered stems for femoral revision surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res 148–159

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Tamvakopoulos GS, Servant CT, Clark G et al (2007) Medium-term follow-up series using a modular distal fixation prosthesis to address proximal femoral bone deficiency in revision total hip arthroplasty. A 5- to 9-year follow-up study. Hip Int 17:143–149

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Meek RM, Garbuz DS, Masri BA et al (2004) Intraoperative fracture of the femur in revision total hip arthroplasty with a diaphyseal fitting stem. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86:480–485

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Jones RE (2004) Modular revision stems in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 420:142–147

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Tsiridis E, Haddad FS, Gie GA (2003) The management of periprosthetic femoral fractures around hip replacements. Injury 34:95–105

PubMed  Google Scholar 

MacDonald SJ, Cole C, Guerin J et al (2003) Extended trochanteric osteotomy via the direct lateral approach in revision hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 417:210–216

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Jando VT, Greidanus NV, Masri BA et al (2005) Trochanteric osteotomies in revision total hip arthroplasty: contemporary techniques and results. Instr Course Lect 54:143–155

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Park YS, Moon YW, Lim SJ (2007) Revision total hip arthroplasty using a fluted and tapered modular distal fixation stem with and without extended trochanteric osteotomy. J Arthroplasty 22:993–999

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Garabano G, Gessara AM, Pesciallo CA et al (2021) Extended trochanteric osteotomy (ETO) and fluted tapered modular stems in revision hip arthroplasty. Does ETO integrity or consolidation, really matter? J Orthop 23:250–255

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Ladurner A, Zurmühle P, Zdravkovic V et al (2017) Modified extended trochanteric osteotomy for the treatment of vancouver B2/B3 periprosthetic fractures of the femur. J Arthroplasty 32:2487–2495

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Weber M, Hempfing A, Orler R et al (2002) Femoral revision using the Wagner stem: results at 2-9 years. Int Orthop 26:36–39

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Sandiford NA, Duncan CP, Garbuz DS et al (2015) Tapered, fluted titanium stems in revision total hip arthroplasty: role and results in contemporary practice. Instr Course Lect 64:359–366

Gutiérrez Del Alamo J, Garcia-Cimbrelo E, Castellanos V et al (2007) Radiographic bone regeneration and clinical outcome with the Wagner SL revision stem: a 5-year to 12-year follow-up study. J Arthroplasty 22:515–524

Singh SP, Bhalodiya HP (2013) Results of Wagner SL revision stem with impaction bone grafting in revision total hip arthroplasty. Indian J Orthop 47:357–363

Sandiford NA, Garbuz DS, Masri BA et al (2017) Nonmodular tapered fluted titanium stems osseointegrate reliably at short term in revision THAs. Clin Orthop Relat Res 475:186–192

Isacson J, Stark A, Wallensten R (2000) The Wagner revision prosthesis consistently restores femoral bone structure. Int Orthop 24:139–142

Berry DJ (2002) Femoral revision: distal fixation with fluted, tapered grit-blasted stems. J Arthroplasty 17:142–146

Pomeroy E, Flynn SO, Grigoras M et al (2022) Subsidence of monoblock and modular titanium fluted tapered stems in revision hip arthroplasty: A retrospective multicentre comparison study. J Clin Orthop Trauma 34:102021