Eccles MP, Mittman BS. Welcome to implementation science. Implement Sci. 2006;1(1):1.

Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Nilsen P. Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks. Implement Sci. 2015;10(1):53.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Kislov R, Pope C, Martin GP, Wilson PM. Harnessing the power of theorising in implementation science. Implement Sci. 2019;14(1):1–8.

Article  Google Scholar 

Birken SA, Rohweder CL, Powell BJ, Shea CM, Scott J, Leeman J, et al. T-CaST: an implementation theory comparison and selection tool. Implement Sci. 2018;13(1):1–10.

Article  Google Scholar 

Birken SA, Powell BJ, Shea CM, Haines ER, Alexis Kirk M, Leeman J, et al. Criteria for selecting implementation science theories and frameworks: results from an international survey. Implement Sci. 2017;12(1):1–9.

Article  Google Scholar 

Mitchell SA, Fisher CA, Hastings CE, Silverman LB, Wallen GR. A thematic analysis of theoretical models for translational science in nursing: mapping the field. Nurs Outlook. 2010;58(6):287–300.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Tabak RG, Khoong EC, Chambers DA, Brownson RC. Bridging research and practice: models for dissemination and implementation research. Am J Prev Med. 2012;43(3):337–50.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Albers B, Mildon R, Lyon AR, Shlonsky A. Implementation frameworks in child, youth and family services–results from a scoping review. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2017;81:101–16.

Article  Google Scholar 

Brownson RC, Colditz GA, Proctor EK. Dissemination and implementation research in health: translating science to practice. New York: Oxford University Press; 2017.

Milat AJ, Li B. Narrative review of frameworks for translating research evidence into policy and practice. Public Health Res Pract. 2017;27(1):e2711704.

Article  Google Scholar 

Strifler L, Cardoso R, McGowan J, Cogo E, Nincic V, Khan PA, et al. Scoping review identifies significant number of knowledge translation theories, models, and frameworks with limited use. J Clin Epidemiol. 2018;100:92–102.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Esmail R, Hanson HM, Holroyd-Leduc J, Brown S, Strifler L, Straus SE, et al. A scoping review of full-spectrum knowledge translation theories, models, and frameworks. Implement Sci. 2020;15(1):1–14.

Article  Google Scholar 

Moullin JC, Sabater-Hernández D, Fernandez-Llimos F, Benrimoj SI. A systematic review of implementation frameworks of innovations in healthcare and resulting generic implementation framework. Health research policy and systems. 2015;13(1):1–11.

Article  Google Scholar 

Barwick M. Is a rose by any other name, still a rose? Why knowledge translation and implementation science are not Synonymous 2018. Available from: https://melaniebarwick.wordpress.com/2018/02/21/is-a-rose-by-any-other-name-still-a-rose-why-knowledge-translation-and-implementation-science-are-not-synonymous/. [Cited 2021 March 18].

Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8(1):19–32.

Article  Google Scholar 

Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O’Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169(7):467–73.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Delen D, Ram S. Research challenges and opportunities in business analytics. Journal of Business Analytics. 2018;1(1):2–12.

Article  Google Scholar 

Nilsen P, Birken SA. Handbook on implementation science. Cheltenham & Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing; 2020.

Cane J, O’Connor D, Michie S. Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research. Implement Sci. 2012;7:37.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Michie S, van Stralen MM, West R. The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implement Sci. 2011;6:42.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Graham ID, Logan J, Harrison MB, Straus SE, Tetroe J, Caswell W, et al. Lost in knowledge translation: time for a map? J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2006;26(1):13–24.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Glasgow RE, Vogt TM, Boles SM. Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. Am J Public Health. 1999;89(9):1322–7.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Harvey G, Kitson A. PARIHS revisited: from heuristic to integrated framework for the successful implementation of knowledge into practice. Implement Sci. 2016;11:33.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Shea J. Taking nonprofit intermediaries seriously: a middle-range theory for implementation research. Public Adm Rev. 2011;71(1):57–66.

Article  Google Scholar 

Foster-Fishman PG, Nowell B, Yang HL. Putting the system back into systems change: a framework for understanding and changing organizational and community systems. Am J Community Psychol. 2007;39(3–4):197–215.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Balane MA, Palafox B, Palileo-Villanueva LM, McKee M, Balabanova D. Enhancing the use of stakeholder analysis for policy implementation research: towards a novel framing and operationalised measures. BMJ global health. 2020;5(11):e002661.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Stirman SW, Baumann AA, Miller CJ. The FRAME: an expanded framework for reporting adaptations and modifications to evidence-based interventions. Implement Sci. 2019;14:58.

Article  Google Scholar 

Rogers L, De Brun A, McAuliffe E. Development of an integrative coding framework for evaluating context within implementation science. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020;20(1):158.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Brown CG. The Iowa Model of Evidence-Based Practice to Promote Quality Care: an illustrated example in oncology nursing. Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2014;18(2):157–9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Glisson C, Schoenwald SK. The ARC organizational and community intervention strategy for implementing evidence-based children’s mental health treatments. Ment Health Serv Res. 2005;7(4):243–59.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Yusof MM, Kuljis J, Papazafeiropoulou A, Stergioulas LK. An evaluation framework for health information systems: human, organization and technology-fit factors (HOT-fit). Int J Med Inf. 2008;77(6):386–98.

Article  Google Scholar 

Shea CM, Jacobs SR, Esserman DA, Bruce K, Weiner BJ. Organizational readiness for implementing change: a psychometric assessment of a new measure. Implement Sci. 2014;9:7.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Damschroder LJ, Aron DC, Keith RE, Kirsh SR, Alexander JA, Lowery JC. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci. 2009;4(1):1–15.

Article  Google Scholar 

Rogers EM, Singhal A, Quinlan MM. Diffusion of innovations. An integrated approach to communication theory and research. New York: Routledge; 2014. p. 432–48.

Davis FD, Bagozzi RP, Warshaw PR. User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Manage Sci. 1989;35(8):982–1003.

Article  Google Scholar 

May C. Towards a general theory of implementation. Implement Sci. 2013;8:18.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Braganza MZ, Kilbourne AM. The Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QUERI) impact framework: measuring the real-world impact of implementation science. J Gen Intern Med. 2021;36(2):396–403.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Klein KJ, Sorra JS. The challenge of innovation implementation. Acad Manag Rev. 1996;21(4):1055–80.

Article  Google Scholar 

Stokols D, Allen J, Bellingham RL. The social ecology of health promotion: implications for research and practice. Am J Health Promot. 1996;10(4):247–51.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Iacobucci D. Network models of the diffusion of innovations. J Mark. 1996;60(3):134.

Google Scholar 

Wilson KM, Brady TJ, Lesesne C, Translation NWG. An organizing framework for translation in public health: the knowledge to action framework. Prev Chronic Dis. 2011;8(2):A46.

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Kirk MA, Moore JE, Stirman SW, Birken SA. Towards a comprehensive model for understanding adaptations’ impact: the model for adaptation design and impact (MADI). Implement Sci. 2020;15(1):56.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Andersson N, Beauchamp M, Nava-Aguilera E, Paredes-Solis S, Sajna M. The women made it work: fuzzy transitive closure of the results chain in a dengue prevention trial in Mexico. BMC Public Health. 2017;17:408.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Dy SM, Ashok M, Wines RC, Smith LR. A framework to guide implementation research for care transitions interventions. J Healthc Qual. 2015;37(1):41–54.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Raghavan R, Bright CL, Shadoin AL. Toward a policy ecology of implementation of evidence-based practices in public mental health settings. Implement Sci. 2008;3:26.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Shea CM, Young TL, Powell BJ, Rohweder C, Enga ZK, Scott JE, et al. Researcher readiness for participating in community-engaged dissemination and implementation research: a conceptual framework of core competencies. Transl Behav Med. 2017;7(3):393–404.