Aikens, R.C., Greaves, D., Baiocchi, M.: Using the Prognostic Score to Reduce Heterogeneity in Observational Studies. (2019). https://arxiv.org/pdf/1908.09077v1.pdf

Anoke, S.C., Normand, S.-L., Zigler, C.M.: Approaches to treatment effect heterogeneity in the presence of confounding. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.8143

Arbogast, P.G., Ray, W.A.: Use of disease risk scores in pharmacoepidemiologic studies. Stat. Methods Med. Res. 18(1), 67–80 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1177/0962280208092347

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Austin, P.C.: Assessing balance in measured baseline covariates when using many-to-one matching on the propensity-score. Pharmacoepidemiol. Drug Saf. 17(12), 1218–1225 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1002/PDS.1674

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Austin, P.C.: Balance diagnostics for comparing the distribution of baseline covariates between treatment groups in propensity-score matched samples. Stat. Med. 28(25), 3083–3107 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.3697

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Bargagli-Stoffi, F.J., Cadei, R., Lee, K., Dominici, F.: Causal Rule Ensemble: Interpretable Discovery and Inference of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects. (2020). https://arxiv.org/abs/2009.09036v5

Brookhart, M.A., Schneeweiss, S., Rothman, K.J., Glynn, R.J., Avorn, J., Stürmer, T.: Variable selection for propensity score models. Am. J. Epidemiol. 163(12), 1149–1156 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwj149

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Busso, M., DiNardo, J., McCrary, J., Busso, M., DiNardo, J., McCrary, J.: New evidence on the Finite Sample Properties of Propensity score reweighting and matching estimators. Rev. Econ. Stat. 96(5), 885–897 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1162/REST_A_00431

Article  Google Scholar 

Ellis, A.R., Dusetzina, S.B., Hansen, R.A., Gaynes, B.N., Farley, J.F., Stürmer, T.: Investigating differences in treatment effect estimates between propensity score matching and weighting: A demonstration using STAR*D trial data. Pharmacoepidemiol. Drug Saf. 22(2), 138–144 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1002/PDS.3396

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gao, Z., Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R.: Assessment of heterogeneous treatment effect estimation accuracy via matching. Stat. Med. 40(17), 3990–4013 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/SIM.9010

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Gon, Y., Kabata, D., Mochizuki, H.: Association between kidney function and intracerebral hematoma volume. J. Clin. Neurosci. 96 (2022a). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2021.12.022

Gon, Y., Kabata, D., Mochizuki, H.: Response to correspondence concerning Association between kidney function and intracerebral hematoma volume. J. Clin. Neurosci. 99 (2022b). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2022.02.025

Greifer, N., Stuart, E.A.: Choosing the Estimand When Matching or Weighting in Observational Studies. ArXiv Preprint. arXiv:2106.10577 (2021)

Hansen, B.B.: The prognostic analogue of the propensity score. Biometrika. 95(2), 481–488 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1093/BIOMET/ASN004

Article  Google Scholar 

Hu, L., Ji, J., Li, F.: Estimating heterogeneous survival treatment effect in observational data using machine learning. Stat. Med. 40(21), 4691–4713 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/SIM.9090

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Kabata, D., Shintani, A.: Estimating the treatment effect with propensity score when the effect varies by patient characteristics: A case study and simulation. Commun. Statistics: Case Stud. Data Anal. Appl. 1–13 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1080/23737484.2022.2043201

Knaus, M., Lechner, M., Strittmatter, A., Knaus, M., Lechner, M., Strittmatter, A.: Machine learning estimation of heterogeneous causal effects: Empirical Monte Carlo evidence. Econometrics J. 24(1), 134–161 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1093/ECTJ/UTAA014

Article  Google Scholar 

Komen, J.J., Belitser, S., Wyss, R., Schneeweiss, S., Taams, A.C., Pajouheshnia, R., Forslund, T., Klungel, O.H.: Greedy caliper propensity score matching can yield variable estimates of the treatment-outcome association—A simulation study. Pharmacoepidemiol. Drug Saf. 30(7), 934–951 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.5232

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Kurth, T., Walker, A.M., Glynn, R.J., Chan, K.A., Gaziano, J.M., Berger, K., Robins, J.M.: Results of multivariable logistic regression, propensity matching, propensity adjustment, and propensity-based weighting under conditions of nonuniform effect. Am. J. Epidemiol. 163(3), 262–270 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1093/AJE/KWJ047

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Leacy, F.P., Stuart, E.A.: On the joint use of propensity and prognostic scores in estimation of the average treatment effect on the treated: A simulation study. Stat. Med. 33(20), 3488–3508 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1002/SIM.6030

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lunt, M., Solomon, D., Rothman, K., Glynn, R., Hyrich, K., Symmons, D.P.M., Stü, T.: Practice of epidemiology different methods of balancing covariates leading to different Effect estimates in the Presence of Effect Modification. 169(7). (2009). https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwn391

Nguyen, T.L., Debray, T.P.A.: The use of prognostic scores for causal inference with general treatment regimes. Stat. Med. 38(11), 2013–2029 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/SIM.8084

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Pedroza, C., Thanh Truong, V.T.: Performance of models for estimating absolute risk difference in multicenter trials with binary outcome. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 16(1), 1–12 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1186/S12874-016-0217-0/TABLES/2

Article  Google Scholar 

Powers, S., Qian, J., Jung, K., Schuler, A., Shah, N.H., Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R.: Some methods for heterogeneous treatment effect estimation in high dimensions. Stat. Med. 37(11), 1767 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/SIM.7623

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Rosenbaum, P.R., Rubin, D.B.: The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika. 70(1), 41–55 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1093/BIOMET/70.1.41

Article  Google Scholar 

Rubin, D.B., Thomas, N.: Matching Using Estimated Propensity Scores: Relating Theory to Practice (Vol. 52, Issue 1). (1996). https://www.jstor.org/stable/2533160

Stuart, E.A.: Matching methods for causal inference: A review and a look forward. Stat. Sci. : Rev. J. Inst. Math. Stat. 25(1), 1 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1214/09-STS313

Article  Google Scholar 

Stuart, E.A., Lee, B.K., Leacy, F.P.: Prognostic score–based balance measures for propensity score methods in comparative effectiveness research. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 66(8 0), S84 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLINEPI.2013.01.013

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Wager, S., Athey, S.: Estimation and inference of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects using Random forests. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 113(523), 1228–1242 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2017.1319839

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Wang, J.: To use or not to use propensity score matching? Pharm. Stat. 20(1), 15–24 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/PST.2051

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wendling, T., Jung, K., Callahan, A., Schuler, A., Shah, N.H., Gallego, B.: Comparing methods for estimation of heterogeneous treatment effects using observational data from health care databases. Stat. Med. 37(23), 3309–3324 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/SIM.7820

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Xie, Y., Brand, J.E., Jann, B.: Estimating Heterogeneous Treatment Effects with Observational Data. Sociol. Methodol. 42(1), 314 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1177/0081175012452652

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Zou, G.: A modified Poisson Regression Approach to prospective studies with Binary Data. Am. J. Epidemiol. 159(7), 702–706 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1093/AJE/KWH090

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar