Beltrão, G., Paramonova, I., Sousa, S.: User interface design for AI-based clinical decision-support system: preliminary study, In: 2022 17th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI).' 22–25 June 2022. (2022). https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9820378/https://doi.org/10.23919/CISTI54924.2022.9820378

Birt, L., Scott, S., Cavers, D., Campbell, C., Walter, F.: Member checking: a tool to enhance trustworthiness or merely a nod to validation? Qual. Health Res. 26(13), 1802–1811 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732316654870

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Braun, V., Clarke, V.: Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual. Res. Psychol. 3(2), 77–101 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Article  Google Scholar 

Breth-Petersen, M., Bell, K., Pickles, K., McGain, F., McAlister, S., Barratt, A.: Health, financial and environmental impacts of unnecessary vitamin D testing: a triple bottom line assessment adapted for healthcare. BMJ Open 12(8), e056997 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056997

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Bureau of Health Information.: https://www.bhi.nsw.gov.au/data-portal Accessed 10 August 2023, (2023).

Busetto, L., Wick, W., Gumbinger, C.: How to use and assess qualitative research methods. Neurol. Res. Pract. 2(1), 14 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s42466-020-00059-z

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Charters, E.: The Use of think-aloud methods in qualitative research an introduction to think-aloud methods. Brock Edu. J. (2003). https://doi.org/10.26522/BROCKED.V12I2.38

Article  Google Scholar 

Coleman, P.: Validity and reliability within qualitative research for the caring sciences. Int. J. Caring Sci. 14(3), 2041–2045 (2022)

Google Scholar 

DePorre, A.G., Hall, M., Puls, H.T., Daly, A., Gay, J.C., Bettenhausen, J.L., Markham, J.L.: Variation in care and clinical outcomes among infants hospitalized with hyperbilirubinemia. Hosp. Pediatr. 10(10), 844–850 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1542/hpeds.2020-0161

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

El-Kareh, R., Hasan, O., Schiff, G.D.: Use of health information technology to reduce diagnostic errors. BMJ Qual. Saf. 22(Suppl 2), 40–51 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2013-001884

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Elo, S., Kyngäs, H.: The qualitative content analysis process. J. Adv. Nurs. 62(1), 107–115 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Etikan, I., Musa, S.A., Alkassim, R.S.: Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. Am. J. Theor. Appl. Stat. 5(1), 1–4 (2016)

Article  Google Scholar 

Florin, T.A., French, B., Zorc, J.J., Alpern, E.R., Shah, S.S.: Variation in emergency department diagnostic testing and disposition outcomes in pneumonia. Pediatrics 132(2), 237–244 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2013-0179

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Frutos, E.L., Muñoz, A.M., Rovegno, L., Pedretti, A.S., Otero, C.M., Gimenez, C., Luna, D.R., Grande Ratti, M.F., Martinez, B.J.: ’Can CPOE based on electronic order sets cause unintended consequences (expensive and unnecessary tests) at the emergency department? Stud. Health Technol. Inform. (2022). https://doi.org/10.3233/shti220059

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gion, M., Cardinali, G., Guzzinati, S., Morandi, P., Trevisiol, C., Fabricio, A.S.C., Rugge, M., Zorzi, M.: Use of routine health datasets to assess the appropriateness of diagnostic tests in the follow-up of breast cancer patients: a population-based study on 3930 patients. Risk Manag. Healthc. Polic. 15, 1087–1100 (2022). https://doi.org/10.2147/rmhp.s342072

Article  Google Scholar 

Given, L.: The SAGE encyclopedia of qualitative research methods: semi-structured interview. SAGE Publ. Inc Thousand Oaks Calif. (2008a). https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412963909

Article  Google Scholar 

Given, L.: The SAGE encyclopedia of qualitative research methods: triangulation. SAGE Publ. Inc Thousand Oaks Calif. (2008b). https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412963909

Article  Google Scholar 

Hak, F., Guimarães, T., Santos, M.: Towards effective clinical decision support systems: a systematic review. PLoS ONE 17(8), e0272846 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0272846

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Hayashi, P., Jr., Abib, G., Hoppen, N., Wolff, L.D.G.: Processual validity in qualitative research in healthcare. Inq. J. Health Care Organ. Provis. Financ. 58, 00469580211060750 (2021)

Google Scholar 

Hernandez, B., Ming, D., Ho, C., Quang, H.N., Phuoc, A.L., Thi, H.T.D., Minh, T.N., Hai, D.H.T., Diem, P.D., Hue, T.L.T., Hoang, C.B., Kim, H.T., Trung, T.H., Paton, C., Holmes, A., Yacoub, S., Georgiou, P.: A human-centred design approach towards development of a digital clinical decision-support system for management of hospitalised patients with dengue. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 130, S87–S88 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2023.04.217

Article  Google Scholar 

Hofmann, B., Welch, H.G.: New diagnostic tests: more harm than good. BMJ. 358, j3314 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j3314

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hughes, A.E.O., Jackups, R., Jr.: Clinical decision support for laboratory testing. Clin. Chem. 68(3), 402–412 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvab201

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Jacobsohn, G.C., Leaf, M., Liao, F., Maru, A.P., Engstrom, C.J., Salwei, M.E., Pankratz, G.T., Eastman, A., Carayon, P., Wiegmann, D.A., Galang, J.S., Smith, M.A., Shah, M.N., Patterson, B.W.: Collaborative design and implementation of a clinical decision support system for automated fall-risk identification and referrals in emergency departments. Healthcare 10(1), 100598 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hjdsi.2021.100598

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Janssens, P.M., van de Wijngaart, D.J., van Dijk, N.: Sensible use of laboratory testing requires active laboratory involvement. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. 52(7), e131–e132 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2013-1097

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Khairat, S., Marc, D., Crosby, W., Al Sanousi, A.: Reasons for physicians not adopting clinical decision support systems: critical analysis. JMIR Med. Inform. 6(2), e24 (2018). https://doi.org/10.2196/medinform.8912

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Kouri, A., Yamada, J., Lam Shin Cheung, J., Van de Velde, S., Gupta, S.: Do providers use computerized clinical decision support systems? a systematic review and meta-regression of clinical decision support uptake. Implement. Sci. 17(1), 21 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-022-01199-3

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Krolikowski, K.A., Bi, M., Baggott, C.M., Khorzad, R., Holl, J.L., Kruser, J.M.: Design thinking to improve healthcare delivery in the intensive care unit: promise, pitfalls, and lessons learned. J. Crit. Care 69, 153999 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2022.153999

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Li, J., Dahm, M.R., Thomas, J., Wabe, N., Smith, P., Georgiou, A.: Why is there variation in test ordering practices for patients presenting to the emergency department with undifferentiated chest pain? A qualitative study. Emerg. Med. J. 38(11), 820–824 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2020-211075

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Maguire, M.: Methods to support human-centred design. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 55(4), 587–634 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1006/ijhc.2001.0503

Article  Google Scholar 

Medford-Davis, L., Park, E., Shlamovitz, G., Suliburk, J., Meyer, A.N., Singh, H.: Diagnostic errors related to acute abdominal pain in the emergency department. Emerg. Med. J. 33(4), 253–259 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2015-204754

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Melles, M., Albayrak, A., Goossens, R.: Innovating health care: key characteristics of human-centered design. Int. J. Qual. Health Care 33(Supplement_1), 37–44 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzaa127

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Micheli, P., Wilner, S.J.S., Bhatti, S.H., Mura, M., Beverland, M.B.: Doing design thinking: conceptual review, synthesis, and research Agenda. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 36(2), 124–148 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12466

Article  Google Scholar 

Morse, J.M.: Critical analysis of strategies for determining rigor in qualitative inquiry. Qual. Health Res. 25(9), 1212–1222 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315588501

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Mthuli, S.A., Ruffin, F., Singh, N.: Define, explain, justify, apply (DEJA): an analytic tool for guiding qualitative research sample size. Int. J. Soc. Res. Methodol. 25(6), 809–821 (2022)

Article  Google Scholar 

Ngo, A., Gandhi, P., Miller, W.G.: Frequency that laboratory tests influence medical decisions. J. Appl. Lab. Med. 1(4), 410–414 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1373/jalm.2016.021634

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Noteboom, C., Behrens, A., Crandall, K., Zeng, D.: People, process, and technology in clinical decision support systems: a meta-analysis. SAIS 2022 Proceedings. 4. (2022)

NPS MedicineWise 2021 Choosing Wisely Annual Report: Reducing low-value care for a sustainable healthcare system. https://www.choosingwisely.org.au/assets/CWA2459_CW_2021_Annual_Report.pdf. (2021)

Object Management Group.: Business process model and notation (BPMN) version 2.0.2.' https://www.omg.org/spec/BPMN/2.0.2/ Accessed 16 February 2023 (2014)

Patterson, B.W., Pulia, M.S., Ravi, S., Hoonakker, P.L.T., Schoofs Hundt, A., Wiegmann, D., Wirkus, E.J., Johnson, S., Carayon, P.: Scope and influence of electronic health record-integrated clinical decision support in the emergency department: a systematic review. Ann. Emerg. Med. 74(2), 285–296 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2018.10.034

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Ray, J.M., Ahmed, O.M., Solad, Y., Maleska, M., Martel, S., Jeffery, M.M., Platts-Mills, T.F., Hess, E.P., D’Onofrio, G., Melnick, E.R.: Computerized clinical decision support system for emergency department-initiated buprenorphine for opioid use disorder: user-centered design. JMIR Hum. Fact. 6(1), e13121 (2019). https://doi.org/10.2196/13121

Article  Google Scholar 

Rendle, K.A., Abramson, C.M., Garrett, S.B., Halley, M.C., Dohan, D.: Beyond exploratory: a tailored framework for designing and assessing qualitative health research. BMJ Open 9(8), e030123 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030123

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Roberts, J.P., Fisher, T.R., Trowbridge, M.J., Bent, C.: A design thinking framework for healthcare management and innovation. Healthc (amst) 4(1), 11–14 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hjdsi.2015.12.002