Abedi, J., & Gándara, P. (2006). Performance of English Language Learners as a Subgroup in Large-Scale Assessment: Interaction of Research and Policy. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 25(4), 36–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.2006.00077.x

Article  Google Scholar 

Au, W. (2007). High-Stakes Testing and Curricular Control: A Qualitative Metasynthesis. Educational Researcher, 36(5), 258–267. JSTOR.

Billings, E. M. H., Coffey, D. C., Golden, J., & Wells, P. J. (2013). Teaching with the Mathematical Practices in Mind. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 19(2), 100–107. JSTOR. https://doi.org/10.5951/mathteacmiddscho.19.2.0100

Brandt, R. (1992). On Research on Teaching: A Conversation with Lee Shulman. Educational Leadership, 49(7), 14–19.

Google Scholar 

Burch, C. B. (1999). Inside the Portfolio Experience: The Student’s Perspective. English Education, 32(1), 34–49.

Google Scholar 

Calfee, R. C., & Perfumo, P. (1993). Student Portfolios: Opportunities for a Revolution in Assessment. Journal of Reading, 36(7), 532–537.

Google Scholar 

Care, E. (2018). Twenty-First Century Skills: From Theory to Action. In E. Care, P. Griffin, & M. Wilson (Eds.), Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills: Research and Applications (pp. 3–17). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65368-6_1

Chang, C.-C., Tseng, K.-H., Chou, P.-N., & Chen, Y.-H. (2011). Reliability and validity of Web-based portfolio peer assessment: A case study for a senior high school’s students taking computer course. Computers & Education, 57(1), 1306–1316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.01.014

Article  Google Scholar 

Cicmanec, K. M., & Viechnicki, K. J. (1994). Assessing Mathematics Skills Through Portfolios: Validating the Claims From Existing Literature. Educational Assessment, 2(2), 167–178. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326977ea0202_4

Article  Google Scholar 

Cook-Benjamin, L. L. (1995). College Students’ Attitudes and Perceptions of Learning Through the Use of Portfolio Assessment [Ed.D., University of South Dakota]. http://search.proquest.com/docview/857040369/abstract/DD3B7978D82A40C1PQ/1

Coutts, R., Gilleard, W., & Baglin, R. (2011). Evidence for the impact of assessment on mood and motivation in first‐year students. Studies in Higher Education, 36(3), 291–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2010.523892

Article  Google Scholar 

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage publications.

Davis, J., & Martin, D. (2018). Racism, Assessment, and Instructional Practices: Implications for Mathematics Teachers of African American Students. Journal of Urban Mathematics Education, 11, 45–68.

Article  Google Scholar 

Diop, K. A. S., & Liu, E. (2020). Categorization of case in case study research method: New approach. Knowledge and Performance Management, 4(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.21511/kpm.04(1).2020.01

Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building Theories from Case Study Research. The Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550. https://doi.org/10.2307/258557

Article  Google Scholar 

Elbow, P., & Belanoff, P. (1997). Reflections on an Explosion: Portfolios in the ’90s and Beyond. In K. B. Yancey & I. Weiser (Eds.), Situating Portfolios (pp. 21–33). University Press of Colorado. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt46nxw3.4

Fritz, C. (2001). The level of teacher involvement in the Vermont mathematics portfolio assessment process and instructional practices in grade 4 classrooms. Doctoral Dissertations. https://scholars.unh.edu/dissertation/15

Gillespie, C. S., Ford, K. L., Gillespie, R. D., & Leavell, A. G. (1996). Portfolio Assessment: Some Questions, Some Answers, Some Recommendations. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 39(6), 480–491.

Google Scholar 

Greiff, S., Niepel, C., & Wüstenberg, S. (2015). 21st century skills: International advancements and recent developments. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 18, 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2015.04.007

Article  Google Scholar 

Griffin, P., & Care, E. (Eds.). (2015). Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills: Methods and Approach. Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9395-7

Harlen, W. (2005). Teachers’ summative practices and assessment for learning – tensions and synergies. The Curriculum Journal, 16(2), 207–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585170500136093

Article  Google Scholar 

Harlen, W., & Crick, R. D. (2003). Testing and Motivation for Learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 10(2), 169–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594032000121270

Article  Google Scholar 

Heron, J., & Reason, P. (1997). A Participatory Inquiry Paradigm. Qualitative Inquiry, 3(3), 274–294. https://doi.org/10.1177/107780049700300302

Article  Google Scholar 

Horn, I. S. (2018). Accountability as a Design for Teacher Learning: Sensemaking About Mathematics and Equity in the NCLB Era. Urban Education, 53(3), 382–408. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085916646625

Article  Google Scholar 

Horn, I., & Schneeberger McGugan, K. (2020). Adaptive expertise in mathematics teaching during a crisis: How highly-committed secondary U.S. mathematics teachers adjusted their instruction in the COVID-19 pandemic. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.13720.83200

Humphries, J. E., & Kosse, F. (2017). On the interpretation of non-cognitive skills – What is being measured and why it matters. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 136, 174–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2017.02.001

Article  Google Scholar 

Inglis, M., & Attridge, N. (2016). Does Mathematical Study Develop Logical Thinking?: Testing The Theory Of Formal Discipline. World Scientific Publishing Company. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/uwy/detail.action?docID=4709107

Joram, E., Gabriele, A. J., & Walton, K. (2020). What influences teachers’ “buy-in” of research? Teachers’ beliefs about the applicability of educational research to their practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 88, 102980. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.102980

Kickert, R., Meeuwisse, M., Stegers-Jager, K. M., Koppenol-Gonzalez, G. V., Arends, L. R., & Prinzie, P. (2019). Assessment policies and academic performance within a single course: The role of motivation and self-regulation. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(8), 1177–1190. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1580674

Article  Google Scholar 

King, N., Horrocks, C., & Brooks, J. (2019). Interviews in qualitative research (2nd ed.). SAGE.

Krall, G. (2018). Necessary Conditions: Teaching Secondary Math with Academic Safety, Quality Tasks, and Effective Facilitation. Stenhouse Publishers.

Liljedahl, P. (2007). Persona-Based Journaling: Striving for Authenticity in Representing the Problem-Solving Process. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 5(4), 661–680. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-007-9092-9

Article  Google Scholar 

Lim, S. Y., & Chapman, E. (2013). Development of a short form of the attitudes toward mathematics inventory. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 82(1), 145–164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-012-9414-x

Article  Google Scholar 

Pohlmann, B., Möller, J., & Streblow, L. (2004). Zur Fremdeinschätzung von Schülerselbstkonzepten durch Lehrer und Mitschüler [On Students' Self-Concepts Inferred By Teachers and Classmates]. Zeitschrift Für Pädagogische Psychologie, 18(3/4), 157–169. https://doi.org/10.1024/1010-0652.18.34.157

Article  Google Scholar 

Renwick, M. (2017). Digital Portfolios in the Classroom: Showcasing and Assessing Student Work. Association for Supervision & Curriculum Development. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/uwy/detail.action?docID=5041558

Schatz, E. (2012). Rationale and procedures for nesting semi-structured interviews in surveys or censuses. Population Studies, 66(2), 183–195.

Article  Google Scholar 

Schoenfeld, A. H. (2015). Summative and Formative Assessments in Mathematics Supporting the Goals of the Common Core Standards. Theory Into Practice, 54(3), 183–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2015.1044346

Article  Google Scholar 

Sowder, J. (2007). The Mathematical Education and Development of Teachers. In Second Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning (pp. 157–223). Information Age Publishing.

Spinath, B. (2005). Akkuratheit der Einschätzung von Schülermerkmalen durch Lehrer und das Konstrukt der diagnostischen Kompetenz [Accuracy of teacher judgments on student characteristics and the construct of diagnostic competence]. Zeitschrift Für Pädagogische Psychologie, 19(1/2), 85–95.

Article  Google Scholar 

Südkamp, A., Kaiser, J., & Möller, J. (2012). Accuracy of teachers’ judgments of students’ academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(3), 743–762.https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027627

Article  Google Scholar 

Wiggins, G. (1990). The Case for Authentic Assessment. ERIC Digest. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED328611

Wiggins, G. (2011). A True Test: Toward More Authentic and Equitable Assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 92(7), 81–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172171109200721

Article  Google Scholar 

Wilson, M., Hallam, P. J., Pecheone, R. L., & Moss, P. A. (2014). Evaluating the Validity of Portfolio Assessments for Licensure Decisions. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 22(0), Article 0. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v22n6.2014

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications. Sage.

Google Scholar 

Zimmerman, J. (2006). Why Some Teachers Resist Change and What Principals Can Do About It. NASSP Bulletin, 90(3), 238–249. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192636506291521

Article  Google Scholar