Abbasian, M. (2016). Dynamic Assessment: Review of Literature. International Journal of Modern Language Teaching and Learning. 1(3), 116–120.

Google Scholar 

Alonzo A.C. (2018). An argument for formative assessment with science learning progressions. Applied Measurement in Education. 31(2), 104–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/08957347.2017.1408630

Article  Google Scholar 

Amels-de Groot, J. (2021). Teachers’ capacity to realize educational change through inquiry-based working and distributed leadership. https://doi.org/10.33612/diss.160149825

Anderson, T.R. (2007). Bridging the Gap; Bridging the Educational Research-Teaching Practice Gap; The power of assessment. Biochemistry and molecular biology education. 35(6), 471–477. https://doi.org/10.1002/bambed.20135

Article  Google Scholar 

Bao, L. & Koenig, K. (2019). Physics education research for 21th century learning. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research. 1(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-019-0007-8

Article  Google Scholar 

Beaumont, C., O’Doherty, M. & Shannon, L. (2011). Reconceptualising assessment feedback: A key to improving student learning? Studies in Higher Education. 36(6), 671–687. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075071003731135

Bitchener, J., & Storch, N. (2016). Written corrective feedback for L2 development. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

Book  Google Scholar 

Black, P., & William, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational, Assessment, Evaluating and Accountability. 21, 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5

Article  Google Scholar 

Chi, M.T.H., Feltovic, P.J. & Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and Representation of Physics Problems by Experts and Novices. Cognitive Science A Multidisciplinary Journal. 5(2):121–152. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0502_2

Article  Google Scholar 

College voor Toetsen en Examens. (2012, tijdvak 2). Examenopgave HAVO, HAVO natuurkunde, opgave 2. Stichting Studie Begeleiding.

Cooper, G., & Sweller, J. (1987). The effects of schema acquisition and rule automation on mathematical problem-solving transfer. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 347–362.

Article  Google Scholar 

De Bordes, P. F. (2013). Coderingsschema’s non-verbaal gedrag. Unpublished manuscript.

Fischer, K.W. (1980). A theory of cognitive development: The control and construction of hierarchies of skills. Psychological Review. 87(6), 477–531.

Article  Google Scholar 

Fischer, K.W. (2008). Dynamic cycles of cognitive and brain development: Measuring growth in mind, brain, and education. In A.M. Battro, K.W. Fischer & P. Léna (Eds.), The educated brain (pp. 127–150). Cambridge University Press.

Google Scholar 

Fischer, K. W., & Bidell, T. R. (2006). Dynamic development of action and thought. In W. Damon, & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Theoretical models of human development. Handbook of Child Psychology (6th ed., pp. 313–399). Wiley.

Galbraith, P.L., Stillman, G. (2006). A framework for identifying student blockages during transitions in the Modelling process. Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik. 38 (2), 143–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02655886

Gottfried, A.E., Marcoulides, G.A., Gottfried, A.W., Oliver, P.H. (2013). Longitudinal Pathways from Math Intrinsic Motivation and Achievement to Math Course Accomplishments and Educational Attainment. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness. 6(1), 68–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2012.698376

Article  Google Scholar 

Gotwals, A.W., Philhower, J., Cisterna, D., Bennett, S. (2015). Using video to examine formative assessment practices as measures of expertise for mathematics and science teachers. International Journal of Science and Mathematical Education. 13, 405–423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-015-9623-8

Article  Google Scholar 

Hayes, A. F., & Krippendorff, K. (2007). Answering the call for a standard reliability measure for coding data. Communication Methods and Measures, 1(1), 77–89.

Article  Google Scholar 

Hays, M.J., Kornell, N. & Bjork, R.A. (2010). The costs and benefits of providing feedback during learning. Psychonomic Bulletin Review. 17, 797–801. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.17.6.797

Article  Google Scholar 

Heritage, M.; Kim, J.; Vendlinski, T.; Herman, J. (2009). From Evidence to Action: A Seamless Process in Formative Assessment? Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice. 28(3), 24–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.2009.00151.x

Article  Google Scholar 

Kalyuga, S., Ayres, P., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (2011). The expertise reversal effect. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 23–31. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3801_4

Article  Google Scholar 

Khan, M., Zaman T.U., Saeed, A. (2020). Formative Assessment Practices of Physics Teachers in Pakistan. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia. 16 (2), 122–131. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpfi.v16i2.25238

Kirschner, P., Speller. J., Clark, R.E. (2006). Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching. Educational Psychologist. 41(2), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1

Li, Y. & Schoenfeld, A.H. (2019). Problematizing teaching and learning mathematics as “given” in STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education. 6(44). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-019-0197-9

McDermott, J., & Larkin, J.H. (1978). Re-representing textbook physics problems. Proceedings of the 2nd National Conference of the Canadian Society for Computational Studies of Intelligence. University of Toronto Press.

Mangels, J.A., Good, C., Whiteman, R.C., Maniscalco, B., Carol S. Dweck, C.S. (2012). Emotion blocks the path to learning under stereotype threat. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience. 7(2), 230–241. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsq100

Article  Google Scholar 

Mayer, R. E. (2014). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (2nd. ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Mayer, R.E. & Wittrock, M. C. (2009). Problem solving. In A. P. Alexander, & P.H. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology. (2nd ed., pp. 287–303). Taylor & Francis Group.

McDaniel, M.A., Bugg, J.M. Liu, Y., Brick, J. (2015). When Does the Test-Study-Test Sequence Optimize Learning and Retention? Journal of Experimental Psychology. 21(4), 370–382. https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000063

Article  Google Scholar 

Montague, M. (2002). Mathematical problem-solving instruction: Components, procedures, and materials. In M. Montague, & C. Warger (Eds.), Afterschool extensions: Including students with disabilities in afterschool programs.

Moon, T.R. (2005). The Role of Assessment in Differentiation. Theory in to Practice, 44(3), 226–233. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4403_7

Article  Google Scholar 

Moser, A. (2020). Written Corrective Feedback: The Role of Learner Engagement: A Practical Approach. Springer. Baden. Austria. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63994-5

Book  Google Scholar 

Norhatta, M., Tengku, F.P., Tengku, M., Mohd, N.I. (2011). Factors that influence students in Mathematics achievements. International Journal of Academic Research. 3(3), 49–54.

Google Scholar 

Pals, F.F.B., Tolboom, J.L.J., Suhre, C.J.M. (2023). Development of a formative assessment instrument to determine students’ need for corrective actions in physics: Identifying students’ functional level of understanding. Thinking Skills and Creativity. 50, 101387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101387

Article  Google Scholar 

Pressley, M., Hogan, K., Wharton-McDonald, R., & Mistretta, J. (1996). The challenges of instructional scaffolding: The challenges of instruction that supports student thinking. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice. 11(3), 138–146.

Google Scholar 

Ramaprasad, A. (1983). On the definition of feedback. Systems Research and Behavioral Science. 28(1), 4–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/bs.3830280103

Article  Google Scholar 

Salleh, F. & Zakaria, E. (2009). Non-routine problem solving and attitudes towards problem solving among high achievers. The International Journal of Learning. 16(5). https://doi.org/10.18848/1447-9494/CGP/v16i05/46289

Schneider, M.C. & Gowan, P. (2013). Investigating Teachers’ Skills in Interpreting Evidence of Student Learning. Applied Measurement in Education. 26(3), 191–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/08957347.2013.793185

Article  Google Scholar 

Scholtz, A. (2007). An analysis of the impact of an authentic assessment strategy on student performance in a technology-mediated constructivist classroom: A study revisited. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology. 3(4), 42–53.

Schwartz, M.S., & Fischer, K.W. (2005). Cognitive developmental change: Theories, models, and measurement. In A. Demetriou, & A. Raftopoulos (Eds.), Building general knowledge and skill: Cognition and microdevelopment in science. (pp. 157–185). Cambridge University Press.

Google Scholar 

Shute, V.J. (2008). Focus on Formative Feedback. Review of Educational Research. 78(1), 153–189. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654307313795

Article  Google Scholar 

Sweller, J., Ayers, P., & Kalyunga, S. (2011). Cognitive load theory. New York. Springer.

Book  Google Scholar 

Taconis, R., & Kessels, U. (2009). How choosing science depends on students’ individual fit to ‘science culture’. International Journal of Science Education, 31(8), 1115–1132. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690802050876

Article  Google Scholar 

Taras, M. (2010). Assessment for learning: assessing the theory and evidence. Procedia Social and Behavioural Sciences. 2(2), 3015–3022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.457

Article  Google Scholar 

Tyng, C.M., Amin, H.U., Saad, M.N.M., & Malik, A.S. (2017). The Influences of Emotion on Learning and Memory. Frontiers in Psychology. 8:1454. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01454

Tolboom, J. L. J. (2012). The potential of a classroom network to support teacher feedback: a study in statistics education. https://doi.org/10.33612/diss.14566050

Van den Berg, M., Bosker, R.J. & Suhre, C.J.M. (2018). Testing the effectiveness of classroom formative assessment in Dutch primary mathematics education. School Effectiveness and School Improvement. 29(3), 339–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2017.1406376

Article  Google Scholar 

Van der Steen, S., Steenbeek, H.W., Den Hartigh, R.J.R., & van Geert, P.L.C. (2019). The Link between Microdevelopment and Long-Term Learning Trajectories in Science Learning. Human Development. 63(1), 4–32. https://doi.org/10.1159/000501431

Article  Google Scholar 

Van Geert, P., & Fischer, K.W. (2009). Dynamic systems and the quest for individual-based models of change and development. In J.P. Spencer, M.S.C. Thomas & J. McClelland (Eds.), Toward a newgrand theory of development? Connectionism and dynamic systems theory reconsidered. Oxford University Press.

Van Geert, P., & Steenbeek, H. (2005). The dynamics of scaffolding. New Ideas in Psychology. 23(3), 115–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2006.05.003

Article  Google Scholar 

Van Geert, P., & Steenbeek, H. (2014). The good, the bad and the ugly? The dynamic interplay between educational practice, policy and research. Complexity: An International Journal of Complexity ana Education. 1(2), 1–18.

Van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Sweller, J. (2005). Cognitive Load Theory and Complex Learning: Recent Developments and Future Directions. Educational Psychology Review, 17(2), 147–177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-005-3951-0

Article  Google Scholar 

Vardi, I. (2013). Effectively feeding forward from one written assessment task to the next. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 38(5), 599–610. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2012.670197

Article  Google Scholar 

Verkerk, G., Broens, J. B., Bouwens, R.E.A., Groot de, P.A.M., Kranendonk, W., Vogelezang, M.J., Westra, J.J., Wevers-Prijs, I.M. (2004). In NVON-commissie (Ed.), Binas havo/vwo (5th ed.). Wolters-Noordhoff.

Vygotsky, L.S. (Ed.). (1978). Mind and society: The development of higher mental processes. Harvard University Press.

Vygotsky, L.S. (1986). Thought and language. Newly revised and edited by A. Kozulin. (2012). MIT Press.

Wiklund-Hörnqvist, C., Jonsson, B. & Nyberg, L. (2014). Strengthening concept learning by repeated testing. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology. 55(1), 10–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12093

Article  Google Scholar