Ferenczy A. Pathophysiology of adenomyosis. Hum Reprod Update. 1998;4(4):312–22. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/4.4.312.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Taran FA, Wallwiener M, Kabashi D, Rothmund R, Rall K, Kraemer B, et al. Clinical characteristics indicating adenomyosis at the time of hysterectomy: a retrospective study in 291 patients. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012;285(6):1571–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-011-2180-7.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sharma K, Bora MK, Venkatesh BP, Barman P, Roy SK, Jayagurunathan U, et al. Role of 3D ultrasound and Doppler in differentiating clinically suspected cases of leiomyoma and adenomyosis of uterus. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015;9(4):QC08–12. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2015/12240.5846.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Liu L, Li W, Leonardi M, Condous G, Da Silva CF, Mol BW, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of transvaginal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging for adenomyosis: systematic review and meta-analysis and review of sonographic diagnostic criteria. J Ultrasound Med. 2021;40(11):2289–306. https://doi.org/10.1002/jum.15635.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Van den Bosch T, Dueholm M, Leone FP, Valentin L, Rasmussen CK, Votino A, et al. Terms, definitions and measurements to describe sonographic features of myometrium and uterine masses: a consensus opinion from the Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment (MUSA) group. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;46(3):284–98. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.14806.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Andres MP, Borrelli GM, Ribeiro J, Baracat EC, Abrão MS, Kho RM. Transvaginal ultrasound for the diagnosis of adenomyosis: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018;25(2):257–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2017.08.653.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Naftalin J, Hoo W, Pateman K, Mavrelos D, Holland T, Jurkovic D. How common is adenomyosis? A prospective study of prevalence using transvaginal ultrasound in a gynaecology clinic. Hum Reprod. 2012;27(12):3432–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/des332.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Orlov S, Jokubkiene L. Prevalence of endometriosis and adenomyosis at transvaginal ultrasound examination in symptomatic women. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2022;101(5):524–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14337.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Mishra I, Melo P, Easter C, Sephton V, Dhillon-Smith R, Coomarasamy A. Prevalence of adenomyosis in women with subfertility: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.26159.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Di Donato N, Montanari G, Benfenati A, Leonardi D, Bertoldo V, Monti G, et al. Prevalence of adenomyosis in women undergoing surgery for endometriosis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014;181:289–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.08.016.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Olgan S, Dirican EK, Ozsipahi AC, Sakinci M. Uterine involvement by endometriosis: sonographic features from elusive findings to apparent adenomyosis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021;262:93–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.05.013.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Exacoustos C, De Felice G, Pizzo A, Morosetti G, Lazzeri L, Centini G, et al. Isolated ovarian endometrioma: a history between myth and reality. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018;25(5):884–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2017.12.026.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Eisenberg VH, Arbib N, Schiff E, Goldenberg M, Seidman DS, Soriano D. Sonographic signs of adenomyosis are prevalent in women undergoing surgery for endometriosis and may suggest a higher risk of infertility. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:8967803. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/8967803.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

•• Bourdon M, Oliveira J, Marcellin L, Santulli P, Bordonne C, Maitrot Mantelet L, et al. Adenomyosis of the inner and outer myometrium are associated with different clinical profiles. Hum Reprod. 2021;36(2):349–57. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deaa307. Findings from this study suggest that imaging features of external adenomyosis is associated with deep endometriosis.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Zanolli NC, Cline BC, Befera NT, Martin JG. Diagnostic accuracy of clinically reported adenomyosis on pelvic ultrasound and MRI compared to surgical pathology. Clin Imaging. 2022;82:117–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2021.11.012.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Harmsen MJ, Van den Bosch T, de Leeuw RA, Dueholm M, Exacoustos C, Valentin L, et al. Consensus on revised definitions of Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment (MUSA) features of adenomyosis: results of modified Delphi procedure. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2022;60(1):118–31. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.24786.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

• Zannoni L, Ambrosio M, Raimondo D, Arena A, Del Forno S, Borghese G, et al. Question mark sign and transvaginal ultrasound uterine tenderness for the diagnosis of adenomyosis: a prospective validation. J Ultrasound Med. 2020;39(7):1405–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/jum.15237. This study evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of multiple TVUS features for adenomyosis.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Xholli A, Scovazzi U, Londero AP, Evangelisti G, Cavalli E, Schiaffino MG, et al. Angle of uterine flexion and adenomyosis. J Clin Med. 2022;11(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11113214.

Raimondo D, Lazzeri L, Raffone A, Giorgi M, Orsini B, Verrelli L, et al. Sonographic assessment of uterine biometry for the diagnosis of diffuse adenomyosis in a tertiary outpatient clinic. J Pers Med. 2022;12(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12101572.

Görgülü FF, Okçu NT. Which imaging method is better for the differentiation of adenomyosis and uterine fibroids? J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2021;50(5):102002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogoh.2020.102002.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Liu X, Ding D, Ren Y, Guo SW. Transvaginal elastosonography as an imaging technique for diagnosing adenomyosis. Reprod Sci. 2018;25(4):498–514. https://doi.org/10.1177/1933719117750752.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pongpunprut S, Panburana P, Wibulpolprasert P, Waiyaput W, Sroyraya M, Chansoon T, et al. A comparison of shear wave elastography between normal myometrium, uterine fibroids, and adenomyosis: a cross-sectional study. Int J Fertil Steril. 2022;16(1):49–54. https://doi.org/10.22074/ijfs.2021.523075.1074.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Săsăran V, Turdean S, Gliga M, Ilyes L, Grama O, Muntean M, et al. Value of strain-ratio elastography in the diagnosis and differentiation of uterine fibroids and adenomyosis. J Pers Med. 2021;11(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm11080824.

Săsăran V, Turdean S, Mărginean C, Gliga M, Ilyes L, Grama O, et al. Transvaginal ultrasound combined with strain-ratio elastography for the concomitant diagnosis of uterine fibroids and adenomyosis: a pilot study. J Clin Med. 2022;11(13). https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11133757.

Stoelinga B, Hehenkamp WJK, Nieuwenhuis LL, Conijn MMA, van Waesberghe J, Brölmann HAM, et al. Accuracy and reproducibility of sonoelastography for the assessment of fibroids and adenomyosis, with magnetic resonance imaging as reference standard. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2018;44(8):1654–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2018.03.027.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Xholli A, Molinari F, Oppedisano F, Scovazzi U, Vacca I, Schiaffino MG, et al. Relation between adenomyosis and elastographic characteristics of the cervix. Hum Reprod. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dead014.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Xholli A, Simoncini G, Vujosevic S, Trombetta G, Chiodini A, Ferraro MF, et al. Menstrual pain and elasticity of uterine cervix. J Clin Med. 2021;10(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10051110.

Xie M, Yu H, Zhang X, Wang W, Ren Y. Elasticity of adenomyosis is increased after GnRHa therapy and is associated with spontaneous pregnancy in infertile patents. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2019;48(10):849–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogoh.2019.05.003.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Zhang M, Wasnik AP, Masch WR, Rubin JM, Carlos RC, Quint EH, et al. Transvaginal ultrasound shear wave elastography for the evaluation of benign uterine pathologies: a prospective pilot study. J Ultrasound Med. 2019;38(1):149–55. https://doi.org/10.1002/jum.14676.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sigrist RMS, Liau J, Kaffas AE, Chammas MC, Willmann JK. Ultrasound elastography: review of techniques and clinical applications. Theranostics. 2017;7(5):1303–29. https://doi.org/10.7150/thno.18650.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Zhang YQ, Chen JH, Zhu TT, Zhao AX, Zhuang LT, Lu CY, et al. Applying contrast-enhanced ultrasound model to distinguish atypical focal adenomyosis from uterine leiomyomas. Ann Transl Med. 2022;10(20):1108. https://doi.org/10.21037/atm-22-4460.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Grigore M, Popovici R, Himiniuc LM, Scripcariu IS, Toma BF, Grigore AM, et al. The added value of three-dimensional ultrasonography in uterine pathology. Exp Ther Med. 2021;22(5):1261. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2021.10696.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Marques ALS, Andres MP, Mattos LA, Gonçalves MO, Baracat EC, Abrão MS. Association of 2D and 3D transvaginal ultrasound findings with adenomyosis in symptomatic women of reproductive age: a prospective study. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2021;76:e2981. https://doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2021/e2981.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Rasmussen CK, Hansen ES, Dueholm M. Inter-rater agreement in the diagnosis of adenomyosis by 2- and 3-dimensional transvaginal ultrasonography. J Ultrasound Med. 2019;38(3):657–66. https://doi.org/10.1002/jum.14735.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Rasmussen CK, Hansen ES, Ernst E, Dueholm M. Two- and three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasonography for diagnosis of adenomyosis of the inner myometrium. Reprod Biomed Online. 2019;38(5):750–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2018.12.033.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Decter D, Arbib N, Markovitz H, Seidman DS, Eisenberg VH. Sonographic signs of adenomyosis in women with endometriosis are associated with infertility. J Clin Med. 2021;10(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10112355.

Zhu J, Liu S, Gao D. Application of color Doppler ultrasound in microscopic imaging diagnosis of adenomyosis. Scanning. 2022;2022:2366871. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/2366871.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Li J, Chen J, Wang Y, Hu L, Zhang R, Chen W. Doppler imaging assessment of changes of blood flow in adenomyosis after higher-dose oxytocin: a randomized controlled trial. J Ultrasound Med. 2022;41(10):2413–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/jum.15923.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Exacoustos C, Morosetti G, Conway F, Camilli S, Martire FG, Lazzeri L, et al. New sonographic classification of adenomyosis: do type and degree of adenomyosis correlate to severity of symptoms? J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020;27(6):1308–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2019.09.788. This large multicenter trial evaluated a new classification scoring system that correlated the type and degree of adenomyosis to clinical symptoms, including fertility, based on transvaginal ultrasound features.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Yildirir M, Aytan H, Durukan H, Gurses I. A clinical scoring system for the diagnosis of adenomyosis. Turk J Obstet Gynecol. 2022;19(2):138–44. https://doi.org/10.4274/tjod.galenos.2022.88289.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central