Bird CC, McElin TW, Manalo-Estrella P. The elusive adenomyosis of the uterus-revisited. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1972;112:583–93.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Chen J, Porter AE, Kho KA. Current and future surgical and interventional management options for adenomyosis. Semin Reprod Med. 2020;38:157–67.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kho KA, Chen JS, Halvorson LM. Diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of adenomyosis. JAMA. 2021;326:177.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Taran F, Stewart E, Brucker S. Adenomyosis: Epidemiology, risk factors, clinical phenotype and surgical and interventional alternatives to hysterectomy. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2013;73:924–31.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Upson K, Missmer SA. Epidemiology of adenomyosis. Semin Reprod Med. 2020;38:089–107.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Yu O, Schulze-Rath R, Grafton J, Hansen K, Scholes D, Reed SD. Adenomyosis incidence, prevalence and treatment: United States population-based study 2006–2015. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2020.01.016.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Rathinam KK, Abraham JJ, Heema Preethy S, Shevaani SA, Sen M, George M, Priyadharshini A. Evaluation of pharmacological interventions in the management of Adenomyosis: a systematic review. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2022;78:531–45.

• Oliveira MA, Brollo LC, Soares T, Pereira TD, de Souza RJ. Surgical treatment of adenomyosis. Current Obstetrics and Gynecology Reports. 2022;11:180–5. This research article provides a comprehensive list of the current surgical options for the treatment of adenomyosis, including uterine artery embolization.

Article  Google Scholar 

Khalilzadeh O, Baerlocher MO, Shyn PB, et al. Proposal of a new adverse event classification by the Society of Interventional Radiology Standards of Practice Committee. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2017.06.019.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Siskin GP, Tublin ME, Stainken BF, Dowling K, Dolen EG. Uterine artery embolization for the treatment of adenomyosis. Am J Roentgenol. 2001;177:297–302.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Wang S, Meng X, Dong Y. The evaluation of uterine artery embolization as a nonsurgical treatment option for adenomyosis. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2015;133:202–5.

Article  Google Scholar 

Froeling V, Scheurig-Muenkler C, Hamm B, Kroencke TJ. Uterine artery embolization to treat uterine adenomyosis with or without uterine leiomyomata: Results of symptom control and health-related quality of life 40 months after treatment. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2011;35:523–9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Tellum T, Nygaard S, Lieng M. Noninvasive diagnosis of adenomyosis: a structured review and meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy in imaging. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2019.11.001.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cunningham RK, Horrow MM, Smith RJ, Springer J. Adenomyosis: a sonographic diagnosis. Radiographics. 2018;38:1576–89.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bazot M, Cortez A, Darai E, Rouger J, Chopier J, Antoine J-M, Uzan S. Ultrasonography compared with magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of adenomyosis: correlation with histopathology. Hum Reprod. 2001;16:2427–33.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

•• Zhang M, Bazot M, Tsatoumas M, Munro MG, Reinhold C. MRI of adenomyosis: Where are we today? Can Assoc Radiol J. 2022;74:58–68. This research article supports MRI as an excellent non-invasive tool that can facilitate the detection and definition of adenomyosis features with a potential to stratify patient management.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bazot M, Daraï E. Role of transvaginal sonography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the diagnosis of uterine adenomyosis. Fertil Steril. 2018;109:389–97.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Rees CO, Nederend J, Mischi M, Vliet HA, Schoot BC. Objective measures of adenomyosis on MRI and their diagnostic accuracy—a systematic review & meta-analysis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2021;100:1377–91.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

de Bruijn AM, Smink M, Lohle PNM, Huirne JAF, Twisk JWR, Wong C, Schoonmade L, Hehenkamp WJK. Uterine artery embolization for the treatment of adenomyosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2017.07.034.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Popovic M, Puchner S, Berzaczy D, Lammer J, Bucek RA. Uterine artery embolization for the treatment of adenomyosis: a Review. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2011;22:901–9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Jha RC, Takahama J, Imaoka I, Korangy SJ, Spies JB, Cooper C, Ascher SM. adenomyosis: MRI of the uterus treated with uterine artery embolization. Am J Roentgenol. 2003;181:851–6.

Article  Google Scholar 

Kim MD, Kim S, Kim NK, Lee MH, Ahn EH, Kim HJ, Cho JH, Cha SH. Long-term results of uterine artery embolization for symptomatic adenomyosis. Am J Roentgenol. 2007;188:176–81.

Article  Google Scholar 

Smeets AJ, Nijenhuis RJ, Boekkooi PF, Vervest HA, van Rooij WJ, Lohle PN. Long-term follow-up of uterine artery embolization for symptomatic adenomyosis. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2011;35:815–9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Nijenhuis RJ, Smeets AJ, Morpurgo M, Boekkooi PF, Reuwer PJ, Smink M, van Rooij WJ, Lohle PN. Uterine artery embolisation for symptomatic adenomyosis with Polyzene F-coated hydrogel microspheres: Three-year clinical follow-up using UFS–Qol Questionnaire. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2014;38:65–71.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bae SH, Kim MD, Kim GM, Lee SJ, Park SI, Won JY, Lee DY. Uterine artery embolization for adenomyosis: Percentage of necrosis predicts midterm clinical recurrence. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2015.04.026.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kim MD, Kim YM, Kim HC, Cho JH, Kang HG, Lee C, Kim HJ, Lee JT. Uterine artery embolization for symptomatic adenomyosis: A new technical development of the 1-2-3 protocol and predictive factors of MR imaging affecting outcomes. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2011;22:497–502.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pelage J-P, Jacob D, Fazel A, Namur J, Laurent A, Rymer R, Le Dref O. Midterm results of uterine artery embolization for symptomatic adenomyosis: Initial experience. Radiology. 2005;234:948–53.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wang Y, Lyu W, Xu W, Yu Y. Asherman syndrome in adenomyosis treated with uterine artery embolization: Incidence predictive factors. Radiol Med (Torino). 2020;125:437–43.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

•• Yuan K, Zhang JL, Yan JY, Yuan B, Fu JX, Wang Y, Sun XD, Guan Y, Duan F, Wang MQ. Uterine artery embolization with small-sized particles for the treatment of symptomatic adenomyosis: A 42-month clinical follow-up. Int J Gen Med. 2021;14:3575–81. This study demonstrates the long-term effectiveness and safety of uterine artery embolization utilizing small particles for the treatment of adenomyosis.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Liang E, Brown B, Kirsop R, Stewart P, Stuart A. Efficacy of uterine artery embolisation for treatment of symptomatic fibroids and adenomyosis - an interim report on an Australian experience. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2012;52:106–12.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kim JY, Song YG, Kim C-W, Lee MO. Uterine artery embolization using gelatin sponge particles for symptomatic focal and diffuse adenomyosis. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2021;48:59.

Article  Google Scholar 

Lee MS, Kim MD, Lee M, Won JY, Park SI, Lee DY, K-hun L. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography of uterine arteries for the prediction of ovarian artery embolization in 349 patients. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2012;23:1174–9.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Park Y, Kim MD, Jung DC, Lee SJ, Kim G, Park SI, Won JY, Lee DY. Can measurement of apparent diffusion coefficient before treatment predict the response to uterine artery embolization for adenomyosis? Eur Radiol. 2014;25:1303–9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Zheng R, Zeng D, Wan T-T, Guo W-B, Guo Y, Liu M-J. Predisposing factors for predicting the therapeutic response of adenomyosis after uterine artery embolization: Serum CA125 levels and accompanying endometriosis. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2018;24:364–71.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Pereira K, Morel-Ovalle LM, Wiemken TL, Kazmi S, Rode S, Hardy A, Vaheesan K. Intraprocedural superior hypogastric nerve block allows same-day discharge following uterine artery embolization. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2020;31:388–92.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Yoon J, Valenti D, Muchantef K, Cabrera T, Toonsi F, Torres C, Bessissow A, Bandegi P, Boucher L-M. Superior hypogastric nerve block as post–uterine artery embolization analgesia: A randomized and double-blind clinical trial. Radiology. 2019;292:269–269.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pereira K, Morel-Ovalle LM, Taghipour M, Sherwani A, Parikh R, Kao J, Vaheesan K. Superior hypogastric nerve block (SHNB) for pain control after uterine fibroid embolization (UFE): Technique and troubleshooting. CVIR Endovascular. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42155-020-00141-2.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Park PJ, Kokabi N, Nadendla P, Lindsey T, Dariushnia SR. Efficacy of intraprocedural superior hypogastric nerve block in reduction of postuterine artery embolization narcotic analgesia use. Can Assoc Radiol J. 2020;71:75–80.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Duvnjak S, Andersen PE. Intra-arterial lidocaine administration during uterine fibroid embolization to reduce the immediate postoperative pain: A prospective randomized study. CVIR Endovascular. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42155-020-0099-4.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Stratil P, Mizones H, Spencer E. Clinical and periprocedural pain management for uterine artery embolization. Semin Interv Radiol. 2013;30:354–63.