aDepartment of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
bDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
cDiego Portales University, Santiago, Chile
Log in to MyKarger to check if you already have access to this content.
Buy FullText & PDF Unlimited re-access via MyKarger Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use read more
CHF 38.00 *
EUR 35.00 *
USD 39.00 *
Buy a Karger Article Bundle (KAB) and profit from a discount!
If you would like to redeem your KAB credit, please log in.
Save over 20% compared to the individual article price. Rent via DeepDyve Unlimited fulltext viewing of this article Organize, annotate and mark up articles Printing and downloading restrictions apply Subscribe Access to all articles of the subscribed year(s) guaranteed for 5 years Unlimited re-access via Subscriber Login or MyKarger Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use read more Select* The final prices may differ from the prices shown due to specifics of VAT rules.
Article / Publication Details
Received: February 01, 2023
Accepted: March 21, 2023
Published online: April 28, 2023
Number of Print Pages: 7
Number of Figures: 0
Number of Tables: 0
ISSN: 0254-4962 (Print)
eISSN: 1423-033X (Online)
For additional information: https://www.karger.com/PSP
AbstractThe concept of hysteria, although apparently surpassed by contemporary nosographic classifications, continues to be talked about. Following Charbonneau’s attempt to de-feminize and de-sexualize hysteria, clinical phenomenology can offer a perspective which, freed from stigma and prejudices through the suspension of judgement, allows us to understand hysteria not as a diagnostic category but as an existential position. In this sense, hysteria would be based on a hypo-sufficiency of the embodied self, which is not perceived as solid and continuous and needs external confirmations of its adequacy. According to the optical-coenaesthetic disproportion hypothesis, the hypo-sufficiency of the embodied self originates from the difficulty of experiencing one’s body from the first-person perspective and from the consequent use of the gaze of others as a prosthesis to achieve a sense of selfhood and identity. Hysteric persons develop a mode of access to their corporeality mediated by visual representations – hence the theatricalization, centrality, and seductiveness of hysteric persons’ behaviour. We suggest to call “figural body” the visual apprehension of one’s body which tries to compensate for the weakness of coenaesthetic apprehension of the lived body. Over time, the figural body ends up superimposing itself on the immediate experience of the lived body. Placing itself on a representative register, this image conveys not only individual ghosts but also cultural aspects, social prejudices, gender stereotypes. Thus, the attempt to experience one’s own body with the mediation of the other’s gaze becomes an involuntary and unaware throwing of oneself into the meshes of representation that are necessarily alienating for the person. Hysterical persons remain stuck in their inability to access an experience of their body that is not figurative, alienating themselves in representations which always come from outside.
© 2023 S. Karger AG, Basel
References Bollas C. Hysteria. London: Routledge; 1999. Charbonneau G. La situation existentielle des personnes hystériques : intensité, centralité et figularité. Paris: Éditeur le Cercle herméneutique; 2007. Kanaan RAA. Freud’s hysteria and its legacy. Handb Clin Neurol. 2016;139:37–44. LaFrance WCJr. Hysteria’ today and tomorrow. Front Neurol Neurosci. 2014;35:198–204. Reynolds EH. Hysteria in ancient civilisations: a neurological review: possible significance for the modern disorder. J Neurol Sci. 2018;388:208–13. Cramer P. What has happened to hysteria?J Nerv Ment Dis. 2019;207(9):705–6. Sigerist HE. A history of medicine. Primitive and archaic medicine. New York: Oxford University Press; 1951. Veith I. Hysteria: the history of a disease. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1965. Devereux C. Hysteria, feminism, and gender revisited: the case of the second wave. ESC English Studies in Canada. 2014;40(1). 19–45. Freud S, Breuer J. Studies on hysteria. London: Penguin Classics; 2004. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 3rd ed.Washington DC: American Psychiatric Press; 1985. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 5rd ed.Washington DC: American Psychiatric Press; 2013. Stanghellini G, Broome MR. Psychopathology as the basic science of psychiatry. Br J Psychiatry. 2014;205(3):169–70. Kretschmer E. Hysteria, reflex and instinct. London: P. Owen; 1960. Stanghellini G, Aragona M, Gilardi L, Ritunnano R. The person’s position-taking in the shaping of schizophrenic phenomena. Philosophical Psychol. 2022:1–26. Kraus A. Identitätsbildung melancholischer und hysterischer. In: Seidler GH, editor. Hysterie heute. Stuttgart: Enke; 1996. p. 103–10. Kraus A. How can the phenomenological–anthropological approach contribute to diagnosis and classification in psychiatry? In: Fulford B, Morris K, Sadler JZ, Stanghellini G, editors. Nature and narrative: an introduction to the new philosophy of psychiatry. Oxford: Oxford university press; 2003. Jaspers K. General psychopathology. Baltimora: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1965. Esposito CM, Stanghellini G. The pathogenic and therapeutic potential of the gaze of the other in the clinic of “eating disorders”. Psychopathology. 2020;53(5–6):291–7. Mancini M, Esposito CM. Lived body and the Other’s gaze: a phenomenological perspective on feeding and eating disorders. Eat Weight Disord. 2021;26(8):2523–9. Mancini M, Scudiero M, Mignogna S, Urso V, Stanghellini G. Se-duction is not sex-duction: desexualizing and de-feminizing hysteria. Front Psychol. 2022;13:963117. Kraus A. Modes d’existence des hystériques et des mélancoliques. In: Fédida P, Schotte J, editors. Psychiatrie et existence. Grenoble: Millon; 1991. p. 263–80. Stanghellini G, Mancini M. Mondi psicopatologici. Teoria e pratica dell’intervista psicoterapeutica. Milano: Edra; 2018. Didi-Huberman G. Invention of hysteria: Charcot and the photographic iconography of the salpêtrière. Cambridge (USA): The MIT Press; 2004. Husserl E. Ideas: general introduction to pure phenomenology (1913). Translated by Boyce Gibson WR: New York: Collier Macmillian; 1962. Scheler M. Gesammelte Werke, XV ols. Ed. M. Scheler and M.S. Frings. Bern/München/Bonn: Francke Verlag, Bouvier Verlag; 1954-1997. Merleau-Ponty M. Phenomenology of perception (1945): Translated by Smith C. London: The Humanities Press; 1962. Stanghellini G. Embodiment and schizophrenia. World Psychiatr. 2009;8(1):56–9. Sartre JP. Being and nothingness: an essay on phenomenological ontology (1943). Translated by Barnes HE: London: Routeledge; 2003. Stanghellini G. The optical-coenaesthetic disproportion in feeding and eating disorders. Eur Psychiatry. 2019;58:70–1. Stanghellini G. Embodiment and the Other’s look in feeding and eating disorders. World Psychiatr. 2019;18:364–5. Stanghellini G. Selfie. Sentirsi nello sguardo dell’altro. Milano: Feltrinelli; 2020. Deleuze G, Guattari F. Anti-oedipus: capitalism and schizophrenia. London: Penguin classics; 2009. Stanghellini G. Divina presenza. Macerata: Quodlibet; 2022. Deleuze G. Francis Bacon: the logic of sensation. London: Bloomsbury USA Academic; 2003. McDougall J. Theaters of the body. A psychoanalitic approach to psychosomatic illness. New York: W W Norton and co; 1989. Fuchs T, Schlimme JE. Embodiment and psychopathology: a phenomenological perspective. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2009;22(6):570–5. Stanghellini G. Disembodied spirits and deanimated bodies: the psychopathology of common sense. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2004. Correale A. La Potenza delle immagini. L’eccesso di sensorialità nella psicosi, nel trauma e nel borderline. Milano: Mimesis; 2021. Freedberg D. The power of images: studies in the history and theory of response. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1991. Lacan J. The formation of the unconscious. The Seminars, Book 5. Cambridge: Polity edition; 2017. Charcot JM. L’hystèrie. Paris: L’Harmattan; 1998. Stanghellini G. The PHD method for psychotherapy: integrating phenomenology, hermeneutics, and psychodynamics. Psychopathology. 2019;52(2):75–84. Article / Publication Details
Received: February 01, 2023
Accepted: March 21, 2023
Published online: April 28, 2023
Number of Print Pages: 7
Number of Figures: 0
Number of Tables: 0
ISSN: 0254-4962 (Print)
eISSN: 1423-033X (Online)
For additional information: https://www.karger.com/PSP
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Comments (0)