National Health Statistics Report U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for Health Statistics. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhsr/nhsr158-508.pdf. Accessed 24 May 2022.

Obesity in America American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. https://asmbs.org/resources/obesity-in-america. Accessed 24 May 2022.

Dimou FM, Ackermann N, Chang SH, et al. Understanding the current role of robotic-assisted bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2021;31:3130–7.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Pastrana M, Stoltzfus J, AlMandini A, El Chaar M. Evolution of outcomes of robotic bariatric surgery: first report based on MBSAQIP database. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2020;16(7):916–22. MBSAQIP database analysis showing decrease in the rate of readmission, organ space infection, 30-day reintervention in robotic bariatric surgery, indicating that outcomes in robotics are improving over time and with increased use.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Acevedo E, Mazzei M, Zhao H, et al. Outcomes in conventional laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted primary bariatric surgery: a retrospective, case–controlled study of the MBSAQIP database. Surg Endosc. 2020;34:1353–65.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Vosburg WR, Haque O, Roth E. Robotic vs. laparoscopic metabolic and bariatric surgery, outcomes over 5 years in nearly 800,000 patients. Obes Surg. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-022-06082-0.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

El Chaar M, Gacke J, Ringold S, et al. Cost analysis of robotic sleeve gastrectomy (R-SG) compared with laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (L-SG) in a single academic center: debunking a myth! Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2019;15:675–9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lainas P, Kassir R, Benois M, Derienne J, Debs T, et al. Comparative analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in severely obese patients. J Robot Surg. 2021;15(6):891–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-020-01181-5.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pastrana M, Stoltzfus J, Claros L, et al. Outcomes of robotic bariatric surgery in super-obese patients: first report based on MBSAQIP database. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2020;16(1):71–9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. Estimate of Bariatric Surgery Numbers, 2011–2019. https://asmbs.org/resources/estimate-of-bariatric-surgery-numbers. Accessed 24 May 2022.

Skogar ML, Sundbom M. Weight loss and effect on co-morbidities in the long-term after duodenal switch and gastric bypass: a population-based cohort study. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2020;16(1):17–23.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Antanavicius G, Katsichtis T, Alswealmeen W, et al. Three hundred four robotically assisted biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch operations with gradual robotic approach implementation: short-term outcomes, complication profile, and lessons learned. Obes Surg. 2020;30:3961–7.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Al-Mazrou AM, Cruz MV, Dakin G, et al. Robotic duodenal switch is associated with outcomes comparable to those of laparoscopic approach. Obes Surg. 2021;31:2019–29.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Beckmann JH, Mehdorn AS, Kersebaum JN, von Schönfels W, Taivankhuu T, et al. Pros and cons of robotic revisional bariatric surgery. Visc Med. 2020;36:238–45.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Moon RC, Segura AR, Teixeira AF, Jawad MA, et al. Feasibility and safety of robot-assisted bariatric conversions and revisions. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2020;16:1080–5.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Nasser H, Munie S, Kindel TL, et al. Comparative analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic revisional bariatric surgery: perioperative outcomes from the MBSAQIP database. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2020;16:397–405. Analysis of MBSAQIP database comparing revisional laparoscopic bariatric surgery to robotic, analyzing both revisional sleeve and bypass, showing lower complication rate for robotic revisional bypass but higher complication rate for robotic sleeve revision

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Acevedo E, Mazzei M, Zhao H, Lu X, Edwards MA, et al. Outcomes in conventional laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted revisional bariatric surgery: a retrospective, case-controlled study of the MBSAQIP database. Surg Endosc. 2020;34:1573–84.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

El Chaar M, King K, Pastrana M, et al. Outcomes of robotic surgery in revisional bariatric cases: a propensity score-matched analysis of the MBSAQIP registry. J Robot Surg. 2021;15:235–9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

King K, Galvez A, Stoltzfus J, Claros L, El Chaar M, et al. Robotic-assisted surgery results in a shorter hospital stay following revisional bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2021;31:634–9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Dreifuss NH, Mangano A, Hassan C, Masrur MA. Robotic revisional bariatric surgery: a high-volume center experience. Obes Surg. 2021;31(4):1656–63.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Bertoni MV, Marengo M, Garofalo F, Volontè F, et al. Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic revisional bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis on perioperative outcomes. Obes Surg. 2021;31:5022–33. Most recent systematic review and meta-analysis of robotic compared to laparoscopic revisional bariatric surgery

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cheng YL, Elli EF, et al. Role of robotic surgery in complex revisional bariatric procedures. Obes Surg. 2021;31:2583–9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Iranmanesh P, Fam J, Nguyen T, Talarico D, Chandwani KD, Bajwa KS, et al. Outcomes of primary versus revisional robotically assisted laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a multicenter analysis of ten-year experience. Surg Endosc. 2021;35(10):5766–73.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pędziwiatr M, Małczak P, Wierdak M, Rubinkiewicz M, Pisarska M, Major P, et al. Revisional gastric bypass is inferior to primary gastric bypass in terms of short- and long-term outcomes-systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Surg. 2018;28(7):2083–91.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Gray KD, Moore MD, Elmously A, Bellorin O, Zarnegar R, et al. Perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic and robotic revisional bariatric surgery in a complex patient population. Obes Surg. 2018;28(7):1852–9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Amiki M, Seki Y, Kasama K, Hashimoto K, Kitagawa M, Umezawa A, et al. Revisional bariatric surgery for insufficient weight loss and gastroesophageal reflux disease: our 12-year experience. Obes Surg. 2020;30(5):1671–2167.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Zhang L, Tan WH, Chang R, Eagon JC. Perioperative risk and complications of revisional bariatric surgery compared to primary Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Endosc. 2015;29(6):1316–20.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Mor A, Keenan E, Portenier D, Torquati A. Case-matched analysis comparing outcomes of revisional versus primary laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(2):548–52.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cadiere GB, Himpens J, Vertruyen M, et al. The world’s first obesity surgery performed by a surgeon at a distance. Obes Surg. 1999;2:206–9.

Article  Google Scholar 

Sudan R, Puri V, Sudan D. Robotically assisted biliary pancreatic diversion with a duodenal switch: a new technique. Surg Endosc. 2007;21:729–33.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Intuitive Surgical, Inc. Intuitive Announces Preliminary Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2021 Results. https://isrg.intuitive.com/node/18741/pdf. Accessed 24 May 2022.

Silverman C, Isaacs A, Tan NG. Robotic bariatric surgery. In: Faintuch J, Faintuch S, editors. Obesity and diabetes. Cham: Springer; 2020.

Google Scholar 

IHS Inc. 2016 update: the complexities of physician supply and demand: projections from 2014 to 2025: final report. Prepared for Association of American Medical Colleges.

Seagull FJ. Disparities between industrial and surgical ergonomics. Work. 2012;41(suppl 1):4669–72.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Park A, Lee G, Seagull FJ, Meenaghan N, Dexter D. Patients benefit while surgeons suffer: an impending epidemic. J Am Coll Surg. 2010;210(3):306–13.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Epstein S, Sparer EH, Tran BN, et al. Prevalence of work-related musculoskeletal disorders among surgeons and interventionalists: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Surg. 2018;153(2):e174947.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Shugaba A, Lambert JE, Bampouras TM, et al. Should all minimal access surgery be robot-assisted? A systematic review into the musculoskeletal and cognitive demands of laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery. J Gastrointest Surg. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-022-05319-8.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Salem JF, Bauerle WB, Arishi AA, et al. Direct medical costs of robotic sleeve gastrectomy compared to laparoscopic approach in a single academic center. J Robotic Surg. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-022-01385-x.

Article  Google Scholar 

Oviedo RJ, Nayak T, Long Z, Yan M. Robotic Roux en Y gastric bypass can be safe and cost-effective in a rural setting: clinical outcomes from a community hospital bariatric program. J Robot Surg. 2021;15(6):929–36.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Romero RJ, Kosanovic R, Rabaza JR, Seetharamaiah R, Donkor C, et al. Robotic sleeve gastrectomy: experience of 134 cases and comparison with a systematic review of the laparoscopic approach. Obes Surg. 2013;23:1743–52.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Buchs NC, Pugin F, Bucher P, Hagen ME, Chassot G, Koutny-Fong P, et al. Learning curve for robot-assisted Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:1116–21.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wehrtmann FS, de la Garza JR, Kowalewski KF, Schmidt MW, et al. Learning curves of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy in bariatric surgery: a systematic review and introduction of a standardization. Obes Surg. 2020;30:640–56.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Vilallonga R, Fort JM, Gonzalez O, Caubet E, Boleko A, Neff KJ, et al. The initial learning curve for robot-assisted sleeve gastrectomy: a surgeon’s experience while introducing the robotic technology in a bariatric surgery department. Minim Invasive Surg. 2012;2012:347131.

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Smeenk RM, van’t Hof G, Elsten E, Feskens PG. The results of 100 robotic versus 100 laparoscopic gastric bypass procedures: a single high volume center experience. Obes Surg. 2016;26:1266–73.

Article  CAS