Apalkova, Y., Butovskaya, M. L., Bronnikova, N., Burkova, V., Shackelford, T. K., & Fink, B. (2018). Assessment of male physical risk-taking behavior in a sample of Russian men and women. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 4, 314–321.

Article  Google Scholar 

Bacon, P. M., Conte, A., & Moffatt, P. G. (2014). Assortative mating on risk attitude. Theory and Decision, 77, 389–401.

Article  Google Scholar 

Baker, M. D., Jr., & Maner, J. K. (2008). Risk-taking as a situationally sensitive male mating strategy. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29, 391–395.

Article  Google Scholar 

Bassett, J. F., & Moss, B. (2004). Men and women prefer risk takers as romantic and nonromantic partners. Current Research in Social Psychology, 9, 135–144.

Google Scholar 

Bereczkei, T., & Csanaky, A. (1996). Mate choice, marital success, and reproduction in a modern society. Ethology and Sociobiology, 17, 17–35.

Article  Google Scholar 

Boothroyd, L. G., Jones, B. C., Burt, D. M., DeBruine, L. M., & Perrett, D. I. (2008). Facial correlates of sociosexuality. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29, 211–218.

Article  Google Scholar 

Brooks, R., Scott, I. M., Maklakov, A. A., Kasumovic, M. M., Clark, A. P., & Penton-Voak, I. S. (2011). National income inequality predicts women’s preferences for masculinized faces better than health does. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 278, 810–812.

Article  Google Scholar 

Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 1–14.

Article  Google Scholar 

Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204–232.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (2019). Mate preferences and their behavioral manifestations. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 77–110.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Buston, P. M., & Emlen, S. T. (2003). Cognitive processes underlying human mate choice: The relationship between self-perception and mate preference in Western society. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100, 8805–8810.

Article  Google Scholar 

Byrnes, J. P., Miller, D. C., & Schafer, W. D. (1999). Gender differences in risk taking: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 367–383.

Article  Google Scholar 

Chagnon, N. A. (1988). Life histories, blood revenge, and warfare in a tribal population. Science, 239, 985–992.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Christensen, R. H. B. (2013). ordinal: Regression Models for Ordinal Data. R Package. Retrieved July 17, 2021, from www.cran.r-project.org/package=ordinal

Cobey, K. D., Laan, F., Stulp, G., Buunk, A. P., & Pollet, T. V. (2013). Sex differences in risk taking behavior among Dutch cyclists. Evolutionary Psychology, 11, 147470491301100200.

Article  Google Scholar 

Daly, M., & Wilson, M. (2001). Risk-taking, intrasexual competition, and homicide. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 47, 1–36.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Darwin, C. (1871). The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex. John Murray.

Book  Google Scholar 

DeBruine, L. M., Jones, B. C., Crawford, J. R., Welling, L. L., & Little, A. C. (2010). The health of a nation predicts their mate preferences: Cross-cultural variation in women’s preferences for masculinized male faces. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 277, 2405–2410.

Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

DeBruine, L. M., Jones, B. C., Little, A. C., Crawford, J. R., & Welling, L. L. (2011). Further evidence for regional variation in women’s masculinity preferences. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 278, 813–814.

Article  Google Scholar 

Farthing, G. W. (2005). Attitudes toward heroic and nonheroic physical risk takers as mates and as friends. Evolution and Human Behavior, 26, 171–185.

Article  Google Scholar 

Fessler, D. M., Tiokhin, L. B., Holbrook, C., Gervais, M. M., & Snyder, J. K. (2014). Foundations of the Crazy Bastard Hypothesis: Nonviolent physical risk-taking enhances conceptualized formidability. Evolution and Human Behavior, 35, 26–33.

Article  Google Scholar 

Fink, B., Neave, N., & Seydel, H. (2007). Male facial appearance signals physical strength to women. American Journal of Human Biology, 19, 82–87.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Foo, Y. Z., Nakagawa, S., Rhodes, G., & Simmons, L. W. (2017). The effects of sex hormones on immune function: A meta-analysis. Biological Reviews, 92, 551–571.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Fox, J., & Weisberg, S. (2011). An R companion to applied regression. Sage.

Google Scholar 

Gangestad, S. W., & Simpson, J. A. (2000). The evolution of human mating: Trade-offs and strategic pluralism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 573–587.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gangestad, S. W., & Thornhill, R. (2008). Human oestrus. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 275, 991–1000.

Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Greitemeyer, T., Kastenmüller, A., & Fischer, P. (2013). Romantic motives and risk-taking: An evolutionary approach. Journal of Risk Research, 16, 19–38.

Article  Google Scholar 

Harris, M. B., & Miller, K. C. (2000). Gender and perceptions of danger. Sex Roles, 43, 843–863.

Article  Google Scholar 

Heine, S. J., Lehman, D. R., Peng, K., & Greenholtz, J. (2002). What’s wrong with cross-cultural comparisons of subjective Likert scales?: The reference-group effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 903–918.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Jones, B. C., Hahn, A. C., Fisher, C. I., Wang, H., Kandrik, M., Han, C., & Holzleitner, I. J. (2018). No compelling evidence that preferences for facial masculinity track changes in women’s hormonal status. Psychological Science, 29, 996–1005.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kelly, S., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (2001). Who dares, wins: Heroism versus altruism in women’s mate choice. Human Nature, 12, 89–105.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kenrick, D. T., Groth, G. E., Trost, M. R., & Sadalla, E. K. (1993). Integrating evolutionary and social exchange perspectives on relationships: Effects of gender, self-appraisal, and involvement level on mate selection criteria. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 951–969.

Article  Google Scholar 

Kruger, D. J. (2006). Male facial masculinity influences attributions of personality and reproductive strategy. Personal Relationships, 13, 451–463.

Article  Google Scholar 

Kuppens, T., & Pollet, T. V. (2014). Mind the level: problems with two recent nation-level analyses in psychology. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1110.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Li, N. P., Bailey, J. M., Kenrick, D. T., & Linsenmeier, J. A. (2002). The necessities and luxuries of mate preferences: Testing the tradeoffs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 947.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Little, A. C., DeBruine, L. M., & Jones, B. C. (2011). Exposure to visual cues of pathogen contagion changes preferences for masculinity and symmetry in opposite-sex faces. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 278, 2032–2039.

Article  Google Scholar 

Little, A. C., DeBruine, L. M., & Jones, B. C. (2013). Environment contingent preferences: Exposure to visual cues of direct male-male competition and wealth increase women’s preferences for masculinity in male faces. Evolution and Human Behavior, 34, 193–200.

Article  Google Scholar 

Little, A. C., Jones, B. C., & Burriss, R. P. (2007). Preferences for masculinity in male bodies change across the menstrual cycle. Hormones and Behavior, 51, 633–639.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lu, H. J., Zhu, X. Q., & Chang, L. (2015). Good genes, good providers, and good fathers: Economic development involved in how women select a mate. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, 9, 215–228.

Article  Google Scholar 

Marcinkowska, U. M., Rantala, M. J., Lee, A. J., Kozlov, M. V., Aavik, T., Cai, H., & Li, N. P. (2019). Women’s preferences for men’s facial masculinity are strongest under favorable ecological conditions. Scientific Reports, 9, 1–10.

Article  Google Scholar 

McAlvanah, P. (2009). Are people more risk-taking in the presence of the opposite sex? Journal of Economic Psychology, 30, 136–146.

Article  Google Scholar 

McIntosh, T. L., Lee, A. J., Sidari, M. J., Stower, R. E., Sherlock, J. M., & Dixson, B. J. (2017). Microbes and masculinity: Does exposure to pathogenic cues alter women’s preferences for male facial masculinity and beardedness? PLoS ONE, 12, e0178206.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Pawlowski, B., Atwal, R., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (2008). Sex differences in everyday risk-taking behavior in humans. Evolutionary Psychology, 6, 147470490800600100.

Article  Google Scholar 

Pazhoohi, F., Pazhouhi, S. & Kingstone, A. (2021). Concern About Contracting COVID-19 Predicts Men’s Preference for Female Facial Femininity, But Not Women’s Preference for Male Facial Masculinity. Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology, 7, 17–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40750-020-00158-w

Pereira, K. J., David, V. F., Varella, M. A. C., & Valentova, J. V. (2020). Environmental threat influences preferences for sexual dimorphism in male and female faces but not voices or dances. Evolution and Human Behavior, 41, 303–311.

Article  Google Scholar 

Pollet, T. V., Tybur, J. M., Frankenhuis, W. E., & Rickard, I. J. (2014). What can cross-cultural correlations teach us about human nature? Human Nature, 25, 410–429.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Polo, P., Muñoz-Reyes, J. A., Pita, M., Shackelford, T. K., & Fink, B. (2019). Testosterone-dependent facial and body traits predict men’s sociosexual attitudes and behaviors. American Journal of Human Biology, 31, e23235.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Puts, D. A. (2010). Beauty and the beast: Mechanisms of sexual selection in humans. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31, 157–175.

Article  Google Scholar 

R Core Development Team. (2019). R: A Language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.

Google Scholar 

Rhodes, G., Chan, J., Zebrowitz, L. A., & Simmons, L. W. (2003). Does sexual dimorphism in human faces signal health? Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences, 270(Suppl. 1), S93–S95.