1. IntroductionThe colonization of any urinary tract tissue, from the renal cortex to the urethral meatus, is described as a urinary tract infection (UTI) [1]. A UTI is one of the most prevalent nosocomial and community-acquired illnesses in humans [2]. Escherichia coli, Enterococcus sp., Klebsiella sp., Staphylococcus saprophyticus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, and Proteus sp. are the most common bacteria that cause UTIs [3]. Enterococci are an opportunistic pathogen that may cause severe and potentially serious infections in immunocompromised individuals, as well as those receiving broad-spectrum antibiotic treatment or those requiring extended hospitalization [4]. Enterococcus faecalis or Enterococcus faecium are the most common cause of UTIs and account for around 95% of human enterococcal infections, followed by E. coli [5]. In Saudi Arabia, the most often occurring bacteria that cause a UTI are E. coli, Enterococcus sp., and Klebsiella sp. [6].Enterococci are attracting attention due to their multidrug resistance, which explains their preponderance in infections [7,8,9,10]. They are innately resistant to a broad spectrum of routinely used antibiotics, including cephalosporins, aminoglycosides, macrolides, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole [11,12]. Bacteria that form biofilms cause more than 65% of nosocomial infections and 80% of bacterial infections, which may become a severe concern in the area of urology [13]. The ability of Enterococcus to produce biofilms is one of its most noticeable pathogenicity characteristics. This property enables the colonization of inert and biological surfaces as well as mediates the adherence to host cells. These biofilms are communities of cells that have been permanently attached to a variety of biotic and abiotic surfaces and are encased in a hydrated matrix of exopolymeric molecules, proteins, polysaccharides, and nucleic acids [14]. There is a noticeable variation in the behavior of bacteria in biofilms compared to their free-living counterparts. Biofilms protect their members from host immunological responses, phagocytosis, and antibiotics [15], thereby complicating the disease. While it is widely agreed that antibiotic therapy is the most important and successful method currently available for managing microbial infections, antibiotic therapy alone is sometimes insufficient to eradicate the bacterial biofilm and the associated infections [16,17].Numerous enterococci virulence factors have been identified as being associated with the biofilm’s formation, including adhesions and generated virulence factors. Asa 1 (aggregation substance), Esp (extracellular surface protein), and Ebp (endocarditis and biofilm-associated pili) are the most important adhesion factors [18]. CylA (cytolysin), GelEA (gelatinase), and Hyl (hyaluronidase) are the produced pathogenic components of enterococci and play a role in pathogenesis [19]. Esp is a cell wall-associated protein that has been involved in the colonization, persistence, and production of biofilms of bacteria in the urinary system [20]. Asa1 is a pheromone-inducible protein that acts as a virulence factor by promoting a bacterial adhesion to renal tubular cells. Additionally, the Ebp operon contains the genes ebpA, ebpB, and ebpC which are involved in the creation of pills by enterococci and are required for bacteria to cause a UTI [21]. The recent focus has centered on the study of the genes implicated in the development of a biofilm and their significance in infections caused by enterococci [17].

Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium have emerged as particularly important etiological pathogens of nosocomial infections, notably urinary tract infections. Therefore, the goal of this study was to investigate the MDR and biofilm formation among enterococci isolated from urinary tract infections and to assess the relationship between the two phenomena.

3. Results and DiscussionEnterococci may be responsible for 15% of urinary tract infections in critical care units (ICU) [18]. In this study, only 30 (13%) enterococci bacterial isolates were found in 224 patient urine samples. Female culture-positive urine specimens were reported more frequently than male culture-positive urine specimens. Females have a greater incidence of urinary tract infections due to anatomical differences and a reliance on the male urinary system’s natural defensive systems [32]. The morphological and biochemical tests confirmed that all isolates (n = 30) were Enterococcus species and designated as E01–E30. The susceptibility and resistance rates among enterococcal isolates were shown in Figure 1. According to the data shown in Figure 1A, the majority of E. faecalis strains were resistant to tetracycline (86.36%), erythromycin (81.81%), levofloxacin, and quinpristin–dalfopristin (77.27%). There were less resistant isolates, such as gentamicin (50%), vancomycin (31%), and streptomycin (27%). Nitrofurantoin showed the lowest degree of resistance (18.18%) regarding the E. faecium strains; the maximum resistance rate (100%) was seen for tetracycline and erythromycin, while the lowest resistance rate (12.5%) was observed for streptomycin (Figure 1B). All the Enterococcus isolate was completely susceptible to linezolid and tigecycline. According to a statistical analysis using the paired t-test, the resistance of E. faecium against the investigated antimicrobial agents was insignificantly (p = 0.8450) higher than E. faecalis, as shown in Figure 1C. A resistance to fluoroquinolones (levofloxacin) may be the result of alterations in the target enzymes related to the DNA replication, hence preventing the bacterial proliferation [33]. Chow [34] stated that all the enterococci tested exhibited a modest inherent resistance to aminoglycosides, including gentamicin, which was regarded as the most often recommended aminoglycoside for enterococci infections. Comparable observations by Maschieto et al. [35], Rajendiran et al. [36], and Wei et al. [37] revealed a moderate level of resistance to streptomycin. MDR Enterococcus sp. strains displayed five resistance profiles for different classes of tested antimicrobials, as shown in Table 1, with 74% of isolates resistant to more than four classes. E18, E21, and E14 were the most resistant to seven antimicrobial classes, whereas E05 and E29 showed a resistance to three. These findings corroborated those of Fered et al. [38]. Additionally, biofilms played a crucial role in the high incidence, recurrence, and severity of UTIs, causing both acute and chronic infections [39]. As a result, the following tests subjectively recognized the formation of the biofilm in the tested enterococci isolates on a CRA media and quantified it using the MTP method. To summarize the CRA data, biofilm producers (P) appeared as black colonies, whereas non-biofilm producers (NP) appeared as pink colonies (Figure 2). The percentage of isolates forming biofilms was 17 (77.2%) for E. faecalis and 6 (75%) for E. faecium. Baldassarri et al. [40] observed that 80% of E. faecalis and 48% of E. faecium were significantly associated with the biofilm production in infected patients. Additionally, Dupre et al. [41] reported that E. faecalis produced biofilms to varying degrees in 86.7% of clinical specimens, whereas only 15.6% of E. faecium specimens formed biofilms. As illustrated in Figure 3, a biofilm formation was detected using the MTP methods. According to the obtained results, 45.45% of E. faecalis isolates were found to be high producers (HP), while 54.54% were found to be moderately adherent (MP) (Figure 3A). Where 37.5% of E. faecium isolates were found to be highly produced, 62.5% were found to be moderate producers (Figure 3B). As shown in Figure 4, a comparison of the two biofilm detection methods demonstrated that the biofilm’s development was subjectively seen in CRA, although only 23 (76.6%) of the isolates achieved the biofilm production criteria (Figure 4A). Using the MTP test, all 30 of the investigated isolates produced biofilms with varying degrees (Figure 4B). The findings of two techniques for determining the production of biofilms by the Enterococcus species were comparable, although it seems that MTP is the more precise and dependable methodology [24,41,42]. Lasa [43] obtained comparable findings; Mathur et al. [44] likewise encouraged the adoption of the MTP approach because of its excellent specificity, sensitivity, and positive predictive value. However, Hassan et al. [45] and Kafil et al. [18] advocated for the use of CRA to identify biofilms.Statistical analysis indicated a significant correlation between the Enterococcus species that form biofilms and the antibiotic resistance to certain antimicrobials (Figure 5). A resistance to several antibiotics, including penicillin, ampicillin, gentamicin, nitrofurantoin, levofloxacin, and erythromycin, was significantly higher in high biofilm producers than in moderate biofilm producers (Figure 5A). According to the obtained data from the statistical analysis using t-test analysis, as shown in Figure 5B, a penicillin resistance (56.2% vs. 43.7%, p = 0.0002), ampicillin resistance (54.5% vs. 45.4%, p = 0.0008), gentamicin resistance (53.8% vs. 46.1%, p = 0.0006), nitrofurantoin resistance (66.6% vs. 33.3%, pp = 0.0054). Similarly, various studies have shown a significant correlation between the formation of the biofilm and antibiotic resistance in the enterococci isolated from urinary tract infections [45,46,47], whereas a norfloxacin, ciprofloxacin, quinupristin/dalfopristin, and tetracycline resistance were rather uncommon among biofilm-forming bacteria. As a result, these antibiotics may be utilized effectively to treat UTIs caused by enterococcal isolates from biofilm producers. Akhter et al. [46] found a strong correlation between the biofilm’s formation in Enterococcus spp. isolated from urinary tract infections and the antibiotic resistance to amoxicillin, co-trimoxazole, ciprofloxacin, gentamycin, cefotaxime, and cefuroxime. Additionally, Fallah et al. [17] reported that the most effective drugs against the Enterococcus species were linezolid, chloramphenicol, and nitrofurantoin.As depicted in Figure 6, 27 isolates were identified as E. faecalis and 3 as E. faecium. The 16S rRNA gene sequences may be used to place diagnoses into a phylogenetic tree and can be connected to hundreds of database sequences [48]. The comparison of these sequences enables the differentiation of organisms at the genus level across all of the major bacterial phyla, as well as the categorization of strains at numerous levels, including what is currently referred to as the species and subspecies levels [49].Numerous investigations have been conducted on the enterococci virulence genes involved in the biofilm’s formation. However, the pathogenic mechanisms and genes involved in the biofilm’s formation in enterococci were deemed to be insufficient [18]. In this study, the presence of biofilm-related genes was evaluated in E. facealis and E. faecium by PCR. The findings shown in Figure 7 indicated that the Esp, EbpA, and EbpB genes were detected in all of the tested strains at a 100% prevalence rate. Shankar et al. [50] detected Esp, a cell wall-related protein, in the enterococci strains. It has been shown that it promotes the adhesion, colonization, and evasion of the immune system, as well as having an influence on antibiotic resistance [51,52]. Soares et al. [53] established that Enterococcus faecalis harbored GelE, Esp, and Asa 1 genes. In clinical UTI isolates, Kafil and Mobarez [18] found a relationship between the virulence factors and the biofilm’s development. The findings of the statistical analysis indicate that there was a significant correlation between the frequency of esp, ebpA, and ebpB genes with a biofilm development in all of the tested isolates (p