Blood samples were collected from asymptomatic HIV-positive patients in Polokwane (Limpopo Province, South Africa). A questionnaire was used to collect demographic and clinical information, such as origin, age, sex, the cluster of differentiation 4 (CD4) count, and other medical conditions, such as sexually transmitted diseases. Trained personnel collected six hundred and forty-seven (647) blood samples from HIV/AIDS patients who were attending different hospitals and clinics in 3 districts (Capricorn, Sekhukhune, and Waterberg) in the Limpopo Province. The blood was collected in EDTA tubes and transported to the Parasitology laboratory of the University of Venda’s Department of Microbiology for further analysis. Upon arrival at the laboratory, the blood was centrifuged for the collection of the plasma, buffy coat, and red blood cells. The samples were aliquoted and stored at −20 °C until further analysis.
2.2. Detection of E. histolytica Antibodies in Serum Specimens by ELISAThe E. histolytica serology’s ELISA was supplied by TechLab, Inc. (Blacksburg, VA, USA) and was specifically designed to identify antibodies against E. histolytica in serum samples. For this study, the serum samples were diluted by 1:50 using the diluent supplied with the kit. Briefly, 100 µL of the diluted serum was added to each sample well, and a drop (50 µL) of the positive control and 100 µL of the diluent (negative control) were added to the control wells. The plate was then covered with an adhesive sheet and incubated for an hour at room temperature. After incubation, the plate was washed four times with 1× a wash solution. One drop of the conjugate was added into each well, sealed with an adhesive sheet, and incubated for 30 min at room temperature. After incubation, the plate was washed, as described above. Two drops of the substrate were added to each well and incubated at room temperature for ten minutes. After the incubation step, one drop of a stop solution was added to each well, and the stop solution converted the blue color to yellow. The absorbance was measured at 450 nm on a VersaMax™ microplate ELISA reader (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). Samples with an OD greater than 0.150 were considered positive.
2.3. Detection of E. histolytica Antigens in Serum Specimens by ELISAA Techlab E. histolytica test II test (Techlab, Inc, Blacksburg, VA, USA) was used for the detection of the E. histolytica antigen (Gal/galnac lectin). According to the manufacturer’s instructions, the test is intended for use on fecal specimens. However, in the present study, the kit was used for the detection of adhesion in serum samples; therefore, some of the steps were optimized. Briefly, 100 µL of the serum specimen was diluted with 100 µL of the sample diluent. One drop of the conjugate was added to each well, and the samples and controls were then added to wells containing the conjugate; the plate was covered with an adhesive sheet and incubated for 2 h at room temperature. After the washing step, two drops of a substrate reagent were added to all the test wells and incubated at room temperature for 10 min. After the incubation period, one drop of the stop solution was added; the stop solution changed the blue color to yellow, and after two minutes, the optical density was read at 450 nm on the VersaMax™ microplate ELISA reader (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). The specimen was considered positive if the reading was greater than 0.050.
2.4. Detection of IL-10 Concentration in Serum Specimens by ELISAThe concentration of IL-10 was measured in the serum samples using the ELISA method from MABTECH (Nacka Strand, Sweden). On day 1, the plate was coated by adding 100 µL of the capture antibody to each well (monoclonal antibody 9D was diluted to 2 µg/mL in a PBS buffer) and incubated at 4–8 °C overnight. At day 2, the plate was washed two times with the PBS and blocked with a blocking buffer containing 0.05% of Tween 20 and 0.1% BSA; the plate was incubated for an hour at room temperature. After the incubation period, the plate was washed five times with a buffer containing 0.05% Tween. The samples and standards were diluted with an incubation buffer, and 100 µL of the samples and the standards were added to each well and incubated for 2 h at room temperature. After the wash step, 100 µL microliters of the detection antibody (biotinylated monoclonal antibody 12G8) was added into each well and incubated for 1 h at room temperature. Following the wash step, 100 µL of the streptavidin–HRP was added into each well and incubated for an hour at room temperature. After washing the plate, two drops of the substrate were added into each plate well, and the plate was incubated for 30 min at room temperature. One drop of the stop solution was added to each well and read within 10 min at 450 nm on the VersaMax™ microplate ELISA reader (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA, USA).
2.5. Statistical AnalysisThe results were entered into an excel spread sheet and edited appropriately (Microsoft office package) and analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS for WINDOWS version 18.0). Assuming that the data followed a normal distribution, the comparison of proportions and statistical significance were tested using a Chi-square test. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant
4. DiscussionAmebiasis is an intestinal and extra-intestinal disease caused by the protozoan parasite E. histolytica, which, amongst all the Entamoeba species, is the only species that is considered to be pathogenic to humans. The infection has been reported to occur worldwide but is prevalent in tropical and developing countries. The disease affects major organs, such as the colon and liver, with different symptoms or is sometimes asymptomatic [13]. However, the question of what causes the difference between disease presentation and asymptomatic infection is still unanswered. It has been suggested that both the parasite and host genetics play a role in the outcome of amebic infection. In the present study, two ELISA techniques were used. These included antigen-detecting and antibody detection. The antigen detection ELISA kits have been used for the diagnosis of amebic liver abscesses in previous studies [14]. The detection of antibodies often indicates a previous encounter of the individual with the parasite and might not necessarily indicate symptomatic disease [15]. The findings of the present study indicate that amebiasis is highly prevalent in the study population. Of the 647 samples tested, 422 (65.2%) were sero-positive for anti-E. histolytica antibodies. The sero-prevalence of amebiasis in this study was higher compared to the study conducted in 2010 by Samie [10], as well as the one conducted in Pakistan, where the sero-prevalence of amebiasis was found to be 73% [16]. A study in the Nasarawa State in Nigeria reported a 40.0% prevalence of intestinal amebiasis in school-age children in Lafia [17]. A study by Zhou [18] showed a prevalence of 41.1% of E. histolytica infection among the MSM community from China, showing that the infection is also transmitted through sexual contact in men who have sex with men. The present study showed that females (66.1%) were more affected than males (63.5%), although the difference was not statistically significant. Some observations have explained the reasons for this difference in the prevalence between males and females in that most families favor female housemaids over males for cultural, religious, and traditional reasons [19]. Similar results on the distribution of E. histolytica by gender were observed in a study by Samie [10]; this study showed that E. histolytica infection was higher in females than in males, demonstrating that females are more likely than males to carry asymptomatic infections rather than developing invasive diseases. The findings of this study are also in support of a study by Jamila [20], who found similar results of higher E. histolytica infection in females (48.7%) than in males (47.8%). Although all age groups were sero-positive for E. histolytica antibodies in the present study, the patients aged between 0 and 25 showed a very high prevalence (68.9%), followed by the older age at 46–80 years, with a prevalence percentage of 67.6%, and the least percentage was observed in patients aged between 26 and 45 (64.0%). Several studies have found similar results. A study in Jeddah on the factors associated with a high prevalence of Entamoeba histolytica/dispar infection among children showed a high prevalence of E. histolytica infection among children aged 1 month- 6 years, with a prevalence of 60.8%. However, their study only focused on children with a sample size of 300 [20]. The results of the present study also showed a high prevalence of E. histolytica in participants aged 46–80, which is in agreement with previous results reported by Samie [10] in the Limpopo Province. Tasawar and colleagues [21] reported that E. histolytica infection was highest in the age group of 33 to 48 years (16.67%).The sero-prevalence of E. histolytica is said to be high in areas with poor sanitation, inadequate water supply, and low socioeconomic development, especially in developing countries. These observations are supported by the results of the present study. Our study found that the patients in rural areas were more sero-positive (66.0%) than the patients in urban areas (63.9%). The high rates in rural areas may be influenced by improper hygiene and agricultural backgrounds [22]. Furthermore, we found that a higher sero-prevalence was obtained for patients attending hospitals compared to those attending clinics. Concerning the correlation between the E. histolytica infection and CD4 count, the results of this study showed no significant association between E. histolytica and the CD4 count. The three individuals reported to have ‘other medical conditions’, such as kidney and liver damage, were found sero-positive for E. histolytica, showing that the patients in this study had mixed infections. There is a possibility that the patients presenting liver damage can encounter amebic liver abscesses in the future.An amebic liver abscess is the most common extra-intestinal manifestation of amebiasis. It has been described as a tropical disease or a disease that is less prevalent in temperate climates, where it is also known as a summertime disease [23,24]. However, its epidemiology and socio-demographic determinants are not well described in the literature. In this study, there were only three (0.5%) patients who showed the Entamoeba antigen in their blood, indicative of extra-intestinal amebic infection, such as amebic liver abscesses. The observations of the present study are in agreement with the results obtained in a study by MecGarr [24], where only two patients were found with proven amoebic colitis. The low sero-positivity rate of the Entamoeba antigen (0.5%) recorded in the present study is an indication that this extra-intestinal amebiasis might be uncommon in our study population. It has been documented that an amebic liver abscess evolves to fulminant necrotizing rupture or colitis in approximately 0.5% of cases [25], and the mortality rate due to amebic liver abscesses has fallen to 1–3% in the last century, following appropriate or effective treatment. A study by Zeehaida [26] explained that the diagnosis of ALA is sometimes difficult since its clinical manifestations are highly different. Although the Techlab E. histolytica II kit is meant for the detection of antigens against E. histolytica in stool samples, it has been used for the detection of the amebic antigen in the blood, and our study has shown that this kit could also be used with serum samples because of its usefulness for the detection of ALA. However, some studies have found the kit not useful for ALA detection [26].Cytokines are important mediators of the host’s immune response. They can be used as markers to determine the immune mechanisms underlying the outcome of amebic infection [27]. Despite the high prevalence of intestinal amebiasis, the host’s innate immune response, as it relates to the clinical outcomes of amebic infection, remains poorly characterized in humans, especially in the Limpopo Province. Therefore, this study attempted, for the first time, to integrally evaluate the potential effect of IL-10 expression on the disease outcome in Limpopo Province.Out of the 467 serum samples tested for IL-10 levels in the present study, 225 were negative for E. histolytica antibodies, while 422 were positive for E. histolytica antibodies. Very few studies have associated IL-10 levels with amebiasis. A study by Bernin [27] showed that IL-10 serum levels were significantly increased in ALA patients, indicating that the invasion of the liver tissue by E. histolytica elicits an anti-inflammatory immune response. In the present study, mostly asymptomatic patients were used. Even though many of the participants were positive for E. histolytica antibodies, most of these had lower IL10 levels, while those that were sero-negative had higher IL10 levels. This is potentially an indication that the IL10 level is protective of E. histolytica. The current study also showed that patients with high levels of IL-10 are likely to have a low burden of amebiasis compared to patients who produce low levels of IL-10. The present study also confirms a previous study by Hamano and colleagues who showed that IL10 protected C57BL/6 mice from amebiasis [12]. The elevated levels of IL-10 show that the patient is already having inflammation and that the body is trying to bring the inflammation down. This indicates the possibility of a protective role of IL-10 in patients who might have been infected with E. histolytica. Therefore, elevated levels of IL-10 in the serum may play a significant role in the development of amebiasis.
Comments (0)