Stein M.V.a,b· Holt R.b· Wieder L.b· Terhune D.B.b,c

Author affiliations

aDepartment of Psychophysiology, Saybrook University, Oakland, CA, USA
bDepartment of Psychology, Goldsmiths, University of London, London, UK
cDepartment of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK

Log in to MyKarger to check if you already have access to this content.

Buy FullText & PDF Unlimited re-access via MyKarger Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use read more

CHF 38.00 *
EUR 35.00 *
USD 39.00 *

Select

KAB

Buy a Karger Article Bundle (KAB) and profit from a discount!

If you would like to redeem your KAB credit, please log in.

Save over 20% compared to the individual article price.

Learn more

Access via DeepDyve Unlimited fulltext viewing Of this article Organize, annotate And mark up articles Printing And downloading restrictions apply

Select

Subscribe Access to all articles of the subscribed year(s) guaranteed for 5 years Unlimited re-access via Subscriber Login or MyKarger Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use read more

Subcription rates

Select

* The final prices may differ from the prices shown due to specifics of VAT rules.

Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview

Received: March 09, 2022
Accepted: August 08, 2022
Published online: October 04, 2022

Number of Print Pages: 5
Number of Figures: 1
Number of Tables: 0

ISSN: 0254-4962 (Print)
eISSN: 1423-033X (Online)

For additional information: https://www.karger.com/PSP

Abstract

Symptoms associated with environmental factors (SAEF; also known as idiopathic environmental intolerance) include the presentation of various common symptoms that are causally attributed to normally benign environmental triggers, such as electromagnetic fields, odors, and chemicals. SAEF are typically conceptualized as psychogenic in origin, and multiple models have proposed that dissociation and responsiveness to suggestions may contribute to the manifestation or expression of these symptoms. This preregistered study sought to characterize these variables’ independent and interactive predictive utility. Participants (N = 294) completed psychometric measures of dissociative tendencies, trauma, SAEF, and a behavioral scale indexing responsiveness to direct verbal suggestions. Moderation analyses were used to evaluate predictions derived from different models regarding whether these variables would uniquely and interactively predict individual differences in the reporting of SAEF. Responsiveness to verbal suggestions individually predicted SAEF, but no clear evidence was observed for an interaction with dissociation or trauma. Dissociation similarly individually predicted SAEF with additional evidence that this association was moderated by trauma such that the positive association between dissociation and SAEF was only significant in those with moderate-to-high trauma exposure. These results align with the proposal that environmental factors may function as suggestions that trigger involuntary symptoms in some individuals. Our findings further suggest that among individuals with a history of trauma exposure, those with dissociative tendencies may be at an increased risk of experiencing SAEF.

© 2022 S. Karger AG, Basel

References Stein MV, Holt L, Wieder L, Terhune DB. Responsiveness to direct verbal suggestions and dissociation predict symptoms attributed to environmental factors. PsyArXiv [Preprint]. 2022. Available from: https://psyarxiv.com/nhb9q/. Van den Bergh O, Brown RJ, Petersen S, Witthöft M. Idiopathic environmental intolerance: a comprehensive model. Clin Psychol Sci. 2017;5(3):551–67. Dieudonné M. Electromagnetic hypersensitivity: a critical review of explanatory hypotheses. Environ Health. 2020;19(1):48. Haanes JV, Nordin S, Hillert L, Witthöft M, van Kamp I, van Thriel C, et al. “Symptoms associated with environmental factors” (SAEF) – towards a paradigm shift regarding “idiopathic environmental intolerance” and related phenomena. J Psychosom Res. 2020;131:109955. Bailer J, Witthöft M, Paul C, Bayerl C, Rist F. Evidence for overlap between idiopathic environmental intolerance and somatoform disorders. Psychosom Med. 2005;67(6):921–9. Witthöft M, Rist F, Bailer J. Evidence for a specific link between the personality trait of absorption and idiopathic environmental intolerance. J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2008;71(11–12):795–802. Van den Bergh O, Witthöft M, Petersen S, Brown RJ. Symptoms and the body: taking the inferential leap. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2017 Mar;74(Pt A):185–203. Eltiti S, Wallace D, Russo R, Fox E. Symptom presentation in idiopathic environmental intolerance with attribution to electromagnetic fields: evidence for a nocebo effect based on data Re-analyzed from two previous provocation studies. Front Psychol. 2018 Aug;9:1563. Bräscher A-K, Sütterlin S, Scheuren R, Van den Bergh O, Witthöft M. Somatic symptom perception from a predictive processing perspective: an empirical test using the thermal grill illusion. Psychosom Med. 2020;82(7):708–14. Popkirov S, Grönheit W, Wellmer J. A systematic review of suggestive seizure induction for the diagnosis of psychogenic nonepileptic seizures. Seizure. 2015 Sep;31:124–32. Wieder L, Brown R, Thompson T, Terhune DB. Suggestibility in functional neurological disorder: a meta-analysis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2021;92(2):150–7. Staudenmayer H, Binkley KE, Leznoff A, Phillips S. Idiopathic environmental intolerance: part 2 – a causation analysis applying Bradford Hill’s criteria to the psychogenic theory. Toxicol Rev. 2003;22(4):247–61. Nordin S, Palmquist E, Claeson AS. The environmental symptom-attribution scale: metric properties and normative data. J Environ Psychol. 2013;36:9–17. Nijenhuis ERs, Hart O, Kruger K. The psychometric characteristics of the Traumatic Experience Checklist (TEC): first findings among psychiatric outpatients. Clin Psychol Psychother. 2002;9(3):200–10. Schimmenti A. The trauma factor: examining the relationships among different types of trauma, dissociation, and psychopathology. J Trauma Dissociation. 2018 Oct–Dec;19(5):552–71. Carlson EB, Putnam FW. An update on the dissociative experiences scale. Dissociation Prog Dissociative Disord. 1993;6(1):16–27. Wieder L, Terhune DB. Trauma and anxious attachment influence the relationship between suggestibility and dissociation: a moderated-moderation analysis. Cogn Neuropsychiatry. 2019 May;24(3):191–207. Weitzenhoffer AM, Hilgard ER. Standford hypnotic susceptibility scale: form C. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press; 1962. Shor RE, Orne EC. Norms on the Harvard group scale of hypnotic susceptibility, form A. Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 1963;11(1):39–47. Bowers KS. Waterloo-stanford group scale of hypnotic susceptibility, form c: manual and response booklet. Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 1998;46(3):250–68. Bowers KS. Do the Stanford scales tap the “classic suggestion effect”. Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 1981;29(1):42–53. Bowers P, Laurence J-R, Hart D. The experience of hypnotic suggestions. Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 1988;36(4):336–49. IBM Corp. IBM SPSS statistics for Macintosh Version 26.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp; 2019. Hayes AF. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: a regression-based approach. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Guilford Press; 2017. Davidson R, MacKinnon JG. Estimation and inference in econometrics. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1993. Johnson PO, Neyman J. Tests of certain linear hypotheses and their applications to some educational problems. Stat Res Mem. 1936;1:57–63. Holmes EA, Brown RJ, Mansell W, Fearon RP, Hunter ECM, Frasquilho F, et al. Are there two qualitatively distinct forms of dissociation? A review and some clinical implications. Clin Psychol Rev. 2005 Jan;25(1):1–23. Brown RJ. Different types of “dissociation” have different psychological mechanisms. J Trauma Dissociation. 2006;7(4):7–28. Bell V, Oakley DA, Halligan PW, Deeley Q. Dissociation in hysteria and hypnosis: evidence from cognitive neuroscience. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2011 Mar;82(3):332–9. Terhune DB, Cardeña E. Dissociative subtypes in posttraumatic stress disorders and hypnosis: neurocognitive parallels and clinical implications. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2015;24(6):452–7. Deeley Q. Hypnosis as therapy for functional neurologic disorders. Handb Clin Neurol. 2016;139:585–95. Wieder L, Brown RJ, Thompson T, Terhune DB. Hypnotic suggestibility in dissociative and related disorders: a meta-analysis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2022 Jun;139:104751. Butler LD, Duran RE, Jasiukaitis P, Koopman C, Spiegel D. Hypnotizability and traumatic experience: a diathesis-stress model of dissociative symptomatology. Am J Psychiatry. 1996 Jul;153(7 Suppl):42–63. Boehmert C, Witthöft M, Van den Bergh O. Causal perception is central in electromagnetic hypersensitivity: a commentary on “Electromagnetic hypersensitivity – a critical review of explanatory hypotheses. Environ Health. 2020 Nov;19(1):122. Jamieson GA. Expectancies of the future in hypnotic suggestions. Psychol Conscious Theor Res Pract. 2018;5(3):258–77. Martin J-R, Pacherie E. Alterations of agency in hypnosis: a new predictive coding model. Psychol Rev. 2019;126(1):133–52. Article / Publication Details

First-Page Preview

Received: March 09, 2022
Accepted: August 08, 2022
Published online: October 04, 2022

Number of Print Pages: 5
Number of Figures: 1
Number of Tables: 0

ISSN: 0254-4962 (Print)
eISSN: 1423-033X (Online)

For additional information: https://www.karger.com/PSP

Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.