1. Warnakulasuriya, S, Reibel, J, Bouquot, J, Dabelsteen, E. Oral epithelial dysplasia classification systems: predictive value, utility, weaknesses and scope for improvement. J Oral Pathol Med. 2008;37(3): 127-133. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0714.2007.00584.x
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline2. Ho, MW, Risk, JM, Woolgar, JA, et al. The clinical determinants of malignant transformation in oral epithelial dysplasia. Oral Oncol. 2012;48(10): 969-976.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline3. Iocca, O, Sollecito, TP, Alawi, F, et al. Potentially malignant disorders of the oral cavity and oral dysplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of malignant transformation rate by subtype. Head Neck. 2020;42(3): 539-555. doi:10.1002/hed.26006
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline4. Speight, PM, Khurram, SA, Kujan, O. Oral potentially malignant disorders: risk of progression to malignancy. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2018;125(6): 612-627. doi:10.1016/j.oooo.2017.12.011
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline5. Yan, F, Reddy, PD, Nguyen, SA, Chi, AC, Neville, BW, Day, TA. Grading systems of oral cavity pre-malignancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Arch Oto-Rhino-Laryngol. 2020;277(11): 2967-2976. doi:10.1007/s00405-020-06036-1
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline6. Reibel, J, Gale, N, Hille, J, et al. Oral potentially malignant disorders and oral epithelial dysplasia. WHO Classif Head Neck Tumours. 2017;9(1): 112.
Google Scholar7. Kujan, O, Oliver, RJ, Khattab, A, Roberts, SA, Thakker, N, Sloan, P. Evaluation of a new binary system of grading oral epithelial dysplasia for prediction of malignant transformation. Oral Oncol. 2006;42(10): 987-993. doi:10.1016/j.oraloncology.2005.12.014
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline8. Smith, C, Pindborg, JJ. Histological Grading of Oral Epithelial Atypia by the Use of Photographic Standards. C. Hamburgers Bogtrykkeri A/S; 1969.
Google Scholar9. Geetha, KM, Leeky, M, Narayan T, V, Sadhana, S, Saleha, J. Grading of oral epithelial dysplasia: points to ponder. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 2015;19(2): 198-204. doi:10.4103/0973-029X.164533
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline10. Zerdoner, D . The Ljubljana classification - its application to grading oral epithelial hyperplasia. J Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surg. 2003;31(2): 75-79. doi:10.1016/s1010-5182(02)00186-5
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline11. Krishnan, L, Karpagaselvi, K, Kumarswamy, J, Sudheendra, US, Santosh, KV, Patil, A. Inter- and intra-observer variability in three grading systems for oral epithelial dysplasia. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 2016;20(2): 261-268. doi:10.4103/0973-029X.185928
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline12. Manchanda, A, Shetty, D-C. Reproducibility of grading systems in oral epithelial dysplasia. Med Oral Patol Oral y Cir Bucal. 2012;17(6): e935-e942. doi:10.4317/medoral.17749
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline13. Tilakaratne, WM, Sherriff, M, Morgan, PR, Odell, EW. Grading oral epithelial dysplasia: analysis of individual features. J Oral Pathol Med. 2011;40(7): 533-540. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0714.2011.01033.x
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline14. Tshering Vogel, DW, Zbaeren, P, Thoeny, HC. Cancer of the oral cavity and oropharynx. Cancer Imaging Off Publ Int Cancer Imaging Soc. 2010;10(1): 62-72. doi:10.1102/1470-7330.2010.0008
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline15. Page, MJ, McKenzie, JE, Bossuyt, PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Br Med J. 2021;372(71): n71. doi:10.1136/bmj.n71
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline16. Dang, D, Dearholt, SL. Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice: Model and Guidelines. Sigma Theta Tau; 2017.
Google Scholar17. Barnes L, Eveson JW, Reichart, P , Sidransky D. World Health Organization Classification of Tumours: Pathology and Genetics of Head and Neck Tumours. Lyon: IARC Press; 2005. Chapter 4: Epithelial precursor lesions, 177-179.
Google Scholar18. Nankivell, P, Williams, H, Matthews, P, et al. The binary oral dysplasia grading system: validity testing and suggested improvement. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2013;115(1): 87-94. doi:10.1016/j.oooo.2012.10.015
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline19. McHugh, ML . Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochem Med. 2012;22(3): 276-282.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI20. Munn, Z, Stern, C, Aromataris, E, Lockwood, C, Jordan, Z. What kind of systematic review should I conduct? A proposed typology and guidance for systematic reviewers in the medical and health sciences. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018;18(1): 5. doi:10.1186/s12874-017-0468-4
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline21. Ranganathan, K, Kavitha, L, Sharada, P, et al. Intra-observer and inter-observer variability in two grading systems for oral epithelial dysplasia: a multi-centre study in India. J Oral Pathol Med. 2020;49(9): 948-955. doi:10.1111/jop.13056
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline22. Gupta, S, Latoo, SH, Gowhar, O. Observer variability in the grading of oral epithelial dysplasia. Int Arch Integr Med. 2019;6(11): 35-41.
Google Scholar23. Shubhasini, AR, Praveen, BN, Hegde, U, et al. Inter- and intra-observer variability in diagnosis of oral dysplasia. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2017;18(12): 3251-3254. doi:10.22034/APJCP.2017.18.12.3251
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline24. Kramer, IRH, Lucas, RB, Pindborg, JJ, Sobin, LH. Definition of leukoplakia and related lesions: an aid to studies on oral pre-cancers. WHO Collaborating Centre for Oral Precancerous lesions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1978;46(4): 518–539.
Google Scholar | Crossref25. Zaini, ZM, Neat, M, Stokes, A, Tavassoli, M, Odell, EW. DNA Aneuploidy and tissue architecture in oral potentially malignant disorders with epithelial dysplasia assessed by a 10 locus FISH panel. Oncol Rep. 2020;43(3): 877-885. doi:10.3892/or.2020.7461
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline26. Zaini, ZM, McParland, H, Møller, H, Husband, K, Odell, EW. Predicting malignant progression in clinically high-risk lesions by DNA ploidy analysis and dysplasia grading. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1): 1-11.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline27. Titford, ME, Horenstein, MG. Histomorphologic assessment of formalin substitute fixatives for diagnostic surgical pathology. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2005;129(4): 502-506. doi:10.1043/1543-2165(2005)129<502:HAOFSF>2.0.CO;2
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline28. González-Mosquera, A, Seoane, J, García-Caballero, L, López-Jornet, P, García-Caballero, T, Varela-Centelles, P. Er, CR:ySGG lasers induce fewer dysplastic-like epithelial artefacts than CO2 lasers: an in vivo experimental study on oral mucosa. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012;50(6): 508-512. doi:10.1016/j.bjoms.2011.09.006
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline29. Rastogi, V, Puri, N, Arora, S, Kaur, G, Yadav, L, Sharma, R. Artefacts: a diagnostic dilemma - a review. J Clin Diagn Res. 2013;7(10): 2408-2413. doi:10.7860/JCDR/2013/6170.3541
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline30. Debray, TPA, Moons, KGM, Riley, RD. Detecting small-study effects and funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analysis of survival data: a comparison of new and existing tests. Res Synth Methods. 2018;9(1): 41-50. doi:10.1002/jrsm.1266
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline31. Sultan, AS, Elgharib, MA, Tavares, T, Jessri, M, Basile, JR. The use of artificial intelligence, machine learning and deep learning in oncologic histopathology. J Oral Pathol Med. 2020;49(9): 849-856.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline