1. Sands, JJ, Usvyat, LA, Sullivan, T, et al. Intradialytic hypotension: frequency, sources of variation and correlation with clinical outcome. Hemodial Int 2014; 18:415–422.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline2. Kooman, JP, van der Sande, FM. Body fluids in end-stage renal disease: statics and dynamics. Blood Purif 2019; 47: 223–229.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline3. Barth, C, Boer, W, Garzoni, D, et al. Characteristics of hypotension-prone haemodialysis patients: is there a critical relative blood volume? Nephrol Dial Transplant 2003; 18: 1353–1360.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline4. Mitsides, N, Pietribiasi, M, Waniewski, J, et al. Transcapillary refilling rate and its determinants during haemodialysis with standard and high ultrafiltration rates. Am J Nephrol 2019; 50: 133–143.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline5. Pietribiasi, M, Katzarski, K, Galach, M, et al. Kinetics of plasma refilling during hemodialysis sessions with different initial fluid status. Asaio J. 2015; 61: 350–356.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline6. Flessner, MF . Peritoneal ultrafiltration: mechanisms and measures. Contrib Nephrol 2006; 150: 28–36.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline7. Morelle, J, Sow, A, Fustin, CA, et al. Mechanisms of crystalloid versus colloid osmosis across the peritoneal membrane. J Am Soc Nephrol 2018; 29: 1875–1886.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline8. Martus, G, Bergling, K, Simonsen, O, et al. Novel method for osmotic conductance to glucose in peritoneal dialysis. Kidney Int Rep 2020; 5: 1974–1981.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline9. Martus, G, Bergling, K, de Arteaga, J, et al. Sglt2 inhibition does not reduce glucose absorption during experimental peritoneal dialysis. Perit Dial Int 2021; 41: 373–380.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals10. Goebel-Stengel, M, Stengel, A, Tache, Y, et al. The importance of using the optimal plasticware and glassware in studies involving peptides. Anal Biochem 2011; 414: 38–46.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline11. Bonfils, P DM, Stokholm K Nielsen, S. 99 m tc-albumin can replace 125 i-albumin to determine plasma volume repeatedly. Scand J Clin Lab Investig 2012: 447–451.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline12. Margarson, MP SN . Plasma volume measurement in septic patients using an albumin dilution technique: comparison with the standard radio-labelled albumin method. Intensive Care Med 2005: 289–295.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline13. Zackaria, ER RB. Intraperitoneal fluid volume changes during peritoneal dialysis in the rat: indicator dilution vs. Volumetric measurements. Blood Purif 1995; 13: 255–270.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline14. Flessner, MF . Peritoneal ultrafiltration: physiology and failure. Contrib Nephrol. 2009; 163: 7–14.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline15. John, B, Tan, BK, Dainty, S, et al. Plasma volume, albumin, and fluid status in peritoneal dialysis patients. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2010; 5: 1463–1470.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline16. Zakaria, ER, Rippe, B. Osmotic barrier properties of the rat peritoneal membrane. Acta Physiol Scand 1993; 149: 355–364.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline17. Öberg, CM, Martuseviciene, G. Computer simulations of continuous flow peritoneal dialysis using the 3-pore model-a first experience. Perit Dial Int 2019; 39: 492.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals18. Barratt, TM, Walser, M. Extracellular fluid in individual tissues and in whole animals: the distribution of radiosulfate and radiobromide. J Clin Invest. 1969; 48: 56–66.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline19. Sharma, R SS . Physiology, blood volume. StatPearls. 2020 - Jan.
Google Scholar20. Hinojosa-Laborde, C, Jespersen, B, Shade, R. Physiology lab demonstration: glomerular filtration rate in a rat. Jove-J Visual Exper 2015; (101): e52425.
Google Scholar